Dodo

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    5,340

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dodo

  1. Posted · Edited by Dodo

    8 hours ago, Princess Arabia said:

    He does it to me too. 

    I think I know why its happening, though. Might be wrong, but to me it seems like he believes if you are not a solipsist yourself and saying solipsism is right, that means you are just the image, basic npc, and not actually consciousness/being. 

    In one breath he says he is me, but the next moment, when he realises I am not a solipsist, he believes that he is not actually speaking to himself anymore (the one/0 consciousness), but to an image/npc that needs to be a solipsist to really be the True Self. 

    If you believe you are Solipsist and solipsism is absolute truth, then anyone who is not solipsist is immediately seen (perhaps unconsciously) as Other and therefore you are talking to the figment of your imagination and telling it it needs to do the work, become a solipsist itself, and only then you can consider it as Being. Then only another solipsist, can really be seen as the self that you are, because you take the position that solipsism is Truth. I am just "thinking out loud" here. 

    I also have images of you in my mind obviously and I can get people wrong for sure. But I also know you are the Self/Noself 1consciosness/0consciousness aka being / isness, no matter what philosophical or epistemological position you take. So you are That "me" regardless, no matter how much I disagree with the image I have of you that is constructed in my mind. 

    I don't know if that makes sense to you, but it makes sense to me.

    I also don't like circlejerking, I am not commenting this to gang up on Razard, I am genuinly interested in these things and exploring them. Its kind of a hard topic to talk about. 

    Solipsism might be subjectively true, but Absolute Truth...that's Being. Hence the title non-ipsism. Being is not Solo, it just Is. Self shining. Being is not 2, but it's also not 1. 

     

    Tldr: Being is prior to duality and oneness

  2. Posted · Edited by Dodo

    1 hour ago, Razard86 said:

    There is nothing to attain, it's a realization not an attainment. You just become aware that you are all alone, as Consciousness because it is singular. It's obvious and direct, but you like mind games and indirectness. And I'm not going through a Solipsistic awakening I became aware of this a year ago. You are not authentically here to actually discover truth. You come on these forums because you want mental stimulation and want to connect and have debates and share perspectives. Which is just mental masturbation. 

    But you are too scared to do the actual work to dissolve your individual self so all that will happen is when your human body drops you will realize you are singular anyway. All paths lead to the same conclusion, all boundaries will fade away.

    So your function is to judge others based on your perception of them, and to spoil the end of the movie, that is not helpful.

    You need to read this. I have been here for a very long time, and you have no clue what work I've done or haven't done. You have no idea what I know and don't know. You have a drawing of me in your mind, you are assuming everything about me. Really try to notice it.

    But read the post in that thread linked, you will see some important stuff there. 

    You might even see yourself being described, if you are honest while reading.

  3. Posted · Edited by Dodo

    On 05/05/2023 at 4:12 AM, Razard86 said:

    Even though you are correct....he is asking on how to meet people. If he asked how to meet enlightened women you gonna tell him they are imaginary?

    1. Listen up, I've said this before and I am going to say it again. Can you guys really try to understand the essence of what someone is asking? He isn't asking to awaken or complaining that he cannot get a woman and feels separate. Those type of questions are appropriate for your response.

    2. He is just asking to meet up with people. That doesn't need a "they are imaginary" type of response. Besides...he could just turn it around on you out of spike (which I do lol) and say who are you even responding to then, because from your POV I am imaginary. So why are you telling an imaginary character that the enlightened people he wants to meet is imaginary.

    Not trying to be a dick or something, just try to be a little more empathetic to what someone is asking. I'm not perfect in this regard either but this one was a softball guys.

    Sounds like completely different Razard. Man i like that guy. Entire post, not just underlined. 

  4. Posted · Edited by Dodo

    13 minutes ago, Davino said:

    @Dodo Yeah, you lost your shot

    You're cheating at solitaire.

    No, im playing chess and you think we're playing checkers. Not my bad.

    I don't deny you had a deep awakening experience. I'm not denying your experience in any way by disagreeing with you or your comments.

    You don't have anything of value to offer me at the current time, because you dont even attempt to grasp my position. I don't feel like I missed any shot. 

