MuadDib

I wandered lonely as a cloud That floats on high o'er vales and hills, When all at once I saw a crowd, A host, of golden daffodils; Beside the lake, beneath the trees, Fluttering and dancing in the breeze. Continuous as the stars that shine And twinkle on the milky way, They stretched in never-ending line Along the margin of a bay: Ten thousand saw I at a glance, Tossing their heads in sprightly dance. The waves beside them danced; but they Out-did the sparkling waves in glee: A poet could not but be gay, In such a jocund company: I gazed—and gazed—but little thought What wealth the show to me had brought: For oft, when on my couch I lie In vacant or in pensive mood, They flash upon that inward eye Which is the bliss of solitude; And then my heart with pleasure fills, And dances with the daffodils.

Zero state level income tax. Low corporate tax. Drug culture. Pussy. 👺

Warm in the winter Shady in the summertime

nature is fucking metal

When I look now, before any thought about myself, “I” shows up as a clear, vibrant awake field in which everything appears: colours, sounds, body sensations, emotions, HANDS, even the thought “I.” The supposed “subject behind the eyes” is just more appearance within this same field; no hard edge marks where “self” ends and “world” begins. In ordinary play, I function as a finite avatar, but in direct seeing, the context of that avatar is unbounded awareness. The sense of being a separate someone is a deliberate narrowing of that awareness. A partition that makes self/other appear, so a shared game can happen. And this field is not a blank screen; it hums with quiet brilliance, singing every facet of itself into existence from nowhere. Every sight, breath, and heartbeat arrives already intelligently shaped. Awareness and intelligence are inseparable here, knowing and creative ordering are two facets of the same presence, among a multitude of other facets that I can access as a part of myself. When the imagined split relaxes, experience is recognised as non‑dual: one field of knowing/being that is ineffable yet obvious, and in practice, unavoidable. Within that field, two notions of truth are helpful. Relative truth is context‑bound and conceptual, claims made inside the game; useful and testable, but always interpretive, always subdivisions and approximations with opposites and errors. The Absolute Truth is what is the case prior to concepts: the full, immediate is‑ness of this moment. It has no opposite, because even “falsehood,” “imagination,” and “mistake” appear within it. If you like the metaphor, Absolute Truth is the entire intelligently structured shared dream, every avatar, every seemingly private intimation, every rule exactly as it is; relative truths are the local, partial descriptions players make within that dream. Seen this way, “others” appear because awareness self‑limits to enable connection and language. The risk is that the avatar forgets the wider context and mistakes the game for the whole. The release is re-recognising sovereignty, “I am the field, not just the avatar”, which dissolves the felt separation without ending the play; you simply play lucidly. Even the ordinary missteps, coincidences, a scrap of litter on the roadside belong to the same covert artistry. In this vast self-organising choreography, a strand of hair and a moon’s orbit fit together with the dances of dmt entities and a tumbledryer of sensations in deep dreamless sleep. Some of the things I would say ... as I drink from the flask of the absolute and feel the cool water reverberate into the relative as I dictate this to my phone, before feeling my fingers tap away at a gpt editor to consolidate it.

I went on a fishing trip with some friends in Africa once, we had our boat moored in a good spot all day and eventually noticed a huge crocodile swimming around with the distant ho-ho-hos of hippos occasionally wafting through the summer breeze. Later in the afternoon, a greedy baboon made its way to the water's edge, screeching at us. My friend's dad flicked a cracker at it, it gobbled it up, and it ran away. It returned again for more. This time, he flicked the cracker a little closer to the water. And so it went on... eventually, he was flicking the crackers onto the top of some reeds in the water, and the baboon was wading in. Nek minute... https://www.actualized.org/insights/crocodile-snatches-baboon I also caught one in a dusbin as a kid. I just opened a banana as it watched me, then put it in the bin. It jumped in. I closed the lid. Ape shit. I couldn't stop laughing when I saw this scene in Blood Diamond. https://youtu.be/CPHFfRJqgDI?si=vIIawuct5iwQGZ1m

