Schizophonia

You are a mtf isn’t it ? lol. I will think about you.

24h something like that

No it’s logical. 🤔 You stupidly defend Peterson because it's about paranoid egotistical issues; you're afraid to admit he's wrong, but you see it. And obviously because of the mirror effect this is projected onto others Why don't you give a damn about Jehovah's Witnesses? Whether you're for or against them? Because you're authentically for or against them, there are no paranoid affects involved that will be projected.

It’s especially that if we must stop everything that have a significant environmental impact we will return to in the pre-industrial age… I don’t see how anything else that science and geo ingenuity wil realistically reverse climate change.

I see eheh. I just prefer something softer/sweater

Nowadays i only eat what i like.

Moral is purely subjective. Objectivity in general is an illusion.

You’re agressive because you know deep down it’s true.

https://politiscales.fr/

Dimensions, the constituent limits of experience, present themselves as a hierarchy (Ken Wilber would call it a holarchy, to be more precise) in a fractal model. 3D is a dimensional structure made up of three smaller dimensions (depth, width, length). "Vision" is a structure containing both "3D" and, for example, the "color" dimension, which in turn contains the "Red" or "Green" dimensions; It is not possible for the human mind to be directly intuitively aware of this, but we know theoretically and experimentally that most colors are in fact combinatorial subdimensions of "primary" colors (red, yellow, and blue). The human being is a knot, a configuration compulsively maintained for some reason, of consciousness and experience (I'm creating a divide between consciousness and experience here, I'll come back to this) of a certain limited field of holons/dimensions; beyond a certain threshold, in the infinitely large or small, these dimensions are no longer perceptible. To return to the example of 3D, the human mind cannot become aware of 4D or 5D, nor can it become aware of the lower dimensions of the "depth" dimension; Just as we are not aware of dimensions that are simply too deranged from our ego, far away in the divine imagination (the dimension "Byugdzugdza%%%%"777555..."). Consciousness, awareness, is the experience of the "discrimination" of an experienceable dimension, that is, its differentiation from other dimensions ("red" is not "depth"). I have the "direct" experience of the taste of an apple -> experience. I experience the "concept," the "language," the delimitation of the "taste of the apple" by dimensions external to the taste of the apple, by what is not the apple (the phrase, the concept "taste of the apple" is of a completely different nature from the experience of the taste of the apple) -> consciousness. Therefore, there is a systematic opposition between the experience of a dimension, and its conscious awareness. The more I experience something (the taste of an apple), the more my attention actually moves away from the barriers that allow me to delimit the experience, that is, the other dimensions; and vice versa. Of course, for something as simple as this, I can actually eat an apple and at the same time say to myself "that's the taste of an apple"; consciously realize it, but in doing so, my attention, and therefore my ego, technically shifts to two opposite places. And it's the same thing downstream! When I experience eating an apple, I become conscious; the taste of sugar, acidity, etc., are technically also a conscious language about what's happening in the sub-dimensions that make up the "sugar" or acid dimension. This process of conscious awareness, of discrimination, is called duality. In this sense, we could say that all experiences consciously acquainted with the human mind are sub-dimensions of the "dual" dimension; that is, they have the particularity of being distinguishable by their non-presence. They are "directly" experienced (1), or experienced and consciously acquainted with their non-presence; that is, by the presence of what they are not (0). Lacan said that language, that representation, functions like a "hole.", the "hole of representation" What is an American flag? It is both an experience, a dimension experienced in itself (a fabric, colors) (1), but also a symbol, a limit that consciousizes something, a dimension, an experiment that is not here (0) (the American people, values, etc.). I experience, with my attention, the American people, whatever that may mean, since of course, as soon as one symbolizes a dimension, as soon as one "signifies," one is no longer in its experience but in awareness, awareness through the experience of what is not the experience one is making aware of -> 1 I make aware of what the American people are -> 0; I am no longer experiencing the American people, but in what symbolizes them, what I use to "delimit," that is, what they are not (experience of the flag). How is it linked to mirror Effect: The split between experience (inner quadrants, as Ken Wilber would say) and awareness (outer quadrants), this principle of duality, has a radical implication on how humans identify: The way a person becomes aware of themselves and others is ultimately the "inverse" of their experience. Let's take the example of a person who sees stupid people everywhere (maybe you? lol); with enough contemplation, honesty, and humor, you'll realize that this person who tacitly suggests they're smarter than average is actually stupider. Why this "paradox"? Because if I were intelligent, I would naturally come to experience being intelligent; I would read a lot of books, watch documentaries, have intelligent and qualified colleagues and friends, etc. But if I experience being intelligent, and experience opposes conceptualization, how could I come to regularly realize that I'm intelligent? Even a neuroscience researcher, when they're engaged in their neuroscience stuff, will see themselves, realize that they're "not smart enough" in the face of the difficulties of their problems, precisely because they're experiencing a particularly intelligent experience. It's only when he descends from an intelligence experience, when he sees an old friend with a more moderate intelligence, that he will actually be able to realize that he is "intelligent." Our level of intelligence can only be measured in comparison with that of others, so if I want to realize (want to be) intelligent, I must actually maximize the level of stupidity I perceive (experiment) in the world; but I am my world, I am the world to which I lower myself through narcissism. If, rather than studying to become a nuclear engineer, I prefer to watch stupid videos on TikTok of political opponents to comment on how stupid they are, I may conceive of myself as more intelligent at that moment because that's my goal; but "objectively," I'm no longer a nuclear engineer, but a guy who makes nasty comments on TikTok; I'm no longer an experience of intelligence. Awareness of a dimension is NOT experimenting the dimension. When I become aware of something, I want it, but I am not it; this is the big difference between wanting and being in Neville Goddard, Walter C. Lanyon, other Christian Science thinkers, and non-dual thinkers of the Far East. From a materialist point of view, to return a little to the illusion; we could also explain it this way: It is not possible to experience something, to make it conscious, that is, to put words to it to say it quickly, and to express it outside the capabilities of your central nervous system. How do you know what the color "red" is? Because you have a field of neurons that allows you to experience it; YOUR neurons. How do you know and recognize aggression? Because it's inside you! How do you recognize the stupidity of others? Because it's yours! Why are you ultimately surrounded by all these idiots rather than intelligent people "like you"? Because you are ultimately at least a little bit of an idiot like them, and pigeons don't fly with eagles. If I want to be smarter, I don't seek to be smarter, because that would mean saying, affirming, or experiencing not being; I AM smarter, I know it; it's at the center of the universe, it's my experience, and therefore there is no awareness. Therefore, everything you say about others, without exception, is a projection of what you really "objectively" are, what the experience of being you is. "Others are bad" -> You are bad. "Others are putting obstacles in my way" -> You let your malice, anger, or other emotions negatively influence your relationships out of pride or misplaced narcissism. "Society is corrupt" -> You are corrupt. "Society is fatphobic" -> You are mean to yourself even when it comes to your weight. "Men are perverts" -> You are desperate to be loved and think about getting together with him as soon as you meet a nice man. "Women are hypergamous and moody" -> You are desperate and insecure and want to be treated like a god as a result. "Right-wing men are misogynistic" -> Almost all of the sex scandals that have occurred in French politics have been perpetrated by left-wing or far-left figures. "Left-wingers are lax" -> Right-wing figures in France are known for embezzlement, and many have electronic collars for it. I could give thousands of examples; it's absolutely systematic. You are what you project; you are the experience, the wave, the impulse, but believe yourself to be only what comes back to you (the maya, the language); to be in the meaning, not just you as a vehicle/avatar, but the nature of others and of the universe in general as well. This is the illusion of duality applied to interpersonal relationships; it's the mirror effect.

