Something Funny

Like I've said. You've already basically leveled Gaza with the ground. When will the threat be "diminished" enough?

Ahaha. Love how you've chaged the number from 1000 to 100. Some profound military knowledge that is. Totally not just guessing random numbers. Also, of course it's better to blow up civilians than to risk the lives of your own soldiers, we get it guys

You won't lose 1000 soldiers a day. Even Russia doesn't lose that much with their shit troops, shit command, and "lets just throw human meat at them" strategy. Israel has one of the best, well trained militaries in the world. Also, how are airstrikes going to help against tunnels build specifically to counter airstrike. And you've already basically leveled Gaza to the ground, is it safe to go in now?

Use infantry to occupy Gaza and eliminate Hamas soldiers, while also not denying basic necessities like Food, Water, and first aid to civilian population? Hunt down and kill Hamas leaders using joined forces of the best intelligence agencies in the world??

Ahahaha. Okay, you are right, I am done. I can argue with stupid people, but there is no point in arguing with someone who has no integrity.

Show me a post where I am justifying Hamas. That was not the question. My question is: is there anything Israel can do (kill a 100000 civilians, commit xyz warcrimes, starve people to death) to make you say "okay, that's to far, I can't justify that"? Because this is a thread about Israel / Palestine conflict? Start a thread about something else and I will share my opinion on that as well. Because it triggers me a lot. You using those dirty manipulation tactics, like your question above triggers me a lot. It's like getting stabbed in the gut by a friend. Apparently not.

This is not an equal war. While Palestinians have bombs dropped on them, Israelis eat ice cream in a park. Attacks on Israel are done using guerilla tactics by a terrorist organization It was not an active combat situation with Israeli lives at stake, so it's not an unrealistic standard to expect Israel to be more considerate of civilian lives when conducting pre-planned, strategic strikes on specific individuals. Calling Palestinian deaths "casualities of an opponent" is fucked up in itself. They were refugees, in a refugee camp. It is called a war crime.

You say that while you are the one coming up with imaginary, disingenious scenarios. Like how you added that those 80 people are Hamas supporters.

@DawnC answer this question.

@Lila9, after someone criticizes both Israel and Hamas in the same post

Please be careful with acknowledging that both sides are guilty. She might not be able to compute that.

I am sorry, but you must be either retarded or 100% disingenius and manipulative to suggest I am justifying or protecting hamas in any way. If I criticize israels war crimes that means I think that it's okay for Hamas to commit war crimes or that I support them, right? You are so binary, it's ridiculous. Nice cope. Most of those death tolls are confirmed by the UN and Israel themselves. Nobody, EVEN ISRAEL, is disputing them that much. Israel has openly admitted to theur last attack and killing almost 100 civilians, they have no issues with it. Besides, that's not the point of the question. The question is, where do you draw a line for yourself? But you are not going to answer, are you? It's crazy how you can't even hold an argument with a bit of integrity.

That's exactly what you've said and keep saying. He was not posing any active danger to anyone. This was a strategic decision to eliminate him without regard for other human lives. There was no proof that this strike will kill him or that he is there. You have no way of telling whose side those civilians were on. It was in the middle of a refugee camp.

Yes it is. That's exactly what you are doing. Comparing a value of human lives. Why couldn't this have been a ground operation, using troop to catch and eliminate him? Because Israel values the lives of its soldiers more than it does the lives of Palestine civilians. This is a ridiculous scenario. He wasn't shooting at anyone at the moment. There was no hard proof that he was even there in the first place. You have no idea who those 80 civilians were supporting nor should it matter as supporting someone is not a death sentence worthy offence. At least not according to the laws of the 1st world countries, which Israel claims to be. And even if your fairy tail scenario was the case. Lets says it was some terrorist holding 80 people hostage and shooting everyone else in the middle of New York. There is no way a solution would be to kill them all together.

@DawnC also, ironically, this is exactly how Hamas thinks and that's why, I assume, you have an issue with them. Ends justify the means. By fighting Hamas like that, you become Hamas.

@DawnC it's disgusting to see you compare the costs of human lives like that. If you think that killing him is worth 80 other lives then it ahould be your and your family's lives. If I gave you a choice: I will kill this guy but you and your whole family have to die. Are you going to agree to that deal? Yeah, exactly.

@Lila9 I am seriously curious. Is there a line where you will say "okay that's too much"? Like if Israel kills 100000 civilians, like Leo said, are you going to say that they have lost it? Or is it okay for them to kill 2 millions of Palestinians for all you care because "Hamas is bad"?

@Merkabah Star but you don't get it. Hamas are bad guys so it's okay.

@Lila9 you see, the difference between you and me is that you basically say: Hamas is cruel and evil so it justifies Israel being cruel and evil too. Every time someone points out Israel's war crimes, you just point your finger and say "but look, Hamas does that too." The difference though is that Hamas is a terrorist group while Israel is supposed to be a civilized state with a seat at the UN. So in my opinion, it's okay to hold them to a bit of a higher standard. And in my opinion, Hamas being cruel and evil, doesn't justify Israel committing war crimes as well. *** But even if you put that aside, and stick to your position of Israel can do whatever they want, and murder as many people as they want because Hamas is bad. It's simply delusional to praise them for being soooo humane at the same time, lol.

@Nivsch @Lila9 Doesn't seem very humane to me...

@Soul_Guy @PurpleTree Why do you guys care what was in trend when? This is so dumb. All that matters is whether they look good on a particular person. Saying out of context stuff like "baggy pants are horrible" is silly.. Ok boomer

You guys sure love to play a victim card. How about 30x more dead palestinian people? I don't see you trying to emphasize with them very much.

What part of what he said sounded cocky or agressive to you? Also, it's pretty dumb to show your face or give any kind of real life information on a forum full of weird, mentally unstable people.

@Lila9 I don't want to think that about you but what am I supposed to think?

Then answer the question. How can you keep supporting Israel when they do shit like that? Yeah the difference though is that Hamas is a terrrorist organisation while Israel is supposed to be a legitimate, civilized country. It actually says a lot about their methods if people are at the stage where they feel like it's okay to hold them to the same standards of savagery.