JuliusCaesar

If/when Dawkins dies he'll wake up into a higher dream which ironically will probably be more like heaven than the christian notion of hell. The same could be said of any other human as well.

The problem with saying that, is there's infinitely more ingredients that go into it as well. Exactly, sensory perceptions, other people, environment, things that happened in the past etc. The change of causality never ends and it also never begins either.

The problem with this isn't that it's true, but rather that it's limited. We could just as easily say that emotions are the basis of all actions. A human prefers eating pizza over rice and vegetables(value judgement/emotional reasoning). Therefore they eat the pizza because they feel best about that decision relative to all the other alternatives of which they're aware. The problem with saying that all action is created by feelings. Is that we could just as easily argue that logic creates all action. Like a human wants to eat pizza because they think it's true that the pizza is tasty. Or maybe even they think it's true that eating pizza makes them cool because they're consuming it at a party with friends. And thus they think it's false that vegetables and rice consumption is cool. Or we could say they feel fasting is a unfavorable action because they think it's true they have to eat to survive etc etc. The problem with saying that all action is produced by logic. Is that we could also say all action is fear based in it's genesis. That the human is eating pizza and maybe also drinking beer because they fear their friends won't like it if they don't. Or that they're eating food and drinking liquid because they fear starvation and dehydration. Can you recognize a pattern forming here? No matter how we endeavor to understand chains of causality as humans. We run into this reoccurring theme where an infinite amount of variables that are all interconnected go into the chain. So our attempts to understand things simplistically always falls short of the full truth. It's only by becoming conscious of infinity that this problem can be rectified. Until then, you're searching for a needle in a haystack, where all the hairs of hay are needles in disguise.

So I did that and these are what came up. Muscle spasms Aches and pains Loss of balance Difficulty eating Inability to recognize or feel pleasure Low energy Inability to focus Which symptoms specifically have you experienced, and when did you notice they arose(in relation to a certain substance, like did you do a drug then days or weeks later experienced these as side effects)?

What exactly do you mean by brain damage? And what symptoms indicate you damaged your brain?

This has basically been answered, but I'll provide my explanation anyway. First there's all possible experience(Omnipresence) from which arises all possible knowledge(Omniscience). Consciousness isn't created in or by the brain, but your individual state of consciousness is correlated with neuronal activity(which is of course is hallucinated by consciousness). As such, some understanding of neuroscience is useful here. The common point of reference for ordinary human consciousness is when the neural oscillations are mostly in what's called beta(12.5 to 30 cycles per second). At this level of consciousness, there exists a 3 dimensional spacetime continuum, with separate objects and lifeforms and all kinds of other differences. You experience yourself almost exclusively as a mortal observer in this state, a slow type of intellectual learning is engaged. However, if you were to fall asleep(or attain the same thing while awake, which occurs to some degree when concentrating on something relaxedly.). Your brain would start to slow down and oscillate with greater energy; paradoxically this causes an expansion in objective awareness of the individual. At that point, your brain is predominately at alpha(8-12hz). The programming that makes you the individual you think of yourself as is located somewhere around about middle alpha. So if you can remain conscious while your brain is predominately at lower alpha, it's possible to alter any characteristic of yourself. You can become aware of why your personality is the way it is, and you can also change it. You can change your physiology; including but not limited to the intensity of thermogenesis, metabolic activity, even what diseases/illnesses are possible/impossible. You can literally heal yourself at will effectively. If it sounds like I'm overstating things here, I'd recommend you study Wim Hoff. His exploits are striking examples of what's possible when a human becomes competent at lower alpha. However, if your brain were to slow down even further than this(which occurs when dreaming) you'd enter theta(4-8 hz). When the brain oscillates at predominately 4.5hz, you're incredibly close to slipping into delta(1-4hz). Delta is the level of the Godhead, here the differentiated self disappears. And causal spacetime reality is impossible(as there's absolute formlessness). All possible realities exist there, waiting to be called upon. Because all possibilities exist there, all knowing does as well. So if you were subjectively aware while your brain is at the gate between delta and theta(approximately 4.5hz) in response to any question you ask would arise the infallibly correct answer. But the modality of language here is foreign to most humans(because it's multifaceted, being comprised of vibratory light and non verbal raw information, not just human languages like English). Not to mention the fact that humans are typically unconscious subjectively at this level(even lower alpha tends to be unconsciously experienced in most people). Hence why you as a human feel so clueless and powerless, even though you've actually been Omniscient and Omnipotent the entire time. I would at this point comment more on delta brain waves, and maybe even on gamma. But since your question was about how Omniscience works and not Omnipotence I'll stop here.

DMT might actually produce reverse tolerance(it gets stronger the more you often you do it instead of weaker).

I was trying to imply that by stating it's less like to work in the event that the individual didn't expect it to(and implied further complication by noting the consequences of heightened neuroplastisticity impacting the placebo/nocebo effect). There's a bible verse that says something in the nature of he that can heal can make ill. And that logic certainly applies to psychedelics. Hence why there's conflicting reports on this issue.

