-
Content count
454 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by koops
-
He said she has more lovers, and they upload some pictures to IG. But look how you frame it: 'rail his wife'. For my perception, is way deeper than that. But you don't have to agree.
-
@Leo Gura in your 'What is Truth' video, you say that these sounds, sights and colors are also Absolute Truth. And that form and formlessness are identical. ''The entire relative domain is absolute truth in disguise.'' You mean that Absolute Truth is always here, whether you are aware or not, you just need the realization of it (awakening); so the relative domain/perception is still Absolute Truth while not awake? For example, if Leo from 2013 is watching the basketball game in his sofa in his relative-dualistic domain (maya we can call it)... thats Absolute Truth, because that's what Is, he is just not aware of it until he awakens and he realizes Oneness, God, Form=Formlessness, Absolute Truth? -Also, you say that Absolute Truth is pure objectivity, which I get where you are coming from, but for example David Hawkins says is pure subjectivity. Truth cannot be proven objectively and can only can be access through 1st person ''experience'', directly, so how is that not pure subjectivity? How do you reconcile that? Doesn't really Absolute Truth transcend labels as objectivity and subjectivity? It just Is? Is this just a semantic thing?
-
koops replied to koops's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Yes, I get that NOW/Absolute Truth is all there is, and we can't find it somewhere else, but still... it seems to me that there is a 3rd category. 1. Im looking at a tree and measuring it, concluding is 7 feet tall, or thinking that is bigger than the tree in my garden. Thats relative truth. 2. Im looking at a tree. No labels, no concepts. Just what is. Now. In this dual everyday state. 3. Im looking at a tree and I have an awakening. I realize everything is One, Consciousness. I still 'see' that tree but I realize there is no separation. My confusion is in the difference between these last 2 points. It seems that there are different levels/degrees of awareness of Absolute Truth. Would you label #2 as grasping Absolute Truth? Is my error putting #3 above #2? (I consider #3 Absolute Truth, but not #2) -
He is far from perfect example haha And really, the insight has to be backed up in real life, not just talk.
-
I hope him the best, but lets see how long it lasts.
-
hahaha Dan, a man walking his talk...
-
koops replied to koops's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Ok, now I understand you. Thanks! I had an awakening last year with your video 'Realizing you are God' and one of my realizations was: THAT was Absolute Truth. It was glaringly obvious. But then I lost it. My confusion was that when you said your hand is Absolute Truth, it is, right, but you are not aware of it RIGHT NOW, directly. You have that reference from the past (from awakening). Like you know what an orgasm is, from the recall of having an orgasm, but you are not having one right now (I hope!) -
koops replied to koops's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
So you can be aware of absolute truth only after (not before) awakening even if you are not in that state now, right? Thanks for your responses! I'll keep doing the work. -
koops replied to koops's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
mmm.. when you say you need extra awareness to be aware of Absolute Truht (and perception becoming being), you mean awakening? Or something more simple as realizing how my mind distorts reality? As William Blake put it:''If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is, Infinite.'' "Doesn't that 'cleansed' refer to awakening?" -
koops replied to koops's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
So you say when I look at my hand and there is a sense of self/I perceiving it, is still Absolute Truth? Is when I add a concept/label that 'becomes' relative truth? My realization was that Oneness/Consciousness/God/Being is Absolute Truth; and that perception/experience/duality is relative truth. I remember you said: Being = Perception - Ego Am I missing something here? -
koops replied to en-el hak's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Beautifully said. That feeling of emptiness and that deeper understanding seem to be steps in the right direction. I feel that the integration of that emptiness (+love) is the way forward. Also, seeing the mundane (survival) as divine. Being able to make peace with survival and not framing it as bad. Reaching the point of loving even the 'bad'. -
koops replied to koops's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Well, it does, don't you think? Thats the point of awakening. I mean, whats the point of realizing Oneness/Consciousness/Absolute Truth if the relative/perception is already Absolute Truth? If I'm sitting on a chest with a million dollars inside, and I'm not aware of whats in it; yes, the money is there, but becoming aware of it makes a HUGE shift in the situation. So when you say 'The entire relative domain is absolute truth in disguise'', now that line makes more sense to me: it's Truth, but unrecognized. This is what confused me. When I heard in your video: 'these sounds, sights and colors are also Absolute Truth' I thought: That doesn't sound like pure objectivity nor Absolute. So my guess is you can say: The relative/perception is non-realized Absolute Truth, right? Thanks. Thats what I was thinking. Makes sense. -
koops replied to koops's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
What I mean by Absolute Truth here is deeper than this. It transcends beliefs -
I meant that they are way more conscious than most people in general, not just spiritual people. The thing is we can't say is manipulation, thats just an interpretation. And Im not blindly defending them, I just genuinely think there is something deeper.
-
I don't consume his content, but is obvious that he is way more conscious than 99% of people. His wife is with other men also.
-
You can see those folks are more conscious than the average person. If you are on this forum you know that. Doesn't mean they are perfect. And is not just about threesomes. Thats what the average man thinks about. 'look how sneaky is this guy, fucking 2 women, how smart' Is way deeper than that.
-
Grant Cardone Elliot Hulse Eckhart Tolle (seriously)
-
They are obviously more conscious than 99% of couples. And ofc the relationship can fail, as do 60-70% of monogamous couples, PLUS all those 30-40% left... do you think they are fully happy, self-actualizing couples? How many monogamous couples are TRULY thriving, and bathing in deep love? And Im not saying polyamory is superior to monogamy; just saying some of the standards they are held to are not fair.
-
Well, thats reality nowadays. There is no point fighting against societal changes. Just adapting to them. And you must educate yourself. You have infinite free education on youtube and millions of books in amazon at 10$. Go deep on how to improve as a man, understanding male-female dynamics and sexual polarity. There is no way around that.
-
wtf is this. Guys, move into a positive-optimistic perspective. Blackpill is a trap. Redpill can become one (although it has valuable information and hard truths), but you have to graduate from that and move on. Learn and APPLY pickup. And then move into a more 'stage green' paradigm type David Deida or Zan Perrion.
-
https://www.actualized.org/insights/the-problem-of-grasping-being I just love this. You writing keeps getting better. It frustrates me that intelligent people dont get this 'simple' fact. And is even worse when they use the authority bias claiming 'ScIeNcE'. Add that to group think and y Im not smarter than a phd but I got it reading The power of now, the 1st spiritual book I've red, when Tolle says: ''When you look at a tree, dont think of the word tree, dont put any labels on it. You look at it, at its essence''. And then just went deeper and deeper from that realization. The problem with scientists, rationalists and high IQ people is that they need to make it complicated. It cant be so simple, they think.
-
So here is a great explanation
-
Yes, I saw a few videos of her, and I thought 'wow what a powerful woman' But in this video, I felt the wounded inner child. Which makes me think. Even high consciousness people with a lot of work on themselves struggle with this.
-
Yeah. I feel most people settle for monogamy because is the least amount of work. But there goes the lying, cheating, withholding, loss of love, (subtle) manipulation. For people that value integrity, honesty and love, monogamy can work, but still... the limitations are huge, especially if you have high libido.
-
Yes. Jealousy is likely to happen. I think jealousy is the emotion that if managed, will propel the human race forward the most. Until that happens, love will be restricted, and fear based.