    Please look up Zen Devilry for further information. I'll help you out.20240424_220718787.jpeg

     

  5. Posted

    2 minutes ago, Davino said:

    Nah, it's just good talking with someone that actually does the work. I can count with my hand how many do the real work here

    You'll also be one day here if you do the work. The same way I was also there cracking my head with solipsism and asking.

    What is your real question, stop playing with me. What do you wanna know, you have one shot, throw your question

    Sorry Davino, but they told me once I am immune to zen devilry, and I'm running with that. 

    If you scroll past all the circlejerk you and Razard could have had in private messages you can easily get to my last post with substance. But you will also need to hear Leo's video, because Lord Knows, if I say it its wrong, but if He says it its right.  I have set timestamps of the juicy bits. 

  7. Posted · Edited by Dodo

    4 hours ago, Davino said:

    I've been addressing the issue since I first awoke to Solipsism

    I'm sick of the solipsism debate. Some months ago while I was literally having one of the most profound solipsistic awakenings of my life I was answering questions on the topic. 

    I have to say that I love "others" more when I'm in absolute consciousness, at least I see you all as my very own self and recognise you as God.

    I'm done with the debate. I'll just answer to "individuals" that are actually going through a Solipsistic awakening and are having a difficult emotional time.

    Its good to know you perceive that Razard is right now going through a solipsistic awakening and is having a difficult emotional time, as you keep replying. 

    The way I see it is that he is some sort of solipsistic guru here to tell everyone what they are missing if they don't fall in the same spiritual trap as him, but you know better, since you are also there. 

  8. Posted · Edited by Dodo

    41 minutes ago, Razard86 said:

    If a person awakens to Solipsism they can discover the deepest form of sex. It's really the greatest thing to discover it's all you. From one perspective you are all alone, and from another perspective you are never alone because the singularity is a multiplicity.

    So it's however you choose to look at it.

    Have you tried semen retention

     

  9. Posted · Edited by Dodo

    1 hour ago, Davino said:

    I've been addressing the issue since I first awoke to Solipsism

    I'm sick of the solipsism debate. Some months ago while I was literally having one of the most profound solipsistic awakenings of my life I was answering questions on the topic. 

    I have to say that I love "others" more when I'm in absolute consciousness, at least I see you all as my very own self and recognise you as God.

    I'm done with the debate. I'll just answer to "individuals" that are actually going through a Solipsistic awakening and are having a difficult emotional time. Thank God my partner helped me during that phase and luckily I found strength to write for help in the forum and got some good guidance. People think Solipsism is up for debate, I was three days crying non stop, the first time I ever got suicidal in my entire life. If you actually wake up to Solipsism you will feel like you are losing your mind, it's soul crushing, insanity.

    Then comes heaven, but the transition, the Oh Shit moment, this is for real, ego panick, that is as tough as it gets

    This is not a Solipsism debate. This as Non-ipsism debate. You obviously experienced something else, that this thread is not about. There was a self there that was suffering something. I am not asking about such an experience. You and Razard can hide your comments if you like, and I will hide my comments replying to them, as to not fill the thread up, because I am looking for specific answers, in search of truth. Not about someone else's experience about an unrelated topic.  0!=1

  11. Posted · Edited by Dodo

    1 hour ago, nistake said:

    @Dodo Can you verify these things in your direct experience?

     Timestamped 10:00. Leo does keep saying "Consciousness exists", but that's because he is using the word exist as "its real", not that it "stands out" which is the real meaning of the word. Basically everything he is saying is what I am saying. So I would argue Leo is a non-ipsist.  Remember that Leo's target audience is Materialists! 

    14:30 he suddenly jumps to the conclusion that consciousness can be seen as a giant mind, here is where I am on another boat. That's where his Solipsism root lies. I have no evidence that consciousness is a giant mind, and in fact his earlier statement, that consciousness needs to be without quality to allow for qualities to appear within it, gets trumped by this. Suddenly consciousness has qualities of mind? 

    I would need some further proof of that exact thing. Fire away. 

     

    PS: Here's just a wonky theory, I don't claim the following is true, I am just trying to understand this solipsistic phenomenon. 

