Adamq8

I see. Take a break and come back to it afterwards but it was a really good video imo.

Check out Leos new video it is amazing how good he is to frame this things into profound truths. Existence just is, there is no escaping it. There is no falsehood in the Absolute. The Absolute is that which renders a concept "falsehood" possible. You are truth now, everything is truth.

We can all agree upon that you can "look" at reality in very different ways and there is always proof off every paradigm that exists. A materialist will look and interpret his experiences according to his paradigm. How many years you done a thing does matter but not really in this case. Either it is an hallucination in the brain or it is conciousness and mind that is reality. You see, a guy who started running for 4 years vs a guy who has run for 20 years, the 4 years guy might "own" the 20 year guy because the 20 year runner has become dull and slow and comfortable and is not progressing. Years dont mean anything really.

Try to imagine a universe without conciousness, it is not possible, what if there is truly one field of infinite conciousness? Which can concieve of infinite possibilitys but some get actualized and some dont. Imagine the singularity, it is infinite possibilitys and acts at infinite speeds so that it cancel it self out, it has to slow down and contract into a "finite" mind of some sort and contract into different objects to experience "time" and motion and a world. Subject/object What if a possibility is that the big bang is a story which conciousness concieves of, and simultanously creates it because it focuses on it, and makes it look like a big bang happend. Since there is nothing outside of this infinite conciousness it has to become reality in some ways. But that is 1 possibility out of an infinite possibilitys. Like Leo has been saying for a long time now, that there are infinite " states" that conciousness can be. Inanimate objects is conciousness but they are not concious is my presumption. It folds like a mirror and fractals to more mirrors and more mirros etc. I would assume as well that there is an external world, but not as we normally concieve of it. The external world is " nothing" " infinite possibilitys" " godhead" " infinite conciousness " Since conciousness is everything it can split it self off and take different " roles" like you and me etc but the " iam" is the same conciousness. The ONE is unlimited in what it can be. Imagine a infinite White light which contracts in a line an produces all around us out of it self.

You will become the world, thats oneness, formless presence. Thats it. Nothing is not " non concious" , the form just dissolves. Presence IS. There really is no non existence. Deep sleep and dreaming would really tell you something about reality and how the infinite presence just becomes everything and holds it. When awakening occurs it is the realization that the form and ego is a fiction and is not the presence but at the same time it is since there is nothing else. Nothing aka pure consciousness dreams.

I suggesr you look up Bernardo Kastrup. We are dissociated alters of the Universal mind. Thats why we cant read each others thoughts etc. But it is a phenomena field of conciousness, so big bang did not happen in a "nothing" We have alot of evidence for the multiple personality disorders which do not know about the other alters in their own mind. Evolution happen since it is outside our individual minds but it is how the Universal mind looks like from the outside, just how "inner concious activity" looks like brain functions when observed from the outside. Evolution is probably for the Universal mind to become meta concious, unfathomable suffering has been put into producing beings with meta conciousness IE self awareness. He can explain this much better but his theory definetly holds water when combining subjective and objective phenomena, he still believes in an external world which is the Universal mind and it is nothing like this "world" If we would see the truth we would dissolve thats why evolution favor survival and not the truth, there is evidence for this. Those being that get to see the truth and the world as it is in it self dies. There is never an unobserved universe or reality.

Youtube, theorys of everything ?

A cop has been killed in sweden in a "ghetto" last night..

Hi guys! Sat yesterday contemplating after listening to a podcast with Bernardo Kastrup and it hit me that there is only 2 metaphysics that can be postulated really. Sure how it works and so forth is a matter of a different discussion but the 2 metaphysics we can really postulate is about death. Either it is the materialism mindset of there will be no experience when death occurs, when you are dead experience ceases to exist and everything goes to non existence for eternity. The other is that experience is fundamental to reality IE conciousness/Mind and that experience will never cease to be, it will be an eternity of Joy but also a immense eternity of your own hell and suffering. Sure we have deep sleep but experience always reboots since the ground is a transpersonal "field" of "subjective" experiences. Either we suffer 1 time and then it is lights out or we will suffer for eternity but memory might not follow in between lifes. If it is true that GOD IS and GOD is eternal it means that conciousness is eternal and all we can do is dream dreams, and when death comes we wake up to realize it was a dream all along. Which one would you prefer and why? And what does experiences point to in your honest opinion?

?? Nice example?

Nice!!

