Emerald

I'll use these for later contemplation but I'll answer them now too, to see what it yields. - I am in the content of my thoughts when I ask myself this. I imagine an idealized picture of me sitting where I am. I feel a tensing in my shoulders and chest in relation to my mind's image of myself and I feel an identification with that image. I feel extra tense when I imagine someone calling my name. A dumbfounded image of myself comes up. It feels as though my sight is myself too. Like there is a soul looking out through binoculars. When I shift my awareness to this space, there is no self in that space. - All of my sense perceptions are moving and maybe a bit static-like. The field of awareness itself has little 'dots' (for want of a better word) swimming around. This is true with sight, sound, and touch anyway. - I'm not sure if the external is real. All I know for sure are my perceptions in the present moment, because my experience of the "external world" is couched entirely in my inner experience. So, if there is anything external to me (which may or may not be) I am not perceiving it now, and thus it resides in the realm of thought-content and beliefs. -I'm not sure what you mean by others.

26

Also, what she said. This applies too.

All people have masculine and feminine energy in varying degrees. No one is just feminine or just masculine. There are plenty of exceptions, but generally men are mostly masculine and women are mostly feminine. It takes both to make a whole person. Even an extremely feminine woman like Marylin Monroe, has a reasonable amount of masculine energy. Women who repress their masculine side are the way that you describe. But that is because the shadow feminine takes its place. The shadow side of femininity is irrational, fretful, stagnating, passive-aggressive, manipulative, clingy, bitchy, high-maintenance, whiny, self-deprecating, and soaked in victim's mentality. Men who repress their masculinity will have the same issues with shadow femininity. But this is less common in men. But all women have a masculine side in varying degrees. So, there are extremely feminine women who have an integrated masculine side, who don't have these issues. It's a matter of integrating one's natural masculine and feminine traits regardless of gender. Women tend to either cling to femininity and repress our masculinity or cling to masculinity and repress our femininity. This polarization is a reaction to social values, causing emotional distress and self-hatred from a young age, like trying to make a square peg fit into a round hole. Men who repress their feminine side have a different set of problems. They have shadow masculinity, which entails violence, aggression, intimidation, emotionlessness, disrespect for life, callousness, greed, unhealthy competition, exploitation, extortion, extreme hegemony, monopolization, and us v. them thinking. Women who repress their femininity will have the same issues. The most powerful people in the world have a BIG issue with feminine repression. So, fear not, feminine women can have high consciousness traits too if they haven't repressed their masculinity. But there are many women who are controlled by shadow femininity. So, for them, integration is needed for emotional and psychological health.

Low

Thank you. I'll definitely check out this list.

Only the ones who are extra sweet. Sincerely, The Sweetest Pineapple EVER!!!!!

The real question is, If pineapples didn't exist, would god still exist? Sincerely, Pineapple #2,375,175,986,965,876

I had two enlightenment experience (artificially induced) six years ago. Since then I've spent five years studying into various spiritual and psychological practices. I found Leo's enlightenment videos about a year ago and started studying into that as well. So, my knowledge comes from personal experience, contemplation, and research. Also, I used to smoke when I was a teenager, and I think I know the experience that you're referring to.

I would say that this isn't an enlightenment experience but that it drew your attention toward certain aspects of your reality in a different way than you're used to experiencing them. So, you probably were receptive to more sensory stimuli that your mind would normally edit out for ease of understanding, because of the different way of processing. So, it probably got past the conceptual mind in greater degree than normal, but probably wasn't an enlightenment experience.

As in, there is only now? I guess we'll never know.

This is good. My experiences have definitely prejudiced me in many ways and speaking to people on the forum has really started me thinking in that direction. In those moments, I "BELIEVE" I was experiencing truth. It was certainly a novel, spiritual experience, but more than that was an extreme degree of clarity and ability to see what had always been there. I had no fear and no self to be threatened, so I was able to be aware of a lot more because no truth could harm me. But now there is only a memory.. which only exists in the realm of belief and imagination. So, there is suffering, struggling, and grasping to get back to a remembered feeling. Trying to escape from fear and a rejection of the present moment for want of an enlightened future moment. Thank you.

