Nodar Bakradze

Thank you for appreciating my confidence. Indeed. Thread is indeed beyond the scope. Fortunately, I have written 800 pages, and on top of that, you can check out my work on social media platforms. Again, thank you for the question and feedback.

The best we can do—owing to the scope of the forum post—is to highlight that, within Principia Ontologia’s deepened fundamental ontology, phenomenology is understood as the systematic study of the first-person experience, exactly as it arises. Naturally, this is rigorous preservation of Husserlian and Heideggerian conception of phenomenology. With that in mind, pure phenomenology is itself limited and incapable of catalyzing an advent of authentically post-metaphysical thinking. This is why the project goes out of its way to introduce genealogical structuralism—not to mention other pillars—within deepened quest concerning Being.

Why are you laughing He made a very interesting point that I really appreciate. Thank you @Reciprocality

I will be very grateful if you could elaborate on your point.

Indeed Ken Wilber details Kuhn’s misinterpretation very well in his classic, “The Marriage of Sense and Soul”

Regarding Thomas Kuhn, his work is brilliant. Nonetheless, was badly misinterpreted by the plethora of so-called “new paradigm” thinkers…

Thank you. I appreciate it.

Thanks for the excellent discussion guys. An imperative maneuver with reference to the Popperian falsifiability principle is the movement from narrow (empirical-sensory-only) to broad (experience as a whole) falsification principle. An acumen Principia Ontologia goes out of its way to install within deepened fundamental ontological inquiry and on that note, is excellently worked out by Wilber in his numerous pioneering contributions.

If philosophy of science is near and dear to your heart, I think you will enjoy reading Karl Popper’s oeuvre.

And on top of that, the very intention to make something complex more accessible is nothing short of a very commendable intention, in my opinion.

I wanted to ask you, What are your thoughts on Jacques Derrida’s body of work?

I really respect your project. Writing on “world disclosure” in an accessible fashion is a heroic feat, keep up the good work.

I would be grateful for an advice on what’s the best way to reach podcasters and bloggers. Since this first part of my project is finished, I am now looking for a publisher while wanting to share my ideas in podcast, discussion, debate format. I feel like attending podcasts will help me find a publisher…

Writing an accessible book on “world disclosure” is a very difficult task. I really respect that and wish you all the best in your project.

Hello. My name is Nodar Bakradze. I am a 22-year-old Continental philosopher from Tbilisi, Georgia. Even though this is my first post on this podcast, I actually came across Actualized.org in my early teens. Needless to say, it completely revolutionized my entire life. Starting from age 14, by virtue of Leo's powerful videos, I have been engaged in disciplined, self-actualization work. Ranging from consistent meditation practice to systematic self-education and autodidacticism to dating, cold approach, and pickup, not to mention other life-changing practices Leo teaches. Even though I discovered Actualized.org right around age 14, I only engaged in general personal development from my early to mid-teenage years. However, close to an end of my teenagerhood, at the age of 18, I committed myself to Leo's Life Purpose Course. I carefully watched all the lectures and did all the exercises. Owing to which I was able to get clear on my top 5 strengths, top 10 values, higher consciousness virtue, top 5 emotional states, and last but certainly not least, life purpose, with its zone of genius, domain of mastery, and ideal medium. After completing the program, I focused on consistently implementing numerous priceless insights Leo shared within his groundbreaking course. After completion of which, I created my life purpose. That I have been committed to since the age of 18. Thanks to consistent implementation of Leo's priceless insights and absolutely groundbreaking life purpose course, coupled with my own independent research, contemplation, meditative practice, and overall self-actualization work, I became a Continental philosopher. Whose philosophical enterprise, Principia Ontologia, is phenomenologically, structurally, and genealogically competent fundamental ontological inquiry, designed to accomplish what my predecessor—and biggest influence on my thought—Martin Heidegger, in his 1927 tour de force, Being and Time, intended to but failed to accomplish. My philosophical project—deepened fundamental ontology—integrates each and every major breakthrough of premodern, modern, and postmodern epochs. And it is most profoundly influenced by, hence "transcends and includes," Husserlian phenomenology, Heideggerian philosophical enterprise, Derridean deconstruction, and Ken Wilber's Integral Meta-Theory, to say nothing of other brilliant Occidental thinkers, whose shadow falls on the project's every page. With that in mind, I am very grateful to announce that Volume I of Principia Ontologia—which follows the structure of Being and Time—is now complete. A three-division, 800-page treatise that catalyzes the emergence of authentically post-metaphysical fundamental ontology, in consequence, marking an advent of what can be described as the most post-metaphysically powerful Continental enterprise in the history of the canon that, in contrast with its brilliant predecessors, reveals itself—to use Ken Wilber's beautiful expression—as the first ever "all-level, all-quadrant" Continental project that equally honors the True, the Good, and the Beautiful, and the Primordial Ground of the entire display. Since the scope of this post won't allow me to elucidate the ins and outs of the project—if you are interested—you can learn more about my philosophical work on ResearchGate. Also, you can find me on social media platforms, such as Instagram and YouTube. Last but not least, in the wake of completing the first part of Principia Ontologia, I would be very thankful to engage in meaningful conversations concerning philosophy, fundamental ontology, Continental canon, the future of Western intellectual tradition, and other similar immensely important philosophical topics. Naturally, I would be very grateful to have an opportunity to have a discussion with Curt Jaimungal, who I already sent an email to right before writing this post. I feel like such discussions would be very helpful for everyone involved, as at the end of the day, authentic Continental philosophy is transformative; consequently, Principia Ontologia's novel insights, acumens, and breakthroughs are nothing short of transformative as well. Besides wanting to get to know other self-actualizers, I want to use this post as an opportunity, in light of Curt and Leo being friends, to ask Leo—if he reads this post and wishes to do so—and likewise, members of this forum who know Curt, for help with regard to reaching him. Thank you. I deeply appreciate all the support. And please, if you haven't taken Leo's Life Purpose Course, stop everything you are doing and complete it. It is the most powerful personal development resource on planet Earth.