Vibroverse

Bernardo said that he took lsd once and actually it was the lsd experience, I guess, that lead him into idealism.

He might be aware of Leo's work.

I believe it for it is absurd.

Aka your vibration, your feeling, the feeling of peace, etc, is everything, and it is so everything that it is even infinitely more important than even talking about it. The state of being is the underlying principle and mode of every moment and mode of being, and that's the irony, that's the "paradox", the being of being of being.

Ask God for an explanation that would be much better than my explanation, and you can think of God as a radio station that is playing 24/7 within you, but you need to tune to its frequency, to make an analogy of it. Of course all these terms like vibration, frequency, etc are analogies, but they, I think, are pretty apt analogies that, perhaps, might help you also. And the frequency of God is pure love and joy and peace, pure contentment, and you already know that by your very nature, for you are an extension of it, like a wave is an extension of an ocean. So the more you release your resistance, the less fear and anxiety based you are, the more you are able to hear from God, from Source, whatever you call it, really.

Action and world happen by themselves, and action and being in the mode of action are consciousness. Being and becoming find their own balance in the modality of being that is you where you are becoming the modality of being that is you. This way you become an appearance, and a collection of appearances, that make sense to you that is being you. And the world becomes itself without knowing itself. It might be the freedom of being where it is itself, its own being of itself, in a sense, and reality forms itself in the way it is and that modality becomes a mode of what it is. When that becomes the situation, then being becomes the mode of being.

What is the process of consciousness becoming the words, and meaningfulness of the words that add more and more, in a sense, to itself, to create, or become, or "discover" a structure? Where, also, are our memories coming from, for instance, the memory of what I did yesterday, and how does it become a part of that "process", of that modality that is "me", is it a mystery? ?

For instance, when you are searching for the action, and being action, etc, then you become the realization of the metaphysical level on the experiential level. The experiential level is like the manifestation of the metaphysical level, and your mind, in a sense, is helping you perceive and realize the metaphysical level in the experience of the experiential level.

Maybe nonexistence and existence as God mean the same thing to VeganAwake, and if so, I would agree with him, in a sense. I'm thinking of the quote from Rumi where he said "the language of God is silence, and everything else is just a poor translation". And yeah, by writing this comment, I'm joining the team of poor translation by being one of the poor translators, I guess, hmm.

How do you know they were not introduced to the God consciousness?

In actuality, there is just one "person" in existence, and what you call I and what anyone, or any being, else calls I are actually referring to the same I of existence. There is only one I who experiences all realities and all dimensions through its infinite individualized forms. The being that is infinite somehow opens itself up as space and time and continuity and all phenomena. This being, that is the only being, simultaneously is every experience there is, and forms and organizes itself as individual realities and contexts. This being is creating, experiencing, all the pasts and futures, and all the locations, and all possibilities, and even impossibilities ever, simultaneously. Being is the idea of the infinity that it is possibility and actuality, also, simultaneously. And being is so intelligent and creative, and brilliant, that it can organize itself within itself into the touch of infinity, and from that point onwards it organizes itself, or it realizes its own self, accordingly. In this way, being is finding itself in itself again, in a way that it did not before, in the idea of evolution through, and as, space and time. It becomes the self informing experience, through intuition and reason, in its truest sense, that it begins to discover its own logic of its own logic of its own logic, ad infinitum. And it realizes the mental nature of itself, and then it moves into the further exploration of the mental nature of the mental nature, in a sense, by its own phenomenology, by its own logic that is itself. It knows itself as history and all the individualities, and, in the process, understands the nature of its being, and its being is, what we may call, Peace and Love, its nature is the process where it experiences the idea, and experience, of knowing itself, the nature of Mind, the mechanism, the science, of how it, the Mind, experiences itself as different forms, of and as, itself. And the more it realizes that Mind and Love and Peace and Reason are all actually the same thing, the more, as its individualized form, it, in a sense, merges, and relaxes, into itself, and allows its individual mind merge, more and more, with the total, absolute, Mind, and within that process, it realizes that it is the process itself. That's the point where it becomes the process that is the end of the process. That's the point where experience becomes the destination, the process, the now, becomes the destination. The mind understands everything, it understands the gist, the truth of all truths, and it retunes to the experience of discovering the infinite relative truths that form it as itself as the process. Being that is nothing, for it is nothing becomes something, and the process of becoming that something, and that process is the nothing. There, being begins to understand what it means to touch the reality, what it means to become being that is the becoming, and unfolding of infinite intelligence as thoughts, words, and deeds to itself, and it becomes the things that it is, and it becomes the process of discovering itself that is the process of being.

I think there is nothing but word and concept salads. This viewing itself as this as a and b. C and d and e and f and g and h and i and j. Nothingness, emptiness, "vibration", becoming forms and concepts and concepts of concepts, and concepts of concepts of concepts, in the possibleness of infinite, and voila, welcome to existence which you've never not been huh.

I think it is because if God showed us what omniscience and omnipotence actually are right now, we'd just lose our frickin minds.

Well, there are people who say that they experienced things like that, but they did not choose the reality they tune to consciously.

Maybe you will move to a parallel dream where that is what happens and some others move another parallel dream where it doesn't quite happen. I don't know, how do we even know what will happen in the future? It might be that each individualized form of consciousness gets to the reality with which they resonate or align, or something like that, I don't know. And I don't even know what the logic of the process actually is other than the experience of surrendering to the quietness, to the inner peace, in a sense.

Being and silence.

