Breakingthewall

solipsism is crazy. Let's see, if there is an experience, it's because perception exists, and for perception to exist, there must be duality. If there is duality, there are two. Where's the mystery? There are infinite dualities; otherwise, there would be nothing. And the explanation: you can't prove that there is another because you can only be in your experience, so only your experience exists. How to qualify this? I don't know.

Confusing. I've read Huang Po, and he doesn't explain things clearly. He uses words like emptiness and mind. It's a mistake. First, he says: it is neither existent nor nonexistent, neither this nor that, and then he says it is emptiness and it is mind. Let's see, this guy is from the year 1100 and is a great mystic, but those mistakes are completely out of place; it's not precise. But since no one really knows what he's talking about, they think he's right. He's wrong. When he says that all reality is a single mind, he's limiting reality. Reality is limitlessness.

Goal of survival you mean I guess. It's a matter of opinion, in your opinion Israel hasn't the right of survive, in the opinion of Israel they have. Who's right? Who wins, like always

So crazy right? Why would Americans and Europeans be bothered by being completely dependent on the whims of a fanatical medieval king? Who wouldn't want an Arab sheikh to be able to turn off the oil tap whenever God tells him to in his sleep and plunge the US into chaos?

If the United States were to stop funding Israel, perhaps at some point a coalition of Arab countries could exterminate them. That seems like a fantastic idea to many, who are very clear that the Palestinians are the kind hobbits and Bibi is Sauron in the dark. It's wonderful to see everything like in a Walt Disney movie! Then, when Israel was about to be exterminated after a fun war with some 8 million dead, it would unleash its entire atomic arsenal on Iran, Turkey, Yemen. Then people will say: this isn't necessary, the Jews should leave Israel because the Palestinians were there first. It's all very simple, right?

It's obvious that Zionism is interested in violent Palestinians, so it has reasons to expel them. Palestinians should realize that using violence is exactly what their enemy wants. If your enemy wants you to do one thing, you should do the opposite. It doesn't take a genius. But it seems the Palestinians don't want to achieve things, but rather to be victimized martyrs and thus go to heaven, and they are achieving that. It's a situation where everyone gets what they want. That's why Bibi sent money to Hamas. They are partners sharing objetives, not real enemies

It's not you who have to trust, it's Africa, indonesia, irán, south America, india, Vietnam, Philippines, and those people who are many thousands of millions. And lets see Germany, Romania, and others who are tired of scams. You could stay with your ideas about so dangerous is Putin and so noble are US, it's your right. China and Russia do not propose leadership, they propose commercial collaboration without the need to lick the boots of the master by allowing military bases and obeying arms spending quotas, and allowing predation of natural resources. US showed that act as a vampire without a drop of honor, let's see how act the others.

@BlueOak After these years of war, how do you see the deterioration of the US's image as a country, and of Europe as a culture? How do you see the evolution of Russia's and China's image? Don't you sense a clear trend in the air? No one trusts the US anymore, not even its European lackeys.. Seems that BRICS is a reliable partner; the West is a vampire. There's a very large world beyond the West of well-being, and that world is leaning toward Russia and China. It's inevitable; everyone has seen the US's game. It's like a narcissist exposed. It was so obvious, but no one saw it, and suddenly everyone sees it.

Russia is aware that winning this war will position it as a major player in the world. That means advantages, a strong economy, national pride, and real power. On the other hand, if it loses, it means poverty, perhaps fragmentation, and internal war. It will do whatever it takes to win. Ukraine is exhausted, and the feeling of having been swindled from within and without is growing stronger. The US has already made its deal; Ukraine will belong to Black Rock. In Europe, more and more analysts are talking about a proxy war, a scam. So, who will win? seems inevitable that Ukraine will collapse. A one-off drone strike will boost morale for a few weeks, and then reality will set in. Anyway they have endured a lot, maybe they will endure more, but Russia already has a lot of land and it's impossible to recover

