Breakingthewall

It's not hostility, it's just that If it's a fundamental need for you to show that the others here are stupid and you're very clever without contributing anything else, that's irrefutable proof that you're the stupid one. And I'm kind enough to show it to you so that you can see it and improve, then you can participate here and contribute to raise the level of this forum with positive push, not with negative one

Infinity as substance is within you; it is what you are. Infinity as form is also outside of you; it is what creates this concrete form, and at the same time, this concrete form creates infinity. Everything is interconnected and synchronized. How do I know this? Am I making this up? No, it's simple rule-of-thumb logic. It's obvious. But first you have to open yourself to the infinity to start your logic from that base. It is impossible for there to be a creator because if there were, he would make choices, he would have preferences, therefore he would be finite. The only possible creator is the fact of infinity itself. It is the cause of manifestation, form, perception, consciousness, since nothing can prevent it; it is the potential that occurs. Infinity is absolute potential, but this has rules, since in infinity, no form or movement can be absolute; it has to be relative to another. Therefore, only synchronous things appear, up to infinite power. Non-synchronous things simply do not appear; they are unmanifested potential. This is totally obvious, not a theory. Nothing manifested exists by itself because in infinity there can be no absolute movement. Points a and b are the same. There are no dimensions because there are no limits. Dimensions are created with limits, and limits are created by the synchronicity between reflections.

Does that mean it's true? As Leo said, there can't be limits, because what would limit those limits? There can't be a creator, because what would create that creator? Why would an infinite creator want to create one thing instead of another?

I'm not islamophobic, Im just pointing the falsehood of that quote. But well, I think that Islam contains a lot of falsehood, maybe bit more than Christianity and Buddhism, that also contains a lot of falsehood. Islam contains some valuable points, and sufism is interesting mysticism. But that quote is not one of them

God is the ultimate nature of reality. If you want to know it you have to remove everything that closes you in the box of the ego. Your mind has to be absolutely clean of limits.

That's true, isolation affects deeply. Some people can bear it quite good, but mostly not so.

There is a dualistic perspective and a non-dualistic perspective, and both are true. Duality is a fact, there are others.

No, I just said that her way is not narcissist, it doesn't means that she hasn't other issues, but not this one. It's rare because most of people is very focused in their ego, but doesn't mean better mental health, just not seeking reward in the image that you project in others

One thing is enjoying solitude and another not having authentic human relationships. When we talk about loneliness, we refer to the latter.

That's because you are not a narcissist then you don't see your power, because for you that's nothing, just misery and falsehood that worths zero, but most of people see a brilliant thing that they confuse with success and happiness and they become a kind of drug addicts of approval and social reinforcement, and their greatest glory is having many admiring and idolizing followers. To achieve this, they build a personality that fits with that of the other party. Look at Only Fans, for example. It's taken to the level of caricature. But the reality is that most people have that virus to a greater or lesser extent. They are puppets dancing to the tune of narcissism. They believe they are happy because they wear a mask of happiness, but underneath they are empty. They only dance activated by their drug. And of course they don't see it, and if someone mentions it, they will think they are bitter or a loser.

What are you talking about? You can't see anyone because you only see yourself. I'd say that you are a lost case, but who knows, time is a good teacher, maybe it teaches you, then you will be welcome. Now you are just unbearable.

Your ego is too dense. Unbearable. Your only intention I appearing smart, profound, mystic. What if you forget about what you seem and just be authentic? Would be better for you and for everyone that's around

No, try to read carefully and interpret correctly. What I have said is that the current dynamic tends towards narcissism and women, being the center of attention for a mass of men in need of success expressed as sex, very easily fall into narcissistic relationship dynamics with others and with themselves, focused on the impact they generate on others, and that is misery and a prison comparable to a gulag if you do not manage to get out of it.

🥱 Yes, same than you. Ok, I already saw what I wanted to see. Nothing interesting to me, just a wall

You are so cute, like my sister when she was 14.

I just try to put you in your place, sorry for that if sounds like a "fit". Because I am, you could call that alive . We assume that we can die because we see people dying. We don't know what happens with that "I am" after physical death, there are many options. One is that you aren't anymore, another is that you are in another form of being.

I said that you must become true and profound. If you become that, you will accept you absolutely without any crack

Only this quote proves the falsehood of solipsism. "Right now" implies before and after. Where are "before" and "after" in infinity? Is infinity a time sequence that never ends? It seems limited in all dimensions except that one, therefore not absolutely infinite. The absence of limits implies total expansion in all directions, which makes it certain that infinite perspectives are always occurring. The timeline only exists in relation to one of those perspectives; there are infinite lines in infinite directions. Anything else is limited.

The brain is like a prism that creates a certain structure of consciousness, which may or may not be focused on the self. They say the self is imaginary because it is created by self-awareness. I think this is not the case. The self is real in that it exists a separate structure of reality that interacts and needs to be preserved. Consciousness may or may not be focused on it. This does not mean that consciousness is creating or dreaming it up, only that it is highlighting and focusing on it or not.

Could be in some cases, in others it could could be totally true. I like other human beings, I don't like falsehood , then I like true people, but there are very few, maybe you can't see the depth of the falsehood in humans due it's need of acceptance

I think it's because before, social glue provided a seemingly solid structure to social relationships, which were ultimately empty. When that glue came loose, the relationships disintegrated. All that remains is to find true and profound relationships. To do that, we must become true and profound.

What evidence could be? it's just a subjective opinion.

The physical being is not physical; it's made of energy, which is reality changing states, reflecting itself. The physical being, as you call it, is the infinitely interconnected structure of reality that is taking place now, manifesting as this experience. Any minimal change in the physical being is a change in the structure of reality, since nothing exists that is not interconnected for the simple reason that any movement is relative to another movement. There is no physical being and spiritual being; there is reality taking form.

Really? Could be, although you sound just like a sad clown who needs to feed his pathetic ego showing that he's superior when he has the understanding of ...well, you already said, a monkey.

I'd say most than 99%. Sex and relationship are a mirage, a trick of the ego. It's something that keeps us moving like puppets, thinking it's necessary and satisfying, and it's almost always alienating. But we all operate at a superficial level where our ego needs to be fed, and we create a vision in which couple relationships and sex are exactly what we need. And this binds us, since it's a very particular type of relationship, a biological need born for the perpetuation of the species, to which we consider an unavoidable source of personal satisfaction. Without it, we are failures; it's necessary. It's a real trap.