But I could make mistakes on purpose so that people think it's me.

@Hojo Thank you. By talking about "castration fear, i will maybe create another topic about this to actualize my views. It will be simpler that this topic.

gnegne. Put it in google translate. Then you do what you want, just wanted to share.

@Sugarcoat https://www.reddit.com/r/Nootropics/comments/11yc5gl/nsi189_report/

No by me.

When i do big posts like this one yes i generally first of all write it in french then i translate it with google traduction; I have a high level of vocabulary in french that i dont have in english so it's simpler like that. I just check the eventual errors in the post before posting it.

Those are my words, I don't know why you say that lol. Maybe because I usually write directly in English, whereas here I wrote this first in French. But not even that, actually.

If it comes from shadow.

lol.

Cool excerpt. By Transcendental Ego it basically means higher self isn't it ?

Half an hour is little. You have a good coffee and a few cigarettes (for me 👺), you take your time, you let yourself go with the flow of writing, you correct/change when you find a better way to say what you want to say in a certain place... And two hours later, you can show off on Actualized with your new topic.

Yes you changed your neuroendocrinology with awareness. If you have been in one direction then you can also go in the other. I'm not grounded enough to grasp all this and make viable recommendations, but you should be able to pay for online consultations with some typically neo-Avaida thinkers who could relate more, or simply email. Neuroleptics also tend to lead to self-dissolution and, by extension, loss of libido, etc, hence the anxiolytic properties. Even antidepressants, in fact. It's more likely a crazy person like me who sleeps poorly who should be taking this combination of medications lol. If I were you, I'd just stop taking this stuff and do a cure of an antidepressant nootropic that increases neuroplasticity, like Semax or NSI 189. The neurological property most correlated with depression/dysthymia syndrome is neuroplasticity/neurotrophins. NSI 189 is apparently comparable to an intensification of emotions and a return to a more childlike state. But it's juste my opinion

Sometimes i want to propose something simple, and sometime something in a more complexe or detailed form; Just like food lol. It's a matter of taste 🤔 I think this kind of detailed form has the advantage to offer more exemples, pov to cling to understand the proposed mecanisms for people who are too strangers to the topic discussed.

No it will happen🙂

Lol. Completely dumb.