Yes, we know what we know and we don't know what we don't know. We, I think, have a hard time with accepting where we are, and our ability to think gives us the power to make anything abstract. We know of things, but another question that interests me is what does knowing something means at all. What do we mean when we say we know something. Do we know something that is external to us, or do we know something that is not. Now, of course there is a certain mode of being, if we try to deny that, we run the risk of fooling ourselves. The reality has a certain mode of being, and trying to deny that actually is trying to deny yourself. However, the question is what is the limits of knowledge and why knowledge is a thing that is making itself a being. What is, for instance, the experience of moving from this moment to the next moment. The mind has a certain mode of being, it has a certain pattern, and when it learns something new, for instance, when it molds itself into a form that it was not before, is it happening as a natural unfolding of being. That's one of my questions in regards to the duality that we call knowledge. What is the mechanism that underlies the process of moving from one moment to the next moment, for instance. And that leads me to the paradoxes of Zeno, where we are thinking of the idea of moving from one moment to the next moment to be an illusion, and it makes sense in a certain sense that experience might be unfolding within itself, but it creates a new form of continuity, and therefore I say continuity probably is an illusion from which we cannot run, in a sense. And that's where I feel like anything that we can objectively refer to, or suggest the existence of in through some objective form, like through language, is not the point to start, or even end, this experience of the process of understanding the experience, for it meets itself in this point in all its journeys that are "away" from its own form, or mode, of being. That might, in a sense, be the process of the creation of worlds, that existence already is the ability of forming and creating itself, and knowing it might, in that sense, necessitates not just knowing it, but being it, and understanding that it is the experience, or the experiencelessness, of being it.

Let alone what the question is referring to, you can even ask whether that question itself is real or not, and luckily we can never get there, at least for now, haha.

I love your questions, your mind seems to be similar to my mind, in a sense. I'm thinking about the nature of learning, and whether it is happening as a result of the same process of achieving, creating, manifesting, receiving other things, other more tangible things, and I think the answer might be yes. And if so, then we need to find the intrinsic essence of that which is to be learned, and as you said, I think it can be a fun and exciting experience really, for it is, then, the same process of being, and then it is just that it is being adjusted to a different modality of being. That's, in my opinion, the point where the idea of surrendering to yourself can be helpful, for otherwise it will be an experience of some form of pain, and it will not be a satisfying journey for you. I think that's where being makes itself evolved to another modality of being, but it has its own intrinsic dynamics. That's, I guess, we, in a sense, come to the question of "how can the one appear as many", and that I guess is the mystery that discovers itself as the process, and that itself, in a sense, might be what a process even is. It is like the inexplicable is being itself, but it cannot explain how it even is able to be itself. Well, that might be something, by its nature that can never be understood, but the question, perhaps, is not about understanding it, but getting closer and closer to the concept of being about understanding it, and that might be the very definition of science itself. I think the most important thing that we forget in the process is that there is a certain order, a certain, as the ancient Greeks called it, Logos, a pattern of being that calls itself towards itself, and that is the dynamic of being that is being understood by realizing that it cannot ever be understood, for it is the very idea of being the missing link itself. And being is knowing itself through itself, perhaps, without even knowing that it is knowing itself through itself, and that very thing, in a sense, might be the very cause of duality, the öne becoming the many.

And even more than that, imagine that you are that professor himself in the dream where you have, in your dream history and memory, learned about those subjects before, and now you are a master of those subjects. I think we, at the ultimate level, the infinite consciousness that contains all possible information and worlds, however, here we are at the relative level where we experience the mode of a process in time and space. Of course, the ultimate knowledge of being itself is a mystery, in a sense, by its nature in all the possible worlds, for existence is its own cause, so it cannot be "known", in that sense, for it is the very knowing itself, it is the very beingness of existence. But, for some reason, on the relative level of knowledge and beingness, there is a certain form of a pattern in the unfolding of reality, and maybe it is a good and intentional thing from the ultimate level consciousness.

Imagine you're having a dream, and in the dream you are in another universe, and you are in a class where a professor is teaching you about some astronomical facts about that universe, or maybe a language that is spoken in one world in that universe. And when you learn some information in that world, about that world, do you really learn something which you did not know before, or is it more like you realizing something that already has been a part of your consciousness which you were not aware of before? Sometimes I think that, in a sense, this might be what evolution of consciousness is like. You the infinite consciousness are like the totality of all possible information in and of existence, but you're experiencing a spacetime reality. So, in that perspective, you're actually like an architect who is discovering yourself when you learn something new, in a sense like what Socrates thought mathematics to be, where he was just being a midwife for the awareness of knowledges that already were within.

Satisfaction and feeling good are your nature, God is Love, God is Peace, God is the experience of feeling good. And what is actually weird is you thinking that wanting to feel good is something weird, because noone told you that feeling good is good, noone told you about that which is obvious. And they told you that the purpose of life is anything but feeling good and satisfied ?

I think it is not just what language is about creating distinctions, but language is a distinction itself, it's a "thing" itself.

To me, language seems to be an object like the other objects of the world, and linguistic structure seems to be a structure like the physical structure. That's, in a sense, like when Hegel says "real is rational, and rational is real", meaning the objects of the inner world are in zero distance from the objects of the outer world. So, to me, both mental and physical structures seem to be at zero distance from each other, and that language is another form of being experiencing being, meaning, as the reality is a self forming system, language also is a self forming system, or maybe we can even say that it is the same system appearing to itself as dualities and subtleties.

Yeah man, I think God can even create a fuckin square circle, like it might even be the creator of fuckin logic in some way that our human minds cannot just grasp, I have no idea, then yeah, you might be right, really ?