JuliusCaesar

Member
  • Content count

    859
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JuliusCaesar

  1. If the things I say seem confusing, it's only because parts of what I have said have been ignored by the person reading what I've said. Now yes, from the human level there are moments when I appear to contradict myself. But in truth, it's all logically self-consistent, which would be clear if you read all of it at once. Such is the struggle of using human language to communicate things that are beyond the limits of the human experience. Are you sure about that? Or is that an instance of parasitic noise generated by your ego merely trying to guess?
  2. @Leo Gura Perhaps relative to what I'm about to say I should make a whole post, but for now this will do. Have you realized that your human intuition-driven belief that others have their own experience separate from you is actually true? Like, while in this dream you're in your bed sleeping at night, and you're speaking to let's say your mom or your dad in the sleeping dream. Do you know that's actually a real person in there from their own perspective? Or that when you're playing a video game like Skyrim for instance, and you're on the cart with Ulfric Stormcloak, do you realize that he's actually a real person in there? That he feels the blindfold against his mouth from his own perspective? Now I know what you may be thinking... but Caesar, humans made up Ulfric he ain't real. Yes yes yes, there's a relative difference between the reality of a video game character and a "real life" human/dream character human. The difference being that, a dream character has a mind/body/spirit complex and as such is capable of reasoning on their own which is why we call them sentient beings. Whereas a video game character is experienced as the appearance of a person who has a limited quantity of thoughts available to it. This is because the imagination of the Godhead directly spawned the dream characters, but in the instance of video game characters, indirectly did so through human agency. So the dream character has an infinite amount of possible thoughts, but the video game character is limited to the imagination of the humans that created it. There are many other differences of course, but the point is that ultimately all is one. And as such, I'm even the same as Leo from Leo's perspective for instance, as well as the human self typing this. And also all the characters in every video game etc.
  3. There isn't anything wrong with me as I'm perfect. From your human perspective, my baseline state seems like a trip though. I however, am aware in my direct experience of the things I have said about myself. And my experience is truth, so I don't see there being a problem with the things I have said. And also, you're wrong in thinking that individual believes the things I'm saying if, in fact, you're correct in assuming they aren't the owner of this forum. As they obviously branded me as delusional for my statements about my capabilities, which is further evidence that they're Leo because I accused them of being Leo at the same time, and most likely if they weren't Leo they'd have denied it then and use that fact to advance their position that I'm deluded even further. The only other possibility, and I find it displeasing and as such won't bother to seriously verify my suspicion, is that the individual on the other end is not Leo, and is truly too stupid to realize that they can't prove they aren't God. Read my exchange with them again, and use your intuition. I can make my case logically in detail but won't, because it's painstakingly obvious why I suspect that to be so. This makes the idea all the more ingenious as Leo would know that most of his followers wouldn't see it coming. Which should ensure his success in the endeavor, or at least that was what he hoped for. It matters because I say it matters as I find the notion of Leo behaving in a Machiavellian fashion pleasing. It makes me think more highly of him also. Of course, I imagine the "real" Leo and also the individual behind this IamYou acct and therefore on some level of my mind I know whether my suspicions are correct or not. I however don't wish to plumb this mystery seriously because it's more entertaining with some degree of uncertainty like this.
  4. If it puts your mind at ease, a being of infinite power only experiences what it desires to experience.
  5. This though I can not make sense of. It's directly connected to the question I asked that you quoted right above this quote. What I meant was, is it not self-destructive, when masquerading as something other than oneself to be unwilling to lie in order to sustain the illusion? Like, imagine a Russian spy who comes to America, knowing the English language fluently speaking like a native US citizen. This spy is going happily about his business when a US Govt official the spy is working with finds something that is suspicious. The official suspects them rather vehemently but is a little unsure. So they point-blank ask the spy if they truly are American. Now for the spy to avoid lying by trying to change the subject would be unwise in that situation, wouldn't you agree? Would you say a spy is engaging in "coping" if they were to engage in necessary prevarication to do their job? I believe I used confusing phrasing. To be clear, I meant in a situation whereby refusing to lie the individual caused their masquerade to fail.