I've read reports from individuals claiming that doing megadoses of LSD(1000 mics or even more) permanently cured their schizophrenia. So it would seem that psychedelics have the potential to cure mental illnesses, but not if the person doing them doesn't consciously endeavor to change themself(while under the influence) or at least it becomes much less likely(the placebo and nocebo effects become pronounced very strongly on hallucinogens, more so then when sober). Another aspect of it is dosage, it's possible that you need a breakthrough dose(or even more) for it to be possible to permanently rewire your brain on the scale necessary to affect this kind of change. Scientific research in this area starting with anecdotal reports of sucess would be invaluable in dealing with this problem(mental illness in humans). But I'm as of yet unaware of any serious investigation into the topic.

It seems to be that cannabis only has a psychedelic impact in the edible form. As if when smoking it, the substance goes straight to the brain and the receptors become tolerant to it swiftly(which begins to wear off even just hours after the fact). But when it's consumed like food, it's almost as if the neurons in your intestines(humans have enough neurons in their gut to make a second brain) become affected in combination with the cranial neurons. And so since your two brains are affected, it's vastly more potent than when smoked(smoking it you just get a sub hallucinogenic dose). This is all just me guessing effectively as of course there isn't exactly any scientific studies that investigate this issue. What was the THC content of the edible you consumed?

Of course, that's the nature of sentient beings at my level of development. That's a twisted notion of spirituality. At it's ultimate, it's about knowing absolute truth directly, which has no opposite. And therefore your logic falls short as it's impossible for good spirituality to have an opposite or even an alternative. I've been able to cease thinking for nearly a full hour before. It's by making dunderheaded assumptions like this that you'll set yourself up for failure in discourse. Your following rationale however, that my human ego doesn't control shit is mostly sound. Because it's mostly been true. I think on some level this is true of all mortals. But actually in my case it doesn't really hold water(or at least not as well as it does for others). What I want to do is to consciously form reality. So this is basically like saying I don't need to do what I want to do. I already have it, it's just that I don't have conscious access to the vast majority of it. Which is what I endeavor to change. If you think humans aren't already omnipotent(albeit in a finite capacity), you would benefit rather greatly from reading up on certain phenomena like the placebo effect. Yessir, full speed ahead sir. I know this already. Perhaps use of SD would be of benefit here. You seem to have me confused with individuals below Turquoise, but I'm effectively at Coral(or at least my philosophy/value system is). Unfortunately, most of my scientific understanding is basically at Yellow. Which is too primitive to seriously enable me to reach my goals(especially without the support of the scientific community). In terms of SD, it would suggest I need to exhaust the possibilities at Turquoise more than I've done already. And the abilities I obtain there will allow me to alter myself into something like a god. I've experienced infinite love before, it was good(the temporary experience brought on by a psychedelic) but lacks practical utility in the dream mortals call consensus reality. There are always an infinite amount of possible ways to skin a cat. While this is true in a relative sense. It's an oversimplification at the same time. If you became more loving, your mind would become more powerful.

This is an unpopular/obscure topic I think, but basically I want to know what Leo thinks about the possibility of a human becoming Omnipotent. Specifically, if he thinks that it's possible under the influence of 5 Meo MALT to reach an Omnipotent state then return to your human form/world with all of your power intact. I sense his objection would probably be that the ego is gone when you're in God mode, and therefore it's impossible. But hear me out, in the video where Leo reports his experience on MALT, we hear him say a few things that suggest this might not hold water. For example, when Leo was approaching infinity, he became aware of how he's constructing his mother out of nothing. So it's obvious that some of Leo still exists even at this high level of consciousness because some of his memories were present. Also, when he became Omnipotent and decided to create for himself a physical heaven, notice that ordinary Leo so to speak remembered the occurrence after he used his power to reduce himself back to his mundane mortal existence. This should be impossible if Leo's ego was fully obliterated, or maybe it was only temporarily, and it managed to become conscious of what occurred after the fact. Either way, in my mind this suggests that it's possible to deliberately do something specific with the power Leo had other than creating heaven. If that's true, then it's possible to relinquish your ability to lose your power. If you did that, then it seems you're left with 2 possibilities, either when you try to return to your human life you'd fail(because it requires you to lose your power). Or you'd do so still bearing an Omnipotent state, and at that point you'd basically be like the Q from Star Trek but in "real" life.

That's solid advise, the only problem is that my need for perfection and to control every scenario perfectly is so ingrained into the fabric of my being, that I have difficulty in actually putting such advice into practice. And it actually inhibits my ability to do anything, as the higher things I desire to do are most likely to be such that I'll have to fail my way to sucess in them. I understand this problem intellectually, but don't really know how to solve it.

I fail to see how there's any difference between power and love. Seeing as I'd be dead if I had either in the infinite degree.

