mr_engineer

I said, I pay attention to what people mean by what they say, how they implement what they say. You need a better attention-span.

But that's what's being done through the cancel-culture, through the enabling of BLM-riots, through the MeToo movement, through the sexualization of children in schools by teaching them about LGBT too early. I don't pay attention to what people say, I pay attention to what they do. What they mean by what they say. This virtue-signalling won't work with me. We all know very well what's going on, let's not pretend otherwise.

This is racism disguised as anti-racism. Is it such a big sin, to ask for a place in the world?! Or, should the straight white male be exterminated?! Is that what the woke crowd believes?! Aww, I'm so sorry.

Society isn't as one-dimensional as you think it is. Anti-woke doesn't necessarily mean, a regression to conservatism. It can also mean a step towards a more egalitarian world, where people are allowed to believe what they want. The straight white male has a place in that world. You seem to be making the mistake of believing the woke people at face-value, that 'they're for equality, for social-justice'. Teal isn't making that mistake, she's talking about what they're actually about. This was true 50 years ago, not today. Today's Green is enabling the enslavement of people by corporations and fascists. This is what she says. Edit - I keep quoting her to show you that I'm not alone in the way I see this. There are legit people out there who agree with me.

Spoken like a true conservative. Rationalizing your own oppressive and repressive behaviors. You're becoming the very thing you're demonizing, do you realize that?!

We've seen how much your so-called 'woke democracy' respects people's body-sovereignty. And it is a big mistake to demonize all of religion. There are good things about religion that are the reason people hold onto it. The solution to those fanatics is to do a better job of embodying those religious values and appealing to them, winning them over from corrupt politicians in the right rather than going full anti-religion. This sounds more conservative, with the in-group vs out-group thing. I don't buy that half of the country wants to go back to the 18th century. Stage Orange in and of itself is a progressive force, it's all about material expansion and development. And we have to integrate a lot of good things about it. Most Stage Orange people simply don't have the time to go after New-Age people, they're too busy dealing with their own pragmatic shit. They won't waste their time proselytizing their religion to people who will 'agree to disagree', which is also a Stage Orange intellectual value. If you give common people such little credit, how will you effect any real positive change in the world?! You are doing your audience a huge disservice right now by breaking a light-source of progress past Stage Green.

I think you missed what I said. Let me repeat. You. Cannot. Brow-Beat. People. Into. Progress. Stage Yellow isn't always neutral, it won't always take the middle way. It can take a stand when it has to. The trucker-movement was a Stage Yellow movement. For human rights, for body-sovereignty. Not fucking up the whole system in the face of an immediate crisis.

Lol, is this your response to me telling you to consider the possibility?! I have been ignoring your failures to walk your talk of 'open-mindedness' but this is just too blatant.

Stage Yellow people will agree with me. Wokeness is the opposite of Spiral-Wizardry. You cannot brow-beat people into progress. The trucker-situation in Canada gave me a lot of hope that people will not be silent against the woke oppression.

This is what it looks like when the adults start standing up to woke oppression. This is a what-aboutism. Stay on the topic, please. Don't shift the focus where you want it and ignore important details. So, what do you want, then? Do you want the world to turn into a communist dictatorship in which people's thoughts, opinions and actions are controlled by the woke people? Where there is no room for disagreement?! Consider the possibility that people's critiques of wokeness come from above, not below. People should be able to say to each other 'what you're saying is bullshit' and not be censored for that. It's not important to solve problems that happened 200 years ago. It's important to solve problems that are happening right now. Cuz we live in the world that's happening right now.

I'm not here to improve my offline life, I'm here to cope with it.

Dating-apps are utterly useless. A total waste of time. It's paradoxical how we delude ourselves into thinking that going online will help us improve our offline life. Don't waste a second of your life on them. Build your offline real life.

Crying is fine. Showing weakness is not. Talking about something you're really struggling with is not fine, that's showing weakness. Needing her love is fine, that is the point of having a girlfriend. Crying is an emotional release. So, there is nothing fundamentally wrong with crying. If she thinks there is, dump her. Showing weakness, however, is a huge disservice to her, because she entered the relationship thinking you're trustworthy. It will make her feel duped by you, in fact. I'm going to give you my definition of vulnerability. It's to express how you feel to her. 'I feel X'. That's vulnerability. And, crying can be an expression of that. The point of being vulnerable is to give her a role in your quest to create a happy life. If she knows how you feel, she can help you get there. This is something that will be encouraged by any woman who wants a proper relationship.

@Hardkill It was just an example of a common limiting-belief, and how it can impact your dating-life. There could be tons of these. Like 'Love doesn't exist'. Or, 'Sex is bad'. Or, 'Wanting a hot woman is shallow'. Or 'masculinity is bad'. These are examples. I'm not implying that you have any of these. My point is that your childhood-trauma can make you interpret things through the lens of these limiting-beliefs and lead you into problematic scenarios like these. Religion can be a huge source of these limiting-beliefs, by the way. So, if your ideas of God come from religion, you will hold onto the limiting-beliefs, just to not go to hell after you die! That's also possible.

What you're facing with women is a recurring theme from childhood. A similar dynamic must've occurred with your parents/teachers (most likely, mom) for you to have internalized that and then seek out the wrong women. The root-cause of this is that you associate 'love' with the wrong things, what they conditioned you with. Things that aren't authentic to you. This is why a lot of people say that self-love is the foundation. And, in the context of dating, this is what self-love means. Going back in childhood, looking at what happened, fixing those issues, the wrong conditioning. And healing the trauma this must've caused you. Also, this is the root-cause of a lot of your limiting-beliefs in relationships. Like, the belief that 'compromise is king'. Or that 'you have to sacrifice yourself for the other person if you want to prove your love to them'. This stuff will make you resentful, internally. And then it'll get projected onto women. (A lot of incel-types struggle with this, which is why telling them that they have to work on themselves to get women makes them react negatively. Not implying that this is you.) Even though you don't have any overt mental-health issues, I think it would be highly beneficial for you to do inner-child work.

