Schizophonia

I am not vegan because i don’t care about animals well being (admitting there is actually a objective world with things that happen outside) just like i don’t care about the Chinese worker who did my iPhone. It’s not a priority in my karma. And i actually have a karma in the opposite sense where veganism seems hard to follow and is linked to neurotic thinking. Technically if you don’t have karma you would end up finish breatharian, and actually if really you don’t have any karma you wouldn’t be « alive » anyway, you would be nothing/everything. What i reproach to some vegans, but even anti-vegans ; everyone pretending being in the « good side » for some reason, is tacitly pretending being not karmic. But there is no « no karmic side »; it’s the illusion of separation, hence mirrors effect, because fundamentally karma is sideless, it’s beyond of that. Everyone who pretend being « the good side » is fundamentally « demonic ».

It’s all me. Everything is perfect.

Maybe I should make a topic about it 🤔 we'll see. People are wondering here and there what is true between "like attracts like" or "opposites attract". Opposites of the same dualities attract each other in such a way that this gives rise to sexual excitement and love.

Separation

Ditto

In fact, this generates a lot of jealousy among most people, even those who are at the forefront of the phenomenon.

I am kind and I have a funny big French accent, ask @Sugarcoat 🐋 You have the advantage of being an native English speaker. All your Jungian enterprise has been for nothing if in the end you still live in shame for fear of losing an argument. And I'm not even here for a "confrontation" in the virile sense of the term if that scares you, more of a "dialectical discussion".

Ok. Maybe i will check his work when i will have more time. Technically it would be possible. It seems logical, but in the same time efforts/entropy are relative phenomenas ? It’s good 👍 If it’s your desire it could ? Yes, like all of us. Especially me take an anxiolytic to fall asleep* Ok It looks like dysthymia. Brain actually physically changes all the time. It’s a curious experience. Yes.

I challenge @Emerald in live debate in august about veganism. Take it or leave it. 🐋

It’s like Markus is not to close technically to conclude to carnivore is the best diet for humans, but he is too afraid for some reason so he copes with a weird and historically nonsensical high fat vegan diet. He believes in God, talks about his manifestations and that kind of thing here and there, but his ego is still stuck on "life is shit you have to make efforts like eating bitter green plants to be healthy". That’s why i put a bit this persona on the side, even if i still appreciate him.

Lol. Don’t know this man, do you particularly recommend his content ? 🤔 It’s counterintuitive from where i see, because after all humans self must have been construct. Or god, samsara’s wheel, has to continually go toward lesser dense forms or ego. (Like you can become a « human » from a denser form of ego in the pas « incarnation » but will never come back to humanity after going to another form even less dense. Like it’s an necessity in the absolute for some reason. If you see what i mean It’s the part i don’t acknowledge well lol By reinforcing the group of neurons that are responsible, via medication and neuroplasticity. Dont know if it’s better than « totally dissolving the self », am i lost at this point. Every hard stimulation i guess. Starts sending pictures of his psychedelic stash as bait on WhatsApp* 👺 Jk I see, i would have intuitively thought it was the case. Classic psychedelics changes the form of the ego but actually it tends to increase it too. 5 MeO is really special.

At this point everyone is evil.

Sadghuru is just a famous yogi on YouTube who likes lames jokes and doing motocross. Why do you resent him?

24h something like that

No it’s logical. 🤔 You stupidly defend Peterson because it's about paranoid egotistical issues; you're afraid to admit he's wrong, but you see it. And obviously because of the mirror effect this is projected onto others Why don't you give a damn about Jehovah's Witnesses? Whether you're for or against them? Because you're authentically for or against them, there are no paranoid affects involved that will be projected.

It’s especially that if we must stop everything that have a significant environmental impact we will return to in the pre-industrial age… I don’t see how anything else that science and geo ingenuity wil realistically reverse climate change.

I see eheh. I just prefer something softer/sweater

Nowadays i only eat what i like.

Moral is purely subjective. Objectivity in general is an illusion.

You’re agressive because you know deep down it’s true.

