Jirh

Atypical/Weird ❌ Special/Unique ✅

That's not what I'm saying. I've never been "psychotic" to experience telepathy. What I experience is recurring subconscious thoughts about telepathy in the realm of possibility, as in my internal radar is on, observing every happenstance, trying to connect the dots and draw lines between various events, in order to collect evidence for telepathy, even though I have already consciously concluded long ago that it is a misconception, and that true telepathy happens through technology, not through some vague mind relationships. In this sense, I'm actually being more open-minded about this topic than most, still the result is always the same, always nothing of value. Coincidence at best. Delusion/misconception at worst.

I'm atypical. In every meaning of the word. In every way, and in every aspect of life.

I don't belong anywhere.

Let alone women. I'm done with humanity. Can't connect with anyone. I'm just lonely wherever I go.

Even among weirdos, I feel lonely. Nobody has any idea what it means to be in my shoes. To experience the paradoxes and contradictions that I do, the bliss and the suffering. To live through all of it, and still be here, fighting, hoping, falling down, getting up, getting knocked down again, and again, and again... My experience of life is so unique, it feels like a mistake, an error, an exception. Something that wasn't accounted for. Nobody should be allowed this much integration. It's just so many different parts that don't fit well together, but somehow do. I'm a monster. A Frankenstein. I shouldn't be allowed to exist.

@Leo Gura Alright cool! I'll be waiting by for a more in-depth video 😍

Well, that's definitely interesting. Is this new? If so, do you expect it will affect your perception and overall insights?

Orgasm is a broader experience. It's not just a fluid release. It's both physical and psychological, even metaphysical to some extent lol.

Not so sure about that. Women are different. Cumming and orgasming are different but related experiences for women. Which one are you talking about here?

Nah, I don't think so. Not all women have orgasm as their highest priority in a relationship. And not all women can orgasm in the first place.

She can shop for great orgasms elsewhere too, nothing to stop her from exploration.

The thread is about locking women in. You can't do that with freedom and democracy. You have to "own" your woman by "force". Otherwise, she will become owned by someone else who's more forcible than you.

You can't stop her thinking, but you can stop her action. It's your job as a man to protect your woman from her own stupidity. You can make it crystal clear that if she ever deviates, that she will permanently lose access to you. This way you may have a chance. Otherwise, you really don't. But also some women are loyal by nature. These are the highest quality women. But they are rare.

@Ulax You've somehow found a way to upset a wide variety of people with different opinions in one post 😂

They're an application of the theory. Could be wrong. Whatever. I think that people are unique. And that uniqueness is enhanced even more in time, because different stages of life manifest differently for the same person, let alone others. I think you're missing something, regardless of what it is. It's on you to inquire into it.

@aurum According to my "general theory of love" above, you are probably lacking care. You aren't really invested into others. You deal with people superficially and don't really care about their most intimate details. This lack of care generates the feeling of dullness and lack of depth, which is what's making you feel that people are all so generic.

How can it possibly be predictable if it's long-term? That would require constant performance at all times, which is tiring and will quickly lead to burn out. Then the mask will fall and the performance will stop and the relationship will fail. I don't think you can predict love in long-term relationships. It has to be authentic to work and endure time. And authenticity is different for everyone. So it's unpredictable.

Well, yeah. I was talking about love in general, which includes platonic and romantic, and even other types of love like motherly or fatherly love. The difference between types of love is not the structure, but the context. Romantic love is based on sexual attraction. The context is mating. So of course there are other factors at play. But once you identify it as love, it will always irrevocably have the two components of care & respect. They are the pillars of healthy love and relationships in general. Attraction can happen without love, and love can happen without attraction. But love cannot happen without both care & respect. It even applies to loving inanimate objects or abstract things like loving your career for example. If you love your career, that means you respect it (you don't take it for granted) and care about it (you're genuinely invested in it). Let's call it a general theory of love haha.

Why would it be a defence mechanism? I don't even know you or care about you per se. I'm just saying what I'm seeing. Lack of integrity is not immaturity. It's corruption. A child can have integrity, and an adult can be corrupt. The two are not mutually exclusive categories, they can overlap or exist separately. Immaturity doesn't guarantee corruption, and corruption doesn't require immaturity. Childhood is a phase of development, corruption is a choice. You were a corrupt child, and now you're no longer a child. Saying "I was young, I'm more mature now." does not magically absolve you and cure you from corruption. Rather, it distracts from the actual work. You may be less corrupt now, but you can't call your past corruption immaturity just because it happened in parallel with it.

I agree. Never implied otherwise. I'm just saying maybe you should examine that "holier than thou" attitude of yours, and in effect withdraw the judgement about younger people. You don't hate your childhood to become an adult. You integrate it. It becomes part of who you are, not the shadow you're scared of.

Maybe you should undo that training.

No way! 😂 What kind of cognitive dissonance would that be? It's like pretending your taste buds aren't working properly, just so you can feel better about saying no.

For me, healthy love is a combination of two main components: Care & Respect. Without respect, love becomes a utility or an addiction. It gets taken for granted. And without care, love feels mechanical and boring. It becomes a performance/chore.

@Miguel1 I think you're exaggerating. I also experience profound levels of attraction and fulfillment when I connect deeply with a woman. The surface level attraction is too meh in comparison. But it's still there with surface level girls, I can't deny it. It's the primary force. It's just that deep connection enhances it by a factor of x10 at least. You're denying the surface level attraction. You're saying it's secondary. I do not agree with that.