Breakingthewall

Great demagoguery, man you are impossible. The nazis didn't want to expulse the Jews from Germany because they are fighting for a land, they want to exterminate them around the world because in their opinion they was an inferior raze who don't deserve existing. I Know that nuances are difficult, and it's much easier if you are Muslim cheer the Muslims and hate the enemies, it's what people use to do. The Nazis were psychotic, and if they offered to the Jews scape from Germany they would accept today escaping walking naked to the congo, but they didn't want expulse them, just killing them until no one Jew remains in the world. That's why when Hamas killed those people in October many Muslim around the world do demonstration shouting: gas the Jews, gas the Jews! Because the Muslims hate the Jews, but then a lot of cries when they get all the blows. That's crazy, then it's fair kill Jews and evil kill Muslims. With those ideas, the only reason is war. Sure, but look so crazy are the Jews, they prefer a terrorist with a bomb than a state with planes and hypersonic missiles in west bank just above of tel Aviv. That's because they are so evil Jews very bad and settlers. That is because the Arabs of Israel are not organized into political parties like Hamas, but are normal workers who have an acceptable standard of living, and are very controlled by police. When the Jews gave Gaza to the Palestinians, if a party called Happy Butterflies, which had as its slogans economic development and fraternity between peoples, had won, then there would have been no blockade and they would have been able to develop, but Hamas won by an absolute majority, its base being the disappearance of Israel and violent fight ,so the very crazy Jews blocked them because they don't like having people around them who want to kill them. They deserve an state, they can have it when the accept Israel. In 1948 an state was offered to them, but they said that they don't want to share, they wanted everything, then they have nothing. This use to happen, hate generates hate. Then a lot of complains and cries come.

The Jews would answer that those militias were created to defend themselves. 🇵🇸 Summary: Origins of Violence in Palestine (Pre-1948) Late 1800s–Early 1900s: Rising Tensions Jewish immigration to Ottoman Palestine increased due to Zionist movements and persecution in Europe. Arab locals grew concerned about land purchases and demographic shifts. 1917: Balfour Declaration Britain, which controlled Palestine after WWI, endorsed the establishment of a “Jewish national home,” sparking Arab opposition. 1920s: First Clashes 1920–1921: Riots in Jerusalem and Jaffa marked the first large-scale Arab-Jewish violence. Arabs feared political marginalization and protested growing Jewish immigration. 1929: Hebron Massacre Widespread Arab attacks on Jewish communities, particularly in Hebron and Safed. Over 130 Jews were killed. This deepened mistrust and led to Jewish self-defense organizations. 1936–1939: Arab Revolt A large-scale uprising by Palestinian Arabs against British rule and Jewish immigration. Brutally suppressed by Britain, with support from Jewish militias. Led to radicalization and militarization on both sides. 1947: UN Partition Plan Proposed a division of Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states. Jews accepted it; Arabs rejected it, seeing it as unfair. 1947–1948: Civil War Phase After the partition vote, violence escalated rapidly between Jewish and Arab militias. Both sides committed massacres and ethnic expulsions. This culminated in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, following the declaration of the State of Israel.

No, same that wasn't the fault of the girls that Hamas parade in Gaza when thousand of people cheer and party kicking the corpses. Why it's ok and bombing is bad? Because they kill more ? If you die it's the same how many others die with you, the number only reflects the capacity of killing of each side.

Because it's not how you say it is. The Palestinians have been violent from the beginning, and so have the Jews. Framing the Palestinians as good and the Jews as bad is the narrow-minded rhetoric that keeps problems from getting resolved. If you start looking for facts to support your position, you'll find them, and if you look for facts to support the opposing position, you'll find them too. Let's see, if I were Jewish, I would emigrate and never return to that shithole even to see my family, but I see what that situation is like. The Zionist Jews are going remain as state, and they're going to do it unless you kill them. At first, fine, okay, you could try to kick them out, but they've been there for 100 years and they're not going to leave. Is that wrong? For Palestinian sure. For them, it's fine because according to them, those lands are theirs and all that. So there are two options: either you kill them or you adapt. If it's impossible to kill them, accept the situation and do what you can. It's not that they've enslaved you and are raping your daughters; it's that after 100 years, they've created a country. Adapt, evolve, grow as a society, take advantage of them, collaborate, forget hate. or die. Your choice.

