Jannes

A part part of the universe is essentiell for the rest of the universe So wie das Wasser die Erde formt und die Erde das Wasser formt, ist alles in der Welt im Grunde EIN Prozess. Die Bäume haben den Hals der Giraffe geformt, die Löwen die Muskeln und Hörner der Bullen. Der eisige Wind das dicke Fell des Wolfes, die heiße Sonne die ledrige Haut des Salamanders, die Pflanze den Pflanzenfresser, der Pflanzenfresser den Fleischfresser, Wie kann eins unabhängig vom anderen betrachtet werden ? Ein Löwe ist kein Löwe ohne Antilopen oder Zebras die er reißt und ohne Savanne über die er läuft und ohne… Der Löwe ist also nicht nur ein Löwe, also ein Löwe ist nicht nur all das hinter der Trennlinie zwischen Fell und Außenwelt, sondern ein essentielles Rad für das restliche Universum. Das Universum würde nicht ohne Löwe existieren und der Löwe nicht ohne das Universum.

FREE WILL = NO-FREE WILL (Absolute): Der Pessimist sagt er hat überhaupt keinen freien Willen. Er ist der Meinung, dass die Umwelt ihn (das Subjekt) in jeglicher Hinsicht lenkt. Er kann dies bis aufs kleinste Detail zurückverfolgen, sodass selbst “Sieh her, ich will meine Hand heben, ich habe meine Hand gehoben, tadaa der freie Wille existiert.“ sich als Folge einer langen Kette ungewollter Tatsachen entpuppt. Der Optimist sagt, er hat freien Willen über Alles, denn er hat die absolute Authorität wie er auf alles reagiert. Was immer er sagt ist wahr, er ist schließlich die absolute Authoritätsgewalt. Wenn er sagt, er habe keinen freien Willen und er würde von der Unwelt gelenkt werden, dann stimmt das, aber nur weil er es gesagt hat, sodass er immer noch die absolute Gewalt über alles hat. Beide haben ābsolut Recht, denn beide sagen ābsolut dasselbe. Die Dualität zwischen Umwelt und Subjekt ist eine Illusion, denn Subjekt impliziert Umwelt und Umwelt impliziert Subjekt. Wenn das Subjekt bis zum Ende gedacht wird schließt es die Umwelt ein. Wenn die Umwelt bis zum Ende gedacht wird schließt es das Subjekt ein.

15mg 4HO-Met 30.12.2022 It feels so good to suffer, because suffering means to manifest, to manifest means to be, to be means to live. Suffering is safeness. Sometimes I ask myself, am I a good person? What makes me a good person? Another time I ask myself „What if I am just a bad person? And another time I ask myself „Am I an actor/ a philosopher/.. ? I am always asking myself these questions. The reason why that is is because there actually isn’t anything real behind the identity. If I ever grasped anything real then it would stick. But it isn’t real and therefore I have to invent myself constantly. I am no particular one, I am the one who imagines new identities out of thin air and even being the one who imagines identities is an imagination from "me“. Nice light brainfuck. We love to demonize god for his creation. That everything is just imagination and not "real“ is so outrageous. God: The floor that you see there, that’s my imagination. (Me (God): No! (indigidant and stunned) God: The wall that you are seeing there, .. yeah that’s also part of my imagination. Me (God): No it can’t!! (outraged and murderous) God: And the lamp you are seeing there.. (Can’t wait to rub salt into my wounds) Me (God): No don’t you dare!! (Full of hate with a baseball bat in the hand) God: .. that’s also part of my imagination. (enjoys being a shameless asshole) Me (God): You bastard!! (Breaks baseball bat in two) „Gott der alte Sack hat sich das alles aus Spaß ausgedacht.“

So to sum up. Cons: - Our understanding of health is very limited. Therefore eating in a way that has proven itself to be healthy for decades is safer then some new invention that doesn’t have a lot of empirical proof yet. - Green Powders are often low quality (heavy metals, toxins, pesticides, .. ) -> Could be avoided with a high quality product Sounds good to me so far ?.

In terms of vitamins and minerals green powders can pretty much replace vegetables. Even chlorophyll (which isn’t in regular supplements) is in green powders. Despite fiber, what is there in vegetables that I can’t get from green powders?

Yes but it’s hard to find a recipe with it. You can’t really do one with just one kind of frozen veg and if you buy a blend then the blend will most likely not match the recipe. But most of the veg that I do eat is a frozen veg mix that I roast in a pan as a sidedish but that still isn’t the optimal comfort that I want ?.

I haven’t verified anything in direct experience but here are my thoughts on it anyway. God wants to experience everything because that’s being unbiased and god is absolutely that. That means god wants to experience higher and lower perspectives. Lower perspectives can only work through lowered states of consciousness. How could you take anything serious in your human life if you could see the whole picture? You couldnt, your human reality would just crash. Lowering consciousness means giving form to something. So in order to appreciate the details you have to make the picture smaller. It’s like high resolution but low consciousness and low resolution but high consciousness.

