yetineti

@Javfly33 So if God doesn’t decide everything in your view, what does? Conventionally, God controls everything. By definition, typically, as well.

@ICURBlessings No Leo isn’t suggesting he would have sex with a 12 year old. But he is suggesting that you would’ve 500 years ago and you would’ve liked and needed it and no one would’ve batted an eye. Animals still rape. They eat their young. Do you like animals? They need to do those things. Cost-benefit. The benefits of having sex with a minor are so absolutely low and the cost is so high. Most people would be going against their sexual preferences, what attracts them, the law, morals, etc. to have sex with a minor now. 500 years ago you had sex with your 12 year old sister and if you didn’t the kingdom was thrown over. You needed a bloodline lineage and you needed it fast. Don’t do that, you die. People are attracted to what keeps them alive, in more ways than one.

@Javfly33 Yeah but God decided not to be awake.

@Keryo Koffa That is a great idea, with the quotes. My last point here: In person, I am extremely patient. You don’t have to believe me. I’ve worked with special needs, the elderly, disabled, kids, etc. blah blah blah. I’m very good with them all. This is an intellectual forum. I’m not babying anyone.

@Keryo Koffa This for instance. Is this a coherent read for you? This is an intellectual forum. I make no attacks on character, however, grammar is in the guidelines of this forum. Grammar aside, does this passage resonate with you? I can hardly make sense of it. I have even ran this conversation through AI to try and correct some of the errors or understand where they’re coming from. It’s nonsensical and some kid is going to join the forum and waste his time on it and become more confused.

@Keryo Koffa Did you change my quote lol? Or is your OS not in English? It could’ve just translated interestingly. Either way, that quote was not what I said. But it was a pretty good summary, I suppose. ——— I see your point about this. I understand how this can be taken personally. But there is really nothing to discuss. I have the ability to point out falsehoods. I cannot show anyone the Truth. Anyone at anytime can fix their grammatical errors or attempt to clarify their point to me. But often times they do not. They have no idea what they’re talking about and I’ve pointed that out, oops. I can’t lead people to Truth, but I can clear the road for those to come.

😂😂😂

@Keryo KoffaThis conversation didn’t just fall out of a coconut tree. The context was their nonsense and poor grammar. Respectfully, their posts are hard to read and conflate ideas. And people seem to go along with them because they’ve built up a strong defense. I haven’t been able to critique at all without getting stuff like “that’s your ego bud, did I strike a nerve :)” And then others rush to their defense because they see that and thinking I’m being mean - when in reality this is the most cut and dry example of deflection and projection.

@Keryo Koffa The first quote is true. The second was in response to @Ishanga smiling at potentially striking a nerve with me. You’re not being fair. Am I being hateful towards you now?

Pointing out grammatical errors and incoherence is not hateful or a personal attack.

@Keryo Koffa Saying I’m hateful and dissing people does no good, when I’m not.

@Keryo Koffa Nothing I said was hateful. Not even close.

@Ishanga You’re not intelligent enough to strike a nerve with me.

@Ishanga Do you realize how nonsensical you sound? You’re just kind of spewing however you’re feeling at the moment. Your posts are often riddled with poor grammar as well, making it hard to read.

@Ishanga You’ve reached incoherent levels of communication, from grammar to rational.

@Ishanga Nobody said this was practical. Then again, it depends on what you’re trying to do. If you want to understand, create or maybe even heal - this could be practical. Mostly will drive you mad, otherwise. This is why I talk about this on this forum and not with strangers. Don’t make what’s practical the truth. The truth is not practical. Unless it is.

@Ishanga Two parts of the same thing.

@Ishanga I am calm in a recliner right now, responding to you. You being a separate part of me. And I being a separate part of you.

@Ishanga You’re the one being ignorant.

@Ishanga Change is not evidence of you being right.

@Ishanga Boo-hoo. The foot will hurt. Doesn’t change anything.

@Will1125 Solipsism is true.

Discussing solipsism - not solipsism - is inherently problematic because it relies on assumptions that contradict its own premise. Solipsism claims you can only be certain of your own mind because everything is experienced through the mind. No mind - no knowing if there’s anything - ever. You can’t prove anything outside your mind exists independently either. And to explain this idea, you must assume that others exist and can understand you, which completely undermines solipsism. The very act of communication presupposes the existence of others, creating a paradox where questioning the external world inherently depends on it.

@Bobby_2021You did not just comment on hormones. You implied a complete falsified version of how they work. Also, just saying it’s someone else’s faults is hilariously ridiculous. Quite the intellect you are You tell others they have no idea what they’re talking about, but everyone is a Google search away from proving you wrong. Yeah, it actually turns out that hormones do not work like this at all either. You can’t just make stuff up here. It is cute seeing you rationalize love with a table though. You’re so lost you can’t even see where people are messing with you.

@EmeraldThe trick is watching something ultra straight and letting the gayness seethe. What doesn’t kill it makes it stronger. Works the other way around too fellas! Want to be more straight? Watch 5 minutes of gayness and really let your manhood defend itself. Besides, if you can’t do that and remain straight, how straight were you really!? Find out! 2x your straight or gayness!