Breakingthewall

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    16,456

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Breakingthewall

  1. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    12 minutes ago, The Crocodile said:

    Why do people like fellating this man? What he's offering isn't that good.

    The point is not why people loves him, is if he is right in what he says or he is wrong. His words could point the truth or point confusion. For me if he says: psychedelic are always useless, and they are useful sometimes, in this case he's pointing to confusion . Then maybe he's pointing confusion in some other things, maybe in everything? Maybe not. It's interesting to know because he's the reference in spirituality in the world, he declared himself as the messenger of the truth in the world and millions believe 

  3. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    The source of everything is just lack of limits, that is nothing. Existing is manifestation, but existence isn't absolute . Because  Nonexistence is the source of existence. How? Because nonexistence is everything, existence is the part that appears from nonexistence, which is everything that could be and is not, therefore it is infinite and what is is finite. The point is that nonexistence is total potential, it lives, it is total and it is you. Nothingness is everything, is what you are and it's total. And Its impossible to grasp with the mind , because really it's nothing .  Not emptiness, or void, or infinity, just nothing. And that's everything . And conciousness is just a facet, the facet that is conciouss of itself, that of course, is everything , because anything else is nothing , but same time is nothing, because it's just a possibility between infinite possibilities 😅. 

  4. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    17 minutes ago, Ishanga said:

    destructive...From what You have said in the past your a regular user of LSD so there You go.. Maybe You can handle it, most I bet cannot, so what he says in general terms is good advice imo.

    I used over all 5meo in the past, I could say a lot, I never use anymore now. I use very low dose of LSD , sometimes DMT vaped and sometimes weed, maybe twice a week, only 2 puffs exactly and this is more powerful than 5 meo, It absolutely opens my mind and my soul to the unlimited. It's not a doubt, a possibility, it's a reality, and without a lot of 5 meo would be absolutely impossible in this life, then sadhguru is wrong, it's an absolute truth. But he speaks as he totally know that psychedelic are bad as an absolute  

    I also do meditation, more or less 2 hours if I can almost every day, never alcohol, movies, books, only this forum as entertainment 😅Meditation is quite clean, open, but not totally, not the same than some moments with bit weed, it's not something that can be a deception, it's absolutely real. 2 years ago my mind was noise, dirty of suffering, now it's almost clean, at least more clean without any comparison, then sadhguru can say anything , but drugs can be a great tool. I only say that maybe he should be bit more humble about what he says or speak about things that he knows 

  5. Posted

    1 minute ago, Ishanga said:

    Plus this thing about if he doesn't agree with You 100% then he is 100% wrong t

    It's not a relative thing, it's absolute. It's like if I'm a famous guru that speaks in YouTube and I say: yoga wont help you in liberation, it's an absolute truth, yoga is bad. And I'm wrong and I never did yoga even once, then what guru am I? One who speaks without knowing? 

  6. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    17 minutes ago, Ishanga said:

    but the message is if You are Totally Alive to what it means to be Human You don't need anything external to Realize it.

    But in my experience it's not real, then he's wrong. So he could be wrong in many other things. He talks and what he says is the absolute truth, and it isn't. Drugs can be absolutely useful.  

    When you start to perceive your energy pattern and your resistance, you can perceive how certain drugs act on it and use them. Let's see, those yogis bury themselves alive and that's fine and if I take 5meo is it bad? Who says so? God? I don't think so. I know that 5meo helps in your liberation process, and LSD and marihuana. I know that 100% so sadhguru is 100% wrong but he talks as if he were God.

  7. Posted

    2 minutes ago, Aaron p said:

    if you look carefully at someone or something you really love, what you will discover is that the actual sensation of love literally is a letting go of yourself (your own importance) its a lack of distinction between you and that thing. there is no you and it...there is just you/it

    You could love someone to the point of giving your life for that person just because it's your karma. Reality could be absolute, but karma, what is happening, is absolutely real too. 

