Principium Nexus

Member
  • Content count

    721
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Principium Nexus

  1. @tsuki The shape would be the blueprint of our thinking! And would resemble the brain in someway, would be very interesting to see a complete mapping of billions of words and sentences from languages all over the world to see what most common and dense structures are and how they fade into each other.
  2. @Charlotte Meditate, let your mind become empty and observe the fullness of infinity.
  3. Watch this how they map geometric relations of words using A.I. or Deeplearning And here for music, amazing structures.
  4. @Mikael89 Thank you, everyone can be helped and will eventually get to the proper understanding. Putting things into words is also an art
  5. You or I are it, we are reality. This thing you are experience now, that is us, my thoughts in your head. So who are you? If it's not you, then who are we? Are we the I? As in one complete being, then everyone is I. The path of the Buddha is to vow the enlightenment of all and guide them to more compassion and love. So where do we begin?
  6. @Mikael89 I think he means there is no absolute begining of "things" nor end. The pen, tree, cat, whatever it might be is not an absolute entity but reality itself is one continious field of non-discriminative awareness. Now you create a label and put it on a perceived thing and put the thing into existence, but before it was just part of the one. Compare it to a painting, you use paint to paint some interesting scene, completely abstract or some object that you want to depict. Now in a real sense that object you painted does not exist, the paint stripes might resemble your imagination but the depiction is not real. Actually it's just paint and if you don't think or structurize those patterns in "things" you identify yourself with it is completely empty in nature. Only after you stick together the patterns of how you perceive reality (like paint on a canvas) and put these "things" you see in distict boxes with labels, they get created in your perception. In their true nature everything is just the paint or awareness floating around without distiction, void and empty, but full of infinite potential to project the many/things on from the one/undiscriminated whole. Language is really THE matrix, it provokes things from nothing. It enables you to think, what to think and not, and is the creative tool to give rise to the many. TAKE THIS LITERALLY, the famous quote goes, "in the beginning there was the word and god created the world". The first thought created a sense of identity from nothing, then this was the seed of all things, from then on "god" kept identifying itself within; to create relativity, time and space. We are gods on-going thought, all following the male and female principle to create, identify and grow into infinity within. Now this all might sound bit much to take in one go, but I hope you get general outline. Thinking, thoughts, language, they create the many from nothing. The things exist in your perceived perception but in true ground are void, since all is but one and not seperated.
  7. You are trying to get an answer in thought while he tries to show you not to think.
  8. The experience itself, they are one and the same. Ouroboros biting it's tail, reality is you and you are it.
  9. Okay one more question, what is thought? If thought is a reflection of what is, thus always lives in the past, then becoming aware of experience is also a reflection and thus we can only live in thought? Or in other words experience and thought are the same?
  10. I would really love to understand how we go from nothing to a thing.
  11. @Faceless I understand what the Buddhist monks try to achieve now. They literally mean the end of all suffering by dissolving their thought not fearing "death", since that's just a thought too.
  12. Isn't the whole purpose of thought to keep i-dentity? It's the only thing withholding us from not caring about this identified body anymore. In that sense we are prisoners by our own thoughts, true liberation would be the end of thought?
  13. I like this experience. Even if its just a thought
  14. I only wanted to point out that this path of contemplation and research will go full circle. There are many people out there like me who fall for the thinking trap, and mistake being with concious thought. Many are on their way to enlightenment and eventually one will come to conclusion there is no more purpose of contempating. Everything is as full as it can be.
  15. @How to be wise I get the "think" in a symbolic representation of what is. So if any idea I have about reality is false, even the gathering of all my sensations to form the "now", then we are bound to be wanders in loose ground.
  16. @How to be wise Then there is still something to be perceived, by someone, either it's you or me. Isn't this what we call reality?
  17. @How to be wise If it does not exist then what is it that I'm experiencing now?