Maybe you it's you who don't understand anything , because you only see your Muslim perspective. Let me explain it to you, let's see if it sheds some light on your mind. Look, the Jews are fragmenting the West Bank and screwing the Palestinians because they're their enemies. Do you understand? If the Palestinians could, they'd kill all the Jews, and if the Jews could, they'd do the same. Do you know why? I'll explain it to you. Listen to this, because you're going to be perplexed: because they're enemies, and that's what enemies do. So, all that talk about the courts and rights is just nonsense. They're never going to let them found a state in the West Bank, because it would be a state... guess what! An enemy state!! And who wants enemy states next to their capital? The mentally retarded. Are the Jews mentally retarded? No!! Let's see if you understand this. It's simple. Friends, they love each other and live close together. Enemies, they hate each other and don't want to live close together. Is it unfair? It's also having a cancer, that's life.

The occupation is not going to end, it's not an occupation, As long as they continue to think it's an occupation, there will be war. When the Jews began arriving, it was an unpopulated area; it was an immigration that occurred 100 years ago, many generations of Israeli have born there. I'm sorry, it's a shame, but it's a fact. If they continue to think in terms of occupation and armed resistance, every last Palestinian will be expelled. They should try to collaborate with the Jews, but since they can't seem to, and their culture is to be outraged victims full of hate, they will be expelled. And quite soon

If they renounce violence and hold constant mass protests, world public opinion would force Israel to give in, but if they constantly kill, they are playing into the hands of those who seek greater Israel. They do the intifadas, that were big movement, but violent. Then they do the game to ben gvir. If they would do the same without violence and with the goal of getting an state they will get it, but if the goal is the end of Israel they won't get nothing, just violence I don't understand why the day before Hamas bombed a lot of Jews, maybe the Jews, who are so crazy, misinterpreted it like they really didn't want peace. But maybe for you that's nothing, only the Jews are guilty because are evil, and the Palestinian are victims then of course they have the right of bombing or parade corpses of 18 years old girls when all the population cheers them. Maybe you are right, they could do, its just some legitimate manifestation of anger and nobody should get angry for those small things

That's because are Jews against Muslims, the Turks have been killing Kurds for almost 100 years, and no one cares. The Palestinian problem affects Muslims because they find it humiliating that people of another religion subjugate Muslims, but if it's between Muslims, they don't care. Yes but the most common is that they think that Israel must to dissapear and any other option is just preparing for the moment when they can make Israel to dissapear. What do you think, that Israel must dissapear or remain? If all the Muslims, including the Palestinian, accept Israel as state, then the Palestinian could have a state , and the Israelites would vote to progressive politicians, but as long as they have a mortal threat surrounding them, they will vote for the hard wing. This is Netanyahu when young, what would you expect from a president who, when he was 25, parachuted into enemy territory to kill enemies like a commando and who's elder brother died in combat when he was 30?

Yes sure, those popes were dangerous spies Yes sure, same than never would belong NATO as their promised. Turkey have 20 nukes from nato , why Ukraine wouldn't have? You didn't understand. Ukraine has an elected government, then violently they expulsed them . They had a pro Russian government because the majority of the people voted them. But some nationalist didn't like because they want a pure Ukraine . Those guys like pure things, you know? Then the impure people got scared.

You mean the elected government in democratic elections. In your opinion they were so bad and useless. Then you should vote against them. About the executions, it's almost proved that were Ukrainian forces . Why the government would do that? It plays against them. There is an investigation , you could check it.

1. 2012: Kivalov-Kolesnichenko Law (pre-Maidan) This law allowed regional languages (like Russian) to be used in courts, education, and administration if at least 10% of the local population spoke them. It effectively granted co-official status to Russian in many areas of Ukraine. 2. 2014: Repeal vote After President Yanukovych was ousted, Ukraine’s parliament voted to repeal the 2012 language law. However, the acting president, Oleksandr Turchynov, did not sign the repeal into law, so it never took effect. Still, the vote alone caused alarm in Russian-speaking regions, especially in Crimea and Donbas, fueling fears of repression. 3. 2019: New language law A new law declared Ukrainian as the only official state language. It required Ukrainian to be used in government, education, media, and public services. Russian was not banned, but its use in public and official life was heavily restricted. 🔥 Perception vs. reality Ukrainian nationalists saw these changes as strengthening national identity and sovereignty. Many Russian speakers perceived them as an attack on their culture and rights.

If I were them, I would engage in serious nonviolent resistance to achieve a Palestinian state, seeking the best possible conditions. But the Palestinians don't want that. They want to expel Israel because they hate them so much, and that's impossible.

