Jannes

Just saw your Blog post about good game and "shooting the shit". Is this example in the video adequate? I just want to make sure I understand correctly.

I haven't seen his forum presence as I joined after Connor. I loved Connors videos so much even though the cringe was almost unbearable. Of course it was crazy and he was out of control but his vibe was incredible. It felt like I kind of understood how people of a more developed society could be like. Free of fears, totally engaged with the present moment. Living every day as though it was the last. The amount of shit he went through in just a couple months. Always changing as well so it kept being real.

What about bisexuals then...

It's either not articulated clearly what is meant by it or it doenst make sense to me. "If serious philosophy starts and ends when you realize you are God philosophy never happens."

We have a different topic though.

It's incredible that we could self sustain ourselves in such primitive ways but get burned out in society which is supposed to make things 10x easier.

I recently stumbled across this. I had no idea what it was so I searched it up. It's not just a fetish, it can be but it doesnt even have to be. For many it's just a way to play and relax. It's about acting like a dog without human thoughts and responsibilities. I find that really fascinating. It's like humans are so sick of themselves they rather play as dogs instead. If I didn't stumble across spirituality and its potential for transcending experiences maybe this is what I would have done. I dont have a good opinion of this yet. Maybe this is a setback. A way to make your mind lazy. Dogs are a lot less conscious than humans probably. Or maybe not and it's the ultimate mediation exercise. A way to connect with being directly. A way for humanity to transform by deconstructing the human identity with fun. What do you think?

@Jannes Do you know more about it though? Seems pretty judgmental otherwise..

Can exactly be that, can also be the opposite imo. But you can think that you do it from a pure standpoint and deceive yourself, thats certainly true.

Thats a pretty deep answer. Do you think its possible to only do one and not the other? ikr

Psylocibin was my first psychedelic. Up until now it was mostly a fun drug was also horny and couldn't really get serious with it even when I tried to. I mean I could work through a lot of inner stuff in a humorous way (for example I remember perfectly how an Italian guy slapped me in the face when I revealed to him that I think that I am unloveable, so heartwarming). But I couldn't contemplate death for example. Yesterday when I took it it was a completely different drug. I naturally only thought about existential question and it was more cold then usual. I took 5meo dmt some months ago but not to a breakthrough dose and recently some lsd. That might have changed psilocybin for me. On the one hand that was exactly what I was looking for, a clear drug I could use for long contemplation. On the other hand I would like to get a drug with more lightness back. Do all psychedelics get serious at some point?

What do you mean by that? I took a pretty strong dose once. Can't remember it well unfortunately but I will give it another shot if I can find it. The lack of taste is a big bonus anyway.

@Miguel1 Thats very inspiring and somehow touches brief chapters in my past where it was similar to me. (not with sex though) thanks for sharing! @Emotionalmosquito I am not sure what you are doing but night game can be pretty harsh. Are you doing some other social activities? Some kind of sport or club can be good to be social and it's not overly demanding. You dont need to be a party maker to be a part of the group there.

Sure all of trips were different of course. But it never got like 98% serious business. I personally matured a lot which could play into it. You mean the same amount of substance? That never played a big role for me, small and middle doses all had the same kind of vibe just with different intensity. I was a middle around. I had way lower and way higher.

No substances definitely affect each other. When I took lsd I saw the same colors and bubbles when I micro dosed on shrooms which is a domain that was very lsd like and I never got it on shrooms before. Isnt that just the synthetic form of psilocybin?

ideal idea of a snack on lsd: A thought about a recent LSD trip that got back to me. I saw all kinds of graffiti art on lsd and probably because I was hungry I saw some kind of food. It was something hefty, fatty, maybe the idea of a little cheese, maybe the idea of a little salami, but nothing very specific. It didn't really have a form physically or taste wise. I remembered a talk of Jordan Peterson where he talks about how when men look for a girlfriend what they have before they got a real girl is the ideal girl the womenness so to say before reality shapes it and gives it all sorts of edges so that it can manifest. So in order to have a real girlfriend one has to sacrifice the ideal in their mind. This can be analogous to this nonspecific food I saw on lsd. It was the ideal thing but it wasn't anything in particular. It wasn't a hamburger, it wasn't lasagne, it wasn't pizza, it wasn't a sandwich, it wasn't a steak, it wasn't noodles, .. it was something superior to all of it, it was the ideal thing. I wonder if thats what plato means with his ideology/ Allegory of the Cave.

The problem with renewable energy is that 1) it's not accessible everywhere, 2) it can't be transported over large distances yet. So if there are no other options couldn't the population of first world countries "just" move to global places with lots of solar power? Of course these countries have a population of their own and many of them aren't as developed. In Africa Mauritius has at least a human development index of 0.8. Australia is hot, has very little population and is has the most developed country in the world Australian Capital Territory HDI 0.98.

Like what? I haven't thought about that. But most countries import and export all kinds of stuff. That wouldnt be unique to this place. It's about making local energy expenditure like for driving, cooling, light, etc. green. BUT with lots of energy you could potentially produce all kinds of stuff by manipulating the environment with energy. If it's too hot you could potentially built giant air conditioning and grow plants with that etc. If you lack water more energy demanding ways of getting water get accessed. Maybe that's all not profitable maybe it is, I just want to analyze the possibility. Because there was a massive worldwide shock when big nuclear power plants exploded. (Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant explosion march 2011) In Germany which is very far ways kids couldn't play in sandboxes for 3 months, all kinds of mushrooms weren't eaten. There were all kinds of symptoms like higher death rate of children which were associated with atomic radiation. If one of these suckers exploded near a an important big city it would be a disaster for the health and the economy of the whole country. Nuclear power plants have two huge problems. 1) they can explode, 2) you can't properly store the nuclear waste. It got very popular to be against all nuclear power plants. "Die Grüne" a Democratic Party in Germany were becoming very popular because they were against nuclear power plants. The thread of them becoming a big party let chancellor Angela Merkel decide to join that popular opinion so her party wouldn't loose so many votes. The Germany overshot with their goals though. Russian gas was a good interim solution before going all green as it is half as damaging as petroleum. You can learn a lot by coming up with questions like these. Even if at the end it shows that there is good reason for why it doenst work, you understand why. Or maybe you actually find a new solution. It's the best from both worlds.

Okay perhaps I am no geographical expert. But you dont need green farmland for every place, if it's just a city wouldn't everything do as long as you have energy? Also you could turn many shitty places around. With solar parks some deserts could built savannas so not unattractive at all. Dont ask me about the mechanisms though.

Not in Australia for example. Small population for the amount of land. Of course I am not talking about conquering land that is already taken.

When all the cool kids go to Australia. Look it's just a possible solution. Maybe it's not realistic but maybe it will have a partial implementation because it is a real possible solution.

Dont meme me.

Maybe. If this is a real solution and influencer do it they might start a trend and pull parts of society with them. Just like the vegan movement. Moving to another country is also adventurous. If they shape existing countries into popular ones who knows. Or maybe countries in the future will have to pay for their environmental pollution and hot countries with los of renewable energy will be a lot cheaper.

For many of them arrogance is a necessary adoption. Many nice guys aren't ethical either, they just give them free shit and are nice to them in hopes that they get pussy, they dont want to be good. This goes so deep. So an attractive women needs to punish these manipulative guys. Also if she would be too nice every low value guy would approach her which would hurt the guys when they get rejected and would put her in danger because rejection is always a bit dangerous. I dont think that they become unethical people because of their position I think that's more what people who dont know them say about them although it could be true to a partial extend.

A spectacular way to survive.