You're getting attracted to the wrong women, then. Do inner-child work and fix your compatibility-issues and try to create the emotional-compatibility that I mentioned above. Girls who are into fitness want validation. That's what drives them. If you can offer that to them, in the right love-language (find compatibility on that front), I think you should be fine. If you can offer them validation, make that the foundation of your game. And develop your game like that.

Wow! That is nice. Go for women who are into fitness. You will be able to get a role in their fitness-journey. And, they'll have this body-type. And if you partner up with them and start some sort of business-venture with them around fitness, that'll give them incentive to support you in your goals. HTH!!

How are you doing on the front of embodying your Life-Purpose? If you have work to do on that front, do it. Cuz once you do it, you'll get access to an abundance of the kind of woman I'm talking about. This will give them an incentive to support you in your goals because it'll be meaningful to them, not because they're incompetent on their own.

Preferably don't go for Stage Blue women. Cuz when they develop themselves, your relationship will face turbulence, in the very least. Go for someone who's at Green and above. I think the answer is in the West itself. There are a lot of post-feminist women there. And I think you can create something better than the patriarchy with them, they don't have too much of that conditioning either.

@Hardkill You won't find this type of girl in a school/college. This is a feminist system, it encourages women to chase their own goals and not give a damn about what others want. Basically, it trains individuals to be narcissistic and this is very bad for women's femininity. They become less womanly when they become narcissistic. (Just like a man becomes less manly when he doesn't take responsibility.) And, being this person takes a bit of a foundation. Look for someone between the ages of 25-30. And look in the New-Age community. They are reclaiming their femininity and if they're wise, they will have revisited their roots, looked at the patriarchy and held onto the good parts of it and figured out how to resource them for building their life. You want to find a meeting of minds on that front with them. This will give you more of a clue as to where to find them. Also, try to create some sort of emotional-compatibility, in which you're meeting an emotional-need for them and in that process, your own emotional-need gets met. For example, if she wants validation/the feeling of being special (this is true for a lot of feminists who feel like their competence isn't recognized by the patriarchy), and if you can give it to them in a compatible love-language, this will make it so they don't need feminism anymore, on an emotional level. Then, you can create your own system with them, without worrying about opposition from them. Women are in trouble in this world, honestly. And, we should recognize this and do what we can to help them overcome their own conditioning and beliefs that 'they have to do it all alone'. This is where the whole 'independence'-mindset comes from. It's not something they genuinely want, it's conditioning. And we should help them overcome it.

A shit-test is not the same as her trying to get to know you to screen for compatibility. It's the exact opposite. Here's what her trying to get to know you to screen for compatibility looks like - her asking you open-ended questions and trying to get to know you. And giving a chance for proper communication. Shit-tests are passive-aggressive behavior that we should run from.

It sounds like V for Vendetta is a prediction for the future. They predicted a virus-outbreak in 2005, before COVID hit in 2020. They posited that it was the governments who did it. They predicted a far-right government. It's very possible to have that kind of ego-backlash to the progressive tyranny like climate-change, COVID-lockdowns. vax-mandates, etc. 'Sutler' analogous to 'Hitler'. His style is also very Hitler-like. Saying that 'whoever leaves their home on revolution-day will be considered a terrorist and made example of'. That's what some authorities did during the COVID-lockdowns. And, of course, some far-left fascists. Banning good music, good food, art, philosophy, etc. Sounds like what the Taliban is doing in Afghanistan. Also, sounds like what the internet-censorship is doing. Keeping the identity of the protagonist abstract. Indicating that it could be anyone. It could be you or me who initiate the revolution. 'If your government was responsible for the virus, would you want to know?' Highlights the blind-spots of investigations where they never point the finger at their own officials. The 'black bags', where once a person is gone, they're gone forever. Analogous to places like Guantanamo bay and classified CIA-documents, except that what happens to someone who goes into the 'black bag' is not reported. 'War, terror and disease' were the reasons they turned to the fascist government. 'Disease' happened in 2020, 'war' is in the process of happening and 'terror' - we all know about that, don't we?! The 'Prothero' character was very, very analogous to Rush Limbaugh. The way the media slants stories and slides in lies is also shown very well. This forum seems to have a pretty big blindspot about that, we really don't like admitting to this reality about the media. For example, their definition of 'hate-speech', really, is 'whatever goes against our narrative'. The fact that nobody believes the media is also shown very well.

There is no difference between shit-tests and low-quality women. It's lacking in femininity and receptivity and openness and all of these healthy feminine qualities. So, here's a shit-test that you can use on them - if they use shit-tests, run from them as fast as you possibly can!

@Rishabh R Forget about girls for a while. Just work on yourself, get successful. Get access to higher-quality people in general first. You need people in your life who have a few brain-cells to rub together. All of the people you mentioned are not worth the time of anyone's day. They're idiots. You want something other than garbage to come out of their mouth when they open it, right?!

His idea of 'high-quality' is in terms of measurements. It's something 'measurable' or 'quantifiable'. 9/10 face, 36/24/36 body-proportions, 5'10 and above height, white skin, blonde hair, a certain size of boobs/ass, etc.