Breakingthewall

Yes I broke it until no brick remained, but then the challenge is breaking it without any substance. It's not impossible.

I don't know if there are subtle realms. Maybe there are. But when someone takes psychedelics and deceives themselves, I wouldn't say it's because they're deceived by some entity. Rather, they deceive themselves because they have a great desire for validation. So great that they would choose validation over anything else. So, they create a peculiar psychological structure in which they believe what suits their purposes, then in the trip they see what they need to see to believe their history.

I chose that name because I was doing 5 meo again and again and I always find a wall before my face. Then I started to look in internet some advices and I found this forum, where many knew about 5meo, and that was the name that came to my mind

Do you think that they are dark energies that makes psychedelic travelers be influenced by them? I think it's simply their narcissism, which prevents them from truly opening up. They only find what they're really looking for: self-importance. No demon is needed to deceive them, since they long to be deceived; in fact, their psychic structure is self-deception.

The Christ archetype comes closer to true openness, probably more than any other mystical figure. It involves the total humiliation of the ego, the total opening of the heart through the acceptance of martyrdom, the surrender after which the closed capsule opens and total glory is manifested. The problem is that it is interpreted as if Jesus is a divine being and must be worshipped. Jesus is the core within every human being; the Trinity is the threefold division of humanity: the Father, the Absolute from which reality emanates; the Son, the heart of the individual in whom the Total dwells; the Holy Spirit, the Mind, which creates a new dimension of existence. Only through the Son does one access the "Kingdom of Heaven," becoming one with the Total. Only through the total opening of the heart does one see that one is one with the Absolute

I don't know what you're talking about. I was talking about honor killings. It has no relationship with gaza, then I don't know why you said that. Regarding Gaza, I had some doubts before and thought the Israelis had the right to defend themselves, but now it seems obvious that they're criminal genocidaires and that Europe should take a firm stand against them. They're a shame to Western civilization, and I think that most of European governments are going to move in that direction. It wasn't clear at first, but it's becoming clearer.

There is a Sufi mystic very similar to Christ, al hallaj. His best-known phrase is "ana al haq," "I am the truth," for which he was tortured and crucified. He embodies the essence of Christ but with language much more direct to the absolute. Is say it is an example of total enlightenment, without any crack, totally opened to the unlimited

Ok, then as the massacre in Gaza is evil, it's ok widespread forced marriages and "honor" killings, and in short the absolute oppression of women. Strange logic, but if for you it works, good.

Those crimes are very common, but anyway, think what fits better for your narrative

Form means differentiation, without differentiation there is nothing. Not happiness or anything else.

If there is no form, there is nothing, and in the absence of limits, form will eventually arise again. So, there will always be form. But form doesn't always have to be suffering. There are infinite possibilities. The most complex thing we know is the human form, which is quite suffering. But there may be other, less dense forms, dimensions that we literally cannot imagine. Furthermore, any other life form other than human is considerably less suffering. If you're a bird, for example, everything is perfect 90% of the time. With humans, the mental dimension arises, the ego, etc., and we already know that it's crazy, but that's not all there is to it. Perhaps it's just a temporary form. I would say that we have to give it our all here. Then, who knows?

God isn't an entity that decides things; it's an unfathomable hole from which existence springs. Forms are created and destroyed in an infinite dance. So there are two options: either you dance aligned with the flow and open to it's depth, or misaligned and closed. But you'll dance anyway.

If we want to open ourself to the absolute, we have to kiss Kali, the goddess of destruction, open your heart to her. Kali is the living form of the bottomless. It is the aspect of reality that breaks down structures, because unlimited openness does not tolerate confinement. Where the self tries to assert itself, Kali cuts through it. Not to negate form, but to liberate its essence. Kali is wild, as the existence, dance of creation and destruction without mercy, if we deny the destruction and suffering, we are closed to the unfathomable. Form is yin and yang, and it's impossible that there is no form. No choice.

Sure, today in the news in my country, it was reported that two Pakistani sisters refused to marry the men their father had ordered. Since they were in Europe, they couldn't do anything to them. Instead, they tricked them by saying their grandmother was sick. They went to Pakistan, where their brothers were waiting to strangle them to death. The Pakistani court acquitted them because their parents forgave them. It seems that women there are like cattle, someone's property, so if that person forgives the murderers, there's no crime. Now they're on trial here, not for murder, but for forced marriage.

I'll give you an example: the Assyrians were very son of a bitch people. They had a torture system where they would put a guy in a box, and only his head and hands would come out. They would leave him in the countryside with two guards who would force him to eat and drink. Then the insects would arrive, and after a few days, tens of thousands of them would devour him. The idea was to keep him alive for a month being devoured by insects Well, this horrible shit, being open to the total is infinitely better than being in your house in a city, isolated, and surrounded by energetic walls that isolate you until you die of old age.