    Maybe there is a giant mind entity, bigger then all other minds, that wants to assert itself as the highest, like a superego, but it is still within the Consciousness with no qualities. As it is so large, larger than all other minds, it lacks the subtlety. There is no other mind (or circle) bigger than it (at the time) to argue with that superego or tell it otherwise, and consciousness itself is silent on the matter, because it is just the space that allows that largest circle to know itself, so that mind appears to itself be God and claims Godhood - again, just because there is no bigger circle (YET) to say otherwise. and because that superego can't see beyond itself just like the normal ego in normal state of consciousness. Just the same delusion, on a whole other level.  

     

  13. Posted · Edited by Dodo

    29 minutes ago, nistake said:

    Not trying to be arrogant, but I think only those people argue about solipsism who haven't experienced it directly.

    Are you alone in deep sleep? There is no other? You are alone? Or there is no self either? Please, be as arrogant as you wish, you don't need to care about my feelings, we are talking about truth, right? 

     

     

    It makes perfect sense that God / Consciousness is 0. Solipsist takes God/Consciousness to be 1, hence "I am God" statements and solipsism arise. Its a paradoxical subject, because you are that 0 consciousness that doesn't exist. You think they were joking that it can't be grasped with the mind??? 

    if God/Consciousness was 1, thats singularity. It is too full of itself to allow anything else to appear within it. There is no SPACE for anything else! How does God create anything if he is everything already? 

     

  14. Posted

    Just now, nistake said:

    Not trying to be arrogant, but I think only those people argue about solipsism who haven't experienced it directly.

    There needs to be a you to experience Solipsism. God does not exist - that, just like Leo says about solipsism, shouldn't be viewed with a negative connotation and bias. Consciousness doesn't exist. Everything else is allowed to exist within it. Consciousness does not. If you can see this you are already a Non-ipsist and Solipsism is a joke. If consciousness existed, it would be an appearance. 

    To exist means to STAND OUT. "From French exister, from Latin existō, exsistō (“I am, I exist, appear, arise”)" 

    Consciousness does not ARISE, you definitely are not arrogant, you are just wrong. 

  15. Posted · Edited by Dodo

    35 minutes ago, Davino said:

    Have you watched the Solipsism video? It will leave no room for doubts

     

     

    I watched part of it. 

    Lets do simple maths. No self, No other. Is this SOLipsism or NONipsism? 

    Self and no other = Solipsism.  You are alone. 

    No self and no other = Nonipsism. Welcome back to reality, you are not alone, there is no you.

    Leo is talking about pure Non-ipsism in this video. When he says You, he is not talking about your 1self, but about the 0self of all.

    Thats what everyone failing to grasp and its too simple, a child can see it. Beginners mind please.

     

    Before enlightenment - Chop wood, carry water
    After enlightenment - Chop wood, carry water. 
     

  18. Posted · Edited by Dodo

    22 minutes ago, CoolDreamThanks said:

    And you call Ramana your teacher, it seems, but have you not read the most basic things he teaches about the world? See it here: https://tomdas.com/2020/03/25/ramana-maharshi-the-world-should-be-considered-like-a-dream/ 

    A little more humility, brother. 

    If you are a prickle he will say goo. If you are a goo he will say prickle. 

    Until you are a prickly goo. 

    I am humble and honest. So sorry that I disagree with you. If you are making a religion out of his words, you already admit that you missed his teaching completely.

    Why do you think he didnt allow them to write it down? Entertain me.

    My answer: because the specific pill was for their mind. Not for everyones.

  19. Posted

    9 minutes ago, CoolDreamThanks said:

    :D:D Ramana didn't make a single video. 

    Try going deeper to the source, to the exact words he spoke to his students. Did you know that his students were forbidden from writing down anything he said when they were in front of him? They did, however, write things down when they left his presence. The main students of Ramana also didn't believe that life was a dream at first, even when Ramana told them that clearly and multiple times. But some of them realized the illusory nature of life after some time. 
     

    You are talking out your butthole and gaslighting me. Ofcourse Ramana didnt make the videos, its all from his devotees. What are you trying to pull? 

    Specifically you have missed that anything Ramana said to his students was NOT it. His teaching was silence, I already said this! Ramana would not for a second entrtain your egoic view of reality. He would say things to specific people based on the situation, but these thins were not his teaching. 

