Schizophonia

If you want to leave after ejaculating, it's because you really don't like the girl, that's logical. Lol It's just that you don't know how to love someone. With this logic, you don't have friends because you don't have sexual desire for them. I don't see why anyone would do that.

I'm still a virgin; I graduated high school a virgin, and afterward, I suffered from extreme insomnia for basically three years. My sleep is still meh, still needs to be improved mais but it's already way better alleluja. Girls have approached me here and there, sometimes very explicitly, but I didn't want to push it because, as I said above, I didn't want to be "stuck," and I lacked desire anyway, probably because of my sleep problems and medications (benzodiazepines, mirtzapapine, high dosages of antihistamines...) Right now, I'm in my small town where I grew up, and we'll see.

I've been openly hit on by 7/8 out of 10 girls before and even while I've been insomniac, even though I find it weird. And I didn't jump on them because I was rational and I know that once a girl is attached to you, you're "stuck," even though it might not ultimately be a good choice for certain reasons, and I don't want to hurt anyone unnecessarily. It's not my fault if you deprave yourself by fucking elephant seals or insufferable women. If I really want sex without a girlfriend, I'd just go to escorts. It makes no sense to me to make efforts to sleep with undesirable girls when I can go see a pretty, friendly, and professional escort. P.S.: I talk to you a lot lately; it's not against you, it's just that you're a strong mirror right now for some reason. This discussion will not last; No duality, all that.

I remember when I was in high school, I saw Hillary Clinton's campaign video. I'm not anti-progressive per se, but it was such a woke obsession that the only white people in the video were like gay lol. And at the same time, there was no social discourse, no anti-oligarchic discourse, nothing.

Too "woke", not anti-capitalist enough.

It's completely stupid.

I know a man, one of the highest-ranking Frenchmen (or the ) in the global information network, who is very grounded in non-dual spirituality and can supposedly manifest women. He boasted in his telegram about "praying" to manifest women at absurd hours, like in the middle of the night, and sleeping with them after a few dozen minutes of conversation, lol. He also talked about his hypnosis master who had siddhis, like being able to see the weather change, turn red lights green in the middle of a city, etc.

This is nitpicking.

What you say is also true for men. I see women as holistic pastries; This affirmation is funny, but that's basically it. The only difference from what you described is that I can't stand it when people try to dominate me, in the sense of taking away the last word. I suppose women will globally be more submissive.

Yes.

They are public ? It was to put a word on it.

New technologies tend to foster a more "ADHD-like" consciousness; more manic and making the present moment less enjoyable. Do you mean you'd like to return to a state where you enjoy yourself more continuously, where your energy isn't lost in mental chatter and particularly complex worries?

I have spoiled the temple of God, I have freed barabbas. We have.

@Emerald I've seen that women also have these kinds of fantasies, just more twisted in other ways. Because it's a fantasy, there's even a sense of disappointment in considering its falsehood. It's the possibility of a more "optimistic" paradigm that's being repressed and downright frustrating for reasons that remain to be elucidated. Personally, if I focus on why I'm tempted by this scenario: The answer that comes is that for some reason it gives me a "casus beli" to express aggression and take power in this way. It's like, "Being imposing is illegal in my system, so if I get proof that life isn't on my side, then that gives me the right to be aggressive, to attack others, to become a Nazi, or whatever (unconsciously becoming "phallic," in a depraved way). We're back to the Oedipus complex and obsessive-compulsive neurosis, or paranoia.

It's cool.

About relations, especially intimate ones.

https://www.16personalities.com/fr/résultats/entj-a/m/4mbb4s2t8 Lolz, it says i'm ENTJ; I don't know why. I often found the questions unclear.

It's very good but i still wait to see what this will get as political outlet. Bernie Sanders barely got more than half of Joe Biden's vote in the 2020 Democratic primaries; and that's still soft socialism. Idk, a less clivant republican will both takes trumpist votes and those of people who could have voted republican but have been disgusted by trump figure.

It's the karma.

Social networks and work.

She suffer from depersonalization/derealisation, is under neuroleptic, and even if we stick to the relationship problem she is not sociable and has its own psychic flaws in general which can generate unwanted results in this area; As everyone else. Look how you jump on her answer to force your paradigm.

But Kamala is not really on the left, it is essentially a liberal. When I speak on the left, I speak of a real Marxist paradigm, or at least anti-capitalist in general; Not only play the card of wokism.

In your world. He's speaking from a relational point of view, I think.

This is always the case. To give a materialistic perspective, for a change, lol; there's a reason why our central nervous system chose to be interested in spirituality rather than bonatics, big cars, or cinnamon apple pies (yum). There came a time when the energy shifted there, and there had to be a logic, an algorithm to explain this direction, and this was a survival logic; human logic. The more "spiritual" someone is, the more one might suspect that anything that doesn't fall under spirituality, that is, from a childish point of view, a language of submission based on castration anxiety, is forbidden. (Hence the fact that spirituality is generally a women's affair, with slightly neurotic men at the top of the pyramid.) And this prohibition will create an avoidance of social relationships and/or love and/or sex. Since the cause of the ban is painful (I'm sure that if I post love poems or things like that, even if it's not my personal thing, you and many others will cringe), a persona that doesn't involve this threat will be compulsively maintained by mental discourse, even if it seems pessimistic. Of course, there are many couples who love each other and are very romantic, I see them everywhere; but this can trigger feelings of discomfort and anger about my more or less conscious sense of dissatisfaction and the trauma I've experienced. So I can also turn my head toward other mirrors, people who seem to be together out of spite or something like that, and ruminate on how all of this isn't love for one reason or another, because even if it's pessimistic, it still hurts less, subconsciously, than being confronted with reality. Often, pessimism, rigidity, is a strategy developed during development to avoid falling into psychiatric decompression; because again, for the ego, survival is what matters most. You didn't just say that; you also wrote a paragraph about how women are eternal adolescents and that it would be better to be in the gulag than to be a woman who lives in attention. It's certainly motivated by aggression, but still hidden beneath layers of rationalization where you escape into your persona as a spiritual seeker. Not even because you'd like to be in the woman's place, but because you suffer from your lack of relationships, even in the male role, if you know what I mean, but it's illegal in your system. Spiritual -> Submission strategy; Prohibition of complaining, of rebelling, of having a libidinal agenda (sex, love, money, involvement in politics, social connections in general, partying). Again, no matter how we get lost in layers of language, in the end, there are only strategies of survival, of power.

@Breakingthewall It's a projection. Generally, spirituality attracts people who dislike matter and other human beings. Even if it's repressed, and even though I love spirituality, it's fundamentally a twisted strategy to gain power. It usually begins early in childhood during the Oedipus complex (omitting other possible scenarios during the transition to the phallic stage); an overly powerful father, a love-hate relationship exaggerated, and you end up with a negative preconception about social and romantic relationships that you obsess over; this is inscribed in the self-concept. The goal of persuading oneself that relationships are bad begins very early and is a unconscious strategy to avoid oedipal temptation, and generally it's a sign of poor superego development; comorbid with other obsessive-compulsive neurotic tendencies. If you want proof to the contrary, abandon the idealistic mirrors and turn to the materialistic ones. Spiritual people are actually the least filled with love.