Nahm

Member
  • Content count

    26,563
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nahm

  1. This makes self inquiry easy, because it reduces decades of bullshit to the immediate need to see for your self. By sitting comfortably in a chair, and contemplating, you will not “go insane”. Notice, right now, that’s just a thought. Have a Good laugh about it for God sakes. Only what is sane has the possibility to reference what is not. You’re good. Relax.
  2. @Inliytened1 I am curious if you have the “something is coming” feeling. If so, can this be the theme? Particularly because it is meaningless yet kicks ass. Excellent job on the drum btw. The restraint paradoxically nails it. Well done.
  3. @still_no_satori It doesn’t mean anything. What meaning could there be for Love? What use would Love have for meaning? It’s already Love. Applying meaning to Love, is like starting a ticking timebomb. The “meaning” would always implode.
  4. @mandyjw Why...even if you use a triangular, or square bubble wand...why....are bubbles always round?
  5. @Inliytened1 But if there is infinity, how could it include anything else? Wouldn't that imply there is something to be included? (See where this is headed?)
  6. @mandyjw Damn it! That’s precisely what the bubble would say.
  7. What if you ‘planted’ him. To tell you, once in your story, that you don’t need to do the whole suffering / enlightenment thing. As in, already been done to the fullest, you’re good to go, live your life for your experience. What if it only appears that history took place before your ‘arrival’ ‘here’? What if the actuality is a comprehensive cover up, so convincing & pervasive, you don’t even question how “you got here”? What if None of “it” ever happened, nor is happening? Imagine how funny that would be. What a relief. What if you simply created bubbles of your infinite mystical magical self, and the bubbles are so convincing, that you believe the bubble, take it as “physical reality”, and don’t notice the “center” of the bubble, is no thing (You)? That would mean you actually never moved, though it seems you do. Never lived, though it appears your are. The ultimate convincer would be the breathing. If that were true though, you wouldn’t be breathing. The bubble would be breathing, and you’d have to be convinced you are doing the breathing. It’d have to appear you somehow breath, but without having to remember to do it. And you’d have to pretty much ignore that to continue believing the non-bubble-actuality of reality. You’d have to basically ignore the fact that you couldn’t explain how it is you continue breathing. The breathe would have to be something you can & are doing, and also don’t have to “do”, if the actuality is, there is no doer separate from the bubble. All you’d really need to do is be infinite, and appear as light. But then, you’d never be able to tell if you are separate from the light, ultimately. It’d certainly appear separate, but if inspected enough, the appearance / actuality reality of it would have to reveal that the light is both your infinite self (bubble), and all ‘form’, at least the appearance of form. None of that could be possible though. Because that would mean that no matter what you learned or realized, the bubble would always morph into ‘more’, in perfect accordance since nothing was actually learned or realized (just bubble morph of “learned” & “realized”, so the true nature of conceptualization would be falsity & infinite simultaneously. Also, couldn’t be possible, because that would also reveal that right now is always bubble, and that a single thought about a past or a you, is only the bubble morph, now, morphing as a memory, the perpetuation of the “cover up” - but in truth, the actuality of the bubble. None of this is possible though.
  8. @Serotoninluv Roughly 9 hrs ago, on a two lane bridge (hard to miss) I passed a guy driving a replica Ghost Busters Car. So we have that.
  9. hmmm.... Infinity has no duality nor form. We only know the formless infinity.
  10. @Shaun Can I ask...what do you know, that is not a thought, perception, or feeling/emotion/sensation?
  11. For sure. Things are not as they appear, and there is no such thing as a coincidence, sans thinking. Trust your Good feeling intuition. The heart knows the story nature. The materialist agnostic thought based perspective knows a “coincidence” of “odds & physicality”, but truly thought knows only nothing.
  12. If you care to, maybe elaborate on why knowing seeing equates to feeling separate. Might be helpful. (I’m saying this from the perspective that separation is not actually and therefore will not feel aligned)
  13. @chudders What is the thought? and what is the sensation?
  14. What is “all this”? What is “everything”? What is “from”? What is “actual”? What is “not actual”? What is the process allowing all of “those”? What is the mechanism which “created” all those? Even to say forgetting was “created”....upon remembering, is nothing.
  15. If it is creation, it need only appear as created. What was actually created, was only forgetting. So nothing was created.
  16. Because there is no answerer, there is no questioner. If there are answerers, who would you believe with such a question?
  17. ♥️?? Solely indeed. Meh. I’d consider it’s a thought in need of release, and to hold it and focus on it, is actually the suffering. Is there suffering in detachment? Ya. Kind of an outro of suffering though. You are Good, anyway you slice it. You are forgiven and loved, before the situation / catalyst for the apparent causation of forgiveness even occurred, you were already innocent. It is still Good to pretend one is not the inner child. You will again, and I will too. Love you. The Phoenix of conceptual love, is Love.
  18. @Truth Addict You said quality is relative. What is relative, is not actually relative, but certainly appears relative, to you. I asked what then, is not relative. What does not change, is another, and probably easier way to ask that. I am asking this admittedly under the (my) projection you are seeking. So if you are not, just ignore. (Just so that isn’t left with the potential sarcastic ring to it....I’m not clarifying or trying to entice you into seeking at all. That would be silly. If you are seeking, desiring the Knowing of Truth, then it is not wasteful and potentially useful. If you are not seeking, or if there is resistance / unwillingness, this comment is not worth your time, which is relative.) @zeroISinfinity ♥️