Schizophonia

Close to him about what ? Why consider Leo as a God ;It is "just" an entrepreneur who became interested in psychedelics and philosophy. he is good where he is good line any human being. I am the result of an entire life to think, to be interested in the politics of my country then psychoanalysis, and lots of trauma directly experienced or transgenerational; My paradigm is very solid and yes I propose point of views to Leo and other. Giving points of view is already what we are all doing here, no one is untouchable. A priori Actualized is not a sect. There is no "must" because i am not a fascist but there are "could" and even "should" because all ways of living life don't worth the same. Living in a barrel and smoking heroine is not worth being an IT engineer and eating vanilla ice cream There is not a remark that is not of a projective nature. So when you say that I project, you are right, but it is a way of delirious that you are superior to me, disguised disdain, to deny that I am also a projection, a mirror of what you are.

Without questioning and challenge, there is no more intellectual progress, and no personal progress at all; since one must see one's energetic structure challenged in order to be moved.

I didn't know he had Hashimoto's, so his chronic fatigue comes from that ? 🤔 My mother has it ioo. Everyone's been talking about this on this thread, but my point wasn't specifically about children; it was witticism, but more about the recognition of archetypes. Right now, I'm trying to change my personality, but as a result, I've started intuitively rejecting and making comments (rather negative ones, even though I'm trying to be polite) about some of my usual mirrors, which project into me what I am (since otherwise they wouldn't be part of my world, automatically, eheh) but no longer want to be. @Carl-Richard Was right in his joke, I will only become what I want to be when there is no longer this conflict.

Nemra projection Projectception

I didn't accuse Leo; it's normal to make assumptions. I said that if Leo makes so many assumptions, sometimes insulting ones, then he should be able to tolerate a thread where I question the reason for his libidinal investment choices. Maybe I shouldn't have said "you're not a man," it's petty, but I intuitively mirrored the pettiness of your message.

This is precisely neurotic reasoning; what you don't see is that 1) There isn't a single action you take that isn't linked to survival, even if it's unconscious. The reason you're on this forum, watching Leo and co.'s videos, is that it's unconsciously a way to gain power, to manage castration anxiety (loss, humiliation, etc.), in accordance with how you were raised by your parents and various early events. 2) You overvalue the intellectual weight of Leo's content. Taking psychedelics and deducing that you're god is very easy. Watching a two-hour video of Leo while cooking and pooping is easy; this spectrum of thoughts, if you can put it that way, doesn't require a particularly developed prefrontal cortex. Marx, Nietzsche, Deleuze, Lacan are intellectual giants, doing their work is already on another level, even Joe Dispenza, lol, to return to the theme of spirituality. My mentor, Franck Lopvet, is at the level of Peter Ralton, maybe even above, if that means anything. And most of these people have children; having a developed prefrontal cortex is different from having children or other ordinary activities. In principle, when we try to distinguish ourselves in this way, it's because we're actually brain rot; a kind of coping. Generally speaking, spirituality is a strategy for gaining power, if you are honest.

And I hope Leo has the shoulders to support a post on a forum, especially when he himself mades way more harsh assumptions about others. You're not a man and you're projecting that onto Leo.

You've been smoking too much on your e-cigarette. I'm just saying that I'm not talking about lineage, maintaining the population, etc; my paradigm is openly egoistical. I also didn't say that having children is the pinnacle, but that it's a very logical investment. I also say this is an illusion; there is no consciousness to evolve. There is a fluid matrix influenced by (one could say mirrored, to become somewhat non-dual again) an egregor, a social body. Leo is not particularly healthy or evolved; spiritual people are far from being more healthy and evolved than average; precisely because they are not (come back non-dual again 🫨) a psychedelic trip, a spiritual work; they are THE WORLD. The only way to "evolve" is to be social, because the implication that I am the world is the only way to give something to oneself, is to give it to other. A Marxist would say that you are the result of your social body; I deeply agree, but this is fundamentally at odds with the idea of the evolution of consciousness, at least the model typically proposed by spiral dynamics. Or even Jungian... If you're loving, you'll normally want children. If you prefer a cat to a child because "it requires less effort," then you're a lazy or cowardly person. But in life, you don't become happy by being lazy or cowardly, whatever the reasons; the end result is less vitality. Even when you are hardworking because you are driven by neurosis, as is often the case with personal development coaches, you will see that the frequency towards which you will slide will be cowardice/physical weakness. You can't love "awakening" or "humanity," it's meaningless. I don't believe it for a single second. Ofc. + Be careful, narcicism and selfishness refer to different phenomena. Eating apple pie is "selfish" but not at all narcissistic; engaging in political actions to show how virtuous you are is very narcissistic, but it is "altruistic." If you see what i mean. No, it doesn't work. It's a fantasy based on hot air.