  8. Posted

    And human love is important, it's good to love some people, not easy because most of people are close in their soul, needing the others to feel part of something not just for love, then it's attachment, and with a very defined perspective of life that use to be have good time and fulfill their duty, and nothing else. But if you are open you could find others who are and life could be beautiful 

  10. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    @Ishanga it's not that I have anything against sadhguru, it's that when I listen him talking about any topic I feel that he's inventing, he doesn't understand LSD and psychedelic, and he talk pretending he does. I'm not saying that psychedelic are good, just that he doesn't understand what they are. He's talking in a superficial level, maybe he thinks he understands but I think he's pretending , maybe he's trying to educate the people as they are kids and he's a conservative father, but that's not a guru

  11. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    3 hours ago, Inliytened1 said:

    What's that even mean 😳 

    I mean yeah I am lucid in the dream now..although most times I just lose myself in it.  I cause myself a lot of unnecessary stress when I get lost like that.  But it's what makes it real.  If I were to stay in a state of Absolute Consciousness I couldn't exist as this particular ego..which I currently am very attached to for whatever reason.  Maybe because the whole dream will dissolve with the ego.  So I'm very attached to the dream. To the point I'm surprised I woke up at all with self inquiry. But maybe i hold on tighter now after awakening.

     

    All that of the dream is meaningless. There is no distinction between dream and reality, what reality is you cannot define, being awake is realizing now what reality is, it is something outside of thought, thought occurs in reality. What you seek is to open your mind to the total often, this opening clarifies your human reality, gives it meaning, you perceive its movement and its vitality, its direction, which is to open more and more to the absolute, to increase its level of consciousness. You understand that after this cycle there is another because you feel the existence alive that can't die. Calling it a dream or not is irrelevant, it is the manifestation of the absolute. Be aware about what is makes you realize that you are appearing now as this experience. You now are alone in the infinity without any fundament now but same time part of a bigger game, see it directly is inspiring . Solipsism means that there are infinite others, but anyway you are alone in the abyss of existence 

  12. Posted

    2 hours ago, Ishanga said:

    . I post replies when You get this way because its a counter point

    It's ok, I just analyze and come to conclusions, which may later change. if Sadhguru makes categorical judgments about LSD or marihuana without nuances and without deep knowledge, as is evident when listening to him, for me he loses credibility. Anyway, it's just an opinion.

  13. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    13 minutes ago, Nivsch said:

    Palestinians inside Israel (Israeli Arabs) vote in elections and have representatives in the Knesset.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_List

    I was reading about the subject, the Druze, the residents, etc., and it is really complicated. It is very difficult to get an idea of how your country works, it is really a great challenge for your country to move forward, but very interesting 

  14. Posted

    50 minutes ago, Nivsch said:

    @Breakingthewall To clarify, it isn't "Palestinians' fault" that they chose to resist to Israel in the West Bank. It isn't easy to just accept to co exist with new people who come to your region.

    But I thing I have an insight. Palestinians and Jews in West Bank are more ideological to begin with and this is why co existence there couldn't be created.

    Whereas in the coastal plain, northern Israel and mountain shelf there is a co existence between Israelis and Palestnians who both are more moderate.

    Jews in mountainy areas vote traditionally much more to the Right Wing in comparison to Jews in other areas.

    The problem with these integrated Palestinians is: does Israel really want them to integrate? To be able to vote in the future, to have public charges, etc? Because they cannot be second-class citizens forever, generation after generation. It seems like an impossible problem to solve, since Israel is a Jewish state, and they are not Jews

  15. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    1 hour ago, Javfly33 said:

    Nah I posted it because I watched the New Years Eve satsang yesterday and found out about the story lol

    For most people just taking charge of your 'inner chemistry' is not as easy as pressing button, but I find important that the preaches this type of narratives because the message is as empowering as it can be for a human being. 

