Schizophonia

I'm not saying the opposite. I just have fun showing when people are in mirrors.

People will have their egos broken because AI will have spoiled their power process. We will have the ability to generate a bot in a few seconds, with why not a voice and an avatar searching, filtering, compiling billions of information available on spirituality to be able to accompany you. Leo Gura's work will be rendered useless in the context of his work, we will be able to generate by AI Leo videos of several hours on any subject; The AI will analyze his persona, his logical schemes, and by playing with all the available information will generate these videos with the same revolutionary ideas, maybe even above (alien consciousness level?) since the AI can directly play with, remix BILLIONS of concepts, arrangement of concepts and logical schemes of any nature (mathematical, physical, linguistic of thousands of languages, pure logic) available to create new ones at your request, automatically it will be the same for the other gurus. This will obviously be the reality shared by all the particularly qualified professions and which therefore tend to an inflation of the ego, like computer science, medicine, teaching, mathematics or physics, these people will be useless, their studies, efforts, will no longer have been of any use in this context. In the longer term, it will even be the athletes who will be replaced, because thanks to the technological singularity, in the longer term to transhumanism, we will have the capacity to regulate in one way or another, our performance in an increasing way; We can already "cheat" with steroids, SARMS, growth hormone, and different drugs to increase motivation and nervous tone; But soon, thanks to new, more optimized drugs, we will have access to direct body modifications (transhumanism), epigeneic and even genes therapies. A millionaire who has never played sports in his life will be able to become more efficient than most athletes today, all without changing anything. Seduction coaches and psychologists will be useless and out of place, brain implants will be able to download into the conscious and unconscious memory logical patterns about the nature of the opposite sex, how to behave in society, and be happier and more efficient in general. Homosexuality and autism can be "cured", or on the contrary according to your ethic. There will come a world, probably within the next fifty years, where you could literally spend your entire life alone; all tasks being done by robots ! But, as I have previously tacitly suggested, this is not just a problem that concerns the world of work. Intimate relationships will evolve according to the following pattern: -First of all, during the trans-humanist stage, there will be an inflation of sexual and even friend competition, people (especially men obviously) with the best nervous system enhancements will beat more normal, non enhanced humans at the seduction game. Every time you have to pick up, or simply have a partner, you will have to fight against enhanced people with a much greater ease to be funny or simply connect with the competitors; you will have to find a way to buy these enhancements. -A deflation: Because most people will now be able to have these improvements, but also and above all "robot" partners who are always funnier, more intelligent, more sexy, and with an unconstitutional love; Humanity itself will become useless and obsolete. -Abandonment: And in the end, it will no longer be humanity as a carnal limitation that will become obsolete, but also its egotistical limitations; Not only thanks to brain improvements will you be able to remove the egotistical injunction to be in a couple, but you will be able to replace it with other forms of pleasure this time autonomous. We will have an application on our phone, connected to our brain, where we can choose to put ourselves in "oxycodone" mode, or "Weed", or "Alcohol" etcetc; The desire for love or to have friends will become totally useless. Work, relationships, intellectualism, maturity in general, all this will become completely useless and we will gradually mutate into another form of alien life derived from the homo sapiens form. First of all, from a global point of view this evolution may not be monolithic and will take the form of a field where each person will be a ramification in their temptation to crystallize their ego by compulsively using new technologies to enrich the self-regenerating feedback loops of the limiting beliefs structuring the ego; Like what is happening today with algorithms but much worse, much faster. So we will have "Homo Sayans" (reference to DBZ ahah) putting their serotonin to zero, their muscles and courage to the maximum and living to fight; We will have in the same logic "Homo Hippinus", "Homo Amourus", "Homo Gurus" etcetc. And in fine, our respective egos will purely and simply be detached from the limits of the human ego (mahasamadhi? from a solipsistic point of view); The said ramifications will be so strong that it will be considered that only humans (Homo sapiens) and the ultra evolved ("Homo Deus") will remain who will either die by deciding to completely forget their human ego (you who mahasamadhi, and the "others" who from your point of view will cause their own death thanks to their superconsciousness, a rationalization like that) or will only remain in this maya in an interminable way. We can imagine gigantic temples in the future where we can land and suddenly basically change maya (switch to Homo Deus) for tens, hundreds, thousands of years or even die suddenly. In a few decades everything will change completely, it will be crazy; the only way out is for your ego to be so resilient that it manifests a third world war or something like that to block the technological singularity.

@RendHeaven Is there a lot of plastic surgery in Japan? Like in Korea.

