Breakingthewall

Sure, then go and fly like Neo. Do it in Iran if you could, then the ayatollah would surrender immediately

The ego has the substance of reality: infinite. It is not a floating illusion nor a mere accident of perception; it is composed of the entire unlimited relationship that reality is. Its existence, as form, is not independent, but neither is it nonexistent. It is an inevitable and legitimate effect of the infinite in motion. You cannot recognize its emptiness, but its total fullness. The so-called "emptiness" is merely a negative concept that points to the boundary of form when isolated. But when you understand that all form is the inevitable unfolding of infinite relationship, emptiness dissolves into fullness. Real freedom is not "letting go of all identification," as if one could dwell in a conceptual limbo without form or content. True freedom is the dissolution of boundaries, recognizing that the limits that seem to separate the self, form, or any structure are merely mental projections. Emptiness, understood as absolute absence or negation, is itself a boundary ,a restrictive concept. How could an ego, with its millions of nuances, its complexity, its interdependence, its real relational structure, be sustained by nothingness? That makes no sense. If you look from an unlimited perspective, everything is empty in terms of separate meaning, yet at the same time, everything is. Being is everything, implies absolute meaning, not absence of meaning, because being is total. Real openness is not found in taking refuge in the denial of form, but in seeing that all form , including the ego, is the direct, inevitable, and absolutely full expression of unlimited reality.

Let's see, serious Buddhism doesn't deny the self; it sees it as a wave in the ocean, not an immovable center but a transient reality. The adjectives "illusion" and "false" are unnecessary. The ego is absolutely real as form, and its substance is the substance of reality. True nirvana consists in being one with substance, seeing form as what it is, a structure that reality now assumes. Absolutely real as form, perfect, interconnected with the whole; it is the whole in motion. Simplifying doesn't work; it's impossible to deny what is. The ego has foundations that come from the totality of form; they are butterfly effects of infinity, which in turn cause butterfly effects in infinity. They are the flow of reality. Where's the point in calling it illusion? It's a mistake that castrates the mind.

Contemporary spirituality, directly inherited from Buddhism and its Western derivatives, commits a profound structural error that limits, castrates, and distorts the true expansion of the mind. That error is the denial of the ego. It is claimed that the ego is maya, an illusion, an empty construction that sustains human suffering. Based on this premise, it is proposed to suppress, transcend, or dissolve the ego as a necessary condition to achieve so-called "enlightenment" or "nirvana." This state, idealized as the ultimate realization, is presented as a realm without desire, without identity, without conflict. However, what is promoted under this label is not real openness, but an existential lobotomy. The ego is not an illusion in the sense of being nonexistent. It is a real and tangible compendium of energetic, relational, and cognitive structures that compose the concrete configuration of every human being. Denying its existence is equivalent to denying one's own structure, to amputating the foundation upon which all interaction with reality is built. True fulfillment is not accessed by eliminating the ego, but by integrating it, understanding it, and overcoming its limitations without denying it. The so-called nirvana, as interpreted by this superficial spirituality, is not fullness but amputation. Suffering is eliminated at the cost of eliminating real interaction with the world. Conflict is suppressed, but so is expansion, complexity, and the authenticity of existence. The result is individuals who are apparently calm, but structurally amputated, incapable of sustaining a realistic, vibrant, and open vision of existence. Authentic expansion of consciousness is not born from denying the self, but from understanding it as what it is: a real structure that must be integrated into a much broader movement of openness and relationship. Only when the ego is recognized, neither idolized nor denied, can its rigidity be transcended without mutilating the mind or closing the door to true fulfillment. The spirituality that denies the ego castrates the mind. The one that understands, integrates, and transcends it, without amputation, opens existence to its deepest potential: a living, complex, relational reality where the self is a legitimate form, but not a limit.

No, because absolute truth is limitless, and those perspectives are limited, that is a fact, without the slightest doubt, and I'm pointing it for making you see it. That kind of spirituality is false in it basis, then it doesn't do the work that it should do, otherwise closes you, because it seems smart, seductive, spoken from a position of knowledge, and it's wrong, then a trap

Then why a lot of things appear?

