Schizophonia

I do it for comfort, to smell good. No, where i am, no one cares, everyone cooks with wooden utensils and no one gets sick The only person i've met who gets sick often is an American living in France, americans also seems have more allergies; The main difference between the two countries in terms of hygiene is that the French eat a lot more raw products, particularly vegetables, fruits, milk and meat (especially beef). And as i said everybody cooks with wooden utensils.

As you feel it 👍

It's essentially a "modern" problem, yes, and the more it goes on the worse it gets. In general stress, competition in general is the price of freedom of modern society. Liar The ego's layers are polarized. People with big egos tend to be more confrontational (negative polarity) but also more funny(positive polarity), extreme people tend to be funny because their ego is twisted to begin with. The three funniest people i know in my country are a Franco-Cameroonian conspiracy theorist who played with anti-Semitism, a radical Catholic activist, and a neo-Nazi activist. Me Pulls down his pants with a confident look* Dw It's the experience. Ahah in my opinion it's a bit too late to worry about it. She is no socially less lazy than us.

When i take LSD i tend to clench my teeth a lot, it also triggers unpleasant tooth sensitivity but i don't know if it's related to prolonged clenching or if it's just neurological. I have other side effects like the impression of having urinated on myself, of having snorted steel because of the vasoconstriction etc.

Having slaves is rational. You may want to avoid being too mean to them either because you're not a sociopath, or because you want to avoid them rebelling and killing you.

This is hypochondria

He has fun playing his ego.

The highest perspective is the one who serves your interests the most. With this dichotomy you can manipulate people who like to see reality through additional layers of concepts because it makes them feel more "intelligent", "evolved" or adjectives like that that allow them to inflate their ego. But this is opposed to a more holistic perspective, therefore more solid, but which is in fact simpler because with "less surface" as Ken Wilber would say. There are no selfish people and altruistic people it's a lie, there are people who have a more or less normal management of their libido (and who will favor their sexual pleasure, taste, their career, sport) and people who favor regressive patterns.

150ug of LSD is a funny trip to me ; And 300ug is a breakthrough toward another world.

You just lie there

I do better with both high fat and high carb than HCLF.

Your opinions shoud le flexible.

It's a shame that these media are controlled by billionaires with an ideological agenda, but it's the only thing to counterbalance the ideological influence of the left in institutions. Leftists don't want to massively propagandize everywhere they can and it starts at school because the professora is a traditionally left-wing institution in most countries. Besides, most people who want to block musk don't really want to do it out of ethics, out of concern for pluralism, but because they see musk/X as a barrier that prevents them from having a greater balance of power, it's opportunistic.

It's strange because >400 posts begins to be significant.

That's honestly what i think. No that's just a ~normale~ (as you would say) behaviour to have. 🤗 Drops his pants and sends a video of a sensual dance with a full erection to his Croatian doe on WhatsApp as a courtship display* Then, sometimes the only answers are simple, especially when the correspondent only exposes insecurities, cognitive dissonance, etc. She's not braver than us ahah

You're in the anima.

@Actualising There's no problem, if you're ready to leave your girlfriend for another one like that then it wasn't really worth it and it's a gift that you're giving to both of you.

Yep. Think about it : There isn't even a way to know how you look like in nature ! The only times you would even vaguely know what you look like would be when looking in the reflection of a body of water. There is also no fashion, no makeup, and we wouldn't even have the same physical appearance due to differences in living standards. And then of course there is survival which distracts our attention. And everything changed like that, but not our DNA ans so CNS. Sadghuru said we would be happy if we if they remove half of our brains lol. You spend your life on youtube so i'm sure you've seen it. I think ego density is the biggest characteristic that determines a person's personality along with their mobility (hypomania vs stability). We could make a grid and sort people on it with these. It's even worse in the third world, that's where you'll meet the craziest people. Third world is not the natural human tribal way of life, it's developed sedentary societies where people live modern wage labor but without being paid "well", are poorly fed since birth, live in unsanitary conditions and are influenced by belligerent cults. (Islam, Hinduism, Voodoo...) Yep. The problem is not being introverted, the problem is having a stressful ego. My mother is extroverted and has a heavier ego than you or me, my father is introverted but he has a very simple ego. I am talking about the human self, when I talk about neurotic tendencies for example it is indeed a characteristic of the self, but it is also a constituent in its own right, there is no difference. And so in the end neurotic people have a bigger sense of self, a bigger ego as we understand it in the "spiritual" sense of the term than those who are not. Even if I am very functional today I have a fundamentally quite heavy ego and that is probably what induces so much fear when I try 5 Meo DMT, i highly assume. Or rather, despite the fractal structure, I don't see the ego as a "bubble" with a heart but rather as a canvas, with sections that are particularly more or less relaxed, more or less complex, and more or less solid. Eheh no what i mean is more than that. A person with a heavy enough ego will be less empathetic than another person no matter what they feel, and the heaviness of the ego is based on the beliefs that structure the ego. Yes but still less funny than turning into a planet 🫨 Dw. Don't hesitate if i need to clarify things i say.

