Dodo

Thatd just it, the investigation of actual dreams at night leads to the discovery that there is something REAL there, which has no form. It is NOT experienced, but is real. The dragon in the dream was not real, but the awareness that knows the experience IS real. You dont imagine the awareness and it is the same 0awareness in dream state and in waking state. To know 0awareness in its purest form, ignore waking and dream, go straight to deep sleep. Deep sleep is the zip file I mentioned. Notice deep sleep not an experience, or in other words, an experience where there is no you and no other. You can also not ignore waking and sleep and think about what is the common denominator between them. You will find out it is You that is common, but not the form obviously. That which is always there is real, and the only thing always there in all 3 states is the 0. So 0 is definitely real, and everything within it may or may not be imaginary, its not my job to label it, I am only interested in That which is definitely real.

By your own definition of the world, solipsism, your direct experience IS concepts and fantasy. How do we reconcile that? Do you get that in your worldview your direct experience is fantasy? And you appear to treat it as real, and judge me for talking about concepts and fantasy, how come? A solipsist should be the first to not trust his direct experience, but you use it as your proof?

@Someone here Just like conscious and unconscious, the number 5 implies the other side of the coin, negative 5. Add them together you get 0, the coin is 0 and now this coin can represent any number. Same 0 for 5 and -5 as is with 100 and -100. reminds me of reality, we have one coin (being) and a multitude of different numbers, incredible diversity! That doesn't make sense to you or what?

Again this is hearsay. As said by Leo in one of his profound videos, not in his exact words, but along the lines of 0 is like a zip file that contains everything, its not nothing / thin air, it is everything condensed With a math map this is true, so I trust it. Think of all numbers from negative to positive infinity, now if we add them all up, we get 0. Ofcourse its tricky adding infinite series, but you can see that every negative number has a positive counterpart, and cancel out.

@Someone here simple exercise to prove my point Think of a pink parrot. Where was the image of a pink parrot before it surfaced to the conscious mind? Now pink parrot is consciously imagined, but while that is conscious, where is the red, white and green parrot? Now you thought of those red, white and green parrot and forget about the pink parrot. The pink parrot image has returned to the vast dark unconscious and you focus the light of consciousness only on the parrots you decide to be conscious of. The other images are readily available in the deep dark unconscious for the powerful light of consciousness to access.

Thats your hearsay. I have no proof that I am creating the unconscious/subconscious. Conscious and unconscious should be seen like the 2 sides of the same coin and the coin can never have only one side. One side of the coin doesn't create the other. They are both created simultaneously, or always exist simultaneously without the need of creation. Ofcourse when you experience parts of the unconscious, they become conscious, but now other things continue to be unconscious outside of your reach. By definition. And you ignore it only because you can never experience it.

@Someone here Does the conductor (conscious mind) control the orchestra (unconscious mind) or the orchestra control the conductor? Is there only an orchestra, or only a conductor? If you want good music, you need both. Only orchestra will be disorganised, only conductor will be silent. One needs the other to get the music! The conductor is one and small, but very important, the orchestra is large and powerful, but in need of guidance. Ying and Yang should not be stirred into a homogenous mess. You need the contrast between conscious and unconscious.

Its beyond obvious, you need to be small and limited in order to hone in and execute small tasks, seeing everything in great detail and being able to interact with things. For a bee to polinate a flower, to a man shmoozing a girl, there are myriads of completely different things that can be done in reality, and you are not conscious of all of them. What you are given is one alive being, you have no conscious control over the bees for example. You don't even have full conscious control of your own body.

Do you deny the isness of the subconscious under the surface of consciousness? If you were conscious of everything right now you wouldn't be able to operate in this world.

Yes, fractals and stuff. All things in the universe rhyme and all life exhibits similarities, from spiral galaxies to the human body, to the flowers, we share the same golden ratio. I know your isness and the bee's isness and my isness are the same, but all 3 of those experiences are completely different. Yet we share this one Isness Being, but being is not an experience. Most Solipsist are confused, as they confuse what they are in essense with their experience and we will have arguments.

Hahaha oh here we go, the dreamer arguing with his npcs 😆

I wondered which section this needs to be posted in, mods if there is a better section, just move it for me please. I am completely afraid to love. Out of fear of the loss that could follow. If I trully love someone, a woman, i am completely vulnerable. She can break me, emotionally and spiritually with her actions. Or if I lose her, I would suffer immensely. As a child I had a pet rooster in my village. I loved that thing. He was not afraid of me whatsoever. All the other chickens run at my sight, but he would just stand there and look at me like I'm stupid. I never once thought about him dying. I told my grandmother he is off limits for cooking. Then one day he disappeared. I saw white fethers in the pig's section. They had eaten him. He somehow got to their enclosure and they ate him. I was so angry, I ran after the pigs and followed them to where they were hiding, trying to hurt them. My best friend was gone. I would let him into the wider garden every day, knowing he will always return by himself at the end of the day. He lived a heavenly life as a rooster not many would dream of. He was even eating my grandmother's tomatoes! On a tanget: I think that rooster was enlightened, like Ramana Maharshi's cow. I trully believe all living beings are far more emotionally intelligent than we assume at first, they only seem wild to us and fearful, because thats the only way they survived with the human so far. Notice the Dodos were like my pet rooster. They weren't afraid of Humans, they were the perfect pets. And Human ate them, even though their meat was sour and dry, not tasty at all. It was an easy pray. Tldr: If I love this human, how much sadness there will be when it is gone? Talking both about loving another person, but also My person.