It exists , is a vast energy network that uses individuals as processors to operate in a higher dimension. Each neuronal synapse is as real as a piece of iron. The collective ego is a symphony of enormous richness, strength, intelligence, and power. It is the intelligence of reality in action, the same as the Big Bang. It is the unstoppable thrust of reality expanding upon itself. Look at it from a non-human perspective; imagine it is something else, like bacteria creating a structure, or subatomic particles organizing themselves in the most efficient way possible. The collective ego is a supreme work of art of reality

Why would Israel want to plunge Iran into chaos? It wouldn't gain anything; it's enough to nullify its military capability, parade fighter jets across its skies with total impunity, and demonstrate its power. Furthermore, the fact that nullifying Iran's nuclear capability makes the rest of the Arab countries and Turkey, with whom it disputes Muslim leadership, the happiest. The real reason for the Israeli attack is first to legitimize friend Bibi, who guarantees himself another term, and second, that now Hezbollah is nullified and there is no fear of thousands of rockets being launched at them, which was a serious threat. Hezbollah had power. Now Israel is going to be legitimate in great part of the world, the fighters against the fanatics with nukes. Much better that the genocides of Gaza

The ego is an energetic system as real as the atomic bonds that form a rock. The only difference is that it operates in a different dimension, but it's a reality, just like a toothache or a cluster of galaxies.

The difference between humans and rats is that humans are cogs in the social matrix, and this matrix has a solid emotional cement. The reality is that whether you live or die is irrelevant, except that it matters emotionally to you. If you didn't have that emotional spring, killing humans would be the same as killing flies or killing yourself: neither good nor bad, indifferent.

What would Iran achieve with the atomic bomb besides being destroyed? All the Iranian anti-Israel rhetoric is an excuse for the Ayatollahs' regime to maintain legitimacy and be able to oppress its people forever. Iran has nothing to do; if Israel wants, it can leave the country without electricity, without oil, and without supplies in a week, plunging into absolute chaos. Iran knows this, but it plays on the fact that Israel won't do anything. It continues to pressure, finances terrorists, militias, all to establish itself as the Muslim hero against the Jewish devil, and thus maintain power, while it expands throughout Syria and elevates the Shiite branch above its hated Sunni enemies, that's the real goal

What would Iran achieve with the atomic bomb besides being destroyed? All the Iranian anti-Israel rhetoric is an excuse for the Ayatollahs' regime to maintain legitimacy and be able to oppress its people forever. Iran has nothing to do; if Israel wants, it can leave the country without electricity, without oil, and without supplies in a week, plunging into absolute chaos. Iran knows this, but it plays on the fact that Israel won't do anything. It continues to pressure, finances terrorists, militias, all to establish itself as the Muslim hero against the Jewish devil, and thus maintain power, while it expands throughout Syria and elevates the Shiite branch above its hated Sunni enemies, that's the real goal

Yeah, I have the horrible defect of critical thinking. It's better to be a lamb, no doubt Anyway, neo advaita self help and neo advaita spirituality is false in its basis. If it's a problem for you that anyone points it, what to do?

Sure but that doesn't mean that are bad, for mostly that's better than being alone. That's human life, family, belonging, etc. You don't need to be a genius to see that, the point is that it's something, a reality. Have kids and teach them is something, is how life is. People use to be superficial, that's why relationship are superficial, but that doesn't mean that worth nothing. When I said above that about relationships are shit that's stupidity, like: I'm better than them . That's spiritual stupid ego, but it's inevitable because if you really don't want a typical transactional relationship you have to understand what they are to don't fall in them He says that he is enlightened because he's aware of his nature. Anyone could say that. What he means is that he can be without labeling, feeling himself. I think that's very easy, basic, like being a kid, or a dog. Im in that state all time , it's still limited, I know it without doubt. He thinks that what he is is "conciousness", the substance of reality, here, now. It's a limited vision, reality is much more than that, he's simplifying because he needs it Conciousness is the fact of being concious or something. Something is needed because if not there is not conciousness. Something doesn't mean an object, could be a thought, cold, time, existing, any movement of reality. Really you are not concious of the movement, you are the movement, then you could say that you are "conciousness", but that doesn't mean that the movement is not real. It's , and it's relation . The nature of existence is relation, reflexion of reality in itself. Existence is the manifestation of reality, reality is the unlimited, existence is the relation of the unlimited with itself Think: why "conciousness" it's creating anything? How? The answer would be: it's like a dream . A dream involves trillions of neural connections, relationship. Saying that of a dream is a joke, it's low spirituality, superstition. Much lower than any classic religion

Existence is relationship; any change in the reality is relative to another field of reality, to another dimension. Since there are no limits, reality at any given moment reflects on itself and changes state relative to itself. "At any given moment" is always, and the number of relative reflections is infinite. Therefore, any stable structure is composed of infinitely many perfectly coordinated reflections, each relatively changing state. If this is so, and it inevitably is, the relational patterns that are maintained are the most efficient. Why? Because they are more efficient. This occurs from particle physics to the evolution of species. Any system spontaneously organizes itself toward the lowest energy expenditure, maximum efficiency. Not because anyone does it, but simply because it is more efficient. The least efficient also occurs, but it is obscured by the most efficient. In an infinitely synchronized framework, the result is absolute perfection, maximum efficiency raised to the infinite power.