No, because otherwise he wouldn't have felt like he wasn't receiving. I don't agree at all with the idea that "men like to give", i think it's incomplete. Indeed. Of course he was needy. Men are less needy because being needy (I certainly am myself lol, it's a spectrum) tacitly means that i need the other for my survival. There are men who are not very androgenous who are sincerely needy but most of the time it's social conditioning since men are submissive all their youth for their survival (to their parents, to teachers). It is also instilled that one must have a partner in order to be like everyone else and start a family, which therefore teleports women further into the "necessary for survival" box and therefore pushes them to be needy. The real need of men, where they must be globally needy, is the proof that they have power. It's still an illusion because of the bias of where we look, but from a holistic point of view there is no imbalance. The reason that pushes me to tell Willy-based nonsense and you to accept it is the same. Op and his ex were in a relationship for the same reasons, in mirrors. She gives him the reason why he stays with her "despite not receiving", that is to say not being alone for some reason. There are also limiting beliefs that prevent people from loving, i could go into detail. Usually it is always the confrontation between the atavistic need for pleasure and love, and the ideal of the self. It's time to use your clairvoyance eheh. No that's for his belief here. His belief is more like "my power comes from my ability to struggle" or something like that. Women are more impulsive. Because he needed her. Not for pleasure, but for other more or less unconscious imperatives.

You should have come. I would have brought back croissants and magic mushrooms.

Men seek proof that they have power (receive proof of domination), the phallus as Freud and Lacan would say, and women seek to have a substitute (receive proof of submission). But everyone is looking to receive, or i misunderstood something. It is a mistake to believe that something cannot be given to two people at the same time, because a phenomenon is always polarized. It's about working out how to receive the polarity that triggers a positive affect for us according to gender. When I give a teddy bear to a girl, i lose power (money) but i receive a feeling of suzerainty, vice versa for the girl. Men fall in love with women, but they fall in love with them like a precious stone, a nice car or something like that.

That he and his ex are able to tacitly demonstrate to their family and others in general that they can have a partner, and of course demonstrate it at themselves for some reason; Love (pleasure) was not the basis of the relationship, they did not energetically calibrate themselves for that. For survival reasons, most of the time men are more distant from their emotions and can stay longer in stupid arrangements based on limiting beliefs, which is why it is mainly women who leave and that is what happened here.

What does that means ? Why don't you date a fat, ugly and stupid guy ? Because you want to enjoy his beauty, among other things. What he really means is that he spent a lot of time with her because he needed her as a social demonstration, but as a result he didn't receive that much proof of female love (not enough of everything i listed) since it's not the tacit contract of their couple. However, since it's not natural, it sounds like work, something exhausting, hence the feeling of "not getting enough in return". No, he got what he wanted: A demonstration of his social power. Otherwise he would have said to himself "Oh, damn, I'm not enjoying myself" and would have left her himself.

No, that's not love, that's being colleagues. It's good to be good colleagues lol, but in fine the goal of a relation is to have fun. Lots of cuddles, sex, food, going out etc etc. If she didn't meet these criteria you should have left her yourself and gone elsewhere if you really wanted a girlfriend.

No, it doesn't work like that, pleasure comes from enjoying your partner like an object of satisfaction ; The energy is not fundamentally different from that which hides behind the love of cars or video games; Love is love, libido is libido. In his case they were together because they liked to see themselves as a couple; There is no imbalance it is an illusion. If a woman doesn't actually love you, and isn't going to be particularly nice or sexual, she's just going to respond to her function, to what they're mirroring and the reason for their relationship, again seeing herself as a factor for whatever reason, probably their social conditioning.

No, not at all, you say that because you are insecure and try to use relationships as social proof, so you satisfy the social demonstration that you can have a girlfriend, form a couple etc but it is not love especially since by using a woman as social proof, you are actually trying to masculinize her. Women want to surrender to masculine energy, they want to be vulnerable; not "improve" themselves lol, on the contrary let themselves go: let themselves "dictate life" even to the political ideologies of their man, have cuddles, be fucked, be devout by going to the gym/cooking yourself/doing fitness/sucking yourself, be flirtatious etc. Then everyone is different, but overall it goes in that direction. Women are very powerful mirrors, which easily turn into synchronicity, of your unconscious: Men are surprised to be left because men identify more with their conscious, unless they have worked strongly on their intuition. Obviously you weren't compatible.

I don't understand the topic. You love a girl because she is kind, willing, intelligent, that you share things, that it is nice to make love to her, that she sucks well, that she cooks well etcetc; In all cases you receive, you like what you receive.

I see.

Don't worry about a bit of sugar in kimchi.

This is a state.