We always have to clutch at something, always against, this that and the other, playing games of all kinds, never happy with simply being!

@Keryo Koffa is it possible that some aspects of infinity have forgotten the Absolute truth of infinite love consciousness, and act unconsciously and against Love, can we really call those aspects love? I understand why Love would let them be, because they are its Children, but I'm also sure it has ways to teach them what they forgot. I don't like the explanation where evil is justified under the name of Love. Yesnits part of it, but it acts against it. It (evil) can be redeemed, in my opinion, everyone can turn from evil to Good. We say I am you etc, but Sometimes there are people so evil, I look at them and say, that right there can't be me. Asleep love may be love potential, but its not Love yet. Idk if I make sense, sorry. Otherwise yes the video was a great watch.

I am emotionally crippled and know it, but you failed to understand the emotional charge of my post, so have to clue you in, you might be emotionally crippled as well

Thank you for spending time writing this out, very insightful

ye im not sayin all of em, you probably ate some egoic motherfucker

Emotional intelligence needed

I was a child back then with my rooster. I wasn't using the pet rooster as means to create love feelings come on... you didnt understand at all. I loved that thing for real. Ofcourse if you love someone or something you will mourn when they're gone. I went very mental on the pigs, even though they were big and a bit scary, I wanted to kill them for what they did.

Ofcourse God will show itself to different nations and parts of the globe in different ways. There is diversity of people and diversity of ways to understand God perhaps. I am not subscribed to all religions being right, but I can see how they can be, in the paradoxical world we live in. The cyrillic alphabet, it is believed, that God gave it to St. Kiril and St. Metodii while they were in a cave. Im sure it wasnt Allah or Jesus who gave the Cyrillic Alphabet, but it was yet another aspect of God. God likes diversity, not everyone the same. Is it that surprising that something that is infinite is not bound to being only one way?

I wondered which section this needs to be posted in, mods if there is a better section, just move it for me please. I am completely afraid to love. Out of fear of the loss that could follow. If I trully love someone, a woman, i am completely vulnerable. She can break me, emotionally and spiritually with her actions. Or if I lose her, I would suffer immensely. As a child I had a pet rooster in my village. I loved that thing. He was not afraid of me whatsoever. All the other chickens run at my sight, but he would just stand there and look at me like I'm stupid. I never once thought about him dying. I told my grandmother he is off limits for cooking. Then one day he disappeared. I saw white fethers in the pig's section. They had eaten him. He somehow got to their enclosure and they ate him. I was so angry, I ran after the pigs and followed them to where they were hiding, trying to hurt them. My best friend was gone. I would let him into the wider garden every day, knowing he will always return by himself at the end of the day. He lived a heavenly life as a rooster not many would dream of. He was even eating my grandmother's tomatoes! On a tanget: I think that rooster was enlightened, like Ramana Maharshi's cow. I trully believe all living beings are far more emotionally intelligent than we assume at first, they only seem wild to us and fearful, because thats the only way they survived with the human so far. Notice the Dodos were like my pet rooster. They weren't afraid of Humans, they were the perfect pets. And Human ate them, even though their meat was sour and dry, not tasty at all. It was an easy pray. Return to topic Tldr: If I love this human, how much sadness there will be when it is gone?

The now that never move, even if you're running.

Yea, because you experience the Now, which is outside of time, but the story and play of life is still inside the time bound book. Your human self is in time and it can move in spacetime. The now doesn't move and doesn't change, but the story of life, just like an ocean wave, is constantly contracting and expanding.

"In physics, equations of motion are equations that describe the behavior of a physical system in terms of its motion as a function of time." Ref: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equations_of_motion "One of the so-called 'equations of motion' is v = u+at where v = final speed, u = initial speed, a = acceleration, and t = time." Ref: Mathcenter.ac.uk If you can change speed, then that implies time. If you were at rest and then started to be in motion, this implies time. All change happen in time, the Now is the Grand Conductor of this play, thats my opinion here. The now never changes, its not in time, but that doesnt mean the play is not in time, imho

Im aware they are different as in I even know equations, but I mean they are interrelated. One implies the other. There are equations linking them. Time, distance and motion are interrelated like the father the son and the holy spirit. Neither can "exist" by itself. Consciousness cant create time without also creating motion and vice versa. My 2 cents