Then how would you do? Over all if they are false. False means that they are limited, because they supposedly are ideas to open yourself to the unlimited. Ralston sais: everything is conciousness. There is no self, just conciousness. Then why forms appear? What you are is the conciousness that is concious of the forms? He would say: no, the forms are just arisings in the conciousness. Ah, then the "conciousness" is something that creates forms? How? Why? He would answer: forms are just illusion that arises in the conciousness. Ah, they are " illusions" , and? How the conciousness creates them ? Then the conciousness is not just "pure conciousness"? He would answer: those questions are coming from the conditioned mind, let them go 🥱. Conciousness is just a limited term, then a lie, so Ralston is a liar, or better, a lobotomizer

He says to observe your thoughts, and then they disappear. Your thoughts are an arising in the reality. The observer observing the thoughts is an arising in the reality. From an unlimited perspective, there is no observer observing; there is flow, and in that flow, thoughts appear. The observer, the act of observing, the thought. everything is in the flow. There is no real separation. So, observing your thoughts places you in the position of observer and therefore limits you. It doesn't matter whether there are thoughts or not; you are limited by observing. You are not the observer; you are the flow where "observing" occurs

He's a liar. Everything that he said is lie, he's inventing to appear interesting and he knows it perfectly 😂

Reality flows, you are the flow. It's not about getting somewhere, it's about being one with the flow, letting go of trying to control it and opening yourself to it. This must be done by the energetic structure we call the self, which, by the nature of human reality, mentally distances itself from the essence of reality, closes itself off from it, and creates barriers. These barriers are made of fear. Fear is absolutely real, an energetic structure that appears in reality because it is the most efficient relational structure. Reality is unlimited power, and that power creates forms. Power means potential, and potential means the absence of limits.

And? There are infinite potential dimensions, and most likely, as this specific form, you're operating at a multidimensional level, and right now, your perception is limited to a point. Once you die as a human, your dimension will be another, something you can't imagine as a human, absolutely impossible, unthinkable, in another geometry, another quality, outside of what this mind can intuit. So, what happens because a dead guy resurrected and walked around? Maybe you'll become an infinite universe.

If you want to relax the contraction, you can't do it by trying to stop doing something like thinking. That's double contraction. You must do it by opening your heart and mind to the flow of reality and becoming one with it. To do this, you must polish your structure, make it transparent. The question is: how? It's not something you do just by deciding stopping the thought, and that's the problem with spirituality: it tells you yes, then ties you down to that point where you try to erase something. You can't; you must try the opposite: open yourself up. It's something positive, an action, not stop to do anything, is precisely the opposite: open yourself. Well you could say that it's equal to stop closing yourself, but you are not closing yourself by the self referential thoughts, you are thinking self referentially because you are closed.

Mystics use to do celibate because mysticism is the true opening to yourself. If you are attached to anyone you get closed easily. sex really means creation of a new life, and this ties you in the human matrix, in the meaning. You could think: yes but you could have sex without do kids. But seems wrong, impure. It's a magic act, something that vibrates in eternity, then have sex just for fun seems wrong . That's shame because sex is great, but If you want openess, you can't do wrong things. Wrong is something that you feel that is wrong. Maybe some kind of sex that seems not wrong could appear, maybe not, who knows? Misticism means be one with the flow, then the flow decides

Divine thoughts are as false than any other thought in order to define what you are because you are precisely undefined. You are, then you only can be, not think in it. Well, you can do it but it's going to be a thought that happens in you, it's the same than anything that arises. If you get attached to its meaning, you are focusing in limits, then you can't perceive what you are, you are closed. You are the totality unlimited. It's absolutely impossible by definition thinking in it, then you never try, because you know that it's exactly the opposite that you should do to be open. There is zero temptation to try to grab with the thought what you are because it's obviously impossible. The point is dissolve any limitation and realize the unlimited. There is nothing to name, just no limits.

You could say it in that way . You are nothing definite, you are everything, absolute potential, unlimited depth, but you can't think in that, because it's unlimited, you only can be it, then you don't try to think in that because it's obviously impossible, any definition is limited, and you are precisely unlimited. You could think: I'm unlimited, but that is an empty thought, means nothing. Unlimited is nothing that you can imagine, you just can be you not think in it. Then the thought dissapear naturally

It's relatively easy to stop thinking if you've realized the inherent limitlessness of reality. This is a fundamental revelation. You can do this with psychedelics or whatever, but once you've broken through the boundaries, even if they return, it's easy to place yourself in a limitless perspective. From this perspective, nothing means anything; everything is the same in terms of meaning: it has none. So, without meaning, thoughts lose their charge; they're irrelevant. It's easy to open up completely and be what you are. What you are is in no way definable, since definitions are limited. They are arising relative to something. You are not relative to something; you are. And the relative occurs in you, therefore, you expand your being in all directions. It's normal; it's what you are.