Do you think that anyone really cares about the Palestinian? They're just a tool of diplomacy. Does anyone care about the 300,000 dead in Yemen and the humanitarian disaster unfolding right now, with widespread cholera outbreaks and 80% of the population on the brink of starvation? No, because it doesn't sell; it doesn't serve to blame others, create moralistic rhetoric, make politics among Muslims, act as if they were in solidarity in Europe, etc. It's all publicity; no one cares at all.

If I have to bet I would bet that expulsion of the Palestinians is being planned, and no one will be able to prevent it. They will harass them until coexistence becomes absolutely impossible, and then they will be expelled to Jordan or any place. It will be a risky and terrible move, but if you've already bombed Gaza like you have, it all makes no difference. Is now possible living together? I don't think so. And turkey is going to yell a lot and then take part of siria

Colonialism is when another nation conquers you and you become a colony, like India and England. Israel's migration has resulted in the creation of a country in a place where there were settlements but which was never a country. more or less all the Jews in Israel are Zionist

True you said that and many Israeli and Palestinian politicians have considered this possibility very seriously, but after years of violence on both sides, the point has been reached where Palestinians, and Muslims around the world in general, hate Israel to death. For Muslims, Israel is the devil, and they only see their point of view. So, how could Israel want to have such a close neighbor who hates it to death and whose population is growing at an exponential rate? It would be suicidal. The chances of war would be 100%, not even 99%. It's guaranteed. So, who will win the next elections in Israel? The hard wing, like always

The Jews think the Arabs want their disappearance. The US doesn't think Germany wants them to disappear. They are its allies, but it impoverishes them to enrich itself. I don't justify the murders in Gaza; it's a terrible situation. But I think the cause is that Israel perceives a threat, so it reacts by becoming an aggressor. Israel thinks it must expel the Palestinians to survive. It doesn't do it because it can't, but it's what it wants as a nation. It's not to become richer, it's out of fear.

Just because it's a lie. Unless you consider "values" to destroy the Nord Stream to sell its gas to Germany and force it into recession, and to provoke a war in Ukraine to force all of Europe to buy its weapons. How many wars has China started? The US starts wars for business and pretends it's doing so for democratic values. Its game is always lying, and being its ally is being its lackey and potentially betrayed at any moment, as Kissinger said.

Or everything. They why call it mind? Definition of mind: represents the intricate network of cognitive, emotional and volitional faculties that provide human beings with the ability to interpret, interact and respond to the environment.

No, the problem is that the US is increasingly behaving like a profit-seeking company, not like a state that defends its values. It pretends to defend its values, but they're really everything for me and nothing for you. Then things happen, like intentionally ruining Germany to enrich itself, and then we're overstepping limits that shouldn't be crossed. Then other forces appear at play, seemingly less evolved but offering the credibility of transparency and a given word.

In Ukraine, there was a coup d'état, and the elected pro-Russian president was ousted and replaced with an anti-Russian one. In Ukraine, 35% of the population is Russian, or have the Russian language as native language, which is why the president was pro-Russian because they had voted for him. However, some people disagreed with this and violently ousted him, they could wait some months and voting against him, but they preferred to do a coup d'etat because it's more effective. After this, the Russian regions wanted to separate, and a civil war began. Then Zelensky arrived with promises of peace and friendship with Russia, but once in power, they explained to him that no, that the plan was different, such as banning Russian language in schools and ministries in the Russian regions, or banning the Russian Orthodox Church (this after the war). All of this was encouraged by the US to put pressure on Russia. When Ukraine was about to join NATO and acquire atomic weapons, Russia attacked because it didn't want enemies on its border with atomic weapons. This is absolutely incomprehensible to you, but understandable to others.

Why it's a mind? What exactly is a mind?

solipsism is crazy. Let's see, if there is an experience, it's because perception exists, and for perception to exist, there must be duality. If there is duality, there are two. Where's the mystery? There are infinite dualities; otherwise, there would be nothing. And the explanation: you can't prove that there is another because you can only be in your experience, so only your experience exists. How to qualify this? I don't know.

Confusing. I've read Huang Po, and he doesn't explain things clearly. He uses words like emptiness and mind. It's a mistake. First, he says: it is neither existent nor nonexistent, neither this nor that, and then he says it is emptiness and it is mind. Let's see, this guy is from the year 1100 and is a great mystic, but those mistakes are completely out of place; it's not precise. But since no one really knows what he's talking about, they think he's right. He's wrong. When he says that all reality is a single mind, he's limiting reality. Reality is limitlessness.

Goal of survival you mean I guess. It's a matter of opinion, in your opinion Israel hasn't the right of survive, in the opinion of Israel they have. Who's right? Who wins, like always