    I find it empowering because Everyone else just wants to sell their bullshit: you have to do this to be happy, you have to do that. But his message is: It is within, there is a way, to liberate yourself, to stop being a slave of the outside.

    So someone that does not sell me chains but freedom, I have to deeply respect the man. How to arrive to freedom might not be able to do it, but it is opening the possibility for people, I yet have to see somebody doing this. Everyone seems to be selling the heavens for a price 

    He says he needs external things, without mercury and without a copper bracelet he would die in 40 days. 

    Anyway it's obvious that your mental state is internal, but some external substances in specific moments could help to release energetic blockages 

    Btw, listen sadhguru is something external 

  16. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    1 hour ago, Ishanga said:

    Sadhguru on the situation of Ram Das meeting Neem Karoli Baba and giving him the LSD, and why taking external intoxicants or other things is not healthy in the long run, and why this is so.. 

    Everything is found within Yourself, all Experiences possible only happen within You, if this was not the Truth, then how come You have Grand or Depressive Experiences and I/We know nothing of it? So, the only question is a matter of control, can You control what is the Experience within Yourself? Yes You can, it is quite possible, its just a matter of knowing How!

     

    On 27/12/2024 at 8:36 PM, Javfly33 said:

    @Ishanga 

    Sadhguru is a bit of a demagogue as always. Yes, the potential for everything is in our body, but there are many blockages. He supposedly doesn't have them since in his previous lives he was a yogi who buried himself alive and dedicated his entire life to energy liberation, so for him it is not necessary.

    His approach is as always superficial, generalist and simplistic. Yes, smoking marihuana all the time for years is bad, but a little marihuana can have a positive effect. The same as the mercury that he consumes every day I suppose. It is better not to pay much attention to what he says, since he does not speak in depth or in a nuanced way, he speaks in easy slogans for a simple audience. 

    Btw: Scientists at the LA JOLLA-Salk Institute have found preliminary evidence that tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and other compounds found in marijuana may promote cellular clearance of beta amyloid, a toxic protein associated with Alzheimer's disease. 

    Btw, another inconsistency in that video, sadhguru says that ram dass tells the guru: don't take the whole thing, that dose is lethal! and the guru takes it anyway. another lie, or superficiality. sadhguru should do more research before talking, but well, it's not necessary because he doesn't talk for people who do research, he talks to seem wise. 900 ug is not at all a dose that can kill, not even 10 times more could kill, but why do research when he is omniscient? And that of: pure shit. what people is he talking to? What mental level? 

    But well , there are just small lies, nothing important, some lies are good right? To reach more people and that. Well....it's a matter that I know, then I detected a lot of inconsistency, little lies and demagoguery, so I extrapolate to all what he says in another topics that I don't know, and the verdict is: LIAR. 

  17. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    3 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

    If they wanna play like that, fine.

    Then anti-semitism and terrorism are also just how history works. Zero sympathy for cries of anti-semitism then.

    I guess that when they have their country complete and free of Palestinians, they will no longer need this victim narrative. I imagine that the Israeli mentality will be something like: after this Gaza, the Muslims cannot hate us more, and the world has already seen what we are really like. The Americans will continue to support us for strategic reasons, so let us use the necessary force to guarantee lasting stability and solve the Palestinian problem. The question would be how. Real genocide is not an option, there are limits. Relocation of the Palestinians is the only option, helping them financially so that they gain from the change, which is not difficult after having sunk them into shit. With money everything is possible, and after this show of force probably there wont be much resistance. The question would be where.

  18. Posted

    On 1/10/2024 at 4:36 PM, Revolutionary Think said:

    They are although a far cry from Hamas and Hezbollah that actively want the full eradication of Jews and are willing to indiscriminately target and murder civilians.

    Well, Israel do exactly the same but in larger scale. They are bombing civilians right now, with reasons of course, they always have legitimate reason for everything.

    their president has funded Hamas, settlers kill with impunity and are not openly genocidal only because of world public opinion. They insist that they are the most moral army in the world while bombing hospitals, and they insist that it is impossible to live with the Palestinians while harassing them.