What I want is to evolve into something that's basically a god. So in terms of the consequences of that it doesn't really matter what I want. I'll have to live with them. In the meantime, I'll be developing occult powers as a human. Doing the best I can to approach infinite power whilst still alive. It's kind of ironic, what's keeping me in my human form is basically the will to die, as that's the logical consequence of my highest desire fulfilled.

@goldpower123 Have you done any psychedelics or meditation or magickal rituals? Or did this just occur as if randomly?

That's axiomatic at this point. Perhaps I should alter the context of my question. As a human, I endeavor to become Omnipotent permanently. I don't really have any other desires/reasons to exist in my current form besides that. Or in other words, imagine someone asks you what they should do if they want to get laid. You wouldn't tell them that they already have all possible sexual experience and therefore the question is unnecessary(even though that's technically true). You would give them some kind of advise containing relative truths about how seduction works. So likewise, the question I'm asking is basically in your understanding, what would be the best way for me to acquire an Omnipotent state and sustain it? And yes, I realize I'm already infinitely powerful, and that humans even demonstrate this on a daily basis(or at least that they're infinitely powerful in a finite capacity, like in the example of the placebo effect for instance).

Well, to perfectly isolate all possible variables is humanly impossible in any experiment. What I mean is the best possible isolation. For instance, if you wanted to test to see if a certain spell which is purported to do a certain thing, casting the spell is the only thing you'd do differently from what you ordinarily do. And you'd also attempt to achieve the same result by your own power as a control experiment. And by your own power I mean you'd try to think into reality what you want to occur directly. Without invoking any spirits, or doing any rituals(or using whatever thing you're testing). This same sort of logic can be used with any form of testable/falsifiable phenomena. This is an assumption which doesn't bear close examination. Yes it's true that to some extent occult phenomena can be more losey gosey than ordinary natural phenomena. But it's certainly possible for magick to be physical and tangible. We're Omnipotent. That means we have unlimited control of space, time, matter, and consciousness. We can make reality do anything simply by thinking about it. However, when we took human form, we removed most of our power from ourselves, so that we're now creating reality unconsciously. And the thoughts a human has is mostly from the perspective of an observer. Because while they're manifesting at the most subtle levels of reality, they don't on the larger scale. However, if you became more powerful(and they are many things affecting your power level, and therefore many ways of altering it), your thoughts would manifest more faithfully. In order for you to comprehend what I've said here, I'll give you an example of what kind of consequence this has in practice. Let's imagine a man has asthma, and he's tried very hard to cure himself, having taken many remedies suggested by alternative medicine(because mainstream medicine told him he's incurable). But none of them have beared fruit. He reads about the placebo effect in medical literature, and decides to try to heal himself. So he tells himself every day that he has no asthma, nonstop for about 8 hours a day. 6 months or so into that his asthma would disappear. So when I say willpower/personal occult abilities, and faith, I really just mean my own human ability to warp reality to my desires directly(and thus need no magickal technology to assist me). And I compare what I can do by my own power against what a certain spirit/whatever technology I'm testing can do. There's a chasm of difference between logical understanding and direct experience. For example, you can logically understand God, but directly experiencing God is a different thing entirely. The only way you can truly understand God, and the true nature of the universe is to become God yourself. If you became Omniscient, you'd be able to understand. Which is in fact possible for humans. Which is why I say that we can understand anything. But yes, from a finite perspective as a limited human it's not really possible. I said I'm rubbing off on you in response to you saying that if you did discover the things Leo says to be true, you'd feel superior to most other humans and academics. I myself have a massive spiritual ego, hence why I said that.

But evil is good, that's what you're missing. I haven't been putting words in your mouth at all(an accusation for which you've not provided any evidence).

I'm not aware that I "put words in your mouth". At any rate, the error in your reasoning is the assumption good and evil are mutually exclusive. That they can't be one and the same, or more precisely that they can't both be good. But in fact they are. If you become conscious enough you'd know this firsthand. It's not logical, but it's true.

You're arguing that objective good vs evil exist. If that's true, a physical heaven(a place where evil doesn't exist) and a physical hell(a place where only evil exists) would be possible. But good is only good when compared against evil and vice versa. In the physical heaven, since only good would exist it would have no alternative, and therefore the concept of good would lose all meaning. The same occurs in a physical hell, since only evil would exist and has no alternative, the concept of evil ceases to make sense. A logical consequence of this, is that in order for reality to be absolutely good it necessarily has to include evil otherwise good would impossible(and therefore it'd be impossible for reality to be good).

It's funny you say I don't understand what you're saying. Let's put that theory to the test. My understanding of your argument is that since evil is the opposite of good, it's impossible for everything to be good if evil exists which in the human experience it does.

This is basically correct. Though love isn't really just an emotion since it's also everything that has nothing to do with the feelings of a sentient being.

But Leo... to most humans loving evil is unfathomable. They think their selfishness and fear is a virtue. How do you propose that they change?

The problem is humans don't know that they can undo evil. They think it's some kind of real quantity independent of their own mind.