I've told him that. It caused him to pause a bit and think about it... as within that tendency, there is an assumption that men are inherently emotionally stronger and more resilient and that women are inherently powerless in relation to men.
He gets it in the abstract, but would often tend to default to the assumption of "man = bad aggressor" and "woman = good victim" with himself and others. And his tendency would be to always sympathize with the woman, even if she's in the wrong.
He reminds me of me when I was a kid and going through my "not like the other girls" phase where I was always assuming that everyone thought girls/women were cruel and vapid... and that I was always trying to be an exception to the rule.
In recent years, he's been a lot more even-handed... in part because of our friendship.
But previously, I was always having to get onto him about his radical Feminist takes where he would always see men as the aggressors and the negative ones and women as the victims and the positive ones.  
This tendency came from him being raised in a very patriarchal high control religious sect and having a bad relationship with his dad.
So, he had a lot of internalized misandry from those dynamics.
And when he deconstructed from his religious background about a decade ago, he polarized over into the polar opposite ideology of rad fem (though he doesn't actually believe men can be true Feminists... in true rad fem fashion).
So, it makes sense why he would have gravitated towards those perspectives.