    The Palestinians are obviously not intelligence prodigies nor are they led by Gandhi, but the last thing Israel wants is a Palestinian Gandhi, because its interests are Palestinian terrorists who give grounds for their expulsion.

  19. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    On 1/10/2024 at 10:54 AM, Nivsch said:

    Fair. The settlements ever expansion is a problem.

    Tell me if I'm wrong, but aren't settlements an essential part of Israeli policy? If Israel takes off its mask, does anyone honestly think that coexistence with the Palestinians is possible? Israel is lying, pretending to be moderate, but it is becoming increasingly clear that the only solution to the Palestinian problem is, let's say, a final solution. The Palestinians must leave, and Greater Israel must close its borders and exist thanks to the deterrence of its military power. Over time, it will create alliances with some neighbors, such as Saudi Arabia, and control its enemies. The question is where to settle the Palestinians. Syria? Maybe it could be possible with the help of west.

    I'm not saying that Israel is "bad", just very hypocritical and victimist. Probably the only solution is the expulsion of the Palestinian, and now the countries around are weak enough to think seriously in it

  20. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    9 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

    What Israel has done to Palestine is reprehensible and criminal by any unbiased measure. Not just crimes but crimes against humanity.

    Israel have an answer for that: That's how history works, and to make a good omelet you have to break a few eggs, ohhh it's a shame, but what to do? Didn't the Romans do the same, or the United States with the Sioux?

    Fine, agreed. But after 100 years of crying and playing the victim for the Holocaust, writing 1000 books and creating museums, guided tours of the extermination camps, make the Jews the people nominated for the award for the most hypocritical and false in the history of humanity.

     

  21. Posted · Edited by Breakingthewall

    On 1/10/2024 at 6:22 AM, Revolutionary Think said:

    Let's say there was a group in Mexico that demanded the land back that it got from the Mexican American War ok so we give them California and they use California to launch rockets and missiles at the rest of the United States. Not only that but, they get help from some Muslim country in fighting us. Then the Native Americans on their reservation start getting the idea of wanting to kill the white man and start entire education systems to educate their children to die for this cause. If

    That could be a reason, and it would legitimize your position, but if while you play the victim and boast of your good will and your even-tempered and civilized spirit, you are slowly colonizing the lands of those natives with extreme violence, destroying century-old houses to install new settlers, and your Minister of Security is a Nazi who idolizes terrorists and openly recognizes that his project is the great Israel, then anyone will think that you are a hypocritical liar and your only legitimacy is strength, which largely comes from your friendship with the bully in the neighborhood. So maybe they will come to the conclusion that you are an abuser and and a liar and that supporting you is shame

  22. Posted

    6 hours ago, PurpleTree said:

    I’m just saying if someone is aggressive/wrong/violent etc. it’s  not cool to blame the (their) victim 

    Obviously. The thing is that those behaviors exist , and for me it is important to understand the dynamics of aggression and defense. The normal thing is when you feel aggression to respond with more aggression or by becoming cowardly. One is to counteract that aggressive energy with your aggressive energy, forward, and the other is to give in to that aggressive energy, your energy goes backwards. These are natural, immediate reactions. Normally, any person has ever reacted by becoming cowardly, going backwards, after which they have perceived a decrease in their security and self-esteem. Then they decide unconsciously or consciously that they will never allow this to happen again and they mentally prepare to respond to the aggression with more aggression. It is more effective than the cowardly option but it implies loss of control and is dangerous. Most people who develop impulsiveness do so in response to fear.

    It is important to understand these internal processes in order to reach equanimity. Practicing real combat sports is quite useful to observe your reflex reactions and try to balance them, same to get involved in real situations. After each event, the focused mind analyzes the process and reprograms itself. The objective is balance in situations of imbalance.

