Schizophonia

It's normal humans are deeply communist and women in particular like contact, being cuddled etc. Modernity does not help people to have healthy relationships and by extension the healthiest social behaviors for themselves and others.

Whatever I can get my hands on I no longer have any dietary restrictions. In the morning a coffee and an ice cream, sometimes a cigar because I still do have big balls. For lunch some kind of meat (It's too expensive but I love lamb, yum) with a salad and a Msemmen with light cheese on top. Coca-Cola or beer in the summer to go with it. For a snack, a large banana (Be careful when eating it tearing off piece per piece, otherwise it's homosexual) with unlimited peanut butter In the evening, meat and vegetable skewers, air fryer fries, and sometimes a glass of wine if I'm with my father.

It's funny in french your pseudo means "the handsome boy"; maybe you are french speaker

Lol this question She is pretty even if she lost some points because of her slightly strange eyes

What I understand is that she thought her ex was meh, found someone else better, rationalized sleeping with him by saying negative things about her ex even though they were objectively true like his drug addiction, couldn't keep the other guy, and so now she's back with her ex to avoid being alone. Something like that. What makes me say this is the sheer amount of information, its opacity/heaviness and the fact that it's spread across two posts as if she wanted to convey an idea while feeling guilty—"like a crab" lol—and the fact that she was ready to go back to her ex after all that. I have no judgment I don't care, I'm just wondering.

I am always being held back by Samsara

@Asia P Are you trying to lowkey tell us that you've found someone better, that he slept with you before dumping you, and so you're now okay with getting back with your ex so you're not alone?

I said I'd probably vote for an immigration party because my ego went down that rabbit hole, and I criticized your interventionist idea yesterday but I'm trying to be as intelligent as possible so I don't attach myself to anything. Don't think i'm particularly right wing.

There are neurotics in all political camps, but instead of criticizing and reflecting on the phenomenon of fetishism most people who see this will validate their own left-wing fetishism. The hallmark of fetishism is hatred, contempt, negative emotions in general instead of compassion.

That would be a shame because she's great. But in the absolute yes It's better to date several girls at once to maximize your chances.

No; does he say something like that ? In our next reincarnation we'll just have to "JIJJIJJJJJ%%%%" together 😏

Not at all I think it's a human thing. In another completely unrelated incarnation there is no more love, sex etc but "ISDGISDIUGSD%%%%HFSDOIHQFDHJLNQI78556867587..." https://www.instagram.com/reel/DW1DWVYFQuq/?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA== No pb

You said we should take money from multinational corporations and give it to the poor who are starving. That's an ethical idea. And i say it's wrong for different reasons You are regularly aggressive and have a big ego.

It's just some kind of limit within infinity.

@LordFall I just went on a date, so I haven't created a Hinge account yet. Since she's interested in philosophy I briefly mentioned Actualized. I made the mistake of saying I was posting here so I hope she isn’t trying to spy on me given all the things I've said here lol.

Yes It's when you give space to a person in their vulnerability, to what is missing

No: you tacitly suggested an ethical principle and I said in return that you would do well to apply it to yourself to begin with if you find it good that much. It's not a question of either becoming libertarians or taking all the money available without any logical considerations. There are stupid things and relevant things to do that don't fall under a manichean dichotomy. Taking a little money from everyone for public services can be relevant, but destroying national savings and giving them to others because they are poor lol makes no sense. It's another problem. What I was responding to was your statement that we have "40 trillion at our disposal"

Glory to Mammon

I don't know your source, but assuming it's true: 1) Once again you want to squander private savings—even destroy these companies' ability to borrow money—and by extension potentially destroy a huge number of often skilled jobs, their R&D, and most of their productive capacity in general. 2)Money is capital it's not linked to the means of production or available social time. Just because there's more liquidity available doesn't magically mean there's more labor and raw materials available; so the moment you start spending that liquidity you'll generate proportional inflation. It's logical even if you add $10 to your wallet it doesn't mean that the equivalent in goods has appeared somewhere in the world, therefore since the quantity of goods is the same but there is more money the goods in question will now cost more. This works to some extent, in the long run, which is why central banks create money to maintain a slightly positive inflation rate. Countries can also implement stimulus plans, but this often creates enormous amounts of debt (it's better to borrow than to print money or, worse, squander savings for the reasons I listed earlier) ans inflation still; the New Deal for example, created so much inflation that it actually reversed a deflationary trend. That's just your opinion. If you're so humanitarian you can delete your Actualized account, sell your computer, and give all the money to poor starving children, lol. Meanwhile even from a humanitarian perspective, thanks to AI as @LordFall said we'll certainly be able to create more abundance of all kinds (consumption, health, etc.) in the long run, for everybody. It's not our prerogative, and intervening could also create problems; like local production collapsing because people prefer to consume foreign aid or things like that. Investments are already a better solution but well to invest you need capital, and to have capital you have to accumulate it, not squander it. Already responded It's true, you could say it's exaggerate, certainly because of lobbying. But unfortunately there are also geostrategic interests at play. The biggest ally and customer of the United States in printed circuit boards for example, is Taiwan, and what maintains Taiwan's independence, and by extension the value of the dollar since the United States buys in dollars, is largely American military deterrence. The same goes for Saudi Arabia with the pretrolium; then Israel, South Korea... Even Europe benefits from the American military, and this pushes Europeans to trade more with the United States and to pay in dollars. At one point, in exchange for the United States' participation in the defense of Ukraine, the United States even tried to negotiate resources in exchange for a treaty between the two countries.

I mean I'm tired of being paranoid about being needy or whatever; it's too complicated It's worse than living under Stalin. I'll try to be authentic no matter what problems it might cause, because you can't really love something you got by cheating anyway. It's easier to amplify one's qualities than to diminish one's flaws; if what i say makes sense.

Not in the sense that there is a nearby paradise stolen by the rich.

It's deeper than that; he takes "pleasure" in watching, raging at, and commenting on videos of women over and over. You can see from his facial expressions that he's on the verge of a psychiatric breakdown.

It's true

It's true that the super-rich protect their class interests and use their power to support ideological agendas they deem important for other reasons.