Breakingthewall

I said that you must become true and profound. If you become that, you will accept you absolutely without any crack

Only this quote proves the falsehood of solipsism. "Right now" implies before and after. Where are "before" and "after" in infinity? Is infinity a time sequence that never ends? It seems limited in all dimensions except that one, therefore not absolutely infinite. The absence of limits implies total expansion in all directions, which makes it certain that infinite perspectives are always occurring. The timeline only exists in relation to one of those perspectives; there are infinite lines in infinite directions. Anything else is limited.

The brain is like a prism that creates a certain structure of consciousness, which may or may not be focused on the self. They say the self is imaginary because it is created by self-awareness. I think this is not the case. The self is real in that it exists a separate structure of reality that interacts and needs to be preserved. Consciousness may or may not be focused on it. This does not mean that consciousness is creating or dreaming it up, only that it is highlighting and focusing on it or not.

Could be in some cases, in others it could could be totally true. I like other human beings, I don't like falsehood , then I like true people, but there are very few, maybe you can't see the depth of the falsehood in humans due it's need of acceptance

I think it's because before, social glue provided a seemingly solid structure to social relationships, which were ultimately empty. When that glue came loose, the relationships disintegrated. All that remains is to find true and profound relationships. To do that, we must become true and profound.

What evidence could be? it's just a subjective opinion.

The physical being is not physical; it's made of energy, which is reality changing states, reflecting itself. The physical being, as you call it, is the infinitely interconnected structure of reality that is taking place now, manifesting as this experience. Any minimal change in the physical being is a change in the structure of reality, since nothing exists that is not interconnected for the simple reason that any movement is relative to another movement. There is no physical being and spiritual being; there is reality taking form.

Really? Could be, although you sound just like a sad clown who needs to feed his pathetic ego showing that he's superior when he has the understanding of ...well, you already said, a monkey.

I'd say most than 99%. Sex and relationship are a mirage, a trick of the ego. It's something that keeps us moving like puppets, thinking it's necessary and satisfying, and it's almost always alienating. But we all operate at a superficial level where our ego needs to be fed, and we create a vision in which couple relationships and sex are exactly what we need. And this binds us, since it's a very particular type of relationship, a biological need born for the perpetuation of the species, to which we consider an unavoidable source of personal satisfaction. Without it, we are failures; it's necessary. It's a real trap.

You are right, it's just a personal and general perception, not everyone is the same. If your energy is open and deep, similar people can appear. What I wanted to express is that girls aren't "lucky" enough to receive social attention. Almost always, everything offered and exchanged is pure ego, completely unreal relationships. But this is normal, since most people are like that, unreal. It's what it is; society creates very superficial individuals. Deep down, people are deeply unsatisfied, and they don't know why; they can't see beyond it. It's very difficult.

Then say something interesting. For now you seem just a smartass

A baby knows that is alive because being is knowing. Knows it very deeply, but in an abstract way. Don't you remember when you were 2 years old? You felt the life totally, that is knowing, it's much closer than enlightenment that knowing that you are a person in a planet with a body.

Saying things like: reality is imaginary. If it's "reality", should be "real". Saying reality is imaginary is saying that the circle is square. Confusion. Or maybe I don't get it

I guess that being always in an absolute perspective then pain is the same than pleasure, but who can be in an absolute perspective more than some moments? Then the relative perspective returns and pain is just pain. You could see bit better, things become less hostile, you stop rejecting the bad thing so much I guess, but I don't know until what level.

The self for me is the perception, and any perception has to happen with some structure. Without structure perception is impossible, and in reality there is always a structure. If there were none, no matter how tenuous, there would be nothing. It would be exactly the same now as before and after, therefore reality would not occur. At some point, there would be some structure, since the potential for it to exist, as we see, and then reality would occur. This necessarily means that there are always infinite structures. The current structure is totally perfect, infinite synchronicity in action, like absolutely all other structures. It's quite shocking. It is infinite and perfect, and its depth is total. It moves, it evolves. The intelligence that designs this moment is absolute. It is not someone, not a god ,it is just the consequence of infinity. Everything is interconnected to infinite power, which makes it infinitely alive. It is totally impossible for it not to be so. So, what is thought? The absolute in a perfect form, infinitely interconnected. If at some point you realize that, it is because the turn of infinity was exactly in that direction. What is this experience, this form? Just an expression of infinity, like anything else. Then, anyone that appears in this experience is another expression of infinity, then it's "another". Just my perspective, maybe you could say: it's me, but I don't see it in that way , me is this form, you is your form. Are absolutely separate, even the substance is the same and it's movement is syncronized in the same whole. From an absolute perspective, both are the same, but from a relative perspective are different, are separate perceptions. Both perspectives are real.

I'm not nihilistic, but I understand the social dynamics of dating well. It's 99% narcissism. Most people are deeply dissatisfied; relationships are empty, superficial, and ego-focused. Sex is hedonistic, people measure themselves by category, and no one touches the other's soul. It's absolutely boring. But what to do? That's human life

Just a mental barrier , something that closes.

Non duality is simply a lie. If there is something that you can't control, there is duality, then there is infinite duality. If duality means that ultimately everything is the same substance, what with that? It's a separate form, then it's another. All non dualistics are people who tries to make scuare the circle

I was not talking about the impact of Christianity but about its essence.

Why don't you become millionaire if it's so easy? Rockefeller

Anyway, Christianity is the religion that aims for true openness, but it must be interpreted correctly. Christ is a metaphor, as is original sin. Christ's bleeding heart is the door to the whole. Buddha's still mind is limited; it lacks the blood of Christ. The Trinity is the formless whole, the form and totality of synchronistic forms. Christianity is true mysticism.

If God were all-powerful, it could choose to be limited, but since it can't, it's completely powerless. It's the inevitable consequence of the absence of limits. And Jesus was a man with profound vision who was crucified. The same thing could happen to you.

Putin is authoritarian with the tacit consent of the oligarchies and the majority of the people. It's a different kind of authoritarianism than, for example, Saddam Hussein, who was a kind of Mesopotamian satrap, a king. Both are authoritarian, but one is centered on the homeland and the other on himself, as evidenced by statues, giant paintings, etc. Regarding tribal leaders, a leader like Sitting Bull is very different from one like Genghis Khan. Both were leaders of a small, warrior tribe. One was, let's say, democratic, while the other drifted toward conquer and authoritarianism, becoming an institution. Each case is different. I guess that it depends of many factors

The shallow and empty attention girls enjoy is a total curse; it binds them to eternal stupidity and adolescence. It's better to be a virgin forever than that shit. Even better is to be in a Stalinist gulag. At least you die with dignity and authenticity. Living as a narcissist is worse than death. They look brilliant on the outside, but they're absolutely rotten on the inside

Why do you think that they aren't as dumb as the average? The problem isn't IQ, it's emotional maturity. Most people are teenagers until they're 80, and that's dramatic. All of their social interaction is ego-boosting, and it's absolutely frustrating and exhausting. retarded like Elon Musk and Donald Trump. When they're having sex, they're thinking about how sexy they are and all that. You have to imagine you're dealing with a slightly dorky 15-year-old boy, never play into his game, never feel attacked by his projectiveness, and be on top of it. Dealing with teenagers is exhausting; everyone knows that.