spiritual memes

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    646

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by spiritual memes

  1. Posted

    6 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

    This isn't game. This is just sexual exploitation.

    It doesn't take any game or skill to sleep with a woman who you have financially manipulated into doing sex work for you.

    I'm tired of explaining this. If it isn't obvious to you within 5 minutes that Tate's whole way of doing business is a toxic fraud, you shouldn't be here.

    I mean, its clearly not obvious to about 60% of young guys on the internet judging by the #freetate comments they make. 

  3. Posted

    1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

    Everything that needs to be said I have said in my Rant Against The Pickup Community.

    It's the same community and toxic mindset that permeates pickup.

    I think Andrew Tate is a different breed. He is both more toxic and more popular than any pickup artist I've ever seen. He's also not primarily just pickup as he promotes get rich quick schemes and conspiracy theories. Pickup artists are stage orange wheras Tate is stage red.

  4. Posted

    32 minutes ago, Intraplanetary said:

    Is it possible that a person can move to Yellow by simply developing oneself spiritually, hence naturally becoming perspectival and also through contemplation? 

    Is it possible that spiritual development by default bring a person up to Yellow stage?

     

    No, if you look at a lot of spiritual influencers, they tend to flatten out at green, sometimes regressing to orange and blue when they get into conspiracies. 

  7. Posted

    Just now, KH2 said:

    Well, fixing self-esteem alone would probably fix majority - if not all - of my mental suffering, and mental blockages. So it's worth focusing on it.

    A lot of insecure angry thoughts keep bugging me throught the day. I need to detoxify myself somehow, look at things from fresh new perspective, gain awareness and actually really grow

    I recommend Internal Family systems therapy. Its really useful for shadow work and gaining awareness into your subconscious thoughts.

  13. Posted

    37 minutes ago, Kuba Powiertowski said:

    @spiritual memes you misunderstood me. On the contrary. I consider consciousness as a prior to everything else that appears and manifests in awarness. But if Carl-Richard claims that genetics determines Will ergo Consciousness, than I demand any proof for such statement. To be honest I don't demand anything from nobody. Beliefs cannot be challenged, changed or removed from outside. 

    Ah i see. I think genetics determine a decent amount of our personality and behaviours so it likely has a significant effect on consciousness

  14. Posted

    47 minutes ago, Kuba Powiertowski said:

    I want a link to a scientific article from researchgate, arxiv or a department of a reputable institute or university where a scientific paper containing such evidence has been published. Only I am asking not for hypotheses of outstanding scientists or theories but for scientific proof carried out in accordance with the entire regime of the scientific method.

    Thank You;)

    This is a circular argument. You are assuming that consciousness is determined by physical interactions and you demand scientific evidence which is by definition physical.

     

     

  18. Posted

    18 hours ago, KH2 said:

    I do feel ashamed that I followed him. The kind of self improvement he's doing - and not only him, but regular stage orange people who aren't scammers and aren't toxic people - is absolute bastardization of the concept. It's supposed to be inner growth over outer growth, not the other way around. Happiness is achieved by growing internally, not by getting a bunch of external shit. The confusion only comes when getting a bunch of shit does lead to inner growth - and inner growth leads to getting a bunch of shit. That's true, but only up to a certain point. At some point, these 2 paths split into completely and polary opposite directions, and only one of them leads to happiness.

    The fact is, I haven't taken true self improvement seriously, and I failed and wasted my time. I will take my inner growth, and quality of my daily emotions seriously this time. While taking complete break from any social media bullshit, as from tomorow, I'm using a dumb phone instead of smart phone.

    Honestly, just that realisation alone puts you above 99% of self help enthusiasts.

  20. Posted

    8 minutes ago, BipolarGrowth said:

    It’s hard to tell if it’s the same thing, but it being your most intense awakening experience is a good sign at least. When I saw it, it was so stunning that I actually couldn’t perceive the source of it. I could only see the light around the outermost edge. Certainly the most breathtaking moment of my entire life. 10 tabs of LSD was like 1/1000th of the intensity of that moment. 

    How did you reach this state?

  21. Posted

    1 hour ago, BipolarGrowth said:

    Well those are going to be states that are usually pretty personalized. The one I was referring to for myself was something I call Absolute Divinity, but this term won’t really mean much to anyone as it was a pretty unique personal awakening to something which isn’t as commonly discussed. You can picture it as “seeing the white light” while already built upon the foundation of previous types of awakening that I’ve mentioned as well as others. Usually our verbal descriptions of one state versus another will not carry the same weight to those interpreting them. It’d almost be more accurate for me to assign numbers. 

    Holy shit I think I've experienced this. It's the most intense awakening experience i've ever had where I had the most intense ego death I had ever experienced followed by me leavning my physical body, moving through a tunnel into a white light of infinite love. I was there for an infinite period of time as time was meaningless there. I was then thrust through another tunnel back into physical reality.

  22. Posted

    2 minutes ago, r0ckyreed said:

    Deep down. We are all epistemological solipsists.  We cannot know for certain anything existing outside of consciousness.  Our epistemology already limits us to all being solipsists.  Of course, you can deny you are a solipsist, but the reality is that you can't know anything outside of your consciousness, which makes us all solipsists.  We cannot know if we are dreaming or not right now with absolute certainty.  Anything else like dualism, physicalism, idealism, etc. is all just a game you are playing.  The truth is that I can only know that consciousness exists and nothing else.  If you exist, then I assume that your epistemology is similar to mine.  So actually, I cannot state the claim I made in my second sentence because I do not know that.  But I assume you exist and assume that your consciousness works like mine.

    epistemologically yes but ontologically no. which is what i was talking about

  24. Posted

    26 minutes ago, r0ckyreed said:

    Well. If Solipsism is true, the person does not have conscious experience and is like a robot.  They have no qualia.  Their brain is like the operating system that produces the illusion of conscious experience.  I cannot know for certain whether other people have consciousness.  Everything I know about another being is objectified.  An animal is an object in my consciousness.  In my subjective experience, I am the only subject there is.  But I seriously doubt that I am the only subject.  If you are actually conscious right now and are not just some philosophical zombie or dream character of mine, then I could never possibly know, but that doesn't mean that metaphysical solipsism is true.  Epistemological solipsism is the case, but metaphysical solipsism is still a big question mark.  There are so many limits to my epistemology that I am always limited to my own point of view.

    who said I was a solipsist? I am an analytical idealist. I believe that matter is the extrinsic appearance of consciousness when viewed from a third perspective. This view bypasses the hard problem of consciousness and is more parsimonious since it does not infer a category of experience outside of what we directly experience.