Natasha Tori Maru

If that is true then what is the below? You presented this example when I said 'pretend you don't have to worry about survival for you or loved ones' Marked up in red above is all survival. Take that away. Now what is left?

@Breakingthewall Missed directly answering so I will rephrase - what is survival? Define it

If you (so to speak), and all your loved ones, do not have to participate in survival - what is left? In your opinion. If your reply is 'openness' - that is synonymous here with 'being', which is also the same as 'no-self'. No self = awareness without centre, experience without owner, stillness without controller, doing without doer.

@Alexop I am playing around with the above, in full awareness I have ignored HUGE variants within the population Flipping the narrative

I could play devils advocate here: all these questions regarding women and trying to find out 'the truth of them' arise because men cannot comprehend life without a penis steering it. There's my female perspective on a masculine generalisation. I could be a pure savage and say try into eunuch mode if you want a taste A lot of male identity, desire and action - even MEANING - gets wrapped around the axis of the penis.

@Emerald 🎯

I eat em for the yolks also. Recalling the weird rash - I developed it AFTER I lost my free supply of backyard chicken eggs... Transitioned to store bought fReE rAnGe/blahblah (it's all lies) around the time the rash begun. Very well could be the difference in the egg source - my mums chickens were looked after like pets and tasted/texture was obscenely different to the store variety. There are really too many variables to think the weird skin shit is attributed to bad store eggs, but it makes me wonder.

All the points you raise have been addressed. There is simply repetition of the same points like a broken record now. You could argue that this is contrary to your openness concept - in this example Carl and I are open to the possibility there was a psychic connection happening. You dismissed it. Just a thought.

Conflating disagree and condescending.

Doesn't account for the posts happening simultaneously - like @Carl-Richard and I were on the other side of the planet, but typing the same thing at the same time. That is the confluence that stands out to me - not the fact we conversed on a topic in another thread. The conversation was the context only

@Carl-Richard I've been following this conversation and indeed - I was literally posting just as you wrote the above this is the context issue. Now really that is a psychic happening. No shit there - I just sat down at work to take a 5 minute break, begun typing a response that this thread exemplifies your language game point, and then you posted THIS of all things! Another example of psychic stuff and how it always happens TO me. Can't directly cause it. My gosh! Good pointers above - shooting on the right track for sure! Programming here stood out to me - its precisely the 'program' in the computer that we are talking about isn't real. The computer is the physical parts - the programming is software that can be loaded/unloaded. ctrl+alt+delete I like how you are steering this. Doing better than me!

They also pull like +50% margins. Duopoly

It's no matter - no one knows what context is - we won't get there. So any half baked ideas are part of the contemplation

I would argue that the second example is actually an example of a context of a context - the hologram from earlier

Slap in the face without context - a sound and a feeling - a slap and a sting! Slap in the face with context - what happened (intent), who did it (status, relationship), where & when (setting), what it means (interpretation) Adding to our definition ?

@ExploringReality Holographic Is there context to a slap in the face?

Upon re-read this sounds like telepathy. I suppose the benefit to telepathic connection and communication would be context is transmitted along with the 'distinction'. Less misunderstanding. Sort of like the entirely of what is 'Christmas' being sent - the tree, the ham, the turkey (fucken yum yum, its obviously lunchtime in Australia), the reason for celebration: birth of Christ (hearsay, goddamit) . As opposed to describing Christmas along with the historical context in a linear method using language. Anyway back to the topic - apologies. This one was with @Carl-Richard in mind

HAHAHA "I changed my mind, no thanks"

This is very true - my brother types INFP. Lovely man, but chronic oversharer. I don't need to hear it! He and I went to battle as kids. I am the heartless one Yes, crying is a huge release for me too. I feel VERY calm after. I rarely cry though. I process all my emotions internally. I don't like to talk about the process. I find it very uncomfortable to be 'in process' and have someone try to elicit anything out of me. Afterwards when I have clarity and distance I am okay to speak about it. But during I am super private. As you can imagine - this is an example of a woman not fitting the expected mould of society (which fits the youtube link above). Usually ends up with segregation or the old aloof/snob label. Interestingly, I thought feeling emotion strongly made me an Fe user, and hence mistyped as INFJ for the longest time. It was @Joshe who pointed out I was showing more INTJ traits. But looking back I actually do not show Fe at all...

@Daniel Balan Hahaha "I took my ego with me into God consiousness"

@Daniel Balan I was wondering this also - Yimpa was very sweet to me when I first started posting. *Channels the woo-woo to call Yimpa*

Interesting thought here. Maybe it can be seen as, for example, in communication: the context of a communication being the substrate of multiple frames of assumption coherently merging - to facilitate understanding of a set of symbols (as opposed to things). That is - looking at it purely as context within the social domain. Bit off track, side thought

I personally don't hand sovereignty of thought to AI. And notice I didn't call you any names here - so please do me the respect of NOT implying anyone is a narcissist for having a different view to you. We aren't trying to shut each other down - merely understand. Different views are being shared. My message was to impart that my experience didn't resonate with you - so I am leaving the discussion.

Once again - you asked for clarification and I answered. Good luck with your spiritual journey. I hope it brings you some sort of truth, although I suspect that will be difficult as it is based on belief. You aren't fully understanding what is being conveyed. It would be wise to listen to the wisdom of the masters.

@OBEler Ah right, gotcha I see I missed this - thank you