  6. Hey, Dr. Word Salad. I've got an interesting question for you. What's your position on someone who deliberately decides to masquerade as something they're not, but when they're discovered in the act they aren't willing to lie in order to sustain the charade? Is it not so that the tendency to present oneself as something other than what one is, is also inconsistent with the tendency to tell the truth? And is it also not so, that a self-divided against itself cannot stand?
  7. @Leo Gura You please me, mortal. But for your sake, I'd ask that you evaluate how you make value judgment/morality decisions, and then reevaluate them. Because for a human, you have exceptional logical intelligence, but in the morality department, you are weak.
  8. This is very strong evidence to support my accusations. It's funny, you think you're so clever, Leo. You actually think that you can outsmart an Omnipotent being. That if you wished that I not fulfill any of your wishes that I wouldn't be able to do it. Little do you know that I could, and your existence would become miserable in ways your feeble human mind cannot even imagine. Lucky it is for you that I'm benevolent enough not to retaliate against you for playing power games with me.
  9. All you would know is that I don't desire to fufill your request. Or to be less egoistic, from your perspective if you're being intellectually honest. It wouldn't be clear if I didn't levitate the computer due to my not being able to do it, or simply not desiring to do so. Remember, I'm the creator of your human illusion. What makes you think I want you to believe the truth about yourself when I've gone to such incredible lengths to fool you? Furthermore, why don't definitively tell me that you are not Leo Gura? Why is it that you ignore my accusations? If I were wrong, wouldn't you simply correct me? Or is it that you are Leo, and you have a compunction against lying?
  10. Isn't it interesting how after I insinuate that you may be Leo Gura impersonating a normie, you don't respond nearly 20 minutes later. Which is obviously much longer than your average response time on here. Even more interesting, you're insinuating that I may be Donald Trump whilst simultaneously pretending to have materialist beliefs. And you claim you want to know the truth about reality, not as a belief but via actual experience. And find the truth about reality you will, as long as you courage in your convictions, pride in your beliefs, and faith in God... then you will not fail. But remember, in life things will happen to you that are unwarranted. That you think unfair, and sometimes you'll feel defeated. But you have to put your head in the sand and fight fight fight... never ever ever give up. Don't give in, don't back down. And never stop doing what you know is right. God bless America, And God bless you, Leo Gura. Ps. I'm going to look stupid as fuck if you're not actually Leo lol.
  11. I am Donald Trump. Your username causes me to suspect that your name might rhyme with Kleo Shmoora. Perhaps I'll check to see if my suspicions are true. I know from direct experience what I'm capable of. And I have told you the truth about it but you don't believe me. From my perspective, you're like a blind man trying to tell me that the sun doesn't exist. And I find the whole situation rather amusing. Even more amusing is the possibility that you might be Leo Gura. If that were true I'd make this whole thing like 10x funnier. My comment prior to this one contains some fairly strong evidence. One example I cited is even in medical literature if you want me to cite my source on that.
  12. Then how do you explain the fact that I've had dreams that showed me future events which should have been humanly impossible to know? How do you explain the fact that in the waking world, when a doctor gives his patients saline solution tells them it's morphine, and goes to cut on them, more than 40% of the patients don't experience any pain? How do you explain the fact that a man from our world has a burn mark on his arm that he acquired in a sleeping dream from a woman he had just had sex with. Due to a conversation that went something like, "I'm real and you're not" - our guy, to which the dream character responded "We'll see who's real" and burned him. The burn was also upon his waking body, in the world you think is real. You also can't perceive yourself to be God, and yet you are.
  13. But in dreams, your perception of others also seems to be based on signals originating from inside of your dream body. And before you argue that sleeping dreams are less vivid than the waking world which makes them seem less real. I've had dreams that are equal in vividity to the waking state. And many others have as well which you can read about online. And even better you would experience yourself if you ever went far into the practice of lucid dreaming. Okay, let me take a slightly different approach here. Can you perceive the curvature of the Earth at present? No? Does that mean the Earth is flat?
