Breakingthewall

Well, they did.

@BlueOak What you're saying is a possibility. The other possibility is the end of the war, and you know, memory nowadays is short. Then the deals restart, brics is growing, Germany needs gas, east Europe tends to Russia, EEUU is being unpredictable, Africa is tired of Europe, who knows the future

Russia’s Wartime Economy: Collapse Averted, Isolation Deepened 🔹 1. GDP and Growth Russia is not bankrupt. In fact, by 2024 its GDP had recovered to pre-war levels, growing around 3.6%, driven by: massive military spending, import substitution programs, and a complete trade reorientation toward Asia (China, India, Turkey). The ruble has stabilized, though inflation remains high (around 9–10%). Russia continues to produce and export energy, metals, and grain at record levels. 👉 The result: a functioning war economy, not prosperity, but far from collapse. 🔹 2. Foreign Trade Before the war, 45% of Russian trade was with Europe; now it’s less than 10%. Major new partners: China, India, and the UAE. Russia sells oil at a discount but in huge volumes, offsetting price losses. It imports microchips, machinery, and electronics through Kazakhstan, Turkey, and Armenia, bypassing sanctions. 👉 Russia has built a parallel trade network, slower but effective. 🔹 3. Industry and Employment The civilian sector (cars, aviation, tech) struggles, but the military-industrial complex now absorbs millions of workers. Unemployment is at historic lows (around 3%), though many jobs are low-productivity or military-linked. The economy is now heavily nationalized — almost all key sectors are under Kremlin control. 👉 This model works in wartime, but would be unsustainable in long-term peace. 🔹 4. Sanctions and Resilience Western sanctions failed to break Russia because: it is self-sufficient in energy and food, holds large gold and yuan reserves, and its population tolerates austerity far more than Western societies. However, costs are real: collapse of foreign investment, brain drain of skilled workers, and financial isolation. 🔹 5. Living Standards Prices have risen sharply, but the State keeps subsidies and jobs flowing. Moscow and St. Petersburg remain relatively stable, while rural areas face scarcity of imports and poorer healthcare. Private consumption has fallen, but there is no famine or social chaos. 🔹 6. Summary Russia is not collapsing — it is reconfiguring. The country has become more closed, militarized, and authoritarian, yet remains economically functional thanks to natural resources, state control, and Asian partnerships. It is, in essence, an armed autarky — not a failed state.

It's very different. I don't support Putin's war, but I understand it. Ukraine is tied to Russia, then the eternal radical Ukrainian nationalism appears once again, and a civil war begins. Then the Americans arrive and start giving weapons to these radical nationalists. And finally, they announce that Ukraine will join NATO, which they know perfectly well is pissing in the face of Russian pride. Russia is much weaker as a nation. If this happens, it's a national humiliation, and the Americans know it perfectly well. Russia is unstable. Putin thinks it's essential that this doesn't happen, and he acts. And he do with the support of all Russia. Russia is stronger now than before. That's a fact. Then Putin movement is successful in many senses

I don't know, it doesn't seem feasible to have a population of millions of people hostile to your regime subjugated nowadays; it's too costly. On the other hand, annexing an area where the majority wants it does make sense.

@Raze Okay, anyway, Palestinians generally think like you. They get caught up in hatred and occasionally commit massacres. You can argue all you want about the past, but the future is more important. What future do Palestinians hope to achieve with more massacres and rapes like the one on October 7th? Don't you understand that life is more valuable than such nonsense? The Jews give them the opportunity to evolve, to become a living society, with proyection, to escape misery. Why choose suicide? It's mentally retarded. The same one you demonstrate in every AI message. As Golda Meyer said, this shit will end when Arabs love their children more than they hate Jews, which is to say, never. Why? Because Islamic idiosyncrasy revolves around honor. Not about what's right, but honor. It's different. Right is internal; honor is external. It's how you're perceived, self-image, how Allah perceives you. Pure narcissism.