I would guess more because it’s easier to hide a low quality ingredient in a powdered form with other ingredients then as the whole vegetable itself.

@effortlesslumen I get that. Whole Foods worked for generations and such a big change might have risks involved that science isn’t yet aware of. I have an instant pot but I haven’t really explored all its possibilities, I use it more like a rice cooker for whole grains and legumes. All the instant pot recipes that I look up have all kinds of specific veggies in them which makes it expensive and time consuming. I just want to throw a blend of frozen veggies in there ?. What if it was a high quality, organic and heavy metal tested product?

AI will help make VR better. I think VR will be big. Why wouldn’t it be, it’s a totally different experience then webbrowsing or video games.

What is living water? Even if it has less nutrients, I can easily consume more of it. I asked AI about antioxidants in powdered greens ⬇️ Are you saying that the combination of different plants in the mix will make a single ingredient less nutritional valueable? Something like wheat grass could be an option then. Fiber isn’t the issue I eat fruit, whole grains and legumes. Meal prep still takes a big chunk of time and eating the same thing every day is super boring. No it’s not. I am like a programmer. I put a few hours into thinking how to simplify everything and so strategically spare time. I don’t necessarily agree that it has to be difficult.

@Michael569 Yes my plan would be to complement my diet. Of course I wouldn’t forbid myself to eat vegetables but I probably wouldn’t cook a whole lot of them anymore if I don’t need to. I cooked and optimized myself 3 healthy meals every day for 3 years but not solely for the purpose of being healthy but also as a cooping mechanism to escape other challenges in life. (I put more effort into the thing I was already good at which was health rather then expanding to other domains like social problems) So I connect healthy cooking with very unhealthy behaviour patterns and so I just make cooking as minimalistic as I can while maintaining health. While I am at it, is there a greens powder that you can recommend @Michael569 ?

Given that AI is pure rationality which is completely dualistic I think it’s unable to "have“ insights into the nature of reality. What do you think? @Nilsi In one thread I read that you rationalized yourself to some mystical experience. Would love to hear your opinion about this.

The driving force that will make VR experience realistic.

A lot of demonization without any good arguments. It’s not clear that sex robots would increase sexual violence against women and it’s also not even clear that sex robots are bad for relationships. For example men could now be more interested in personality then sex because their sexual needs are met. I don’t necessarily agree with the child sex toy part. Yes it’s fucking weird but you have to look at it statistically. If it lowers the rate of criminal pedophiles then it’s a good thing.

One thing that prevented me from disproving the existence of a physical reality are atoms. You can prove the existence of atoms with experiments and to my knowledge you can even somewhat see them with the best high end microscopes. For some reason I thought that if we can experience atoms (through a microscope for example) that this means that the physical objective world really exists (as something outside of consciousness) because it is actually grounded in first order truth. But there really isn’t anything special about atoms. Seeing them through a microscope is just an experience like every other experience. It is okay that they exist, they totally can, it doenst prove however that they exist as something outside of consciousness. The thought that this experience (seeing atoms) is actually real (points to something outside of consciousness) is also just a conscious experience like any other. Maybe the hard thing I couldn’t wrap my mind around was that consciousness has so many layers which appear to be separate because they can’t get connected (mind matter problem) and therefore thought that it can’t all be consciousness. I remember a quote I got from a forum member: „Consciousness is both Creator and Creation. The seemingly appearent seperation is an Illusion.“ Maybe that finally sank in a little deeper for me.

Yeah basically.

Most of us have seen the potential of AI even in its early stages and it will get 100x better in the coming years. Of course you can try to outsmart AI as long as possible but in 10 years let’s say, do you think there will be more then just a handful of "axiomatic jobs“ (someone needs to press the start button on AI) left?

I think it’s exactly not that. I think it’s a direct experience which later can be conceptualized. that’s wild. With Chatgpt? I would love to try it out as well but too many user are using it already. Maybe it’s just categorical impossible. Like an eye trying to look at itself. Maybe it will just have an error when it is about to realize something mystical.

What would be an insight into the nature of reality that isn’t "human“ to you?

Oh thats interesting. A direct experience into a facet of reality like ONENESS (Self vs Other), GOODNESS (Good Intention vs Bad Intention), CONSTRUCTION (Construction vs Destruction), NATURAL (Natural vs Artificial), … I remember you saying somewhere that you philosophized yourself to some kind of mystical/spiritual experience of some kind. ?

What’s the risk of heavy metals in your greens powder?

@LastThursday AI will be able to take information from the real world instead of internet information in the future. AI can be programmed to build server and machines and power stations that would provide the energy, making AI pretty much completely independent if one wishes to do that. That’s not what I meant. My question will we create such an intelligent tool that it doesn’t need a tool user anymore because the tool gives better direction then the user himself?

You can buy a sex doll.