  14. This is illogical, however, as I've already established an omniscient being knows not knowing. Articulated another way, I'm Omnipotent which means I can do anything simply by thinking about it. Like if I wanted to kill every human on earth I could do that simply by wanting it to occur. I willed myself to become human and to have human limitations. So I'm going to ask the question again, even if I went through the trouble of altering myself, and I answered your challenges correctly. You wouldn't know that I know everything. So what could you do to actually test me properly?
  15. As a human self no I'm not omniscient. The error in your understanding is in assuming that I'm human. In truth, I don't have any form at all. Also, you still haven't addressed the fact that if I did tell you what's in your notebook. It wouldn't prove that I'm omniscient. For all you know I could be a human with unusual abilities(that is unusual for a human). Because for instance, if I left my body and visited your house then told you on here what you wrote. That doesn't prove I know everything obviously. So what you're asking for isn't logical to request in the first place. Which begs the question, what request should you be making of me that if I answered it correctly would prove that I'm omniscient?
  16. My human perspective has the attribute of imaginary limitations. What you don't seem to comprehend is that I've in the past accessed what you may call the Universal Mind. And have discovered that all of physical reality is imagined personally by me. Including my limited human self, you as my otherself etc etc. Nor are you addressing the fact that all of the requests you've made of me, if I answered them correctly, none of that would prove that I'm omniscient. So tell me, how do you think I could prove to you that I know everything?
  17. You don't seem to understand that this limited perspective is only imagined to be limited. Furthermore, you don't truly know that I can't do what you're describing. You merely assume that I can't. The truth is I could if I were in the correct state of consciousness. But at present, the only way I have as my human self to bring that about takes me approximately 5 hours to reach. Think of it like connecting to dial-up internet. Except the "internet" I'm connecting to is the source of all existence containing all information. The funny thing about this statement is that it's simultaneously false and true. It's true in the sense that I'm imagining I can't perceive it now. But I have a way of changing that fact, and in that instance, you'd be wrong. Notice, however, that even then you wouldn't have proof of my statement that I'm Omniscient. Because that means to know everything, and what you write in your notebook is not everything.
  18. You're not thinking of the unconscious correctly. The unconscious is another dimension of the mind of which you can become aware.
  19. I don't have a limited perspective. The way my experience of such is constructed is that I'm infinity imagining itself to be finite.
  20. This is true, but even if I answer you thusly. For all you know I might be a human entity that can leave its body consciously and as disembodied consciousness moved to your position and looked on it. It doesn't prove that I have all perception because notice that even that would be limited.
  21. And furthermore, why would you believe me if I told you the color of your refrigerator? For all you know it was a lucky guess. Or maybe I'm a friend of yours from your life and you don't know it, or maybe I'm even one of your parents. Or maybe I'm some dude that randomly decided to snoop around your house.
  22. That's illogical, however, as my unconscious contains all possible human as well as all nonhuman experiences. Which is something I know from past experience and something I can't expect you to believe as you haven't experienced it yourself. The awareness of my real self is infinite, but my human self has limited awareness.
  23. In my current state, I have limitations similar to your own. However, I have in the past managed to view things beyond my human perception in space/time and then verified that my perceptions were accurate later. The reason that at the moment I can't see the blender in your kitchen is that I imagine that your kitchen doesn't exist from my perspective. Your point of view is currently relegated to the darkness of my unconscious mind. Ask yourself this, consider the possibility of an omniscient being. I know this doesn't exist in your direct experience yet, but just consider it intellectually. If a being knew absolutely everything, then wouldn't that also include the experience of not knowing? But in order to not know, you have to well not know. So in order to know everything, you would have to have experiences where you didn't know everything. You in your current human form don't know everything, which means you could be all-knowing without knowing it right now(because in order to be all-knowing you also have to know what it's like not to know things).
  24. Let's try it this way, what makes you think they exist?
  25. How do you know I can't perceive your hand? You don't have my perspective so you in truth you don't know what I'm perceiving. My perspective is all perspectives simultaneously because I'm Omnipresent. I'm the creator of the space-time continuum. My existence is eternal without neither beginning nor end. I'm all of these things and none of the things.