Breakingthewall

Yes but those meanings are real, the point is understanding and aligning them. Remove meaning is necessary for meditation, meaning is necessary for human life, and we are humans

I don't know, just a feeling. But thinking it deeply, at the end this thing was much better for me for many reasons, if weren't for this guy I would lost a lot not in material way but let's say dignity, so who knows, maybe my intuition was accurate after all. Butterfly effects are imposible to know before it happens, our only guidance is intuition after all

That will only happen if Israel is totally destroyed. Since it has nuclear weapons, it will destroy its enemies before then. So, that idea seems unworkable, so we'd have to find another one. The true face of middle east now is another. Palestinians must completely renounce violence, as it plays against them. The only reason Israel doesn't exterminate them is because of international public opinion; this international opinion is their strength. If they renounce violence and hold constant peaceful demonstrations and pressures, without stones, without violence, the Zionists will lose their reason. They may kill some, but they are already killing them. They must allow themselves to be killed without responding, to destroy Israel's image. Don't kill teenager girls and expose their corpses; that works against them. They must stop being mentally retarded and become intelligent, or they will have no future. Launch rockets that don't do nothing is simply stupid, nonsense.

I'd say that it's more: intrinsic joy=absence of meaning . Relative joy=positive meaning.

Meaning is relative. If you want to put yourself in an absolute perspective, you simply have to eliminate meaning. Without meaning, the focus opens; with meaning, it closes. Meaning is obviously real from a relative perspective. If you break your leg, it means you won't be able to walk. The idea isn't to cancel meaning completely, but to be able to cancel it at will for a while, opening yourself to the unlimited. Meaning = Limits

Yes because he's a professional scammer and I was bit more idiot than I am now. Idiocy is something by default, little by little with experience you learn, but it's a long process. The main obstacle is that everyone of us feel that is extremely intuitive and accurate and see very deep. Maybe we have watched too many movies and we believed them in a subconscious way, then reality is very different Anyway, now that I remember, first time I met that guy and his brother I hated them a lot just in 5 minutes, then I convinced myself about they were good, because I want to believe it .

Well, with the experience I've gained with psychedelics, I've learned not to believe anything specific that pops into my head while I'm tripping unless it's something about my energetic reality. That is, if while I'm tripping, I see that my relationship with my girlfriend is making me feel limited and confined that's a reality because it's my feeling. But if what I see while tripping is that my girlfriend is having random sex on Tinder, or that she is selfish and bad, then I don't believe it; it could be easily a delusion

The guy is Turkish from a remote province close siria. Researching him, I discovered that while he was a councilman, he expropriated land from poor families with the help of his police connections, threatening to buy it for a fraction of the real price, taking advantage of his privileged position. I saw him a few months ago in a trial with his son. I winked at him and he bowed his head. The prosecutor is asking for nine years in prison. I made a will stating that if anything happened to me, the trial would continue through someone else, and I sent it to him in case he had any... definitive ideas. He's a complete son of a bitch who would kill you for money without hesitation. But who knows, maybe he does for his family, and for him he's a fighter who does what must be done.

thinking you're Jesus Christ and stuff like that

That's not exactly like that ,depends on your goal. If your goal is to "see things," it's a bit silly, as you say. But It depends; it can also be interesting. But if your goal is to break down the barriers in your mind, then they work. The barriers then rebuild, but each time the dynamites are a little weaker. Psychedelics can permanently change your energetic structure, and if you know what you want, it's a change for the much better.

It depends, in some moments it's just openess, no content, but in others there are "revelations". Some of them are extremely useful, others are just delirium

once did 5 meo DMT, and a guy I used to associate with came to mind. I saw him as pure and virtuous, like a saint. Afterward, I wrote him a letter saying how lucky I was to have met someone so upright and pure (thank goodness I didn't send it to him). The guy stole a significant amount of money by falsifying a document. He spent a year lying, saying he was doing something when he was actually stealing. Later, I found out he had a criminal record for organized crime. The guy was a lawyer and former councilor of a province, by the way. A complete pure saint.

Weed for me is the best psychedelic ever, but in very low dosage, 2 or 3 puffs, maybe combined with 5ug of LSD, then a couple of hours of meditation. It's not like you are very high on psychedelic, it's meditation x5, because you are still more or less sober, you could have a conversation and nobody would realize that you are high, but the barriers get softer. I grew lot of weed as business in the past and I never used it because made me paranoid. I used to think: my karma is shit, but what to do? Then I starting using a bit and I discovered that it's the real deal. Weed made you paranoid when you are installed in the lie.

Solipists are obsessed with convincing non-existent people that only they exist. It's a little strange.