"No human philosopher imagined a galaxy, or catalogued any of natures hidden treasures"

https://www.actualized.org/insights/actualized-quotes-281 It's one thing to speak of ever expanding consciousness and it's another to proclaim supremacy over every scientist who has ever lived, as if you were somehow privy to this from a position of solipsistic omniscience. To say, "This is more real than anything any human scientist understands" is not insight, it's hubris disguised as revelation. A mind that truly grasped infinite consciousness would not need to diminish others to validate its truth, and would recognise all scientists as a part of its own ever expanding imaginitive intelligence. You speak of God as containing all minds, yet exclude the minds of scientists from that divine intelligence as if they are blind by default. That’s not omniscience, that’s ego in transcendental clothing. Science, and scientists for all their limits, are not the antithesis of consciousness. They are one of the countless expressions of it. To claim direct access to a reality beyond all scientists is to place yourself atop a hierarchy you invented as much as any insightful scientist could. If consciousness truly rises forever, then perhaps humility should rise with it.

Real vs Fake Spirituality A concise reference guide 1. Lecture Aim & Context Show the core difference between genuine, truth‑oriented practice and “spiritual‑flavoured” self‑deception. Help you spot wrong approaches in yourself, teachers and communities. Challenge extreme relativism without sliding into dogma. 2. Working Definition of Real Spirituality Purpose: realise directly that mind imagines all of reality and see through that illusion. Driven by ruthless personal inquiry and epistemic rigour. Leads to full sovereignty of mind—recognising your mind as the creative “God‑Mind”. Requires radical self‑reflection and eventual dissolution of the finite ego (not physical suicide). 3. The Relativism Trap “Anything goes” fails real‑world tests (e.g. Nazi mysticism, child‑beating madrasas). Therefore a structural core to authentic practice exists, despite technique diversity. 4. How Mind Creates Illusion Default human state: unquestioned projection and survival‑biased fantasies. Deep inquiry shows the rabbit hole goes all the way—entire cosmos is imagined. 5. Deconstructing Self & Survival “Self” = story, personality, desires—built to aid survival. True practice makes every survival impulse conscious, then transcends it (Animal → Human → God). 6. Markers of Fake / Corrupted Spirituality Survival in spiritual costume (sex, money, fame, luxury, power). Belief, authority, tradition, community attachment, moral crusading. Commercialisation, influencer branding, emotional escapism, political agenda. Using practice only to “feel good” or cope, not to face reality. 7. What Spirituality Is NOT 8. Genuine Practice Blueprint Adopt complete not‑knowing; question every assumption. Rely on direct experience only. Maintain constant mindfulness in daily life. Engage in deep solo inquiry (long silent retreats, serious psychedelic sessions, shadow work). Cut addictions/distractions; create space for sitting in solitude and “dying of boredom”. Develop full epistemic responsibility—trust no authority, including your own biases. 9. Reframing Prayer (Example) Common plea (“Heal my child”) = egoic survival request. Authentic prayer: “Grant me courage to face reality as it is and release attachment to outcomes.” 10. Final Orientation Goal is intimate love of raw Being/God, not escapism. Joy arises when self‑concern dissolves; mundane life is seen as divine hallucination (Maya). Requires decades of disciplined honesty and willingness to dismantle every comforting illusion. “If your practice doesn’t satisfy you when you sit alone in silence, it’s just another distraction.”

