ajasatya

amazing guy on his area of genius. tough past, tough mentality. he has a lot to offer and a lot to learn.

help you get out of the mental boundaries.

@Aakash by best guess is that you need some heavy breakthrough experience at this point. would you consider going to a long retreat?

it does not feed the ego. not two things. do you call a body and a cell two different things? "two things" is only in the mind, for "galaxy", "planet", "body", "cell", "molecule", "atom", "electron" and everything else is made out of the same substance.

the entire post is still full of linguistic confusions. "your consciousness", "it's not your life", "you are a puppet" etc. i'm not saying that language should contemplate Truth. i'm just pointing out that there is still attachment to language and confusion about what "i" and "you" mean. but it's also full of authenticity because it comes from a genuine experience. it's not offtrack. ultimate clarity!

@Anton_Pierre you're right and wrong at the same time.

PS: ecosia is a non-profitable company. everyone that works there receives standard salaries, regardless of the company income. you can check out their transparency portal.

not possible. find who you are and live a great LIFE.

who are YOU?

not sure if you were being sarcastic, but i was being serious. this kind of work requires a deep inner thirst. it's like an unstoppable drive for ultimate clarity. if you're here questioning why you should even do it, then it's certainly not for you.

@theking00 god is not a separated entity. god is the fabric of everything. god lives through everything AS everything. god speaks through your mouth and sees through your eyes. the tricky part is that god can become aware and still not know itself (humans are the perfect example of this manifestation of god). this is the reason behind the existence of the spiritual seeking process. god wants to know itself and contemplate its mysteries.

@brugluiz my best example is ecosia.org

there's no reason. forget about it.

@kindayellow what dies? what's the difference between: going to sleep and never waking up again waking up without having ever gone to sleep

it doesn't match what he says...

yeah i've been there on the other extreme. "there is no world out there" and its variations are very familiar to me. if you ask me, my most sincere answer is i don't know. to me, existence is so absurd that "there is a world out there" and "there is no world out there" can be both true at the same time. or what if it's something in the middle? something we can't grasp with the mind? i don't discredit leo, spira or any other pointer because i've had a heavy dosage of those profound mystical experiences myself. i'm just saying that we need a certain amount of maturity before we can help leverage mankind's level of awareness through our words and works. if you want to aim high and reach as many people as possible, then polish your language... "what did he say? 'poo-poos'? 'bullshit'? doesn't sound like a grown man to me" it's not the content. it's the attitude!

here's another profound insight: science is a phenomenon of the universe trying to understand what it is. it's the other side of the same coin that you flipped on your collective ego episode.

not sure what your "serious" means. famous? university professors? this is where we disagree. the movement already has an unstoppable momentum. "serious" scientists won't be able to do anything about it. human culture will transform faster as more people are falling in existential crisis. it's a natural flow. of course you can scream and say "my scream is part of the natural flow". but you can also work quietly and peacefully and say "my calmness is part of the flow". up to existence!

never heard of those. my frame of reference for science is built upon a mindset that's closer to how einstein and tesla used to think. that's how i think about science and that's how i influence the scientific community to evolve. when it comes down to deep understanding and questioning, everything else in the domain of science looks like child's play to me... just more models. also, bashing the current mainstream scientific mindset is highly counterproductive. it sounds arrogant and immature... turning this into an ideology war makes things worse. simply practicing and promoting a new way to approach scientific foundations has been way more productive as far as my experience goes. keep in mind that human beings that are willing (and brave enough) to question everything are extremely rare. how much % of people on this planet have access to clean information about psychedelics? check out the humble attitude of this guy called dean radin. maybe you're familiar with his stuff.

i define materialism as the perspective in which we make "naive" assumptions and simplifications of Reality in order to be able to model it with a certain degree of accuracy. modeling chemical reactions and physics equations are within the materialist perspective. and when you drive an electric car, program a cluster of computers, launch satellites on space, go through a critical surgery and come out alive or just use an online platform like actualized.org, it becomes clear that engineering works. this is where lay people get confused about science. they think that the current (most accurate) framework to model Reality is a "real thing". but scientists - those who come up with such models - are aware that those are just abstractions of the mind. this video shows what i mean.

they may not agree on certain models of quantum mechanics and this is how science evolves. disagreement promotes improvements because everyone becomes more rigorous and methodical. you can't deny the experiments, though. if you deny the results of such a simple experiment as the double slit experiment, you can't even call yourself a scientist. we scientists do agree that we do not understand the mechanics of sub-nano realms. and, to make things worse, measuring becomes a real problem from there. about "materialism", it depends on what you mean by that word. i consider myself a materialist... it's just that what we know as "matter" is not made of solid little pieces as we thought before. i also consider myself a spiritualist... it's just that Spirit can feel solid and look static. in other words, as far as my insights have shown me, matter = spirit.

because you haven't awakened in the level of Heart yet. checkout some adyashanti stuff on this subject. i think his message can help you. also, feel free to pm me if you want to talk about details that you're uncomfortable sharing here.

@Krzysztof hallucination is imaginary. Truth is true RIGHT NOW.

@moon777light go to a retreat and discomfort will be your friend.

by cultivating a noble and high mission. the motivation to work hard will manifest spontaneously.