  18. @Phill "Once you die you are death and everything will be worthless". The existential crisis you have is because "you" think there is nothing of the self that will continue after death. You have to question who you even are, who is the self, what even is identity, and maybe your current perception of who you think you are is very limited. Basically we humans are made out of billions of cells, each dying and regenerating everyday (some studies say that every 7 years nearly all cells have been replaced!). So all these living organisms inside you are able to live on their own as long as they get nutrients ect. They (the cells) have your DNA but could basically live seperate from "you", taking it one step further a genetically identical twin is nearly the same person. The difference is that a human never has the exact same experience as anybody else and the perspective they have is thus unique. So from these two simple example we can already see that having same DNA or "physical body" doesn't mean it is the same "person" since the psychological or mental part is always different due to different experiences. A clone of you is not you, he/she is a completely new person. Where I'm getting at is that the perceived idea of identity is very vague, the ego especially likes to claim that it is one unchanging person but that's obviously false. If your body changes every 7 years then there is nothing left of you in the first place. Your physical body as to say at 70 has already died 9 times! The majority of where you was born with has been completely replaced. So what does "physical death" even mean then? Well obviously it's not about losing your specific body then. Now lets have a look at the mental/psychological part. Our minds are like operating systems, the believes and presumptions we have are constantly updated. Smaller ones don't affect us that much but deep changes in our paradigm of thinking can cause some sudden (unwanted) shifts. Even after reading this your perception (slightly) changes and you will continue further with new ideas and believes. The body and the mind are constantly dying and regenerated, going through certain age also can wildly alter perception of life. You are never the same person. We are constantly changing. Our surroundings do give us the impression of confinement, the fixed place where we live, who our friends and family are. It are the things that appear to be unchanging on medium to long timeframes that give us a sense of position in the world. In the grand scale of things nothing is fixated, everything will change and will never be the same again. The ego likes the illusion of maya, or the illusion of solidity of things. That's because it can cling, claim and think it is his/hers. Now concluding, physical and psychological death happen all the time. There is however the one "scary" final death of our perceived body, we see that other people are indefinitely dead and seems they won't come back either. It scares us, because we only see an end and no new begin, so we created the idea of heaven. To be clear, I dont know whether heaven exists, maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. My question to those who claim that it exists, how do they know. So that final death, the "no return" freaks some people out. Others are content with what they have done and that's it. We are scared because we feel we build something over all those years, that spirit or essence that has been there from the beginning. It is "us", and we pressume it will end here. What if we broaden our view and go beyond our physical body and mind? The things we have done in this world are they not also a part of your identity? They live on in the minds or as physical chronological events that you started. It is your essence that is the whole reason those things are happening and continue to affect the future. In a sense, your life has altered the whole universe. All your actions, every breath, tear and ecsastic moment has changed faith and will continue to do so. Taking it to the max, you are the universe, it has your identity, all our idenities, each living as some sort of organ inside the larger whole. Maybe if you die now you will lose everything, but imagine that all these consequences shape new life. What if "destiny" what you experience are the past lives that brought you here and the things you do know will bring you somewhere else in the next life. This is my whole drive, to have faith that the things we do here resonate to a next life, if we bring good into the world that will bring good to the future. Same goes for bad things. See yourself as others, drop your identity, be alive and enjoy things while sharing, caring and loving everything around you. You will be amazed how frictionless life will become and maybe there will even be an awakening of a larger being. When you die you will not die in fear, you will die with a tear of awe and gratitude and prepare for the next ride, namaste!
  19. Hello, For several years now I have noticed that my sleep posture has quite a significant effect on my overall sleep and how I wake up the next morning. For me what appears to be best is to lay straight and preferably not lay on my face. When you curl up I notice that sleep becomes lesser quality and also that it feels less restored. I think one could say this might be because of bloodflow, oxygen and nerves. Alternatively could it be because the alignment of chakras or that you take a bad body posture with you during sleep, similarly like have a sloppy body posture during the day (lowers self-esteem etc). What do you guys think, does it matter to you how you sleep? What are your ideal conditions for the best sleep?
  20. I tried to sleep without pillow last night and it did help actually. The body seems to align better with the head then.
  21. @Sirius Thanks I can try to sleep without a pillow for a week. Lets see if it makes any difference.