https://politiscales.fr/

Dimensions, the constituent limits of experience, present themselves as a hierarchy (Ken Wilber would call it a holarchy, to be more precise) in a fractal model. 3D is a dimensional structure made up of three smaller dimensions (depth, width, length). "Vision" is a structure containing both "3D" and, for example, the "color" dimension, which in turn contains the "Red" or "Green" dimensions; It is not possible for the human mind to be directly intuitively aware of this, but we know theoretically and experimentally that most colors are in fact combinatorial subdimensions of "primary" colors (red, yellow, and blue). The human being is a knot, a configuration compulsively maintained for some reason, of consciousness and experience (I'm creating a divide between consciousness and experience here, I'll come back to this) of a certain limited field of holons/dimensions; beyond a certain threshold, in the infinitely large or small, these dimensions are no longer perceptible. To return to the example of 3D, the human mind cannot become aware of 4D or 5D, nor can it become aware of the lower dimensions of the "depth" dimension; Just as we are not aware of dimensions that are simply too deranged from our ego, far away in the divine imagination (the dimension "Byugdzugdza%%%%"777555..."). Consciousness, awareness, is the experience of the "discrimination" of an experienceable dimension, that is, its differentiation from other dimensions ("red" is not "depth"). I have the "direct" experience of the taste of an apple -> experience. I experience the "concept," the "language," the delimitation of the "taste of the apple" by dimensions external to the taste of the apple, by what is not the apple (the phrase, the concept "taste of the apple" is of a completely different nature from the experience of the taste of the apple) -> consciousness. Therefore, there is a systematic opposition between the experience of a dimension, and its conscious awareness. The more I experience something (the taste of an apple), the more my attention actually moves away from the barriers that allow me to delimit the experience, that is, the other dimensions; and vice versa. Of course, for something as simple as this, I can actually eat an apple and at the same time say to myself "that's the taste of an apple"; consciously realize it, but in doing so, my attention, and therefore my ego, technically shifts to two opposite places. And it's the same thing downstream! When I experience eating an apple, I become conscious; the taste of sugar, acidity, etc., are technically also a conscious language about what's happening in the sub-dimensions that make up the "sugar" or acid dimension. This process of conscious awareness, of discrimination, is called duality. In this sense, we could say that all experiences consciously acquainted with the human mind are sub-dimensions of the "dual" dimension; that is, they have the particularity of being distinguishable by their non-presence. They are "directly" experienced (1), or experienced and consciously acquainted with their non-presence; that is, by the presence of what they are not (0). Lacan said that language, that representation, functions like a "hole.", the "hole of representation" What is an American flag? It is both an experience, a dimension experienced in itself (a fabric, colors) (1), but also a symbol, a limit that consciousizes something, a dimension, an experiment that is not here (0) (the American people, values, etc.). I experience, with my attention, the American people, whatever that may mean, since of course, as soon as one symbolizes a dimension, as soon as one "signifies," one is no longer in its experience but in awareness, awareness through the experience of what is not the experience one is making aware of -> 1 I make aware of what the American people are -> 0; I am no longer experiencing the American people, but in what symbolizes them, what I use to "delimit," that is, what they are not (experience of the flag). How is it linked to mirror Effect: The split between experience (inner quadrants, as Ken Wilber would say) and awareness (outer quadrants), this principle of duality, has a radical implication on how humans identify: The way a person becomes aware of themselves and others is ultimately the "inverse" of their experience. Let's take the example of a person who sees stupid people everywhere (maybe you? lol); with enough contemplation, honesty, and humor, you'll realize that this person who tacitly suggests they're smarter than average is actually stupider. Why this "paradox"? Because if I were intelligent, I would naturally come to experience being intelligent; I would read a lot of books, watch documentaries, have intelligent and qualified colleagues and friends, etc. But if I experience being intelligent, and experience opposes conceptualization, how could I come to regularly realize that I'm intelligent? Even a neuroscience researcher, when they're engaged in their neuroscience stuff, will see themselves, realize that they're "not smart enough" in the face of the difficulties of their problems, precisely because they're experiencing a particularly intelligent experience. It's only when he descends from an intelligence experience, when he sees an old friend with a more moderate intelligence, that he will actually be able to realize that he is "intelligent." Our level of intelligence can only be measured in comparison with that of others, so if I want to realize (want to be) intelligent, I must actually maximize the level of stupidity I perceive (experiment) in the world; but I am my world, I am the world to which I lower myself through narcissism. If, rather than studying to become a nuclear engineer, I prefer to watch stupid videos on TikTok of political opponents to comment on how stupid they are, I may conceive of myself as more intelligent at that moment because that's my goal; but "objectively," I'm no longer a nuclear engineer, but a guy who makes nasty comments on TikTok; I'm no longer an experience of intelligence. Awareness of a dimension is NOT experimenting the dimension. When I become aware of something, I want it, but I am not it; this is the big difference between wanting and being in Neville Goddard, Walter C. Lanyon, other Christian Science thinkers, and non-dual thinkers of the Far East. From a materialist point of view, to return a little to the illusion; we could also explain it this way: It is not possible to experience something, to make it conscious, that is, to put words to it to say it quickly, and to express it outside the capabilities of your central nervous system. How do you know what the color "red" is? Because you have a field of neurons that allows you to experience it; YOUR neurons. How do you know and recognize aggression? Because it's inside you! How do you recognize the stupidity of others? Because it's yours! Why are you ultimately surrounded by all these idiots rather than intelligent people "like you"? Because you are ultimately at least a little bit of an idiot like them, and pigeons don't fly with eagles. If I want to be smarter, I don't seek to be smarter, because that would mean saying, affirming, or experiencing not being; I AM smarter, I know it; it's at the center of the universe, it's my experience, and therefore there is no awareness. Therefore, everything you say about others, without exception, is a projection of what you really "objectively" are, what the experience of being you is. "Others are bad" -> You are bad. "Others are putting obstacles in my way" -> You let your malice, anger, or other emotions negatively influence your relationships out of pride or misplaced narcissism. "Society is corrupt" -> You are corrupt. "Society is fatphobic" -> You are mean to yourself even when it comes to your weight. "Men are perverts" -> You are desperate to be loved and think about getting together with him as soon as you meet a nice man. "Women are hypergamous and moody" -> You are desperate and insecure and want to be treated like a god as a result. "Right-wing men are misogynistic" -> Almost all of the sex scandals that have occurred in French politics have been perpetrated by left-wing or far-left figures. "Left-wingers are lax" -> Right-wing figures in France are known for embezzlement, and many have electronic collars for it. I could give thousands of examples; it's absolutely systematic. You are what you project; you are the experience, the wave, the impulse, but believe yourself to be only what comes back to you (the maya, the language); to be in the meaning, not just you as a vehicle/avatar, but the nature of others and of the universe in general as well. This is the illusion of duality applied to interpersonal relationships; it's the mirror effect.

But I could make mistakes on purpose so that people think it's me.

@Hojo Thank you. By talking about "castration fear, i will maybe create another topic about this to actualize my views. It will be simpler that this topic.

gnegne. Put it in google translate. Then you do what you want, just wanted to share.