Tom Riddles Diary These are simple server-client programs I wrote in python drawing inspiration from copying this guide with the addition of this library for a few functions. I call it "Tom riddles diary" and it can be used to train magic to mastery in more ways than one, as I shall demonstrate in the coming weeks, and eventually months. #SERVER import socket import threading import pynput from pynput.keyboard import Key, Controller keyboard = Controller() PORT = 5050 SERVER = socket.gethostbyname(socket.gethostname()) ADDR = (SERVER, PORT) HEADER = 64 FORMAT = 'utf-8' DISCONNECT_MESSAGE = "!DISCONNECTED" server = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) server.bind(ADDR) def handle_client(conn, addr): print(f"[NEW CONNECTION] {addr} connected.") connected = True while connected: msg_length = conn.recv(HEADER).decode(FORMAT) if msg_length: msg_length = int(msg_length) msg = conn.recv(msg_length).decode(FORMAT) if msg == DISCONNECT_MESSAGE: connected = False print(f"[{addr}] {msg}") if msg == "Key.space": print(msg) keyboard.type("\\") if msg == "<49>": #print(msg) keyboard.type("1") if msg == "<50>": #print(msg) keyboard.type("2") if msg == "<51>": #print(msg) keyboard.type("3") conn.close() def start(): server.listen() print(f"[LISTENING] Server is listening on {SERVER}") while True: conn, addr = server.accept() thread = threading.Thread(target=handle_client, args=(conn, addr)) thread.start() print(f"[ACTIVE CONNECTIONS] {threading.activeCount() -1}") print("[STARTING] SERVER IS STARTING...") start() #CLIENT import socket import pynput from pynput.keyboard import Key, Listener HEADER = 64 PORT = 5050 FORMAT = 'utf-8' DISCONNECT_MESSAGE = "!DISCONNECT" SERVER = #localIPaddress ADDR = (SERVER, PORT) client = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) client.connect(ADDR) def send(msg): message = msg.encode(FORMAT) msg_length = len(message) send_length = str(msg_length).encode(FORMAT) send_length += b' ' * (HEADER - len(send_length)) client.send(send_length) client.send(message) #print(client.recv(2048).decode(FORMAT)) def on_press(key): msg =("{0}".format(key)) send(msg) def on_release(key): if key == Key.esc: return False with Listener(on_press=on_press, on_release=on_release) as listener: listener.join()

If you meet Jesus on the road, kiss him.

What's a Super Mod, and why don't we have any? Are members P3 and L4 retired mods and people with warning points? Also, @FlyingLotus is the only member plus account, what's that?

Feels warm, like stepping into sunlight after a lifetime underground, unseen, unheard, invisible. All men appreciate a genuine smile.

INFPs lust after power more than anyone, hence Robert Greene's books.

A smile

Update, This diagram of a mist net seems like it would be more effective at catching birds... Natasha has been working hard in the art section

#### #Tragic# ------- ####

Bro, she's so into you, I saw her last week while wearing the psy vision goggles I invented. She's playing hide and seek, I couldn't catch her for you though, we need a slutterby net, any ideas? I know the strings need to be somewhat loose and laced with fun, the braiding cant be too tightly wound. She needs to feel like she has a chance for escape, but that's all I've come up with so far.

https://www.actualized.org/insights/actualized-quotes-266 LLM scientists have known since 2020. Tech bros are a different breed. https://www.actualized.org/insights/my-game-awakening Play in and of itself won't attract the feminine. Consider the running theme in "pickup content" the idea of women "testing" men. Often framed as shit tests. This isn't being done out of malice, as men typically interpret it. Women test men, not for sadistic pleasure (although that certainly does occur), but to FEEL them. The nuance here is understanding that she wants to empathically FEEL where you are strong, where you are weak and where you show potential internally. Through this process, she develops a holistic sense of "you" as a man and will then be attracted to that entire dynamic or not. This process takes time for deep attraction to develop, and is facilitated by PLAY over some amount of time. Some elements of play are attractive as she can FEEL within the capacity to play certain qualities that are assets over a man who can't. Either due to insecurities, a lack of attunement, or some other unhealthy limitations, as described, so yes, being able to play is crucial; however, it's not what actually generates attraction. https://www.actualized.org/insights/the-distinction-of-real-spirituality Real spirituality facilitates your capacity for developing various integrities and structural reinforcements to your "presence" as a man that can make you very attractive in specific dimensions. Still, the nuanced point that must be groked here is that this isn't about becoming stronger as an ego as pickup subcultures imply ... the feminine can FEEL this subtle (or not so subtle) narcissism. It won't be attracted to it if she's healthy and has integrated a healthy feminine energy, of course. Also note, if you wanna PLAY all the time, she'll FEEL that you're just a boy, so try not to overdo it. But if you're trying too hard not to play, she'll feel that too.

Buddhist Rats