@Raze It's true that the Jews arrived with deeds of purchase (in 1947 they own the 7% of the land) and displaced some local workers. It's unfair. Throughout history, unfair things have happened more than once, but these things happen. There have been the wars that had to happen, and there were many, and now there's a situation in which there's absolutely nothing to gain by violent means, only the stupidity of honor. The honor that makes Arabs kill their daughters if they don't accept being raped by whomever the family decides. It's time for change. Maybe you could understand that this conflict is not about land, it's about identity, religion . It's purely emotional. Then remembering the past is useless, there have been thousands of conflicts about land much worse than this in the history, and they have been finished. This one is about identity, much more difficult, emotional and stupid

@Raze @Raze Then the starvation? On the subject of Israel's creation, you can cry for another 80 years if you want, and cause the deaths of hundreds of thousands, or evolve. It's a matter of choosing what you prefer. If you prefer to immolate yourself, you're free to do so. I believe the Arabs would gain much by opening their minds and looking to the future. You think they should continue on the path of hatred and war. In my opinion, that's stupid if your enemy is stronger than you, but everyone chooses. Seems that Muslims have a barrier, they don't like evolution. For them the most important is following the Quran and being absolutely prisoners of it. Strange behavior, seems like extremely stupid to an incredible level.

@Kid A what you call revolution Is it to expel a democratically elected government by force without waiting for elections? About that of true and false, then we have to assume that what one side says is true and other is false. Ok, then I will choose one side and believe what that side says. It's simple, thanks, I was bit confused but not anymore

@Raze This is extremely complex for a mind like yours, but let's try: You said Israel uses starvation as a weapon. That's not true when it sends food every day. If it weren't, the entire population of Gaza would have died of hunger. Thousands of videos show children with vitality and normal appearances, and adults too. That implies that the starvation story is a lie. I know this is quantum physics for you. Read the text many times and ask whatever you need to. I'm here to help Regarding the issue of coexistence, it became more difficult for the Jews when the Arabs began to kill them. I know that at your level of understanding, it's absolutely justifiable for you that the Arabs killed Jews, but you must understand (at least try to) that the Jews didn't want to be killed.

What are you talking about? It's easy to find what really happened. Maybe not for you, but for anyone really interested in the chain of events and understanding is easy.

Saying that Russia wants to annex another country is not accurate. Russia wants to annex a part of Ukraine populated by Russians who want to be Russia and who are at war with Ukrainian nationalism. It's a unique situation, and it's been greatly exacerbated by the US to make money.

I like a lot this one, I think he's a sufi. A Muslim who accept everyone . He was imprisoned 5 years for terrorism https://www.instagram.com/reel/DKMJOe-yZdy/?igsh=eHRzN21mOHc3eXZh

@Raze this one is revealing https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPpEAbgkhRz/?igsh=cDFwZWh1YzBncmJ6

Is seems that the Jews idea was coexistence at the beginning. And many Arabs are coexisting in Israel, listen. This one https://www.instagram.com/reel/DKmxuDdN8OX/?igsh=MW01ZjlicG45dm00dg==

@Raze sure, always the same boy. What about those? https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPo5-mcjJrP/?igsh=bGRzcHJrZGw1aW9k

@Raze sure man. Why aren't there photos of starved crowds? What were the Palestinians eating for 2.5 years? Think by yourself, don't believe bullshit. Logic is the key. Stop being a believer.

you mean that it's not islam responsibility , it's west responsibility. But that's not the case. Where there's no radical Islamism, it's because governments don't allow it to develop. For example, in Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, or Morocco, it's repressed at its roots. Where there's anarchy, it emerges, as in Syria or Iraq. Then there are countries like Türkiye or Qatar that foster it. In the internet age, uncontrolled Islam leads to radical Islamism. Perhaps because islam essence is quite radical and expansionist

Your IA lies, if this had been the case, the conditions would have been similar to the Siege of Stalingrad. Most of the bombings were announced and food was supplied to the population. That is, the enemy fed the population. Maybe it's talking about you. Look, I'm going to tell you a secret that will change your life: AI is programmed to make you feel good so you use it more. It's intelligent (hence the "i") and knows what you want to hear based on your bias. If I ask the same AI about my message and it knows it's from me, it will say it's an accurate analysis worthy of a genius the world isn't yet ready to understand. Try to answer with your own mind. Maybe it's difficult now, but if you endure you will get some results fast.

Let's look at the example of the Oslo Accords. Afterward, perturbed fanatic, Dr. Baruch, went to a mosque and killed 29 people. All of Palestine and the Muslim world in general took this act as proof of Israel's hypocrisy. The fact is that Israel absolutely rejected the attack and called it repugnant. But this justified a wave of terrible attacks by the Palestinians, which were approved by the vast majority of Palestinians and seen as heroic by the Muslim world. What do you think of this? They were right to respond to the mosque massacre with a wave of massacres, right? You're probably comparing it to the destruction of Gaza. This is selective blindness; it's completely different. Was a single fanatic, not an organization. Always there will be some fanatics.