    Even the self inquiry "Who am I" is Not Ramana's teaching, but a tool to quiet the mind. You really are going to talk about Ramana Huh? 

  20. Posted · Edited by Dodo

    12 minutes ago, CoolDreamThanks said:

    :D:D Ramana is looking down on you frowning. All good though, no harm - no foul. Only a piece of the illusion appearing confused. 

    You need to learn more about Ramana lmao... You're talking with a guy who has binged on Ramana videos for a decade.

    What you are doing is using these spiritual teachers to present your delusions as true and calling me confused. If you give me a poop on a golden platter, im still not eating that shit!

    "Oh you're saying the golden platter is not incredible?" 

    "No dude, the golden platter is amazing!! But what you added onto it smells rotten!"

  21. Posted

    1 minute ago, CoolDreamThanks said:

    @Dodo In other words, you think you know better than Ramana Maharshi, Jesus (in ACIM), Mooji, Lisa Cairns, Leo, Ramaji, Sri Nisragadata Maharaji, Buddhism in general, and one of the main teachers of Hinduism -- Adi Shankara? Buddhists call it anicca, Hindus call it maya, and Christians call it a dream.   

    I don't recommend following others based on belief. Still, it might be wise to look at well-respected spiritual teachers and be open to the idea that if you disagree with all of them, then perhaps there is a possibility that you are mistaken. Just another POV to consider. :)

    Don't give me that. Disagree with Ramana? His main teaching was silence... Lol... Disagree with Jesus? His main teaching was love.

    Everything these teachers said was a concession to the thinking mind. They gave you toys to play with to keep your attention while the presence works on you. 

    Please dont give me that. You speak to me about Ramana Maharshi... lol you have no idea who I am.

  22. Posted · Edited by Dodo

    5 hours ago, Razard86 said:

    The reason you can never know...is because it doesn't exist.

    The reason you can never know is because you can never witness it. "BeCaUsE iT dOeSnT eXisT" is your own  assumption and preference. 

    You really write a lot, and I already explained much in detail in previous post.

    Its 8am and i spent a lot of time writing to you yesterday, and seems in vein. So here is everything explained by an AI which shows exactly the narrow mindedness of your position here. And I am close minded. Sure....

    Me:

    If something is out of your direct experience, you cannot prove if its there or not right now. Guy says that means it doesn't exist. Anothrr guy says it does exist. Third guy says, we cant be sure whether it exists or not. 4th guy says it both exists and not in superposition. Which guy is right

    ChatGPT:

    Each person's perspective represents a different philosophical stance:

    1. The first guy's perspective reflects a strict empiricist view that only accepts what can be directly observed or experienced as real. From this standpoint, if something is beyond direct experience, it's deemed nonexistent.

    2. The second guy believes in the existence of things beyond direct experience, possibly based on faith, intuition, or belief systems. For him, existence transcends direct sensory perception.

    3. The third guy holds an agnostic viewpoint, acknowledging the limitations of human knowledge and refraining from making definitive claims about the existence or nonexistence of things beyond direct experience.

    4. The fourth guy's viewpoint seems to allude to quantum superposition, a concept from quantum mechanics where particles can exist in multiple states simultaneously until observed. However, applying this concept to existential questions might be more metaphorical or speculative.

    There's no definitive "right" answer here; it depends on one's philosophical, spiritual, or scientific perspective. Each viewpoint has its own rationale and implications.

    Me:

    Ok but you said there is no definitive right answer and you claim this is a right answer. So the guy that already admitted he will never know the right answer, the agnostic, was the only one following truth?

    ChatGPT:

    It's true that the agnostic perspective acknowledges the inherent uncertainty in many existential questions, which can be seen as a form of intellectual honesty. However, labeling it as the "right" answer implies a value judgment that may not apply universally. Each viewpoint has its own validity and implications, and what may be considered "right" or appropriate can vary based on individual beliefs, values, and circumstances. So while the agnostic stance offers a humble recognition of uncertainty, it may not necessarily be deemed superior or "right" in every context.

     

    See, chatGPT says it best. I cant spend more time arguing when you only see what you see and deny logic because you dont see it. 

