Schizophonia

Yes it’s not smart to take your opponents for fools and/or to caricature their arguments.

I scoffed at the arrogance. There are definitely more left-wing intellectuals than right-wing ones, and perhaps they have on average a slightly higher IQ. The danger lies in the problem of language; the intensification of the symbolic order distances you from the real and makes you potentially fuckeable; manipulable, potentially self-destructive. By ladling out signifiers (objects, linguistic elements...), I can manipulate your instincts for social integration and power in general to impose a political delirium upon you, just as I could a nutritional or sports-related/bigorexic delirium; essentially any delirium that is ultimately contrary to your interests.

I was dismissive but what I meant was that if you are awake, if you know there is no separation, it makes no sense to complain about "others" or to judge them. Yes I am projecting onto you; I am talking to myself, it's all we do in the absolute.

No you lie you are not awakened. It doesn't make sense to say "I am awake" and then immediately say "I am annoyed because people have X problem. It's like saying "I am a breatharian, I awakened to prana as my only source of nourishment," just before taking a big bite of a slice of Emmental cheese.

No it's a myth, it's actually the opposite. Cold make you crave heat, sport makes you crave rest, and lack of controll make you crave controll it's logical. A man who is already very controlling ultimately won't want to go back to that; he’ll want the opposite. People who like being dominated are chaotic people; trapped in a feminin/hysterical subjectivity. "Controll" is a trategy to eleminate castration anxiety (if you do what is supposed to do, if you submite to the symbolic order as Lacan would say, their is no reason to be castrated, fail) and so get closer to phallic position; and in a such position what will be projected (libido = projection) will be submission of someone (to you). That's why masculin neurosis is said "obsessive". @Emerald said somewhere people here says she is masculin; i's because instead of surrendering to the phallus (the "external") to assuage castration anxiety, she seeks directly to inhibit it through a cold writing style, her veganism, etc. That doesn't make her a lesbian though lol; obsessional neurosis is not phallic. Intuitively everyone knows that a rigid vegan man (i dont talk about emerald anymore here) is not particularly virilesince the neurotic mechanism is fundamentally rooted in excessive castration anxiety, yet it nonetheless "covers" that anxiety. Aggression can be viewed as a form of domination, but behind this is precisely the feeling of being castrated. I'm agresive because i feel castrated by someone else/something it's logical, and the more you feel castrated in the everyday life the more the phallus is projected. An estrogen-rich woman be aggressive yet simultaneously desire submission in order to regain the sensation of possessing the phallus. A very calm, hearty-eating man might appear placid perhaps overly nice yet have no reason to seek power elsewhere; consequently what gets projected is the lack of a phallus, and he will want to "insert" it. Libido is a game of reaffirming your symbolic position, positions in other's desire; it's a conditionning. Fundamentally the masculine position is "perverse"; it is a matter of denying castration. That’s why dangerous activities are intuitively associated with men, and why paying too much attention to one’s health or whatever elsei s often seen as "gay". Smoking cigars, drinking moonshine, driving monster trucks, and cracking crude redneck-style jokes = Masculin position, tend to be perverse. Wearing white shirts with the sleeves rolled up, drinking vegan soup "because I read some studies," using the word "problematic," voting Democrat (or even goofy ideas held by right-wing castrati, like being a royalist lol, i'm trolling but castration exists across all the spectrum) = Obessive neurosis; preference for the masculine/phallic position but higher anxiety castration ((because less androgynous, more conflict-ridden relationship with the father, traumas?...), so I suppress my desire so as not to end up castrated. Can be masculine but more versatile, with more stranges fantasies involving a dominant/submissive split, depending on the moment or context. Hypersensitivity, which can manifest as aggression, pettiness, rumination, etc = hysterical neurotic, who is fixated on the idea of being the object of the other (the other being the one who possesses the phallus). If you are a corporate executive speaking harshly to a subordinate, the underlying sadistic drive is essentially to become an object for that employee to occupy space in their inner world. Fundamentally this is no different from a woman applying makeup and perfume to occupy space in *your* inner world; the strategy is simply different. If you want to appropriate someone's subjectivity (whether through feminine perfume or, negatively, through aggression), it means that in your game, it is *he* who holds the phallus. A men's fragrance tends to have a scent that "calls to order" conveying an impression of power, strength, "lack of castration" whereas a women's fragrance tends to possess a scent that, for some reason, signifies castration, thereby inviting the person playing the role of the phallus to "plunge into it." It is the same dynamic at play with garter belts lol or to provide a non-sexual context with why we are more afraid of (or pay closer attention to) beehives or insects with striped patterns, or why taking high doses of LSD causes one to see alternating black and white lines. These are objects that tend to disrupt representation (the combination of symbolization and the application of affect and imagination in general) and thus automatically trigger heightened attention, and by extension fear or excitement depending on the context. The same goes for strong alcohol, chili peppers, cheese, extreme sports, and various things associated with masculinity or higher testosterone levels. The masculine accepts castration as an object because it is what propels him into the phallic position. He who rejects castration, who cannot handle it plunges into castration anxiety. He who refuses to have his arm amputated (to handle symbolic castration; the entry into a world that is limited, relative, and dualistic; the fall from infantile narcissism as Lacan would put it) in order to avoid pain cannot quickly return to productivity, strength, to the "phallus" in other words and will instead remain preoccupied with the prospect of castration ("Oh no I'm going to have my arm cut off, blah, blah, blah..."), thus remaining within a feminin subjectivity. Hence the notion of hypergamy that one hears so much about these days: women look "upward" (at the phallus that rises above, that resolves their issues), whereas men look at what *they* can fix (meaning looking rather "downward", since once again libidinaly looking too high up would likely result in humiliation or castration). I sometimes run into gay men at work and they have a distinct energy that intuitively makes one want to "bottom" for them, not literally lol but rather to speak to them in a deeper, more assertive voice for exemple. Most of the gay men I’ve encountered seemed to be "missing something" a void reflected in their energy and appeared more sensitive or even prone to depression.