I'm not stuck, i just take pleasure simping talking to you and you are difficult to replace. There are plenty of normies i could easily win over but there would be no point in doing so outside of sex. If you would push me away i would just shrug and give Willy another direction, for now he cares enough about his slavic alien so I'm taking advantage of it to have fun. Ahah, no that's the hot part Sometimes i start discussions and I'm actually too lazy to continue, because the goal was mainly to show off my ideas, because I had a burst of interest or something like that.

When we are small or when we live in a setting where stressors are intermittent (typically survival, in the third world) it is easier to be happy. But in the opposite case, negative experiences, cognitive dissonances and defense mechanisms (neurotic character) makes the ego much heavier, with more layers eheh, and we find ourselves in a rather cold and repetitive place. I tended to have a very strong ego myself and when i started to socialize, and it is still a bit the case today, i was surprised to see how normal and happier people than me seemed more "simple", their psyche was simple while mine was very complicated and heavy. It is not just happiness that the ego suppresses, it is also motivation, physical power, empathy towards others including family, punctuality etc. My father made a lot of efforts for me and yet I always had difficulty loving him, the same for most people; During my first try with LSD not only did I enter a state of ecstasy, samadhi, and I was finally able to feel a powerful feeling of love and empathy. I wait for it eheh.

Not necessarily, even a normal person can be happy if his ego begins to lack substance. This normally happens when we overcome the problems that the ego identifies with, but if the problems are too complicated, if they are permanently there without being corrected, then this blocks access to happiness.

It's normal. I have confidence your performance😉 Happiness comes from freedom (from the ego).

Lol. I let spiders in my rooms because they are harmless and kill other insects.

Thanks, ditto Michael.

Okay fine, so where is this moral? It has to be somewhere. In the Bible maybe? Once again you begging the question, and that's normal because it's the only thing you can do with something drawn solely from the imagination. I can i've already killed several chicken (for eat ofc). It's disturbing for the ego at first, but not being able to kill an animal to eat it is also disturbing in the other direction for someone who is used to it. Do you think that a few million people, generally western/white or of marginal religious tendencies here and there in the world are normal, and the tens of billions of humans who have done this throughout history are not normal? I don't care in itself, having to do something because "nature" would be as imaginary as your ethic, that's not what i oppose veganism on (for me). No, it's the opposite, it would be to declare that there is an objective world that would legitimize my point of view the most, in absolute terms. Because if everything is imaginary, it leaves room for maneuver to slide towards a maya where eating lentils is super good and holy etc. But right now, you can imagine your ethics as much as you want, you imagine above all a maya where meat tastes good etc. That's what your being wants to imagine the most. Don't know if i'm clear. Begging the question + as a Lacanian pain in the ass i direcly see the mark of libidinal regression in the "animal flesh". For me it's just a piece of protein that tastes good, yum, then my empathy will eventually push me to avoid killing an animal in a way that is too cruel. Again, not because I'm "good" (regression) but because as an empathetic person I feel good about not hurting it too much. In fine the result is a trade-off between the two libidinal forces, that is to say that I will savor this freshness and, at the same time, make sure that the animal has not suffered too excessively (or that I have not seen it suffer, because ultimately it is essentially a question of perception). I don't see any problem with someone becoming vegan because they are hypersensitive and have a fixation on eating animals, it would be rational. But when you talk about "good", "animal flesh" it is not the same phenomenon that is hidden behind it. It doesn't tastes good and it's not nutritive Ahah We are all just selfish, only our survival matters; Idealistic ideas, which are far from the body, are a way to survive in a social context where you are weak, even if it's totally denied by the conscious . Freud and Nietzsche described this same phenomenon from two different points of view, if you're interested. Health*