Breakingthewall

God is a blinder of gold and diamonds, but a blinder.

The point of spirituality is to open your perspective to the true dimension of the game you're involved in. You go around like a donkey with your leather blinders on, which only allow you to see a shitty carrot in front of you, when in reality you are the living infinity in its incessant flow. Few dare to take off their blinders; they exchange them for more sophisticated ones, but they're still blinders. Right now, total infinity is, and that's who you are. When you look, do you see a carrot, or do you see the unfathomable?

Nah almost sure Hamas don't win , Israeli society will see the destruction of Gaza as necessary after October 7, Netanyahu will be considered a strong leader capable of doing what is necessary, the world will protest tepidly for a few months, and then forget everything, and the Palestinians will be worse off than before.

They're doing exactly what the Zionist far-right wants. As you know, Hamas received money from Bibi. Why? Because Hamas is Bibi's best friend, its number one fan. Their mosquito-like attacks don't do any real harm to Israel; they only serve to inflate Palestinian pride and legitimize the Zionist Nazis, without touching Israeli infrastructure or causing any damage. But Palestinians are children, and they're not looking for a strategic move, but rather to inflate their pride. Every time they inflate their pride by doing stupid things like setting off shitty rockets, Bibi toasts with Smotritch and Ben Givir, and they send a few more settlers to west bank Anyway, there is an exception: the 7oct. Who planned this knew that the reaction of Israel was going to be extreme, then the plan was martyrdom of the people of gaza to destroy the image of Israel. It's a extremely brave movement that must be respected, even I don't share doing this, I think that in Gaza Hamas win because around the world Israel is going to be seen as absolutely evil society. The price is high but they are willing to pay This is a war very difficult to understand . Are the Palestinian going to get anything with this war? Maybe yes

Why? What will the Palestinians achieve with attacks?

Palestinians think they must fight the Zionist invaders, and the way to fight is through war. It's normal to think this way. All cultures have waged war. You may think it's justified because there are reasons for it, but it actually works against them. It strengthens the radical branch of Israel, and their violence has no real effect in terms of expelling Jews or obtaining benefits. On the contrary, it allows radicals to win elections. For Palestinians, the most dignified thing is to be a martyr. It may make them proud as a group, but it gives them no real benefit. It's exactly what people like Ben Gvir want. They're playing their game.

There is a basic realization in spirituality ,it's the beginning of opening to what you are. In my experience, it always happens in this way: at a certain moment, whether with psychedelics, in meditation, or however it comes, the boundaries within which you contain experience dissolve. Your mind , or you, if you prefer, expands without limit. At first, this is perceived as an absolute, boundless void, because anything that exists , sensory experience, your life, whatever , appears like a hologram stretching into infinity and turning into nothing. Reality is an absolute empty well , like a cosmic gong that rings and shows you the absolute nihilism of reality. It’s actually a pretty horrible experience, by the way. So you have to return there again and again. The key lies in the absolute void there’s something there that hasn’t yet revealed itself. What is it? You must be the absolute void, until it’s no longer horrible. Not wonderful either, just… absolute void. You must overcome the horror vacui, like a climber must overcome the fear of heights. Then, at some point, the void opens. It is the total. Let’s see , the void is something limited; it excludes fullness. It’s a limited perspective in which you are perceiving the inherent emptiness of reality, without realizing that you are there perceiving the void. And then a shift happens: you’re not observing the void . you are the void. And then you open. It’s like a crack breaks open the void and reveals the essence of reality: the absence of limits that makes totality inevitable. Ahhhhh! The prodigal son has returned from the fucking desert he was living in. The obvious has been revealed , what always was, the total, your nature, what you are beyond time, beyond events, beyond experience , what comes before all of that. Then, from this realization you could thread a logic that leads you to the inevitable conclusion that manifest reality is the unlimited relating to itself from infinite perspectives, and that only that which is synchronous with itself to infinite potential appears, not by desire, will, or any other reason, but because it is inevitable, because there are not limits. And this infinite synchronicity is absolute intelligence for the sole reason that it is the only possible possibility. Absolutely simple. Then you can begin to intuit the unlimited interconnectedness that exists within you and of which you are simultaneously a part, the living infinity swirling, flowing upon itself beyond what your mind can even intuit. You can be open to your nature but not grasp your dimension, it's unfathomable.