The Russian economy is not fine even that 4% of growth because 8% of its GDP is dedicated to war, but it has a much greater capacity to manufacture weapons than NATO, and it also has the help of China. It also has 90% support among the population, who are willing to make sacrifices, so it seems impossible for NATO to win. By winning, I mean containing Russia in Ukraine.

that has already sold you mean I guess

Its a big blow but not from a nuclear perspective. To say that it diminishes Russia's nuclear capability because instead of being able to launch 5,000 nuclear bombs, it could only launch 3,700 is nonsensical. I suppose you'll agree. If nukes start everything is finished, those people in the news say those things because they need the audience, but everyone knows that nukes is not an option The problem with this successful attack is that put Russia in the need of a revenge for their public opinion. Not good for Ukraine. Do their want a total war with Russia? Kiev would be like Gaza

Yes sure, Russia has 5800 nukes, 1,800 mounted on ballistic missiles, and many more stored for installation. Why do they say that destroying a few planes diminishes Russia's nuclear attack capability? It's totally stupid. Just launching 100 missiles is goodbye to everyone. The nonsense being told on the news is incredible

The problem in Palestine is that if an intelligent leader emerges capable of devising clever and useful strategies that open the door to the creation of a Palestinian state, the retarded people will start howling that he's a traitor and that Israel must disappear. He'd better shut up or they'll kill him. Then the retarded people will launch a lot of rockets that won't kill anyone, and Bibi will be happy.

As long as Palestinians don't recognize the State of Israel and are obsessed with its disappearance, there will be no peace. That's why there's war now. You can twist things if you want and say that Ben Givir, Bibi, and the settlers. The reality is that if Palestinians have Israel's disappearance as the center of their culture, they are Israel's mortal enemies, and mortal enemies are treated as mortal enemies. That's life. Are they so pitiful for their suffering? Sure, but first, stop being a mortal enemy, and then we'll talk. Now you'll say: The land was theirs, and they should leave. Great. And all the models should want to fuck with me. Life is so unfair. I'm going to kill people.

I'm not Jew and I don't live in Israel . The rhetoric that Israel must disappear legitimizes Zionist violence and give power to people as Netanyahu and ben gvir, that's why they have given money to hamas. Israel will only disappear if it's destroyed in a war, and before that, it will launch all 400 nukes it has. So, why not look for a possible solution instead of obsessing over something impossible because you think it should be that way?

The opposition party is talking about stopping by the settlements. If it wins the elections after this and the Palestinians try constructive solutions, perhaps it will be possible. Jewish extremists are interested in Hamas and violent Palestinians. Violent Palestinians work for Zionism. They should realize this.

A war how? The only possible war is non violent resistance, violent is what Israel wants to have a reason to expulse the Palestinian. It's very stupid doing what Israel wants

No like 2 times x week

Huang po is great but the idea of one mind is confusing. "One" appears in the limit, implies two. The unlimited is unlimited, not one. if the idea of one appears it's because you are operating between limits, so you are defining what can't be defined. Huang po say that it's not small, not existent or non existent, but then he say that it's void and it's one. Both ideas are misleading.

The Nazis were psycho and they didn't know exactly why they hate so much the Jews, was about some weird ideas about the first world war, communism and some other nonsense. Really they need someone to hate to unite the people.

The Romans reached everywhere with their enormous technical and organizational advantage, wiping out all armies and subduing all peoples. I guess they thought that if they didn't do it, others would do it to them.

Native Americans also exterminated each other. Why do you think they reached Patagonia, crossing the jungles of South America, in nine thousand years? Because they loved to explore? Or because there was another native behind them, pushing them with their exterminating impulse?

Who doesn't like it, if only he exists? The empty images that appear cannot be liked or disliked; they are hallucinations without inner reality, so why talk to them?

Yes but those meanings are real, the point is understanding and aligning them. Remove meaning is necessary for meditation, meaning is necessary for human life, and we are humans