I have had two enlightenment experiences, and they were nothing shy of Heaven on Earth. They just weren't permanent and were catalyzed by an artificial means. But they closely match the descriptions given from others who have had an experience of ego-transcendence. So, I'm no expert, but I do have experience to back up my assertions. But don't believe me... seek it for yourself if it's important to you. Or "stay in the park", if that is what you want. Either way, it doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things. Do what is right for you.

I've wondered the same thing. Assumptions will come up, like I'm supposed to be listening for a little voice to tell me something. Then thoughts will come up trying to rationalize. Then frustration and resistance. Then panic at nothing coming up... am I wasting my time... maybe I should try something else... maybe I'm doing it wrong. My advice is to just keep asking it without trying to control the experience and maybe some wordless insight will break through or maybe that isn't how it happens at all. Try to clear away your assumptions and expectations and just commit to the meditation. Trust the experience, is my advice. Do as I say, not as I do.

So much this.

Well said.

I realized that I was sacrificing a lot of personal happiness for the sake of perpetuating and aggrandizing an illusory self-image. When this impetus fell away, true inspiration and satisfaction remained. I had desires to affect the world, but none of them were grounded in ego; they were a result of pure joy, love, and inspiration. But self-interest didn't go away. It's just that my perception of myself expanded to include all of existence. So, compassion and self-interest were one and the same.

Because of the paradoxical nature of truth and wisdom, it means that wisdom isn't a fixed state. A wise action one minute can be a foolish action the next. So, wisdom is a constantly changing state of being and not any particular insight. For example, when I was on the Ayahuasca, I had an insight that everything was one and that there was no barrier between myself and anything else in existence. I felt deep unconditional love for everyone and everything. So, after the experience was over, I sought to have no boundaries between myself and others and to attempt to practice unconditional love. This was foolish and sometimes unsafe. So, I choked out the more practical truth that a person needs healthy boundaries for the loftier truth that all boundaries are illusory. Also, I had an insight that so much of my striving for achievements were neurotic attempts to feel significant. I was in college, so I was then pulling myself in two opposite directions: trying to maintain my achievements and trying to stop being in the achievement mindset. My grades dropped a bit, and I always felt conflicted and guilty about achievement from that point forward. I'm still trying to reconcile that one a bit. So, my misunderstanding of paradoxical insights really threw me for a loop for years following my experiences.

Sorry. I didn't check out the link. I've studied a bit into archetypes of the unconscious, and these are the feminine counterparts to the masculine archetypes. I haven't read the book though.

When I meditate, I focus on the sensations on my body and try to experience them for what they are without putting though- labels over them. However, because I'm used to experiencing the sensations in my body relative to my concept of how my body looks, my mind automatically creates thought-images of my body when I focus on the sensations. One way I tried to bypass this was by imagining that the sensations in my body were objects floating in space. So, sort of imagining that my bodily sensations exist in a universe of their own, separate from the other sense perceptions that I think of as mine. So, now the mind gives me images of black space with little vibration-looking-things floating in it. So, it seems that I can't escape the concept of vision placed over my sense perceptions. Any advice, thoughts, or observations on this phenomenon?

I haven't. But I'm interested in trying it out.

The only thing I know for certain is that I don't know. I was just curious as to how a person could tell if someone was enlightened or not. From where I am, I cannot.

The feminine counterparts of King, Warrior, Magician, Lover are Queen, Mother, Wise-Woman, Beloved respectively.

Yes and no. They are free from the illusion of ego because they don't have the ability to create complex abstract concepts like we do. But they may not have the ability to be self-aware enough to realize their enlightenment.

Human beings have a dual nature. We have the higher nature of concepts and ideals and an instinctual animalistic nature. Animals only have the animalistic nature, speaking generally.