Nahm

@starsofclay Thanks.

@MarkusSweden Relationships are there so you can learn more about others, and yourself. From your take on relationships, you reveal there is more to learn about yourself, specifically, from females. I find there are phases with ages too. Roughly 17-24, not interested in family, looking for who I am, what my potential is, etc. Perfectly fine. When after 24, having kids, that’ll bring a person right back to family and relationships. Not always, of course. You have forever for the solitude, trust me on that. Explore relationships. Or don’t.

@GrowingUp Enjoyed reading that. Thanks!

@Seed It’s beautiful! To big?! No! Cover the whole room with wanted!

@Joseph Maynor This hits like a ton of bricks when you realize there is only you. So anything you could “know”, is you. It’s a very, very, very, funny realization. In the illusion, there’s always more to learn, and more distinctions to be made, more understanding to be experienced, but this is very different than knowing. Thank you for this post. I’m laughing so hard right now. There are practices of detaching from thought, but I don’t think there’s a practice of not knowing.OMG that’s so funny.

@Patang ❤️❣️

@Ibn Sina OMG yes. We get more of what we focus on. So simple, hardly anyone can realize it. We’re all too busy being smart for that nonsense. Lol! The only thing I’ve seen “work” for this, is helping someone realize when they changed the relative point from themselves, to anyone else.

@Edvard I think it means “I don’t know”.

@George Fil That’s awesome and thanks, it helps to have an idea where you’re at. I think what triggered the notion of “So what F them” could be the mentality expressed by ‘them growing up and having to face reality”. As in, the falsity that triggers is there is no facing reality. They are creating their reality. It must be that you have something in your ‘reality’ which is not desirable, and you’re at a loss for how it traces back to you. Thus, a thought of resentment to the contrary.

@Patang I love this post! Thanks. Only thing I’d suggest, is that the past doesn’t store information. That’s a thought. I mean this in the sense of achknowledging that is a thought, aligns more with, overall, what you’re saying here. It’s just lovely. Thank you again. ❤️

@Patang right on. There is a supply, because there is a demand.

What is spacetime relative to? That’s the crux of what I’m suggesting is worth looking into. When he said God doesn’t play dice with the universe, he was a materialist & atheist. He expressed logically an inescapable order to everything - no room for randomness nor mysticism. He said this to Neils Bohr in response to the Copenhagen gathering, and the lab tests of Thomas Young’s double slit experiment, which proved the moon isn’t there when Einstein wasn’t directly aware of it. Einstein was denying the truth revealed in the double slit. Here he is with your OP, but you stated you’re at 80%, he was at 100%. Later, he did realize the truth, noting reality is an illusion (100%). My aim is at your remaining 20%. A helpful realization is the actuality of what relativity reveals.

@Patang ❤️ So no one is charging money for enlightenment. People are unwilling to look within, and looking to pay someone else to tell them to, some number of times. Enlightenment is always free. That’s it’s nature.

@George Fil How’s your morning meditation practice going? How long each day? How many days in a row are you today? No need to analyze that ‘voice’. It’s a thought. Quiet the mind instead.

@MarkusSweden Modern science is about sales and continuation of funding. Look at science from 80, 90 years ago. Have you looked into why Einstein is readily named as the smartest human (arguably)? Have you looked into the profundity of what relativity points at?

Mind sharing your own experiences with psychics?

Both, for less duality, closer to realizing it’s all you.

@MarkusSweden You can describe your dream from last night. Doesn’t make it “material”. You can touch & feel your surroundings right now. Doesn’t make you “physical”. Science is just describing the dream. There are scientists claiming reality is ultimately material? Who are they? You.

Someone found a way to sell love?

It’s funny that the title of the post warned of the trap.

@isabel Why did the feathers come that way?

@Jackthelad Well, either way, I think the obvious thing for you to do would be to basically be the Actualized Roast Master General and really just let us all have it with our ‘nonduality’ and ‘mindfulness’, etc. There’s a gold mine of material here. Like how Ray Ramono derives material from marriage, and Seinfeld from doing nothing... you could create the genre of good hearted, yet deeply bitter, nonduality “seeker” mockery.

@dorg Yes. OMG. Yes. It would be noumena though, not trying to be semantical. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noumenon

@Pernani I think deducing the most beneficial practice by individual could be done relatively based on their past / what needs to be honed and what needs to be surrendered. That way you have an idea of the intended outcome or what is to be gained, before beginning a practice, after spending a lot of time any arbitrarily. That way you could have a clear reason to stick with it, and be confident you’re doing the right practice at the right time. Here’s a link with a few basics, might be helpful. I notice sometimes, individually speaking, people do breath focus, self inquiry, do nothing & occasionally neti neti as almost a default, and occasionally a lessor heard of meditation would have been more efficient and beneficial (at the time). (IMO) Check out this link for many underappreciated meditations: https://sites.google.com/site/psychospiritualtools/Home/meditation-practices On a funny note, as I was typing neti neti (meaning not this, not this), autocorrect keeps changing it to something else. Like it’s mocking me. Lol

@Jackthelad 33 is young. Seen any of the roasts on Comedy Central?