That's crazy. What's your opinion on GB future? It's a very complex country, with ramifications all over the world, which has been very predatory in the past. I've recently seen several documentaries of a British guy, Adam Curtis, do you know him? Very interesting

At the speed at which events are unfolding, in less than 10 years, BRICS could be the powerhouse. It already is de facto, and China's pace is unprecedented in the history of human kind. Billions of poor people in Africa and Asia look to China with hope. Europe and the US, the former colonizers and modern plunderers, are seen without their smiling masks as the swindlers they are. Their entire foreign policy is a scam: appearing protective while causing instability to plunder resources. Traore is only the first to openly speak about this in Africa; soon there will be many.

Sounds like an interesting experience . The Japanese are fascinating, very difficult to understand. They seem like a very repressed culture, where everything is ritualistic. They're absolutely horrified at not meeting social standards, and where the main value is the repression of instincts in order to fit into the social framework. And then there's the whole hara-kiri thing... In no other culture has suicide been an institution. Not to mention their sexual fantasies. Very different than any other culture.

For that to happen, the Likud must lose the elections, and for that to happen, the Palestinians must renounce violence, which serves no purpose at all.

🔥 How the Conflict in Palestine Began in 1947 🗓️ 1. UN Partition Plan Approved (November 29, 1947) The UN passed Resolution 181, proposing the division of the British Mandate of Palestine into two states: one Jewish and one Arab. Jewish leaders accepted the plan, though not without reservations. Arab leaders rejected it outright, seeing it as unfair—Jews were a minority but would receive the majority of the land. ⚔️ 2. Violence Erupts Immediately (Late November – December 1947) The very next day, Arab militias and civilians began attacking Jewish neighborhoods, particularly in Jerusalem and Jaffa. Jewish supply convoys were ambushed; tensions escalated rapidly. Jewish militias (Haganah, Irgun, Lehi) organized defenses and carried out retaliatory strikes. 📈 3. Civil War Escalation (January – May 1948) Fighting intensified. There were bombings, ambushes, massacres, and forced expulsions on both sides. The Deir Yassin massacre (April 1948) by Irgun and Lehi resulted in over 100 Arab civilian deaths and triggered mass panic among Palestinians. Key battles occurred in cities like Haifa, Tiberias, Jaffa, and along roads to Jerusalem. The British, still officially in charge, largely abstained from intervening. 🌍 4. From Civil War to Regional War (May 1948) On May 14, 1948, Israel declared independence. On May 15, Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and Lebanon invaded, marking the beginning of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. 📌 Timeline Summary DateEventDescription Nov 29, 1947UN Partition PlanAccepted by Jews, rejected by Arabs Dec 1947Initial violenceAttacks by Arab militias; Jewish reprisals Jan–Apr 1948Civil war phaseEscalating battles, massacres, expulsions May 14–15, 1948Israeli independence → warArab states invade

not exactly. The plan of two states was approved in 1947, as the Palestinian didn't accept it the fight started, and the Arabs hit first, then a lot of killing happened and 400 thousand were expelled, then in 1948 the state of Israel was proclaimed and an Arab alliance declared war. Btw I don't approve the foundation of Israel in a occupied land, I think that it was a mistake, like everyone thinks because it was, but the Jews want Israel, the historical home. now, 80 years later and a lot of wars later it's a fact, then, what's the solution?

The solution is not impossible but extremely difficult. First, Hamas would have to disappear or become marginalized, al fatah or any other get the power. Then, if the Palestinians renounce violence, the Likud could be displaced by progressives and a two-state solution could be initiated. The problem is that it seems impossible to evict the 700,000 settlers, violent far-right fanatics, and Israel cannot allow a united West Bank above Tel Aviv with an army and modern weapons, because war could break out at any moment.

Then , All the anti-Jewish indoctrination in Palestinian schools, what's the direction it's going in?

What is the solution according to you? If what I said is dumb, what is smart? Carry out attacks, launch rockets? What do they achieve this way? Btw, what's that of dumb? If you don't agree expose why, don't call dumb the people and say nothing

Yes, because supporting Israel has become the symbol of the right, and supporting the Palestinians has become the symbol of the left. Those on the right are fine with killing civilians, committing genocide, or whatever. Since that's their side, how can they be against themselves? It doesn't make sense. And those on the left justify everything the Palestinians do. Here you can see Raze saying that the fact that the Palestinians committed the Passover massacre just the day before the presentation of an Arab peace plan has no relation to the failure of this plan. The blame lies entirely with the Jews, and the Palestinians are always right, and their massacres are fully justified

No, I fully support the western protest against the occupation and the genocide, but also I see the responsibility of the Arabs in the escalating violence due to its intolerance and religious hatred. Israel has come a long way, having to defend itself from all the countries surrounding it until it gained respect and recognition of its existence. If the Palestinians could, they would commit genocide; they aren't because they can't, but all their culture has the basis of hate to Israel. You think it's justified; I think it's stupid because it only leads to destruction.