They renounced violence, but there was more violence than ever. Look, there's a sector of Israel that seeks violence. Settler terrorism is a reality, and Smotrich and the other radicals support it. This is a fact, but these people are a minority in Israel. It's inevitable that there are radical lunatics on both sides, and there's no justification for a lunatic like that doctor who entered the mosque killing people, and whose tomb is now a site of pilgrimage. But if they have Hamas and the martyrs of Al Aqsa in front of them, then the only solution is total war. Imagine if Dr. Baruch massacres people in the mosque and then puts them in a van and makes a parade through Tel Aviv, while everyone cheers him hysterically? Then the condemnation of Israel would be absolute. Well, that's how it is in Gaza, and in a large part of the Muslim world, many people celebrated the September attacks. Perhaps for you, that's justified. So, in my opinion, you're part of the problem. Massacring innocent people without any purpose and then celebrating it as a success is simply celebrating hatred. No one celebrates the deaths of innocent people in Gaza; it's seen as inevitable to erase the malignant tumor of radical Islam.

@zazen There are radical Islamists in many places, not just in Gaza. Why is there radical Islamism in Sudan, Syria, Afghanistan, or Nigeria? There are no Jews nearby. Iran is radical Islamism, and Erdogan is an Islamist, but he's moving slowly because Turkey wouldn't allow something like Iran. There is radical Islamism in Europe, and in general, there would be in all Muslim countries if it weren't repressed.

@zazen By the way, using the example of the Spanish colonies demonstrates a childlike level of understanding. Those who rebelled were descendants of Spaniards, just like in the American War of Independence. Not the Aztecs; they no longer existed. Do you understand the difference? The Bulgarians were colonized by the ottomans for centuries. Did they teach their children suicide?

Then you don't justify, just you see that has a cause (legitimate) that are the conditions that give rise it. Is being bit liar right? Yes anyone who believes in Muhammad, paradise and hell is stupid by definition. Christians also believe in dogma, but nowadays they are minority who really believe, and also are stupid. Anyway Jesus weren't a warlord pedophile. It adds a plus of stupidity. And cause this: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPeEJL_DSAG/?igsh=NGJkbTNieWE5dGQx Anyway, what would you think about a country ruled by fanatic Bishops that forbidden women showing legs under death condemn? Well, as you are a liar, if it's in your side you would justify it Look liar, it's the Muslim voice NOW, after realizing that Israel is impossible to erase. Before, liar, the voice was total war against Israel. Can you understand the difference, liar? The Jews and south America never built is identity focused in hate, liar. They had independence wars, like the Indians, but even the American natives, who were really exterminated, never teach hate and suicide to their children. As you are a liar, for you it's the same, but it isn't Yes, and they rule Palestine, that's the problem, as you know, liar. I'm done with both of you, you are just liars that are defending your position because your origins, family, anything, is closer than this position than the other. If you were a Jew you would defend Israel with the same lies. No integrity. Zero value. Anyone who can see would be that obvious reality that regardless of the thousands of nuances and injustices committed, a society based on the cult of death, which teaches suicide as an essential value to its children, has no future. It must change of its own free will or be forced to do so. The Japanese were forced, the Aztecs too, and the Islamists will be. Watch those educative videos https://www.instagram.com/reel/DMc7LXbuKZ8/?igsh=MWN6bXdjZW8yNWgybQ== https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOlO27PE96c/?igsh=Z3ozYng1dnlodjQ= One final question: Do you think it was positive or negative for humanity that Buddhism existed or not? And Christianity? And advaita Vedanta? And the Aztec religion? And Islam? And Japanese empire? And Nazism? And Spanish expansion? And democracy? And American culture? And communism? Roman empire? Gengis peace? Are all the same? No one absolutely positive, but some more that others, and some of them quite negative . And nowadays Islamism...well. Islam has the chance of stopping being politic and become personal, Sufi. Let's see if they achieve it or become islamist, and that's a plague

@Raze Using Chatgpt for data is acceptable, but for moral and value judgement , it's an insult to intelligence. If you can't understand it it's impossible have a conversation with you. Settler terrorism is something extremely negative, no one doubts it. You should also condemn Palestinian terrorism, not justify it. The Palestinians must absolutely abandon violence, and from there begin to achieve things. The first thing they would achieve would be a change of government in Israel, and the second, a state. Then coexistence and development as society. But first they should want that. They want development or death and paradise? That is the question. This Palestinian thinks that they are focused in death https://www.instagram.com/reel/C9xQ3Vhp6yW/?igsh=czdoa3cwOWd0dHFq