     

    I made sure to include that it is impartial when it says that the agnostic viewpoint is not necessarily the right one, but it admits that it is intellectually honest. While you fail to grasp my position and keep saying i am not honest about this that and the other. You need to grow up and give space to others. Yes, others, you are a noone. You are not The One. I AM NOT THE ONE. WE are both No One.

  23. Posted

    Happy Birthday Leo! 

    A lot has changed..And Natasha, she was a real one. I miss her a lot. The only reason I know your birthday is today is her thoughtful post here from years ago.

     Im not as thoughtful as her, but reality made sure I had a sync event to see this just hours ago.

    I hope you have a great one and keep being you! (Hehe, as if you had a choice!)

     

     

  24. Posted · Edited by Dodo

    12 minutes ago, Razard86 said:

    What I love about the Absolute Solipsism question is.....it teaches why corruption exists, why misinformation exists, and why what you call evil exists within humanity in one fell swoop. Your inability to accept the truth even though everything points to it being true, is proof that a human chooses convenience/comfortableness over honesty and integrity. 

    The struggle you have to accept oneness, is really just your inner struggle against evil. If you deny Absolute Solipsism you say even though I know everything is ONE, I choose a lie because a lie is more comfortable. I choose it because it is more convenient for me emotionally. I do not want to do inner work to unattach myself from the need of Other and take full responsibility for how I construct reality, instead I will keep other around so I can treat them however I want, and blame them for whatever I want.

    The birth of evil, is the birth of other. It's why I am so fascinated with this topic because I get to see how evil works. God is very fascinating in how it shows that conditional love for truth creates corruption. It's an amazing thing to see really. 

    Literally the ramblings of a mad man. I try to help you but you are just a raging storm of bullshit. You need to want to help yourself. 

    You are talking now that humanity, evil, corruption and misinformation exist after you told me something needs to be directly in your experience to exist. 

    Please man do me a favor!

    So my house doesn't exist if its not directly in my view, but suddenly evil, humanity and corruption exist? Give me a fkin break dude. You need to rethink all that by yourself while looking in the mirror. 

     

  25. Posted

     

    5 minutes ago, Razard86 said:

    All that happened is You are NEO, lol you are ONE.

    You got one part of that wrong. NEO is not one. Its in the name: Not Even One.

    I AM one lap ahead of you, and to you it seems like delusion, from your limited rigid point of view as a SoLiPsISt. You see me running behind you, thinking you are ahead of me.

     

    36 minutes ago, Razard86 said:

    Your entire argument is based and predicated on guessing. Not confirmation. If you cannot prove something exists, it doesn't exist until you prove it. YOU are your own proof. You have never proven something existed OUTSIDE OF YOU EVER.

     

    You did not understand anything I said. SMH feels bad man.

    If you cannot prove something exists, that doesnt mean it doesn't exist. Thats your opinion. 

    Its only in your untrained mind that you jump to that conclusion, because you want to keep the illusion of knowing everything. How convenient for your ego, instead of admitting that you dont know that which is beyond you, you say it doesnt exist and now you feel great!

    oh dear...

     

     

    39 minutes ago, Razard86 said:

     

    What your entire argument just now was, is I know something exists, even though I cannot confirm it. This means you believe that your house exists, without confirmation. So you prove, that you believe something is true even though you cannot confirm it, this means you are imagining it.

    Oh yeah, was that my argument, or your stick figure representation of my argument?? In your mind you believe im saying "i know it exists" ??

    1 hour ago, Dodo said:

     @Razard86

    You are literally jumping from the sane conclusion that "you cant be sure of something if its outside of your conscious minds grasp", to the insane conclusion that "it definitely doesnt exist if its not in your conscious minds grasp."

    Do you have to fill all questions with an answer? Sometimes you have to leave the questionmark there and not try to force your answer. Are you able to choose Mu, instead of Yes or No as the answer? You need to be able to do that when faced with a paradoxical question or something that can't be known for sure ever.

    Q: Is there anything outside of your perception right now.

    Wrong answer A: definitely not

    Wrong answer B: definitely yes

    Correct answer: Mu (cannot be answered, we don't know the answer, we will never know the answer, its a mystery, your ego cant take that)

     

    You are disrespectful, because you dont even attempt to understand what im saying.