Gesundheit2

Only if that was possible, right?

Haha! This is cool! Here's me:

I'll just leave this here: You're your own guru.

It could be, I don't know. But for me, it seems spontaneous. When I am sleeping at that time, I often have vivid dreams, whereas the default mode for me is no dreams. I think that confirms that it is spontaneous.

Intent is indeed important, but it doesn't invalidate in any way the difference between times of the day. What I find fishy about Sadhguru's explanation is that it's very vague spiritual jargon that you could not possibly make any sense of it or utilize it in any sort of meaningful way. For me personally, I usually experience peak consciousness levels between 5 and 6 AM, depending on the time of year. So that's valid. The reasoning behind it is still in question for me, and Sadhguru didn't give me anything useful to work with. I am speculating that it might have something to do with cortisol levels, since there's a morning spike that happens everyday. This is merely speculation of course, but at least it's scientific. https://www.risescience.com/blog/cortisol-and-sleep

I am telling you the absolute truth. But you don't understand it cuz you're not enlightened. Do not doubt or argue with me. Take it as a fact, with open-mindedness, cuz I know more than you. Go and sit under the moon for 12 days and a half, then come back and maybe you will understand. For the initiated, they need to sit under the sun when it's 15% cloudy for 54 days and 3 hours.

A lot of people don't understand that most of spirituality/religion thrives on the ignorance of stage Blue audience and the naïve open-mindedness of the stage Green one. Without those two, most spiritual/religious teachers would be out of business.

This is a very common stage Blue/Orange tactic. Muslim preachers (Imams) do that all the time, and nobody dares to question them or call them out, cuz they're the established authority by Allah. There's a cool Indian movie on this very subject called PK.

I would say that the false positives are a lot more common than the false negatives, especially at the highest levels. But even the false positives are not that many at the highest levels, so that makes the false negatives really rare. Personally, I only know a couple of people (besides myself) that are barely tier 2. How many tier 2 people that you know personally?

It is not correct to say that time exists, because it doesn't. The word "existence" implies perception. On the other hand, time is an abstract concept. We can think about it, but not perceive it. When we lose thought of time, we often refer to that experience as eternal now, timelessness, God, or something like that.

@Carl-Richard Cool! Thanks for sharing.

It's really hard to state something about nothing. I honestly try to think of some way to speak about these kinds of topics, but nothing seems anywhere near perfect. Any attempt that I might make will probably only hinder the outcome that I'm trying to create within the other person. It's like if I spell out the answer, it will become wrong the moment I speak it. So what I eventually end up doing is making suggestions and leaving the rest up to the gods.

I don't know what time it is for everyone, but for me it's between 5 and 6 AM. My consciousness feels very different at that time. I experience an increased lucidity and expansion of state. I'd first noticed that phenomenon a few years back, but didn't give it much attention. But it's still happening till this day. Though, it does not happen in any other time in the day or night. And I don't know any possible explanations. I will see the video, maybe there's something there. EDIT: Nope. Bullshit explanation.

We don't even know if he'd actually had a cat. He only posted a picture of a cat with some lamentation text, and another artistic picture of a strange-loop of a cat and a ball of yarn. That's it, and now people think he had a cat that died and all that. Doesn't look like much has changed if you ask me.

@Someone here

Spiritual Dick. Man, I just love the internet!

@Someone here Thanks. That was a refreshing mental masturbation session for me. I'll now return to my little solipsistic meditative bubble and stop arguing. I'll also admit that your spiritual dick is bigger than mine if that makes you happy. Cheers! @Alexander1 ???

That's because you are using language in a problematic way without knowing. It is true that I am currently in the present moment. But it is also true that I was in the past, and will be in the future. I can use different tenses of the verb to be, and all of them will make sense. You are simply being linguistically racist in favor of the present tense against all other tenses, that's all. To make the point clearer, I could tell you that you will not be in the present moment, or that you never were in the present moment, because you are already in the present moment. It's just a language game. And you're just a noob. Sorry.

Yet, in order to talk about the so-called "present moment", you would have to use language and a paradigm. Without those two, you would be silently embodying the realization instead of mentally masturbating it all the time. This is like saying water is H2O and thinking that you've actually explained water. Being - Present Moment - Now - Is - Existence - Verb to be. All the same thing. A circular explanation does not explain anything. I don't know. It's kinda obvious from the way you talk. Santa Claus will not make sense to you unless you return to being a kid again.

This is a false causation. You don't have to take any thoughts seriously, even if you've become allegedly "absolutely conscious" of them. On the other hand, religious people take their convictions seriously, even though they obviously have not become absolutely conscious of them. What does it even mean to become absolutely conscious of something? Like what's the difference between that and becoming relatively conscious of that same thing, or some other thing(s)? According to the paradigm you're using (present moment), certainty is something that you're imagining, right? So why are you certain of your certainty? You obviously lack construct-awareness, and you are not aware of that. Being 100% certain of something doesn't automatically make it true. Kids are 100% certain that Santa Claus is real. Overconfidence does not create truth. You're stuck trying to explain reality through the new paradigm that you've acquired recently from the internet, and you fail to see what's beyond that. You are lost in language and you don't understand how it works. Maybe there's more for you to learn before you may start teaching. I don't think you're kidding. I think you have crazy and delusional thoughts that you take very seriously, even though you don't have to.

This has never changed. It's just that we're different. Unlike you and Leo, I don't take my thoughts very literally/seriously. I allow them to pass through my mind, and I observe them as they pass. The only thing that I don't do is to attach to certain thoughts whatever they might be. You might think that I'm stage Orange materialist, but the truth is that I'm always playing the devil's advocate on purpose. Sorry, but you guys have crazy/delusional ideas and you're attached to them so deeply that you believe that they're absolutely true. But since you consider the ideas true, and since you take them seriously/literally, then what happens is that you take any disagreements or criticism to heart, as if it's pointed at you personally, and not at the ideas. This is evident, at least in this thread. Look back and see. I said nothing about you. You made quite a handful of personal judgements and I ignored them, as I will keep doing because they are a misperception and a misrepresentation of my character mixed with a narrative that has been going on about me for a long time.

@Someone here It looks like realizing your true nature does come with superpowers. After all, you've just used one to expose me and my bullshit, all through the internet. I'm guessing you can probably see through everyone else too, even though we're just imaginary characters in your dream. From now on, I will agree with you on everything you say. Just please don't harm me telepathically when that feature/siddhi becomes available. ??‍♂️?