There is only one definition: I am that. And it's the absolute, open, total, bottomless depth. And from it the existence explodes with the power given of the limitlessness, that is total. The source of the reality is a hole without bottom, but this hole is full of everything, because it has not bottom

In contrast to your poem, some logical description, let's see if you see it Absolute openness is not a thing, nor an entity, nor a form. It cannot be defined positively without betraying its nature, because every affirmation creates a limit, and absolute openness is precisely the absence of all limits. It is not a substance, nor a void, nor a being, nor a consciousness. It is nothing that can be conceived in opposition to anything else. It is not “nothing,” because nothingness is the negation of something, and this already establishes a conceptual border. Nor is it “something,” because something is differentiated from other things, and all differentiation implies relation and limitation. It is not emptiness, because emptiness only has meaning in contrast to fullness, and that duality is impossible at the level of the absolute. But it's the absence of lack, because the openess is absolute potential. Maybe you could call it God, but not because it's a creator, but because is the source of any possibility

Good point, to say that the absolute is infinity is a mistake. The absolute is the absence of limits. It is not something, it has no dimension, it is neither empty nor full, it is total openness. Infinity would be an inevitable consequence.

In my opinion, he's approaching the issue backwards. He says: Infinity can only create logical things; anything illogical cannot exist. Rather, it would be: everything that manifests is relative, that is, relational. Every relation is logical, since they are two equivalent words. And that's it, there's no need of more. When he speaks of nothingness, it's the same. Nothingness is the absence of contrast or movement. Nothingness is ontologically the same as everything; nothingness is unmanifested reality, the absence of relationship, and "somethingness" is manifested reality, contrast. Since there are no limits, at some point there will be contrast, fluctuation, or relative movement. That moment is always, and its unfolding is unlimited.

I don't know, maybe things doesn't work like that, but maybe it's possible to see deeper, let's see. Imo if all the barriers are dissolved , a lot of possibilities can be perceived. But for now I can break the barriers just for some moments and probably not totally . No they are very important questions that all of us do, suffering is a real challenge, and it exist, it's everywhere

Fear of suffering means fear of depth. Jebe wounded Genghis Khan with an arrow, and when Gengis was about to boil the enemy leaders in oil, Jebe stepped forward and said that he was the one who shot the arrow and that he requested the honor of being the first to be boiled in oil. At this gesture, Genghis named him general. We are reality, and reality expands in consciousness and beauty. Suffering is only the pain of childbirth, nothing, irrelevant. We must open ourselves to it with joy, since the beauty of depth deserves that price. Trying to evade it, like those who take refuge in the idea of illusion, only serves to dry up the mind. And when suffering comes, houses of cards fall. The only way to face real suffering is like Jebe: Give me more. The problem is that there is no choice , then it's the only wise option because the other option kills the beauty and doesn't avoid the suffering

I don't think so, when observing, it seems that reality tends toward expansion, and in this tendency, moments of dissonance occur until they equalize. It seems that everything is cyclical and restarts from an energetic imprint, also seems obvious that everything has to be coherent with the whole. This is speculation. You could call it mental masturbation or whatever, but that's what it seems like when observing. Another speculation: maybe if you achieve the absolute perspective in this cycle that perspective don't dissapear after death/restart. It seems so when that happens

@Davino Look this and tell me what do you think. Btw, if those ideas are let's say not welcome, just tell me. I don't want to contradict Leo because it's his place, and I see value in his teachings, I just want to nuance the perspective that's necessary to open up to the absolute Then: The point is that if your perspective is that you are conciousness and conciousness metamorphoses into the things that appear, these things are unreal, as solipsism proclaims. Then when you say you've realized God, divinity, this God would only be an appearance that consciousness takes on. But then, this consciousness that takes on coherent forms would need to be God to take on those forms. But if that consciousness were aware of itself as God, this very fact would be a mirage, another creation of consciousness. This impossible paradox is resolved in a very simple way: consciousness is simply perception of change from form, and when this perception occurs, it can turn inward and perceive its true nature. The fact that it is perception does not imply that it is an illusion; it implies that it is relative. Relative is not equivalent to false; it is simply relative, like any perception.

Then the infinity has a center: you. And a ground, a limit. Well, that's exactly what supposedly should be dissolved to open yourself to your true nature

Yes experience and conciousness are unlimited, I agree. What I pointed is that If you remain in the perspective that reality is fundamentally experience, you remain in the position of a conscious observer of reality. This is a center. You are observing reality; it's inevitable. The shift is taking a step back and opening the focus, collapsing the observer and the experience. Then there is no experience, there is reality, and change becomes irrelevant; it is arising that occurs. It becomes transparent. Then the absolute truth (to call it somehow) manifests, the substance from which change is made. This could be "defined " as absence of limits, that implies absolute potential, that is perceived as plenitude, positive push, absolute glory. You could say that this is just a subjective perception, and it is, but same time the absolute potential is the source of everything, is what you could call God. Anyway, maybe we are talking about the same in different ways