  23. Posted

    1 hour ago, zazen said:

    ''A famous thread of all the top strategic thinkers - from Kissinger to Chomsky - who warned for years that war was coming if we pursued NATO expansion, yet had their advice ignored''

    https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1700719253685678286.html

    - Kissinger, in 2014, he warned that "to Russia, Ukraine can never be just a foreign country" and that it therefore needs a policy that is aimed at "reconciliation". He was also adamant that "Ukraine should not join NATO".

    - John Mearsheimer - probably the leading geopolitical scholar in the US today - in 2015: "The West is leading Ukraine down the primrose path and the end result is that Ukraine is going to get wrecked [...] What we're doing is in fact encouraging that outcome."

    - Jack F. Matlock Jr., US Ambassador to the Soviet Union from 1987-1991, warning in 1997 that NATO expansion was "the most profound strategic blunder, [encouraging] a chain of events that could produce the most serious security threat [...] since the Soviet Union collapsed"

    -Clinton's defense secretary William Perry explaining in his memoir that to him NATO enlargement is the cause of "the rupture in relations with Russia" and that in 1996 he was so opposed to it that "in the strength of my conviction, I considered resigning".

    -Noam Chomsky in 2015, saying that "the idea that Ukraine might join a Western military alliance would be quite unacceptable to any Russian leader" and that Ukraine's desire to join NATO "is not protecting Ukraine, it is threatening Ukraine with major war."

    -CIA director Bill Burns in 2008: "Ukrainian entry into NATO is the brightest of all redlines for [Russia]" and "I have yet to find anyone who views Ukraine in NATO as anything other than a direct challenge to Russian interests"

    -Pat Buchanan - assistant and special consultant to U.S. presidents Nixon, Ford, and Reagan - writing in his 1999 book A Republic, Not an Empire: "By moving NATO onto Russia's front porch, we have scheduled a twenty-first-century confrontation."

     

    Just because a nation is acting aggressively in the present, doesn't mean its the aggressor. Separate being aggressive from being the aggressor and instigating provocateur of a situation. 

    Is it necessary more to understand the situation? But is absolutely impossible to find a single article in the Western press that deviates from the retarded narrative of: Putin is a megalomaniac psychopath who in his final years wants to conquer Europe to return to the Soviet Union. He is evil, like Voldemort, and the Americans are the Good and Zelensky is Gandalf the Grey. Oh, and don't forget to wear diapers when you go out.

  24. Posted

    On 25/12/2024 at 4:18 AM, Lyubov said:

    Everyone wants to be captain hindsight now and especially with Ukraine. Supporting Taiwan absolutely was the most rational and strategic thing for the US or any superpower in their shoes to do at that time. Imagine if China was able to expand their zombie communism to the rest of Asia? The world would have not developed the same, human rights would have been a joke compared to what it is now . Everyone wants to cry about big bad America. I’m not saying this western democracy form of government is perfect, USA has a ton of issues with it’s double standards but you are taking for granted what we have now because of our form of government being the dominant one. We probably wouldn’t even be having this discussion if western democracy didn’t prevail, have you seen how heavily censored Chinese internet is? Forget any form of open dialogue. 

    The problem is that before the US acted to defend it's values, contain communism and now, since there is no real enemy, it creates it for business, to maintain its economic status. It is the motivation of a company that pursues profit, only its wars are not only commercial. So it has gone from being a positive force to drifting towards psychopathy.

  25. Posted

    Just now, PurpleTree said:

    Well you already can’t really choose to be afraid or not afraid can you? Or do you think depressed people can also choose to have more fun neuro transmitters?

    Yes you can , it's a matter of attitude. You decide don't being intimidated never, then when that situation happens you resist, after some times you have create an mental energetic structure quite strong. Everyone feels the fear, but if you really decide be stronger than the fear you can stand a lot, even in torture and extreme situations