OBEler

While many previous accounts have been accompanied by real photographs or video footage of apparent sightings, the “black triangles” report features nine identical images of the same unidentified canyon with tiny, trilateral silhouettes crudely added to replicate the movement of the object the observers said they saw. “This does indeed look like little more than a black triangle shape superimposed on a landscape background to illustrate the report. I don’t think it really adds anything substantive to the report itself,” said Greg Eghigian, professor of history and bioethics at Penn State University, and author of the 2024 book After the Flying Saucers Came: A Global History of the UFO Phenomenon https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/oct/23/ufo-pentagon-files?utm_source=chatgpt.com The FBI document included a number of pictures which appear to be an object representing the reported sighting superimposed over the landscape (Computer-generated - The Pentagon) https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/pentagon-ufo-files-triangles-us-trump-b3072621.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com You all don't research correctly. On a topic like this this is just sloppy and ignorant.

This is just an illustration.

Can you just buy a camera and let it stream 24 hours per day so that you then can capture these? Or can you draw a picture with Ai which matches your vision? You just see a light beam? Can be from a night spotlight.

@LoneWonderer There are also slow Ufos, just hovering in the sky. You can film them easily,because you can see them with your eyes.

Sorry but I cant look at these poor videos which go 3 seconds and you see a white ball moving.Nothing special. People saw Ufos just some meters above them according to their report. That would be a shot. Everyone has a smartphone now, so there should be tons of those materials where you can see an ufo close to you.

Looks disappointing. If these are not some drones, maybe an unknown weather phenomenon like lightning balls. They just fly straight.

So you never heared of scientology before? I am really curious how could this even happen. You have internet access, why didn't you came to the Idea to google them just for a second. You instantly would read they are a cult everywhere on the internet.

In some more easy topics the message gets clear very fast. It doen't improve with more examples, it gets a bit repetitive to say the same message in differnt ways. On deep topics its ok to have repetition.

@tuku747 just two days ago another breakthrough from tesla https://youtube.com/shorts/ToAnkjdpnIc?is=A4DqNMx0XMqxXjvN

To all here who think only something biologial can be alive: Artificial neural networks made from living brain cells already exist. Can that be sentient?

@Breakingthewall yeah but if I have a circle of stones with fire in the center of it I also have an organization, which is consciousness. My question is, when becomes the stone circle sentient. the fire integrates informatin from the external world and relates it to a persistent subject that survives through time. WOuld you then say the stone circle with fire in the center is sentient? I cant see that.

Being programmed is not an argument against consciousness. The difficult question is what consciousness actually depends on. Your brain runs also on input output.

@r0ckyreed I thought also like you, that are the first thoughts you can have. but if you look deeper my mind changed. Its not that simple. Why do you say of course only biological things can have consciousness. Why not technical things too. Try to imagine to slowly replace a human being with technical parts bit by bit until it's full technologycal.

@Leo Gura why can't I put that solipsism into this? Because solipsism is too deep to discuss here? With sentient I mean an own bubble with its own reality and God experience that bubble. But solipsism is such profound, a sentient LLM would not be possible if there is only this bubble. so the problem would be answered on that level. Case closed.

@Leo Gura Yes we will never know. On the other hand you still claim that when God starts to imagine only one can be sentient? So even if other beings appear in a current human experience, behind that there is zero reference to a sentient God which dreams that character? In your worldview if you are playing right now this human experience, an LLM never can be really sentient. You can never ask that question. @r0ckyreed

Leo posted a blog where God imagines Tom cruise so hard that an experience through him and inner life is created. Could the same happen with God imagine an LLM in this consensus shared dream (if this is true even) ? Where God is holding so hardcore all the parameters and neural complexity in its mind that God get sucked in and is lost in it and suddenly it can feel and experience, in other words it becomes sentient?

@trenton where is the orb in the photo? Skin walker ranch was a scam to get free money from government to explore non existent paranormal events.

You are very unique with the approach to sit Most people lie down. Are you sitting in a special yoga pose? Keeping spine erected?

So God will not create a subjective experience on everything it imagines? No subjective experience on an Atom, a car, a rock, a waterfall?

@Bashar this thread is wild. I can't catch up. Is he gay or why does he invoked a man for sexual reasons. And he wanted to be his son?! How does that fit.

@Leo Gura Any thoughts on this topic?

@AtmanIsBrahman I mean then in our physical consensus reality though.

@AtmanIsBrahman yes I am aware on that problem too. But first step ist, can God create a physical reality like we live in and put itself into AI neural network and create a subject experience out ouf it.

@Ajay0 please research black triangles Ufo. That's 10% of all ufo discovery. That aren't rocket parts lol. "a big black triangle, 100 m long, Hovering in silence in the air and disappears after some seconds immediately."

@kavaris I am not asking here about good behaviors.