thisintegrated

They're not bees

I really hated that. Gave me a bad trip when I watched it on acid.

Acid only enhances what's already there.

I guess I used to deliver pizza while on acid, regularly.

This sounds unusual for an INTJ. INTJs usually only want respect/admiration, and don't really care how others feel about them as that's Fe. Interesting. I seen no examples of Green INTJs, but this does make sense.

That's completely unrelated to the concept of something outside God. Yes, within yourself, you'll only find.. yourself! But that's not the question.

Terra e Hunter x Hunter Heroic Age Honzuki no Gekokujou Ajin Kingdom

It's fun when you get interesting new insights/awakenings. But the only real reward is being free of your own delusions/fear. No fear = no suffering = bliss

Let's summon.. @Leo Gura for comment.

You will love Terra e https://anilist.co/anime/2158/Terra-e-TV Features at least one Turquoise character. I think this might be my favorite anime of all time.

If I was to guess, I'd say Leo is more awake than you. You can only ever awaken to yourself. You're not gonna be able to verify that there's nothing outside. All you can do is theorize, and consider the possibilities, and what makes the most sense. Even if you had an IQ of 10000 and meditated on psychedelics for a million years you could never "verify" if there's something outside or not. That's why you can't conclude that there's nothing outside.

God has no way of checking. God is only God of itself. To confirm there's nothing outside would require looking outside, which would require being God of outside.

God can only know itself. It can't know anything beyond itself as it's not a God of anywhere else. God is only God of itself, and nowhere else; nothing else. If God could go outside of itself, it wouldn't be God of that new place. Is there anything outside God? God can't know, as God isn't God of anything outside God.

omg.. only people who know nothing about MBTI rely on tests like this. The fact you're placing such importance on tests makes the extent of your knowledge clear. You accuse me of making "faulty assumptions", yet give not a single reason for why this should be the case. You've also not been able to refute a single point I've made, not even the one about P not meaning "less judging". Should be easy to prove me wrong if I was.

Most people consider MBTI to be nonsense, and the stereotypes are typically seen as a joke as they doesn't seem scientific. The stereotypes aren't objective, so most people just dismiss them. Not all ESFPs. Depends on the ESFP's Fi values. They're hyper-aware of the physical world, and live in a world of "people/places/statuses", and so they're likely to have many connections and know many people.

Ok, give me BuddhistLover's friends??

Your writing style makes me want to throw myself in front of a locomotive. Would you say vocabulary is the "core" of language? The fact your thinking is SOOOO rigid/inflexible confirms there's absolutely no way you're an NTP. When you see "core" you don't see the possibilities of what I could mean by it, regardless of how obvious it is. Like, if I said "helo there!" you'd go "wtf does helo mean? you're not making any sense!!". What's more judging: ISFP or ISFJ? The answer is ISFP. If you understood the functions this would be obvious, yet you're typing yourself as a P because you think it's less judging.. dude.. what.. I swear almost all your arguments are over semantics, or seemingly intentional misinterpretations of other people's words. If me and someone else are both "talkative" I might say we're similar in our talking tendencies. Or I could also say we're identical in our talking tendencies. They're both the same thing. "Talking tendency" is a broad idea, so it's easy for two people to be identical in something so broad. But even when two people are identical in speech, there will still be differences within that identical speech if you choose to subdivide speech into more specific elements. So I can say two Ti users are identical in their use of logic, but I can also say they're similar. On a macro level they're identical, on a micro level they're similar. I've not specified how far I'm zooming in, so both terms are correct.

Te likes team-work, team meetings, etc., but that's not exactly the same as being "social and outgoing". Socializing for fun is an Fe thing. Not an assumption. Just because a function is extroverted doesn't mean it needs people. Only some extroverted functions can make someone want to socialize.

Nothing. You could say Netflix itself copied YouTube, and then that YouTube copies whatever was before it. If you took a video on your phone and uploaded it to your own website, could anyone sue you? Well that's literally what Netflix is doing.

I'm afraid this man contradicts your beliefs. He says suffering is a product of the mind. I'm surprised you'd share ideas you're so strongly against.

Actualization is a hobby too.

And fill it with what instead?

Extroversion is only correlated with "outgoingness" in feeler sensor extroverts. E.g. An ENTP's extroverted function is Ne. Ne has no need for people. Ne is all about potential/future/ideas/innovation. It's mostly Fe that makes ENTPs want people. ENFPs are extroverts like ENTPs, except they don't have Fe and care about spending time with people even less. Also.. Intuitive extroverts will often prefer socializing on a forum like this. It's hard to find intuitives irl, so if you're surrounded by sensors you may feel more alone than if you went on a forum to talk about think you're actually interested in. If I was an sensor, I'd be content with just talking about ordinary things with family. But as I'm not a sensor, I'd feel more alone talking with them than talking to strangers on the internet. Intuitive extroverts need to talk about intuitive topics, and for most the only place they'll get that is online.

Categorization is the core of language/communication. This is why I pointed out the ridiculousness of me giving you pages of function descriptions. If we can compress complex ideas into just "Te" then we must. How does it confuse convergences? If you and someone else are the same type, you easily identify the similarities. And if there any any differences, the model makes those apparent too, and you add on other models to account for those differences. You seem to assume MBTI is just the 4 letters, and that "P is perceiving" and "J is judging".. If this is the case then you're more than likely mistyped.

I don't think it's possible to trademark the idea of "streaming". They can only trademark IP, which they sometimes sell to other streaming services who want to fund a new season.