Make Actualized Great Again

Don't be narcissistic, you're a mammal; you have the needs of ordinary humans, no matter how forgotten/repressed they may have been. I'm not saying to have children to "populate the planet," but to generate love. I've seen many people who have had children speak to me and obviously each scenario is individual but very often it gives real meaning to their lives. And it's not just about having children; it's about having a sensual, vitalist, and enterprising approach to life; having children, having a group of friends, doing business, having a job, making music, riding a jet ski, wandering in nature, feeling the beauty of nature and the present moment in general etc.

Did you really ever see someone who became exceptionnal because of psychedelics ? It's like, like people are neurotics they can't just say "I want to take psychedelics because it's a funny/interesting experience", they have to pretend it's necessary for "conCIOusNEss PersOnAl DevelOpment", that it's "better than therapy" while you have everywhere people who had 30666 trips are are barely different than before, or the differences actually come from experiences/efforts in real life. So you shouldn't make assumptions and suggestions to people who smoke crystal meth, because "Crystal meth smokers are just responding to their desire, you're trying to impose your value system." ? Everyone here makes assumptions about everyone else; politicians, self-help gurus, streamers... That's what I'm doing here, making a hypothesis about Leo Gura (I don't will don't put "I think that" at the beginning of each of my sentences ) They can ignore me yes. No one's going to jump on me for saying that except children lol. When I think about my father and the men his age who are hardworking, tough, who did a tough year of military service in their time in the French army, etccetc.; I would be ashamed to be like that, to be so fragile that you can't stand people politely making assumptions about my energetic structure on a forum. It's funny because on my Discord there's a guy with the same username as you who's a polydrug addict with fetishes. And he's unhappy... You're free to do what you want, yes, but there are ways of living life that will make you happy, because they're in line with our nature, and lifestyles that will make you unhappy. I am an intellectual. When I see the completely shitty, uninteresting level of certain intellectuals, I would even say that I am probably one of the greatest French intellectuals of the modern era ahah. 😏 Everything you say is projective My mentor (Franck Lopvet), who is easily on the same level as Peter Raltson, has about five children. Developed countries are having fewer children because capitalism, combined with the breakdown of the collective, has created a society where it is difficult to have children. The countries that have the most children are those where the social structure allows it, i.e., developing countries with relatively strong families, or more redistributionist countries (France, New Zealand, etc.). It is also possibly easier to get tangled up in one's neuroses when you have more free time; the injunction of survival blunts the recourse to neurotic functioning.

No because when i say "he should", I'm talking about enjoying, satisfying desires. Morality is a form of superstition in the sense that it aims to be an end, and unconsciously, it's actually about the fear of being punished. Desire/Enjoyment on the one hand, castration anxiety on the other.

You didn't offend me

@Alexop Maybe Swedish collective unconscious was adapted to a naturally very masculinizing environment, such as cold and few resources, and now that Sweden is a rich and modern country it must adapt so that individuals can return to more balanced behaviors.

You're not loving, otherwise you'd be serially monogamous like most humans. Because why bother looking elsewhere when you already have someone to whom you can give what you have to give? Obviously, you don't love your boyfriend very much, and vice versa (because otherwise he wouldn't stoop to dating a girl in an open relationship who also explains on a forum how great a guy she met was). Since you're not loving, you encounter mirrors that aren't loving, that is, not very physically present (men tend to be for women the mirroir of their symbolic order).

Eheh; I saw it too. The scenario is a bit random but the realisation and actor game is good, espcially if you see it at the cinema.

