davecraw

If that's true then why didn't you reveal my code?

Your teachings, as expressed in your bio and your YouTube videos, emphasize the profound idea that "you are me". This concept, while fascinating, has led me to ponder certain practical aspects of our interaction. Specifically, I'm curious about your experience when you respond to messages or create content. When you craft a response or record a video, is there a process you engage in, such as typing or filming? Or is it that these responses and videos aren't typed or recorded but are merely phenomena being experienced? For the sake of clarity, when I refer to your videos, I mean those found on the Actualized.org YouTube channel, and your posts are those associated with the Leo Gura account on this forum. The metaphysical implications of this query are immense. Consider the difference between your viewers actually producing the videos on your channel at some point in their lives versus not engaging in this process at all. I would greatly appreciate your insight on this matter, and I also welcome thoughts from other members of this forum. Is anyone else intrigued by this question? Does anyone else deem this topic of paramount importance? Thanks in advance for your time and responses.

Let me approach this from a different angle. When you respond to this post what is your experience? Can you describe your experience (what you are aware of) while you respond to this? That may help me know whether your experience is different than mine.

In Leo's videos there appears to be certain body involved in making the videos. Do you (or the other people) accumulate that body and make those videos with that body?

Do you know whether I am experiencing or not? If yes, then do you know whether your experience and mine are different or not?

And I know you are experiencing too. So since it's known that you and I are both experiencing that leads me to the question of whether your experience is different than mine.

Oh lol I thought you meant intensive care unit.

Do you agree that only the source of this post creates this post?

What do you mean?

As far as I can tell, I know you are experiencing. If you can point out a flaw in my logic then I'll reconsider.

Can you explain the errors in my logic? I don't want to carry broken logic and would appreciate your analysis. Thank you.

If only you are experiencing then that's the same as claiming only I (the source of this post) am experiencing. Whichever way you chop it up I am experiencing and you are experiencing.

Then you know that this claim is coming from you in which case its source (I) is experiencing just like you.

What is the evidence in your experience that your entire expereince is imaginary and not real?

Why have you redefined real things to be thing that you imagine?

Why do you identify with the thing you're experiecning? Why are you sure that you are not beyond your experience?

But if something were to be real what criteria would it have to meet in your mind?

Is it based on something beyond your mind and if not why? For example, this response is represented in your mind. Is its source beyond your mind and if not why?

What do you mean by real? What are the criteria that something must meet to be real?

Clearly you are going to end up with a body that you can't move or perceive with pretty soon. When that happens will you be able to create a new body and if so how?

What do you mean by imagine?

I want to know your perspective and supporting evidence for your claim.

Do you have any evidence that's true? Why do you think that?

I want everyone else's answers too. I feel the more I've thought about your perspective the less I understand it. Can you please clarify whether you think you are imagining me.

Do you think that I am imagining myself, or is myself beyond my imagination? What do you mean by imagine?