Breakingthewall

monogamy is ideal. The problem is that for many people, regular sex with the same person loses strength, while emotional ties gain strength. then the problem arises: not having sex with others becomes a duty towards your partner, rather than a real desire, then your partner becomes someone who makes you have to repress yourself, that is, limits your freedom. The relationship became your jail. for me the solution is easy: never mix attachment and sex. The problem is, how to grow kids if you want to ?

Yes but Christianity is most easily understood as a metaphor for enlightenment, although for centuries almost no one understood it that way. It's pretty obvious if you consider that Christ was a hippy who preached love and poverty. Muhammad was a conqueror, a kind of Genjis kahn who unified the Arab tribes through the war. Maybe that's why the Islam is difficult to understand since our perspective, but there is spirituality in it would say that the difference is that Christianity says: love unconditionally and you will dissolve your ego. islam says: obey completely and you will dissolve your ego, renouncing to it. it would be said that the first is theoretically higher, and the second more practical. probably throughout history more egos have been dissolved by obedience and renunciation than by unconditional love

the suffering that has happened in your life weighs you down because you are attached to it. Like an addiction. you think it defines you. spirituality will make you identify with the formless, and all that past suffering will be like a dream, unreal. only the present is. You will see that all that suffering is nothing, it's you, now, who is creating suffering. Get out of this is possible

but the result has been to scare them in perpetuity. Christianity says: love and you will enter the kingdom of heaven. islam: obey or go to hell. both penetrated among very primitive people, but their formulation is the opposite

That's what I was thinking, if maybe I'm wrong and it's a metaphor about enlightenment and the ego, but it doesn't seem like it. although on the other hand the Sufis were true mystics

imagine that there is no difference between nothing. anything is the same as anything else. that is nothing. "something" is the apparent differentiation, the form. without form there is nothing. only you, and you have no limits, and you are nothing. in deep sleep it is like that. eternity doesn't last long. it doesn't last. an instant is eternity. until you imagine the differences and time begins

You are here to learn. don't complain and get to work. Nobody is going to do for you

an evil tale to dominate ignorant people through terror, making them believe that they have a spy inside their mind who is going to write down their every act and thought so that, when death comes, they will be sent to eternal torture if they have not obeyed what their dictator order. An horrible way to submit the humans

Well, was one way of putting it. to express that the typical alpha man apparently sure of himself and leader is deep down a slave of his self-image, of his results, of what others say. and by definition, slave is not alpha, so for me it is beta. but of course there are many points of view about what is alpha and beta

Let's see, in the case of an atomic war of total destruction, how many missiles would come to touch US soil. on the other hand, if nato unleashes all its power on russia, the destruction would be much more effective

because people are trapped in form and cannot conceive of formlessness, so even those who are interested in spirituality, which are many, are not able to go beyond separation and the concept

there is only one true alpha: one who is completely independent, indifferent to the opinions of others, completely integral, rooted in the present, and one with the whole. the others are all beta

when in all sincerity you think: I wish I had never existed. It is when you are ready to leave the ego behind and open yourself to true spirituality. you have been chosen, as there is no other path for you. get into it

I think that the soviet union is the greatest disgrace, that has happened to europe with the nazism, and communism has been perhaps the worst tyranny of humanity, with countries turned into prisons for decades, but even so these murders have to be proven and I hope that they are false

maybe, I'm not defending the Russians, I'm just saying that you have to prove it. Logic tells me: if I were Ukrainian, I would tie the hands of civilians to give more sensation of the cruelty of the Russians. It is a huge media weapon and in war anything goes. and I also want to believe that they are not so sons of bitches, but it is possible that they are.

Of course it's horrible and in wars soldiers get demons. I'm not saying it's a clean war, only trying to see things with equanimity. This swastika doesn't say nothing to me. I'm not sure who wrote it. Probably the Russians, but it's to early to say it. Irak wat lasted 8 years but in the first days, bombing Bagdad, thousands died

I don't know man, i search : civil casualties in google and the number that appears is 1500. If sadly it's wrong and it's 30.000 or like that, i would apologize and change my mind. Of course there are crimes and killing, but doesn't look something generalized

Ah ok ok, I am ridiculous because I use the information that exists now to get an idea of the situation. you, on the other hand, are so intelligent that you know that those numbers are falsified and that they are hundreds of times higher. that is to say, that the West is accounting for fewer casualties than there are. friend, you are naive, maybe you are right and I am not, but it will be by chance not by your reasoning. Try to think with calm and detachment, your emotions are not useful for anything

Well, even if it seems unintelligent to you, I try to use logic instead of emotions. the number of civilians killed in the war does not reach 2000 right? If Russia were systematically executing civilians as you say, the figure would be two more zeros. 1500 civilians killed in a war like this indicates a willingness to respect civilians. For example, in Irak the civilian casualties were hundreds of thousands. Maybe I'm wrong, but getting emotional doesn't get you closer to the truth.

It is interesting to see how people become polarized and stop being interested in knowing the truth to be interested in defending their position. the saying is true: in war the first victim is the truth

Where is the difficulty to get some dead bodies? it can be people killed in a bombing and staging an execution of children tied up in cold blood.

it is strange that they have tied the hands of a 7 year old boy before killing him. it is possible that it is a farce, although it can also be true. but I bet on the fake, if I were Ukrainian I would do that montage, a good strategy

Salvia is an experience. makes you see how weird reality can get. it is something indescribable. show him this video to see if after watching it he still wants. That guy seems having a bad time https://youtu.be/cG1Ir51PnQM Anyway, could be traumatic but same time is liberating. Salvia was my first strong trip, and made me to want more psychedelia

@Someone hereIt will be as if you turn a radio off. You will disappear, it will be as if you never existed. could it be that you did not exist? but don't worry, surely I, or someone else will still be around. I really am you, exactly. Does it comfort you in the face of your disappearance? if not, it is because you are attached to all those peculiarities that you imagine make someone here something special, unique. all those particularities are created by the voice of your mind, they are nothing, you are attached to a dream without substance. when you die the voice will go out. turn it off now and you will know what is after death: the same as before death

@RMQualtrough detachment is the answer. All is a dream, all is you, love the dream but don't get attached to anything, and the horror disappears