  22. Let's go straight at it, where did it all begin, how did it create and where is it heading? The modern science paradigm speaks of the big bang, a singular point in space and time with infinite density. This point contained everything, all matter and energy that is present in today's universe is from this beginning. In principle the big bang contained every event ever to happen but all happening in the same moment, then the inflection point was reached where all these events began to separate, this gave rise to time and space itself. Read that again, everything that will ever happen already existed, all in the same moment, but these events are distending from each other since the big bang. Is this the red shift that scientists speak of? The fading of all energy and eventually time itself will cease to exist or get infinitely small? In scientific terms they would call this the heat death of the universe, everything will separate so much form each other in all directions that the energy density in the infinite future would near zero or fade to exist. Without change, without increasing entropy time itself will stop to exist. So let's go to our basic view of the big bang. At I, we see the singularity in all it's glory, infinitely small, dense, containing all that is and will ever be! At II, the big bang has began (what caused it for now is a mystery, something outside of our physical time and universe). The expansion is happening in a constant rate towards all spatial dimension. Physically we can observe the three axis (X,Y,Z) they are present in this very moment and create our 3D world with length,width and depth. I assume this happens in all directions in the same rate and from a logical stand point the sphere is the most balanced shape we have. We see this everywhere in space, all forces are equally balanced, there is no preference towards any particular point in any direction. The exact moment after the big bang looked schematically looked like II and it does look exactly the same now, but where does it expand into? Is there even a thing to grow into or are we not growing but turning inside out. Yes, this is a completely new concept but this would be the idea of a cyclical universe, the universe is growing into itself from itself, like a torus turning inside out, being perfectly balanced and having no real edge but itself and the absolute starting point of it all, the singularity. Whoaa, space is folding in upon itself, let that settle for a while and think about the implications. If you were traveling on the edge of this sphere what would you see? It's not nothingness, you will not see any edge, you will only see more space filled with stars. The edge of the universe is the now! Why because this is where the future is still unwritten, but looking back we can see into the past and the origin where we came from. In this exact moment you are experiencing all of reality at the edge, don't think of it as something spatial, think of it as time. You are surfing on this expanding bubble into the future. Why can't we see into the future then? If we are on the edge we should be able to look back into the past (heat map of the universe) but also into the future? In some sense we already can with our minds, but not physically while looking into the skies of the universe. The light arriving to us has already happened and is looking into a frame of the past, but we cannot find such frame of the future. We could argue that looking into the past is actually looking into the future, because all the logical consequences that follow are derived from the past, so we can only know the future by looking at the past. Are the future and the past then the same thing, possibly. As we can see in this model which is much more logically sound and satisfying in my opinion the universe is a balanced place, it looks the same as every smaller fractal of itself in the cosmos. We see this toroidal shape EVERYWHERE, it's the basic shape that arises in any form of electro-magnetism and charges that flow. Now depending on your position in this relativistic shape where we float on, everyone see a different point of view in time, but they are all following the same path and to be completely accurate there is no separation in any of those events. The end and the beginning are the same for every event in space and time that will ever happen, again and again. Seeing the equilibrium point as our origin/singularity or the big bang also explains that time from our observable frame could have existed beyond what we can see from our physical universe. The time before the big bang is still part of the same process that create the new universe or passing through the eye of the singularity. This is what we want and what is the most logical, a continuous universe, if it exists now it will in the infinite future. It has always existed and will always exist. The big question that arises is if there was any first cycle, what was before this? My personal view is nothing, the universe really is a gift, the grandest of all.
  23. @Leo Gura Check this out. https://www.quora.com/Is-the-universe-likely-to-be-shaped-like-a-torus
  24. @Neo That's what I was trying to get at in my next post, that the physical observation and the mental interpretation of reality itself are one and the same. All the empirical findings we do are qualities of the "physical world" but this physical world only lives as a concept in the mind. What if those qualities we find are actually telling us more over how the mind works than the "physical outside world". Relativity and time are not outside there, no they are created in the mind, and understanding how these relations arise is knowing the matrix of mind. So this concept what I just applied to the "physical" universe actually applies to the mind too. How does relativity arise and in turn give rise to identity and reference frame of the observer?