Schizophonia

This concept seems as shaky as “anarcho-socialist”. Afterwards why not, but it is generally not in this context that people invoke the notion of morality. ?‍♂️ agree I won't kill her, because it wouldn't be worth it to risk getting caught for just 50 euros. Yes, but something done thoughtfully is not necessarily moral. Otherwise premeditated murder would be “moral”. And what is the importance of acting punctually or not? A thoughtless/one-off act may or may not produce good results, the same goes for a thoughtful act. Btw, killing an animal isn't really one-off/"instinctive", it takes time and preparation. If you give me money and I'm sure no one will ever know, yes I do. There is no reason not to do it except if they are friends, in this case I want to keep their presence. So what ? It's true that average humans, especially modern humans, have a certain level of empathy, and some have a lot of it. But it seems to me that that's not really what we mean by "moral" because it's just biology. Is killing if you are a psychopath moral? It's like being a carnivorous animal somewhere, isn't it? It is just a system invented by Kant, based on a theological paradigm. I am not a Christian. The social contract is pragmatic, it's not really about morality in the universal sense, as we can understand it. Money Why do something you won't benefit from? It's as if it didn't exist. That's all there is. Whatever ? What do I gain from it, if not the (still egotic) gratification "oh, I do good, I'm the good side, blablabla" ? If that's so, not interested in "regressive anal sadist" rewards. ? No, it's very simple and rational. No You think what you want, of course ? I don't see any place where I have been "intellectually dishonest"

Someone in my family worked with people with Down syndrome (or at least retarded people, I don't know) and apparently they were a bit like that, lol. There are also these bonobo monkeys who have sex to say hello.

Yes. I have no "values", I only follow my interests. No, you can act thoughtfully (not instinctively) without being aligned with any moral value system. Otherwise it would mean that a serial killer who acts with premeditation is a very moral person, which makes no sense. Ditto No, semantics have nothing to do with the moral question, whether or not you agree with me on what is rational or not. No, I said it's rational to continue eating meat if it's in your interest or you don't care, it's also rational not to if it makes you disturbs (so it is not in your interest). But it's a question of mirror neurons, not "morale".

It's a catch 22, it totally fixes my insomnia but makes me stupid. Next experiment: H1 antihistamine with very short half-life, like benadryl.

No actually, is it a manual that can be found at Fnac? lol. It is about limiting one's possible field of action according to arbitrary laws, and in a "disinterested" manner (in a theological paradigm, not fishing in the hope of going to paradise is intelligent, pragmatic, but it is no longer a question of being "moral"). In other words, obey without flinching the law of a system that has been put in your head even though you do not believe in any form of punishment. There is absolutely no reason to deprive yourself of killing an animal to eat it (among other things, but here the subject is veganism) if you do not believe in divine punishment. Deprive yourself of killing an animal by removing the notions of "moral", "ethics", "justification" or "excuse" when you are an atheist and/or are not convinced of any kind of punishment is the stupidest/irrational thing you can do. I've already said it 50 times but no one can answer me, at least without the response being a quick ad hominem, or simply drowning the point by paraphrasing what has already been said by multiplying useless concepts and providing an answer. more complicated/boring. Of course there is no possible reason, because I am only explaining very simple and tangible observations and resonances.

You got screwed for being too lazy to work and hoping to find a magic potion. Cheat codes only work on GTA, eh.

Ethics and morality do not exist, they are irrational aberrations. There is no reason to want "a fairer world" or "to be more empathetic", it doesn't even work anywhere except to protect your ego with magical thinking. Everything you do by distilling these irrational ideas is in fact maximizing the possibilities for a very rational and cynical elite, even psychopathic/sociopathic. The Marxist-Leninists understood this perfectly and this is largely why they criticized the principle of human rights, maintaining bourgeois power by keeping the people in the illusion that these arbitrary laws are somehow "universal" . But you are weak modern Westerners incapable of killing and gutting an animal to eat it, the paradigm of the unjust jungle as ultimate reality scares you too much so you embrace a world of illusion ideal for your ego, even if it means becoming manipulable. The height of mental slavery is when you're willing to let yourself die so you don't have to kill an animal to eat it if that's your only option (or even argue about it like it's not obvious) as I have already heard many times, sometimes even from fairly well-known vegan YouTubers (notably Vegan gains and That Vegans Teacher, as I remember) These people should get a Darwin award, lol.

Lmao, ok. And you are a humble person, full of common sense and emotional maturity, just like the member of this Olympic-level asshole enclave. of r/Vegan rddit.

And me, I want a 100 kilo elephant seal, stupid and ugly, aggressive, ignorant, and who farts/burps all day long.

Toulouse, therefore algerian, obviously. In Rome we do like the Romans.

Bla-bla-bla bla-bla

I don't want a car even if you give me one, I prefer to live in a studio than in a villa, my favorite activity is walking and sex. I would have to write an entire essay to explain it.

lmao

Love is a pleasant feeling, it has nothing to do with the notion of morality. In fact it's selfish...but anyway, if you dig into why people go into "moral" delusions, you'll find that it's also selfish, everything is selfish in a more or less conscious and sophisticated way. He is more or less empathetic. He felt the hurt he may have made another person feel, did not appreciate it and made clear his desire not to do it again. He can himself disguise the underlying mechanics as much as he wants with his "towards the suffering of all other sentient beings", the truth is that his main and only tangible motivation is basically his mirror neurons and nothing more.

Peterson doesn't really seem like a "monster" to me, in fact he seems rather sensitive. Same for Tate, he is a good fighter and sportsman but otherwise he is a materialistic slave. I imagine guys who are easily influenced or simply very stupid coming to talk to me like some sort of absolute weirdo after having seen too many personal development videos.

Either it's a nocebo effect (or something that comes from another food but which you attribute to cheese) or it's an intolerance, probably to casein. Dairy products from Jersey cows for example are much less immunogenic, but if you are sensitive it is best to simply remove dairy products or at least those from cows. Goat's milk is on average about 10 times less immunogenic than cow's milk, from what i remember.

The same thing happened to me two years ago in Strasbourg, two strangely "sweet" guys who were in fact proselytizing for an evangelist church.

@Sincerity You're not nice.

I am also distant, but because I am very afraid of being “ineffective”.

What are your mothers' connections? Why do you compare “be nice” and “walk on egg” ?

I see. But I like to change.

Me either. Yet I looked everywhere, I don't know how to find ethics. And did you find it? ?

which ? I had several profile pics ?

Morality does not exist, it does not come from anything tangible and you can only submit to a system out of fear of punishment, supperstition... Having such a bias prevents you from seeing things from an “energetic” perspective.