Breakingthewall

It's my problem. If I start participating here I can't avoid some reactions but that's dumb, people is how they are and that's it, no more interactions, just posting sometimes some thoughts

Ok ok thanks

😭 Please. Okay, let me explain. I don't actually think that about "dumbs," I say it as a joke because the vegan user has this irritating need to put himself on a pedestal and, with a contemptuous chuckle, look down on all those "dumbs", (including you and me btw) and repeat his endless litany. Then I, being reactive, read it and think, "Oh my god, give me patience," but God doesn't, so I write a comment. But I'm progressing and in some moment I won't do again

The illusory rabbits you mean I guess. Or only the rabbits and you are enlightened?! Man you are so cute teaching those dumbs. You are special. So different and better. Much ❤️❤️❤️❤️ and a a kiss with tongue.

For anyone interested, this is a process of awakening. Four or five years ago, I decided to go through my psychological structure because it was extremely hard. I only felt peace when enveloped in intensity, which involved considerable risk. Self-help was impossible, and my intuition told me that beneath the emotional mud lay another reality. Spiritual readings seemed dissonant to me; something didn't fit, a certain deception, always a mistake. Krishnamurti, Tolle, Ramana, etc., grated on me; there was a flaw. I once saw a video of some guys taking salvia and thought there was something interesting there. Breaking the control of the psyche, that was the key. I bought salvia, and well, it wasn't very fun, but it was exactly what I was looking for: a break. Then I read about 5-MeO, and I got it, I tried it, and it was extremely horrible. Then I found this forum and learned some basics about spirituality. I cut out all distractions, never read a novel or watched a movie again, and socialized as little as possible. I meditated for three hours every day minimum, even though it was extremely unpleasant, and I took mushrooms and 5-MeODMT hundreds of times, at least once a week but usually more. I began to understand the structure of the psyche, the derivations of the emotional system, attachment, the need to be accepted, the twists and turns the psyche makes to avoid seeing the unspeakable: not having a clan, a group, a family, in base, all the absolute falsehood of society, all the pressure, and the death, the absolute nihilism. I let go of everything superfluous, everything false. Mystical experiences began to occur. Dissolution, infinity, the source, all of that. But the emotional system remained. Every so often, I was struck by hatred, nihilism, emptiness, the misery of human life. At one point, the sensations became physical, overwhelming. I realized that my system was under constant tension, but that tension was being channeled through extremely efficient survival mechanisms. I realized that most of my internal activity was aimed at dissipating underlying tension. Things became unbearable; my ears were ringing at 100 dB. I'd walk down the street, and at one point, it felt like the pressure was going to crush me. My stubbornness is considerable, so I kept pushing, doing things like taking four maximum doses of 5-MeO in a single day after taking LSD. At some point, a phase shift occurred. It wasn't a single moment; it was an internal movement that lasted about a month. Gradually, the flow state without contraction began to normalize, although sometimes the old pattern would return, but only briefly. Then, something settled into my internal state that can be described as an opening at the base. The psyche wasn't closed, but open at one end; therefore, the energy didn't bounce around creating a vortex, but flowed through that opening, creating straight, clean lines. At a certain point, my internal state was always open, devoid of contraction Then a change of identity occurs. The basis of what I am is not form, but that openness of which form is an expression. That openness is not a thing, it is not definable, it is not love or joy, it is openness, period. That openness is everything, and there is nothing to hold onto there, you can only dissolve. You don't know if after death this or that, you know that death and life are equivalent in essence because both are in the openess and that the only possible attitude is total surrender. Openness has no limits or boundaries; it is what the ego fears most because it cannot classify or manage it, it can only shut down, surrender. Then openness reveals itself as total. It is what it is now, the totality. Pd: now I think, 🤔not bad intuition choose the name breakingthewall here so long ago before knowing about this topic and after doing psychedelic just a couple of times. Breaking the wall is exactly what awakening means.

Maybe you should tell to your doctor to change the medication 😅

An ultimatum. That sounds so serious. Don't get so angry, do as you said in your post, act like a kid. Oh wait....yes, I understand now.

Yeah, and feed dogs, that's essential. I have known a couple of cases of people who think that they are maximum authentic with themselves and they are the opposite. Well, a couple of cases no, 90% of people being generous When I was a child, I was absolutely dominated by attachment to my family, fear of death, and need for other people. It was all very fun and joyful, but it wasn't awakening. But what am I going to explain to you, wise one? 🤣

Yeah change is fundamental, existence is change. Existence is the manifestation of the reality. Incessant movement due to the inherent instability of the absence of limits. Any stability must be contained; in an open framework, change is permanent in all directions. The question then becomes: what is reality? It is the absence of limits. And what is change, what changes, what is the fundamental substance? There is no fundamental substance; change is relation, and relation is mathematical possibility, a coherent fluctuation between possibilities. There is no substance that fluctuates; fluctuation creates substance. Possible relations are stabilized by the very fact of being possible, and they mesh with each other ad infinitum. This does not begin; it is always existence. There is no beginning to anything; any limit is apparent, created by a frame of reference in order to operate, just like time.