Ofc you're right; without going into details if i was less anal i probably would be right now with friends, working etc. It's because i'm still too much neurotic for now that i lose time in a forum or in internet, and so automatically i fall into mirroirs like you or others who bring me back the reason, the energetic game for which i am still here; that is to say I refuse to contemplate, accept how (I think) am small, out en childish narcicism, and so is afraid to be discovered, that which automatically limits my interactions with the outside world. Even if I decide to play the man, the one who adopts the phallic position, when I am with you this position is not objectively true because otherwise it would not appear; I will really be my masculine ideal only when the non-masculine/phallic mirrors (me in denial) stop appearing; because I would naturally be alone or surrounded by phallic men themselves (athletes, workers, honest about themselves and the world). If I'm phallic, then I'll naturally be surrounded by people like me, so the polarity will disappear. If I consciously want to be phallic, but in reality I don't embody it, not to the same extent for whatever reason (insecurities due to trauma and neurotic mechanisms), then I'll end up with people who truly reflect who I am, and my interactions with them will potentially be frustrating for all parties because of the conflict between the software I'm trying to bring and the real energy of the egregor. I give in to this egregor (Actualized), but sometimes because I'm uninhibited, my crazy, ribald psychoanalyst from a rugby player's region of France software , an archetype like that ahah, which is ultimately closer to my deep conditioning, "higher self," will take over, and I'll come into conflict with my usual mirrors here. For example, I recently realized that I probably couldn't be friends with people who are too left-wing or far-left, often LGBT. Not out of malice at all, but precisely because my deep-rooted way of being kind is in conflict with theirs. My first instinct, if I want to be kind, is to make others feel lighter. I like to be low-stress and strong, so I'll naturally want to share that, BUT this involves a process of self-dissolution, acceptance, weakness, etc, which is simply not acceptable for people (mirrors!) who have a strong sense of individuality.

Since you are so developed you could use your large development to react like a normal man, and not like a teenage girl who gets angry and insulting because someone made an assumption about your structure. Because that's what it's about; I've never been rude/mean, it's just hate to be discovered. Once again, as you are a diva, you feel humiliated by my approach and try to humiliate me back with your "tier 2 thinking" business. Well if you are that smart you should be able to understand that if you state something, that this thing is blackpilled, and then you call yourself anti-blackpilled then you are contradicting somewhere; You probably denied blackpill because you felt humiliated by my comment.

I attacked nobody, I just looked at what you wrote and gave an idea what could going on. If you cannot stand even friendly assumptions about your energy structure, then by definition it is impossible for you to develop. I precised you don’t have to take you as an exemple to work on your energy agenda. So much the better You said you said that women can't be happy with an average man, that's a blackpill idea (or redpill idk, whatever) That said, it doesn't mean that you believe in BlackPill most of the time; our structure is fluid with ego backslashs. I trust you. Once again, my game is to delve into people's unconscious; not what they consciously think and say whether it's true or not. I'm not even saying that what I say is true, I'm just giving a point of view that can explain the energy.

Lol what is this question. They would be more pist because you “steal” their potential girlfriends (looksmatchs), I guess.

When you operate in a regressive, sadistic-anal manner, libido becomes confused with aggression. So you'll create frustrating fantasies like "If I get a girlfriend, I'll be frustrated because she can't satisfy/be loving with a beta like me (or other people; the scenario doesn’t have to concern you just trigger agression)" something like that, because you enjoy the aggression it generates. Look at the structure of the fantasy/game; it's not even "He can't get a girlfriend", but "He can get a girlfriend, but won't be able to enjoy it to the fullest because the girl will get cringey from interacting too much with someone at that level" (that's not quite what you said but it's the underlying fear, to put it briefly); my goal here is to maximize aggression. And this comes from a mixture of trauma and the poor developpement of the Oedipus complex which did not allow the imaginary phallus to be castrated, you to enter into the symbolic order. Aggression is enjoyable because the phallus is confused with excrement; there is a game of playing with excrements/dirty things and turning that into a power feeling. But it is a form of mild chronic psychosis; your character of “I am the blackpilled” on x subject does not make you gain power, in the real world. It’s an illusion and a tentative to maintain a regressive psycho-sexual fantasy which ultimately incites and implies castration (poor life).

My dad used champix but he said me it turned him abnormally angry/impulsive lol

He followed me as a "ghost" (only I can see that he is subscribed) but I have never seen him posted.

It feels like most of us have undiagnosed attention deficit disorder and depressive mood (there is a comorbidity between the two); so instead of having a normal life we protect ourselves by locking ourselves in the forum or certain problems; and in the top of the pyramid there is Leo who is kind but also dysthymic; He is not sociable, revolves around neurotic ideas like "the truth" and has even developed chronic fatigue. I want to feel frequencies where I am happier and without attention problems, and I have looked at the thing in all directions I do not see how approaching these frequencies would not lead to disengagement from this forum but also to "personal development" in general. Because there's no longer any need for "personal development" when you no longer have mood problems; you naturally go somewhere. It's like "Looksmaxxing" lol; taking care of yourself is normal for most people, but when you're neurotic, hygiene, dressing well, etc. become something special.