Breakingthewall

What I wanted to point is since your experience is finite there are infinite possibilities out of it. In an infinite frame that's implies that are others dimensions that are coexisting out of your field of experience. The fact that you don't experience them doesn't mean that they doesn't exist. if mathematically they are a possibility, they are real. In a infinite frame mathematically possible is equal than real.

That true, they have it much harder because their real goal is finding a life partner who meets certain standards in a relationship that works and grows over time with great monogamous sex, commitment and social life together. Their entire game is geared toward that end, and many, if not most, fail, as it's a difficult goal.

Yeah in general, women find random sex humiliating. What they find stimulating is the attention and, at a given moment, having a man they consider high-value tied to them.

Yes ok but the only possible answer is because it's out of your field of possibilities. "Out" implies just that something is out, not solipsism.

Okay, but the last thing. Let's see, the ultimate reality at the physical level is changes of state. This is obvious and any physicist accepts it. Changes of state are ultimately information, and this information can ultimately only be a symmetrical duality changing state with respect to itself. On, off, on, off, etc., that is facing itself, reflecting a change of state. What is really what is facing itself ? The reality. Ultimately, it's impossible for it to be anything else. This implies that the most fundamental aspect of reality contains the totality of reality. In all directions, reality unfolds to the infinite power. It's always the same: symmetrical changes of state synchronized with other changes of state raised to the infinite power. It's only information, zeros and ones, but each zero and each one is the totality of infinite reality that unfolds infinitely. What else could be?

Look, experience is change isn't it? What is change ultimately? Change of state. If there is only one thing, one field of reality and nothing to compare it, there is not a state, the state is in comparison with another field of reality that is in another state, is obvious or not? Then multiply that reflection to infinite power. It has to be absolutely synchronized because if not there can't be contrasted, and if it isn't contrasted it doesn't exist

Why not? What prevents it? According solipsism it's just an image that you are creating right now as god

Without something exterior to your field of perception perception is impossible. You are perceiving a phone now, then how this phone appears, who created it? You? Then make it levitate with your will. You can't control what appears, then it's external to you. You could answer like Leo in the solipsism video: you as god created it but you hidden this fact to have an experience. Then this fact is outside of the experience, then something is outside, then infinite things are outside

Your answer is full of condescendence, now I remember why I talked you like hostile 😅

Imagine an infinite framework, in which there is nothing, no limits, no differences, no reference points. It is neither large nor small, it has no dimensions, it is nothing but it is not limited, it has no bottom. If there is movement in that framework, what does that mean? What moves? With respect to what does it move? It's impossible. If there are no limits, there can be no change because there is only the absence of limits. It's the same now as before, here as there. So, how can there be change? The only way is by changing state. How can something change state without a reference that's in another state? It's impossible. The only change of state is in comparison to a reflection that's in the other state. A zero is zero compared to a one. If there's only one zero, then a one, There never really was a change because there never really was an "after." It's always now. And if now is only one state it's always changeless. It's only zero compared to one, and one is one compared to zero. Without the two states reflecting each other, there's only one state. Which means no state, no change. Nothing. Any change must be relative to a reference that is in the other state.

Then expose your point. For now your point is: all of you are idiots. Imo it's a negative approach, that's why I tried to make you see it. Then you don't like that others point you negative things, ok, then be positive, explain why people is wrong without insulting them. When I asked you before you just answered: I'm not your monkey, then I thought you are here just for trolling and that's annoying. Maybe I shouldn't say anything, but what to do? Then we are in a endless argument. Let's finish it. Sorry to be hostile, but try to stop putting down the people without any positive contribution

Where is a mistake or something that is not obvious?

Do you think that in eternity there have been different experiences than yours now? not human experiences, totally different . If you answer yes, where are they now, if you are not experiencing them right now? Are in the past? Then reality is a timeline?

Just pointing the obvious, if you can't see it, what to do?

This is the logic of solipsism, which confuses the absolute with the relative, needs a step back. The absolute is not experience; it is the matter of experience, its source. Experience is always relative because it requires perception, and for perception to exist, movement and change are necessary. In the absence of change, perception disappears. The absolute is where change occurs; it is the source of change, the total potential, but it is not change itself. Change is a manifestation of its unlimited essence. Therefore, you will never leave experience because you are the experience. But ultimately, experience is an emergence from infinity. Therefore, it requires another experience to exist: infinite intertwined experiences reflecting each other in perfect synchrony. Otherwise, perception would be impossible.

It's not hostility, it's just that If it's a fundamental need for you to show that the others here are stupid and you're very clever without contributing anything else, that's irrefutable proof that you're the stupid one. And I'm kind enough to show it to you so that you can see it and improve, then you can participate here and contribute to raise the level of this forum with positive push, not with negative one

Infinity as substance is within you; it is what you are. Infinity as form is also outside of you; it is what creates this concrete form, and at the same time, this concrete form creates infinity. Everything is interconnected and synchronized. How do I know this? Am I making this up? No, it's simple rule-of-thumb logic. It's obvious. But first you have to open yourself to the infinity to start your logic from that base. It is impossible for there to be a creator because if there were, he would make choices, he would have preferences, therefore he would be finite. The only possible creator is the fact of infinity itself. It is the cause of manifestation, form, perception, consciousness, since nothing can prevent it; it is the potential that occurs. Infinity is absolute potential, but this has rules, since in infinity, no form or movement can be absolute; it has to be relative to another. Therefore, only synchronous things appear, up to infinite power. Non-synchronous things simply do not appear; they are unmanifested potential. This is totally obvious, not a theory. Nothing manifested exists by itself because in infinity there can be no absolute movement. Points a and b are the same. There are no dimensions because there are no limits. Dimensions are created with limits, and limits are created by the synchronicity between reflections.

Does that mean it's true? As Leo said, there can't be limits, because what would limit those limits? There can't be a creator, because what would create that creator? Why would an infinite creator want to create one thing instead of another?

I'm not islamophobic, Im just pointing the falsehood of that quote. But well, I think that Islam contains a lot of falsehood, maybe bit more than Christianity and Buddhism, that also contains a lot of falsehood. Islam contains some valuable points, and sufism is interesting mysticism. But that quote is not one of them

God is the ultimate nature of reality. If you want to know it you have to remove everything that closes you in the box of the ego. Your mind has to be absolutely clean of limits.

That's true, isolation affects deeply. Some people can bear it quite good, but mostly not so.

There is a dualistic perspective and a non-dualistic perspective, and both are true. Duality is a fact, there are others.

No, I just said that her way is not narcissist, it doesn't means that she hasn't other issues, but not this one. It's rare because most of people is very focused in their ego, but doesn't mean better mental health, just not seeking reward in the image that you project in others

One thing is enjoying solitude and another not having authentic human relationships. When we talk about loneliness, we refer to the latter.

That's because you are not a narcissist then you don't see your power, because for you that's nothing, just misery and falsehood that worths zero, but most of people see a brilliant thing that they confuse with success and happiness and they become a kind of drug addicts of approval and social reinforcement, and their greatest glory is having many admiring and idolizing followers. To achieve this, they build a personality that fits with that of the other party. Look at Only Fans, for example. It's taken to the level of caricature. But the reality is that most people have that virus to a greater or lesser extent. They are puppets dancing to the tune of narcissism. They believe they are happy because they wear a mask of happiness, but underneath they are empty. They only dance activated by their drug. And of course they don't see it, and if someone mentions it, they will think they are bitter or a loser.