The world agrees on the two-state solution, but Israel isn't colonizing the West Bank just to steal land. There's land elsewhere. This is partly because they don't want an organized West Bank, as it's in a dominant geographical position, above Tel Aviv. A perfect place to bomb. Also there are the fanatics who want the biblical borders. It's a big problem. No one in the world knows what the solution is, because there isn't one now. Changes have to happen for a solution to be possible. In my opinion what Palestinian should do is peaceful resistance, grow in education and intelligence, don't kill no one jew, never. Resistance as Gandhi. If they do, no one will support Israel if they kill Palestinian. But if they parade teenager girls corpses in a van around the city, then the thing is more difficult.

The Arabs don't like Jews because they think that they are stealing their land, not because anti semitism, and because they are profaning their sacred places, and the Jews say that the land was empty and the Arabs were hostile from the beginning due religious issue. It's a very complex problem, but the fact is that the jews are there and they are not going to leave unless the Arabs kill all of them. So what is the solution? Destroy Israel? I don't think that this is a possibility. Then? Kill girls and parade them in the cities to be bombed after? Seems absolutely stupid, they are going to be destroyed doing that, without getting nothing, except the paradise of course. It's a destructive ideology imo, but it's what it is, then don't complain if bombs fall, they already knew it. That's true that the jews invaded the land with their immigration, but what to do now? Make them abandon Israel? How? Seems that first they would expulse all the Palestinian, they are there from a century, so it's a fact. The only possibility is a big war where all the Muslim world destroy Israel. Is it necessary? They have nukes , would be not easy to do that, maybe impossible. Just for religion, because nobody cares about Erdogan killing kurds or the war in Yemen with 370 k killed

Really do you think that they invaded Israel because they were worried about the Palestinian? Anyway, the violence begun much sooner 1. 1920 Riots (Jerusalem) First major outbreak of intercommunal violence. Over 200 Jews injured, several killed. The goal was to oppose Zionism and Jewish immigration. 2. Hebron Massacre (1929) One of the worst incidents. 67 Jews were murdered, many mutilated. Hebron had a long-standing Jewish community for centuries. Some Arabs protected their Jewish neighbors, but the attack was large-scale. 3. Arab Revolt (1936–1939) A national Palestinian rebellion against British rule and Jewish immigration. Included killings and bombings targeting Jews and British officials. Over 400 Jews were killed, dozens of settlements attacked. In response, the Zionist movement further militarized its defense (e.g., Haganah, Irgun). Really? Leading up to June 1967, tensions between Israel and its Arab neighbors — particularly Egypt, Syria, and Jordan — escalated dramatically. Several key events occurred: Egypt expelled UN peacekeepers from the Sinai Peninsula (May 1967), who had been stationed there since 1956. Egypt moved 100,000 troops and heavy equipment into the Sinai, right along the Israeli border. President Nasser of Egypt closed the Straits of Tiran, a key shipping route for Israeli oil imports — which Israel had declared would be a casus belli (cause for war). Military alliances formed between Egypt, Syria, Jordan, and Iraq — all threatening to destroy Israel. Syrian artillery bombarded northern Israel from the Golan Heights almost daily in the months prior. Why Did Israel Launch a Preemptive Strike? Faced with these threats, Israel's leadership believed a coordinated Arab attack was imminent. Israeli intelligence indicated: Egypt was days or hours away from launching an assault. The Arab armies together outnumbered Israel significantly in men, tanks, and aircraft. On June 5, 1967, Israel launched a preemptive airstrike that destroyed most of Egypt’s air force on the ground within hours — giving Israel air superiority from the start. Was It Justified? Israel argued it was a defensive strike to prevent annihilation. Arab states claimed Israel was the aggressor and used the attack to justify counterattacks. The UN and most of the international community later recognized that while Israel struck first, the war had been provoked by Arab military mobilization and blockades, making Israel's actions preemptive rather than aggressive in intent. Israel attacked first in 1967 not out of expansionism, but due to a perceived existential threat from surrounding Arab states. The move was preemptive, aimed at neutralizing what appeared to be an imminent multi-front invasion. That's true They think that it's impossible live together with the Palestinian then they want to expulse them, after a century of war. I'm not saying that it's "good", just that it's not so strange.

Your analysis is extremely biased. First, Gaza was under Egyptian control, and the Egyptians didn't grant Egyptian nationality to Gazans and kept them in miserable conditions. Then Israel retook it and at one point withdrew, forcing thousands of settlers to leave. The Palestinians elected Hamas, which has Israel's demise in its charter and periodically orchestrates attacks, so it was blocked. There were also two internal civil wars with thousands of Palestinian deaths. Hamas fires thousands of rockets at civilian areas, causing as much damage as it can.

If you raise children to hate a vastly superior enemy, and teach them that martyrdom and suicide are the supreme values, then don't complain when they exterminate you. You can do it, but there are consequences. It's like when the Nazis declared war on the entire world, weren't very clever, and then ended up destroying everything. Cause and effect. If you want war with someone ten times stronger, bad. It's better to compete with them in intelligence, in industry, even learn from them and collaborate with them, become their friends. Respect their religion and share your sacred places. How crazy, right? Much better to go and commit suicide with a huge bomb attached to your body at a crowded dinner. That's the wise way to act.

