Schizophonia

lol yes mea culpa

Accepting assuming a dual and relative incarnation is what Lacan called symbolic castration. Masculine energy stems from the phallic position, that is, the disidentification, the projection, of this so-called castration. For example, if I'm hungry, the feminine reaction (which is also partially present in men; we're always a spectrum) will be to complain, to symbolize the problem, the lack/castration. The masculine reaction (that women have too so) will be to squint and on the contrary to tend to desymbolize hunger; this can be through dissociation like a Buddhist monk, or conversely, through struggle like stealing from people lol or simply by working. The subject of castration is intimate and can take an infinite number of forms, of energy; and therefore there is a potentially infinite number of corresponding phalluses. For example: Your perspective on life (castration) is "I am humiliated, I am nothing in the face of life"; embracing this, loving this so it tends to not be a problem ans so not be symbolized, conscious, will attract women who experience (consciously or unconsciously) this castration. Something, a holon, appears and proposes a problem X : -I become conscious the world is X and I am subject to it; I shift my attention to it, I densify it = feminin position. -I repress the problem of X into the unconscious by attempting to symbolize non-X aka no problem aka Y (to use the chromosome analogy) - In the same way that to see the left I must render the experience of the right unconscious, that to experience cold I must render heat unconscious etc; like any dual experience - = masculin position. The more you intensified this masculine position, the more you will attract women (regardless of interfering third-party beliefs like "I'm ugly," etc.) who share the same subject but will therefore be able to transfer it, to transfer the anxiety onto you so she can in turn suspends awareness of the problem. This is why women might express a desire for someone vulnerable, which seems paradoxical at first glance; it's not that they want someone weak, it's that they want someone who demonstrates the ability to accept their lack, their castration, probably because he is strong enough to bear the consequences Another example: "I'm shy." A shy girl who is self-conscious will appreciate someone who is shy but accepts it, who will bear the social consequences and accept their preference. "In life, you have to work hard." A girl who is conscious of this idea will like someone tough, in a rolled-up white shirt, who votes right-wing (lol) who owns it. Oppression, authenticity, gluttony, sensitivity, fear—It works for any subject.

Yea he looked more natural

Caribbean cuisine is very good.

You mean "normal" sosage with meat ? I don't understand the question. Oh yes so that makes sense. These sausages/blood puding with added spice/pepper are called West Indian black puddings. ("boudin antillais").

In France, we have sausages made with pig's blood that we usually eat with mashed potatoes, it must be popular in other countries. It's excellent with aligot (a type of mashed potato with cheese).

Romantic love is a very explicit form of love; no one says "I love being hateful" lol even if it's factually true, but people admit to liking romantic love. From an infinite perspective, romantic love is love like any other feeling; there is no one more or less closer to infinity.

I was going to say "Sugarcoat and his swedish friends love that" reading this post

?

That's what I thought too, but generally if what comes back to you is aggression it's because the underlying intention stems from aggression. That's what emerges from the topic is something like I don't have the right to love (in the holistic/metaphysical sense, not just a specific form) because life is difficult and "it's not the time". But it doesn't work because humans are deeply communist; so when one isolates themselves they generally end up weakening, to become low on energy, develop obsessive-compulsive behaviors, and generally become physically weak. This is something you can observe in yourself and other people; including and especially personal development influencers. What could have happen is that if you were in contact with very aggressive people at an early age (often one parent, the father, classmates...), because of your karma (and their) in general, you could have to protect yourself adopted a dissociated/stoic persona, a split personality, to suffer less from the emotional sphere. And since everything is polarized, you cling to the positive polarity: "I'm the one who tells the truth, who's blackpilled, blablabla." Except that it is indeed a response to repressed aggression - to be supposedly consciously stoic I must unconsciously be very emotional - so as in reality one does not go without the other, when you believe you are helping someone you are also transferring to them the unconscious part, that is to say your aggression your fears etc; like a troy horse. You said you went to a club to look for girls; but if you're inherently quite sensitive/kind and perhaps neurotic because of certain experiences, this will only make you more bitter because the girls who might be interested in that kind of thing don't go to clubs, or hardly ever; They're not on social media either or almost. Regressive approaches (like the orange stage when one is open to the high above) have the unconscious aim of suppressing pain. This reinforces the neurotic vision, but avoids the original rupture. There's not really an how it's an illusion; if one lets go of its authenticity, their will naturally go to the corresponding place, with the corresponding people (and money, everything else).

@AION Imagine Heroin

I am more intelligent than everyone else. Me me me

I was trolling you but yea I'd say there's not much point in worrying about it.

You must be a great genius

When you go to a museum, do you feel like dropping your pants and caressing your genitals on the paintings

It's a believe system that you project

You saw my post and thought "There's too much joy of living I have to balance with my diet and my monochrome pp"

Do you know Markus Rothkranz

It's normal humans are deeply communist and women in particular like contact, being cuddled etc. Modernity does not help people to have healthy relationships and by extension the healthiest social behaviors for themselves and others.

Whatever I can get my hands on I no longer have any dietary restrictions. In the morning a coffee and an ice cream, sometimes a cigar because I still do have big balls. For lunch some kind of meat (It's too expensive but I love lamb, yum) with a salad and a Msemmen with light cheese on top. Coca-Cola or beer in the summer to go with it. For a snack, a large banana (Be careful when eating it tearing off piece per piece, otherwise it's homosexual) with unlimited peanut butter In the evening, meat and vegetable skewers, air fryer fries, and sometimes a glass of wine if I'm with my father.

It's funny in french your pseudo means "the handsome boy"; maybe you are french speaker

Lol this question She is pretty even if she lost some points because of her slightly strange eyes

What I understand is that she thought her ex was meh, found someone else better, rationalized sleeping with him by saying negative things about her ex even though they were objectively true like his drug addiction, couldn't keep the other guy, and so now she's back with her ex to avoid being alone. Something like that. What makes me say this is the sheer amount of information, its opacity/heaviness and the fact that it's spread across two posts as if she wanted to convey an idea while feeling guilty—"like a crab" lol—and the fact that she was ready to go back to her ex after all that. I have no judgment I don't care, I'm just wondering.

I am always being held back by Samsara

@Asia P Are you trying to lowkey tell us that you've found someone better, that he slept with you before dumping you, and so you're now okay with getting back with your ex so you're not alone?