They are tough with the weak and vice versa; consequently they will twist reality to cast groups that are numerical minorities or those that do not fight back (such as Jews or the wealthy) as villains, while aligning themselves with or rather submitting to groups that constitute a numerical majority and/or revendicatives.

It's natural but mediocre.

Compulsion

Why do you do this topic ? Because you have a prefrontal cortex you can easily obtain the logical answers that will come as a response to this topic, so there is a hidden, more unconscious will who motivates it. To answer the question in principle when kindness is insistent there is an agenda.

You said that women require a lot of effort, and thus tacitly that the expenditure of energy is not reciprocal. Ideally you don't lose too much energy; it's more of a transfer like a cathode and an anode.

There aren't any I just wanted to say that your service looks cool and that I could have been a customer under different circumstances.

Valentin’s curse 😹 No it's okay she doesn't live very far away. Precisely she was in vacations and came with her parents to a place where I worked, then she came back alone. At my second job, yes, I met girls. The problem isn't meeting girls.

If you have to do everything for your wife or girlfriend it means she doesn't love you. Normally it's balanced; you are indeed the most "phallic" in the dynamic as a man (the most necessary for the other's survival; it can be money, beauty, muscles, making love well, humor, intelligence, compassion, anything) but in exchange she takes care of the rest. Maybe I didn’t understand what you said .

No I'm talking to a girl; it's going well I think but I won't be able to see her until September. I also have other options I case I didn’t meet her, but I prefer her. I meant that I would only use dating sites if I were really socially isolated or just wanted fuck; it could be relatively simple but it doesn't interest me that much. Yes the packaging makes all the difference. I have friends who complain about not getting any matches on dating sites, and of course their photos are awful like selfies in their shitty student room lol

It's no longer necessary but if it were and you didn't live thousands of kilometers away I would have used your services. 😸

On the contrary since the therapist does not have access to your sober self.

@Judy2 Lol. Most of the girls I know have at least one anecdote about being stalked, hit on by an old man, or worse.

We're supposed to have active lives (culture, sports, etc.). If this fundamental need isn't met you'll have fantasies of being a pasha and maybe even become one. Like the Saudi princes who become perverse; they only want to drive Ferraris, sleep with Ukrainian escorts, and eat dates. If you don't expend your energy, you become fat (full of energy ).

If he really had "the energy of a philosopher," he would have done it already. His ego is complex and polarized into various attributes that could be deemed positive or negative depending on the context. Yet he does not love himself; consequently he clings to the idea of being a philosopher as he views that aspect of himself as the most worthy of love. However since this amounts to a "lie by omission" he must now convince himself that he truly is a philosopher, and he is already inclined to divide the opposite sex into "stupid women" and "philosophical, spiritual women and so on". It is not love in this karma.

When hookers' clients realize that universal basic income is going to send prices skyrocketing since the women won't have to do that work anymore they’ll become AI-skeptics too. 😸

Leo has built himself the persona of a serious conscious businessman in a white shirt. If AI arrives and enables universal basic income he will no longer be able to gain value through his social status and he knows it; so he's using a coping mechanism convincing himself that nothing will happen. What is he ultimately going to manifest? 👀

That's true. I am the OG

You are always with people similar to you anyway.

What needed to be said essentially has been said.

You can be a calm extrovert. Personally I’m relatively extroverted I enjoy being around people, but I don’t like large gatherings; I really enjoy going bowling or to a bar with a small group of friends or just as a pair for exemple.