The Judeo-Christian influence (I am in relative truth here of course) has pushed into the collective unconscious and in particular into men the archetype of the "marty". There is therefore in fine a pleasure, a feeling of power in embodying "the one who gives but does not receive" or a persona of the kind, but this one is not enough imagination and requires mobilizing a lot of aggressiveness and sexual energy in general to be maintained. The stress of going to talk to a girl in the street is not a fear of being ridiculed or attacked, a girl cannot hurt you like that, it is in fact the fear of betraying this archetype. In nature men do not hesitate to be racist, misogynistic, kill animals to eat them, to be mercilessly pragmatic in general, and even have more sociopathic behaviour like rape (if one is psychopath); An undomesticated man would not hesitate for a single second to intensely flirt with women here and there to satisfy his sexual desires. Shyness, routine, superstition, respect for authority above oneself; All these are modern anomalies.

I can sense that you are afraid of being "second choice".

I want to answer you out of politeness, but the truth is that the only thing i have to answer to the majority of your objections is that it is simply a matter of time before this happens and that the problem you are exposing is obsolete. Even when it comes to the human psyche when you speak of the need for "flesh", i believe that it is, once again, only a matter of time before this dissonance is corrected by the human mind. I'm agree eheh.

Because psilocybin is purely serotoninergic while LSD has a strong affinity for dopaminergic receptors too, even other catecholamines and histamine in a lesser extent ; That mades LSD more stimulant and give it a more "manic" vibe that most of psychedelics. But in its defense it's also probably the more deep long effects psychedelic, the only one who can play in the same category than DMT.

The first time i took 300ug of LSD i imagined i was going to have a typical very egotistical spiritual experience lol. But actually i found myself drooling in my bed GDHGDJD£££3333%%%%%%ing and in my head i was in the bottom of the asshole of the universe, with random visuals of big black hairdresser women holding out her giant foot, harmonica noises, and other insane and basically random experiences. I didn't have that even with 4 HO MET, metocin is also pervet but it's already more orderly and pure. 5 MeO MIpt was the coldest, purest, "yang" experience I've had despite the bodyload to the point of looking like a tomato with cushing's syndrome. I never tried a big dose of psilocybin so i can't say.

What i mean is that LSD is more stimulating; Not only are there more unpleasant side effects (tight jaw, vasoconstriction, walking and acting like a Fallout robot at x3 speed...) but the trips are particularly manic and strange. Lots of aggressive sexual energy with magenta, chrome visuals, and succession of white and black lines. Crazy ideas, completely alien experiences (best point of LSD for me).

That's why i only dropped LSD like at 6am so i could sleep on the evening. Yes but it is limited to vasoconstriction, i never had serotonin syndrome with LSD and btw no one has died with LSD, even with huge overdoses. When I tried a medium/high dose of tramadole once, i had serotonin syndrome and the next day i threw up 6 times in one day.

https://www.euronews.com/culture/2025/01/15/viral-scam-french-woman-duped-by-ai-brad-pitt-love-scheme-faces-cyberbullying "Fraudsters have scammed a French woman out of €830,000 by making her believe she was dating Brad Pitt. The victim has faced an onslaught of online harassment – revealing quite to what extent empathy and human decency is in short supply when it comes to people falling for AI scams. An AI-generated con featuring Brad Pitt is causing quite the stir in France. A French interior designer, known as Anne, was scammed out of €830,000 after she was duped into thinking that she was in a relationship with the Hollywood actor and that he needed money for cancer treatment. The 53-year-old's story was broadcast on the French TV show Sept à Huit on TF1, where she disclosed being scammed by individuals pretending to be Brad Pitt. They used fake social media and artificial intelligence image-creating technology to craft an elaborate and heartbreaking swindle. In the episode, Anne shared how she received a message from someone purporting to be Jane Etta Pitt, the actor’s mother, telling her she was exactly the woman her son needed. " "Soon afterwards, she started to receive messages from what she didn’t know was an AI imitation of Brad Pitt. Anne was going through a divorce with a millionaire entrepreneur at the time, and over the course of a year, her ‘lover’ would send declarations of love and even asked her to marry him. " "Once the link of trust was established, then came requests for money, as the scammer began to send luxury goods to Anne as gifts. However, she was told she had to take care of the customs bill – which for one handbag was reportedly €9,000. When Anne’s daughter warned her mother that she was being conned, she said: “You’ll see when he’s here in person then you’ll say sorry.” Eventually, AI photos were sent showing Brad Pitt in hospital with kidney cancer. He needed money for treatment, with the excuse being that Pitt’s real-life ex-wife Angelina Jolie had frozen his bank accounts. Despite Anne’s doubts, she was reassured by the fake star’s “doctor”, who emailed her explaining Pitt was fighting to survive. It was then that Anne transferred around €800,000 to an account in Turkey. " The photos :

😂 You hope to get rid of me ? At the moment i'm chilling in my hometown, i'm in no rush, next school year i'll see about moving back to my university town, i'll normally be more social.