Time is not something, is the order and rate at which changes occur, measured in relation to other changes. It's just a relative measure, what is real is change.

In that sense could be. If you are totally 100% open to your true nature all time without any rest of human emotional structure, then yes. But there is not problem being also human and remembered sometimes the people with which you have a direct connection and which makes you feel part of humanity

Awakening feels like there is no separation between you and the reality, you are not going to die but death is in you. Anything that could happen is the reality and you are that, then you can release the control, let the tensional node that needs being a center fall, so all your energy system opens up.

That guy says that the only real is the self. Who knows what he means with self. Maybe he's totally deluded, those gurus believe that they are enlightened, because they meditate, empty the mind an listened other gurus, so then they know what happens after death, whats everything, etc. For example he said that you feel grief if a friend dies because you thought that you posses him .bit nonsense right? Then maybe everything else are nonsense

Happy that resonates

Showing your level again? Still waiting for corrections about my physic theories to learn and improve

For me, it has a fundamental flaw: it places human consciousness at the center. This creates an aberrant framework: there is a limit, I. The precise formulation, for me, would be to say that human consciousness quantifies the flow of reality by giving it structure, establishing defined beginnings, ends, and processes, separations within a flow of constant change without separation. That is to say, human consciousness creates distinctions and forms, but the flow exists without consciousness, since consciousness is not something different from reality; it is reality observing itself from a self-preserving and seemingly separate structure called life. In other words, consciousness is a model of reality that acts as an interface between the external and internal, creating a virtual reality. But reality doesn't depends of human consciousness. We should understand what human consciousness exactly is. It's very possible to understand it absolutely clearly .

But in short: god is not conscious of the entire universe, god is the entire universe, and consciousness is nothing separate of the event, is the event itself, same that will and intelligence. There is not a god creating, the creation is god. There is not a will creating the movement, the very movement of the cosmos is the will. There is not intelligence creating coherence, the coherence is the intelligence. God is absolutely direct, is the reality. Is exactly what is happening now. There is not a master beyond the scenes, god is here, is writing in my phone now.

Man, I'm writing the best quality post that exists in the entire universe. If you don't appreciate them, I'm sorry. But trolling? I'm putting all my process power, that's not small, in those structures. I'm not talking exactly about the title, but I'm following a line of ideas that I think are at least not despicable.

And let's go beyond. An electron is not a "little ball": it is a local modification in the same electronic field that extends throughout the universe. What implies that fact? That an infinitesimal change in a single electron in my brain that happens thinking that some scholars are not so smart would affect every electron in the universe, and consequently the entire universe. It would be an effect impossible to measure with our means, 0 followed of trillion of trillons of zeros, yet absolutely real. Mathematically the global configuration of the universe changes by this electron. This is not mysticism, is absolutely real, nobody could refute. So, those scholars who claim they and the moon aren't connected should perhaps study a little more.

Another assessment to be humilliated by the erudites: All processes in the universe occur within a single, absolute flow. Time dilation doesn't change that flow; it just re-expresses it within different frameworks. The ‘rhythm’ is one; what changes is its local projection. This adjustment is the restoration of the fundamental symmetry, that called gauge, that maintains the coherent relational fabric of the cosmos. For anyone who doesn't know it, Gauge symmetry is the freedom/need that reality has to adopt different “appearances” without changing its essence. For example, light is a manifestation of gauge symmetry In other words: Reality is a boundless relational system that self-organizes in local coherence. Total reality has a quantum-relational structure whose coherence is absolute. Any local variation must be integrated into that coherence, not because there is a correction that happens"later", but because reality cannot manifest itself in any other way. And this, friends, is the cause of the of life, brains, computers, cyborgs, wars, psychosis, hell, and suffering. And beyond: this is the cause of the emergence of physical laws, that are emergent phenomena arise from the inevitable absolute coherence inherent in reality when a symmetry rupture occurs. Fine-tuning is not created; it is inevitable.

Silence. Well, lets put a risky assessment that contradicts the sacred Einstein. It's surely easy to demolish. The rate or speed of time is relative, but the fact of time, the structural succession of changes, is absolute. Then time is absolute. Let's play without anger.

Still waiting for some incoherence in what I wrote. I would be very grateful if anyone points it because my purpose is refine my frame. Please, show me any

Show me where I'm incompetent

@Someone here do you see? You don't know nothing, I'm better, you are worse,.etc. But any reference to any point? Anyway, maybe anyone would like to read those posts

I don't know, maybe if the argue is about the points that are given and not about who's more cool, then it could be possible