Really?i thought it was a reaction to the UN's decision to approve the creation of the State of Israel. I hadn't heard that Egypt and its allies attacked to prevent the genocide of Palestinians. Yes, after observing the troop grouping, knowing the attack plans and reading in the Egyptian press that Israel was going to be wiped off the map Yes, because they lost the war, if they would win, they would erase Israel from the map. Do you understand that they do that deal because they lost the war? It wasn't a friendly war to make deals, was with the idea of destruction. Well, was a war. Yes, the far right government believes that the Palestinian must be expelled and for them Hamas is more convenient, same than the attack on 7 oct, probably they allowed it to destroy gaza, almost sure. There's a drift toward fanaticism in Israel, it's a fact, and more and more Israelis think the Palestinians should be expelled. This is what happens when there's a climate of constant war; hatred arises. This is how it's always been, and it's always been resolved, as we all know: by destroying the weakest. So, what should Hamas do? Kill more 18-year-old girls and parade their corpses amid the cheers of the population? It can do that, but it can't cry when the consequences come. Do you think that the jews are bad and the Palestinian are good? Maybe it's a bit simplistic. Both want to survive, but if you are weaker, start a war is stupid. No, both kill , but the Palestinian kill less because are weaker. If they were stronger, they would kill with a lot of happiness. Same than the Sioux, if they could, they wont left even one american alive. They have been victims because the only reason that they were weaker, in other case they would be executioners. When you're the weak one, fighting back automatically defines you as an idiot. You only go to war to win, not to have your people bombed. In short, your idea about good and evil is so naive. Or maybe it's just because you are Muslim and you cheer your team, as everybody does?

Maybe it's stupid, But after three wars with the intention of extermination, plus other smaller wars and thousands of deaths in attacks carried out by a people who worship hatred, the Jews do not trust Hamas, whose essential principle is the expulsion of Jews from Israel. You find it scandalous that the Jews do not allow these people to develop, but for the Jews, the development of Palestine means that it develops its essential principle, which is the deadly hatred of Israel. Perhaps if you had a neighbor who hates you to death and raises his children in hatred, you would think it a beautiful idea if he had rifles, tanks, and hypersonic missiles, and that honors you as a human being. But you must understand that not everyone is as selfless as you. Now you will answer: but they came after and the Palestinian were there first. Well ok, maybe they should commit collective suicide, but it's normal that they don't do, even some people is very sure that they should.

If with truth you mean your ultimate nature, truth is openenss . Imagine absolute openness as a blank sheet of paper without borders, without paper, without background, without ink. And yet, because there are no borders, the line appears, as if the openness itself were drawing itself infinitely. The draw is the being, it's always and we are that, but it's a consequence, a manifestation. What we really are is the depth, the unlimited. Watch anything, listen anything, that is relation, and relation is being, that's the manifestation of the unlimited, it's essence manifested .

God is not nothingness, the source of reality is openenss. It's not something nor nothing, it's absence of limitations. From that infinite dimensions inevitably arise. They never begun and just now you are that. You can't understand the source of reality positively, if you do, it isn't. The path of negation inevitably leads to limitlessness as the foundation of everything. It is not being, not consciousness, not unity, not emptiness, not totality, not witness. It is absolute openness, non-obstruction, the unnameable that allows all forms without being any. From this arise being, non-being, consciousness, love, life, death, intelligence, god, as relative manifestations. Being is relative, without relation there is not being. Not being is so real than being, but being is, let's say, evident. Being is just appearance, same than god. Appearance means something that arises. Even it arises always, its relative. The only absolute is limitlessness . Not being are the infinite potential relationships that are not possible, being are what are possible Then, to be one with your nature you have to detach yourself totally from everything, even from being and conciousness. What you are is no limit, anything else is a relation that arises from this . Even the infinite being is just an arising, a consequence not a cause. There are infinite infinites, and all of them are relative

The problem is that the whole idea of "you are God imagining reality" is false in every way. What does "imagining" mean? Creating images out of nothing? What does "images" mean? All these ideas are relative; they shrink infinity to make it manageable by the conceptual mind. It's low-cost fast-food spirituality that simplifies everything into concepts understandable to a basic, structured mind. In short: religion.

It very obvious. Now your experience is determined by a form, like any other possible experience. Without any form there is no change, then there is no perception. Imagine a frame without change. You simply can't imagine it, it's out of the experience. Then, if the experience is limited by a form, it could be limited by a different form. when? You could answer: after this form I will experience another. Then you are confusing the form with your nature. "You" is the form , your nature is the source of any form. When you think: I'm going to experience another form, this "I" is this form, you can't experience another form because you are this form . That the point of spirituality, detachment of the form, no confusing the form with god