Yes but one thing is to show strength and determination to remain and another is to become supremacists, which is what is happening. You could blame anyone but the fact is that

No, it's not a recognition de facto, is ask for concessions in exchange for nothing. My narrative isn't that the Zionists are "good," it's that they've perceived a threat from the Arabs for 100 years. If you want real concessions, the threat must cease completely: Israel must be wiped off the map, as Iran, for example, proclaims. Then we can try to negotiate a Palestinian state, since in the absence of a mortal threat, the Progressive Party can win the elections. Otherwise, people like Netanyahu, who promote more violence because it suits them, will always win. Doing something stupid like 7Oct gives wings to radical Zionists. You think it was a legitimate manifestation of weariness; I think it was a supreme stupidity that led to the destruction of Gaza.

That's true and that a democracy is bombing civilians is a big scandal and must be showed. What I said in the other thread is that Palestinian must recognize israel to start a path towards the peace. Since they don't do, there will be war. Now you will say that the zionists are expelling people from the West Bank, and they're criminals. Then the Palestinians are right to vote for Hamas, which advocates for Israel's disappearance. This leads to nothing, only the destruction we're seeing.

It's quite simple: the absence of limits in the reality makes it inevitable that at some point there will be a fluctuation, a change of state. For this to happen, there must be division, since any change is with respect to another field that remains in another state. Since there are no limits, this has always occurred, and has occurred infinite times. Two reflected fields changing state only exist as an apparent change if their movement/change is synchronous, since they only exist as a change in relation to each other. Then, above these two fields in synchronous movement, another movement opens in each of them, since each is the bottomless infinity. Thus, infinite changes of state unfold in infinite dimensions, all of them synchronous for the sole reason that the non-synchronous does not appear. The dimension of this manifestation is immeasurable; it has no bottom. Everything is possible relationships, movements, perspectives at different angles that fit together in an absolutely symmetrical way, since the slightest asymmetry results in infinite asymmetry; therefore, it is not. This is reality. It is essentially the absence of limits, absolute being. In form, it is perfect symmetry in infinite dimensions. Each node of relationships has infinite ramifications and emits infinite possibilities, infinite expansive potential, which, if it meshes with another possibility and synchronizes, manifests.

Yes, sure the 380.000 who died in tigray 3 years ago can scape but they didn't do because are lazy, or the 200.000 who died in Yemen, or the 12 millons of displaced in Sudan. Another thing is that nobody cares about them because it's not interesting for the public

Israel don't want peace so bad, they want to expulse the Palestinian, same than the Palestinian want to expulse the Jews. It's what they call a war. Do you understand? Both hate each other, then that idea than when the Palestinian parade corpses of teenager girls around gaza is legitimate because they are victims and when Israel bomb the Palestinian is bad seems like you are not understanding the situation. Ah, ok, then the massacre the day before of the treaty was irrelevant. Well, you have convinced me: the poor Palestinian are good and their massacres are legitimate, and the evil Jews are bad and like kill children. Ok, it was so sophisticated analysis that I didn't get at first, but now I do. I understand your point: as the Palestinian were before, the Jews must go. With this reason, only a language works, the language that is being spoken now.

The absolute is what is, not the experience , the relative is the form of what is, the experience . your ultimate nature is the very fact of the absence of limits, any god is secondary. But this doesn't mean that the relative is false, it's relative, it's the manifestation of the absolute, and in my insight the relative is infinite connection, infinite life in all directions, infinite relation creating a whole that can't be though. Infinite gods in infinite dimensions, and the experience is precisely relative to them, to the others infinite dimensions. You are not creating nothing, it's a absolutely limited vision, one limit: you, the other: the creation. Impossible! The reality is infinitely multiple, but it's always the same essence, the absence of limits, which implies everything. Your mother, your girlfriend, everything is there in substance, it's everything. But then in the relative they are in form, or not. Absolutely sure that there is experience outside your experience, for a reason: the experience is relative, then relative to other.