thisintegrated

Yep, sounds about right. 538 is called the "Goal Seeker", from the "Solution Master" group. "Ambitious and competitive with leadership ability. Pragmatic, goal oriented and driven, but somewhat self interested. Balanced wings. SO/SX" Edit: While I'm at it.. "794: Gentle Positivist. Innovative, but self doubting and withdrawing as defence. Focus on positivity, gentle help, the looming future." Exactly. That's why I keep linking to that site. Spend enough time there and MBTI's validity becomes clear. ENTP 7w8 784

I knew it??

They're called wings. They're supposedly closely related to your primary number. There's also tritypes, which is an alternate interpretation of the model where you select one number from each type (head/heart/body), starting with your primary number. E.g. if you're a seven you're either a 7w6 or 7w8. And your tritype might be 784

I don't know if such tests exist, but shouldn't be hard to find if they do. I'd suggest just looking it up on youtube and hearing a description. Or just studying charts like this. Pick the one that fits you best, and the one next to it, whichever one fits better.

That list includes ENFP of every enneagram type. If you know your enneagram, you can improve the accuracy even further. E.g. ENFP 7w6 https://www.personality-database.com/search?keyword=enfp 7w6&cat_id=30

As an ENTP, can confirm.

https://www.personality-database.com/profile?personality=12&category=30 ????

I think that's Carl's type. You're definitely Carl-like in that you respond to half of my posts, so I'd say yes. https://www.personality-database.com/profile?personality=12&category=30 You tell me if these stereotypes fit you.

Easy. ISTPs are absolutely nothing like ESFJs, although they're both sensors. Just checked, and their stereotypes are accurate too. Go have a look if you don't believe me.

I thought detailed analysis of two types would be evidence enough for you. That was really just a proof of concept so you get the point and go on the website to confirm for yourself. I'm not gonna write a paragraph on every single type, and explain how each stereotypical trait is accurate.

It's maybe not 100% straightforward to understand, but that is how it works, for the most part. BPD often is influenced by genetics/trauma, but it only manifests as "the crazy, unstable, self-absorbed woman" in some personality types. INTPs with BPD would for sure not look the way you'd picture the stereotypical person with BPD. To be the "crazy" kind of BPD person, you'd have to take your suffering seriously. Your life would have to revolve around emotions. You'd have to be entitled and not used to hardships. Otherwise, you wouldn't even care or think much of your mood swings.

I'm not unique. There's nothing unique about me being god. There's no limit to how many "the one god"s there can be. Any limits are self-imposed, and imaginary.

Exactly. I don't think you're quite getting it yet though. What I was using INTJ as an example that needs determine one's personality. If a person's needs are x, they develop into an INTJ. If their needs are y, they develop into an ESFJ. This applies to identical twins too, as Atheistic pointed out.

You're still not getting it. Yes, you are all there is. You can verify it and see all of infinity within you. But that says nothing about the potential for alien yous to exist. You have no way to reach out to them, as you can never leave your own self.

ESFJ was just a good a example. Why are INTJs logical? Because they want to be.. because they need to be. Why aren't ESTJs logical? Because they don't need to be.. and so they don't want to be and never become it. No recognition of its value = no adaptations made to get there

The point is that you can't know anything outside of you, and that thinking you're all there is can only ever be an assumption. Yes you can create other Gods within your consciousness, but that's still within your consciousness, and isn't the same concept. Just don't go thinking other people are real or anything crazy like that. Solipsism is still 100% true.

Ravenclaw

Of course. In MBTI you're either a introvert/extrovert, sensor/intuitive, feeler/thinker, judger/perceiver.

That's just silly. People aren't born with their personality. A personality is formed to adapt to the environment. A kid will develop in a way to fill in the gaps in the family. You've probably heard "opposites attract", which suggests that compatibility depends on how well people complete each other. But this isn't limited to just romantic relationships. This is how communities operate, in general, at all levels. Kids adapt to become whatever's missing in the family, and that's how a personality is formed. Imagine if this wasn't the case, and a family didn't have a kid who's good with computers. This is very rare. ESFJs care more than any other type about having kids. It's their life goal, basically. That's why most moms are this type.

xSxx people, rather than xNxx people.

The stereotypes don't lie. Have a look at the link. I mean literally one of the stereotypes is "she's your mum"

Here's the most comprehensive list you'll find about "INTP quirks" https://www.personality-database.com/profile?personality=13&category=30 Any other INTPs here should also find this interesting.

My man.. you really need to work on that Fe. Barely anything I say is fully serious. Maybe if you spent more time studying psychology you'd be familiar with techniques such as undermining the opposition and demonstrating social awareness. And then there's just Fe-specific language, which should make the nature of my posts even more apparent. I really shouldn't have to explain this stuff, but the younger INTJs are dark and serious, I guess. No Fe = no getting through to you?‍♂️

What did you learn?

?