You literally came in saying concepts about this is devilish and thats why Leos teaching is not that good, how is that for a personal opinion and create seperation between teachings yourself? Leo is not that good but ralston is etc, thats all fine but recognize that it is your opinion nevertheless, Leo has had more impact on me then ralston, then Leo is better for me and ralston for you, but who is right? No one ofcourse. But it is still in this reference an assumption that someone gets mad about you picking on Leos teachings, how is it relevant in this thread if someone 1 time defended leo but not in this thread? You speak of judgement and the funny thing is how you yourself is judging Leos teachings cause it does not fit your views of enlightenment or what not. Or we can turn it around and label it constructive criticism, no matter how we turn it, we can keep going all night or just agree to disagree. But in my interpretation there is a subtle " passive" agressiveness in your comments, but if that is not the case then im wrong about that interpretation, and if so, im sorry. But you should still see through that every teaching is filled of concepts, some resonates with you and some dont and thats all fine brother, I just dont agree with you about who's teachings is more or less better, but who cares? If it works for you im cincerely happy for you ? Im not trying to argue here or something so misunderstand me right, just trying to point out as well, but lets not derail the topic, have a great night

@IAmReallyImportant Firstly thats an assumption that people get mad, especially in this thread. Remember that you are projecting this unto others, What if someone has experienced it exactly as Leo laid it out, there is no such thing as non conceptualization when it comes to this when using language, perhaps it is your attitude against his teachings that might be a bias? ? You prefer ralston over Leo, thats your preferences and I disagree on that part, see? This is not such an easy thing as 1+1=2 Also you create a bias out of that some are getting upset but still you dont seem to feel that your attitude and preferences is a bias YOU have that ralston has a better teaching then Leo

Care to elaborate??

Yes the same iamness in me is the same within you, I just feel that experience continues in very different forms all the time, like a field of transpersonal phenomena, like a psychedelic trip almost

Yes nice Greg ? seeing will happen about the nature of death and life sooner or later, no need to fear anything, glad that you feel peaceful

Yeah I dont see how the odds of us being here, contemplated it yesterday of wtf why do I even exist it is literally insane, like wtf is this reality, the logical conclusion is that reality is and that it is not two. But really contemplate, how come "you" exist?

Nice questions and it definetly is something to contemplate. What I meant with this inquiry is that, according to the vast majority of scientist which is ofcourse materialists claims that conciousness is a brain function and when the brain ceases so does conciousness. IE it is a transistion from "alive" existence to "dead " non existence. Obviously they have no clear consistent evidence in favor of this claim. If we really investigate it, it is conciousness that has " brains" if that makes sense. When im refering to the "who" is ofcourse conciousness. It is the one enabling this, whatever it is. Universe = conciousness Conciousness = Universe, there is clearly zero seperation between the two. So it is not two. What I mean with experiences, is that we can label this = experience in the limited sense of language. There is either eternity of this how ever it might be or it will be eternity of not this. Hehe if that makes any sense. This is more of a philosophical inquiry then anything else, but it has real implications nevertheless imho. Either non existence is true and real or it is not, thats what am getting at.

That would be awesome if you get on his show Leo! I like Curt and how he asks questions, I believe his channel will be a big one. I just so think that his audience is a big mix of materialism all the way to conciousness only paradigm ??

Yeaaah it was a great interview!

Yes brother yes ??

Keep going its nothing to worry about, also had deep meditations like that, hehe it is insane. But it is even more insane on lsd trip, it literally felt like I stopped breathing for a looooong time, It felt like I became so concious that I saw through the illusion of my body and the breath

Nice writing ? really good

There will always be different interpretations by different people. It is just an opinion using thoughts like everybody else. Go your own path and see what is true. But I dont understand people on Youtube commenting and "debunking" others. I speak in general and not just this guy. I sense a big ego from people who are trying to constantly debunk others and to show how they are right and the other is wrong. Typical humans ?? As I said go your own path, listen to teachers and different teachings but dont hold a particular one as the ultimate truth. Concepts and words and thoughts can NOT grasp the infinite and to say this is so and this is not so using a finite mind to grasp the ungraspable and then arguing about that this finite model is more and better then your model. Lol. It is infinite, you can speak about it forever and still miss infinite more of it. Some concepts might be more of use then others but thats about it ime.

Yes I agree, and i think the configuration of the five senses limits our perception of "infinity" down to what we see in front of us, and psychedelics alters that either really radical or just a bit, same with other drugs or breathing techniques etc. But then we have the mind which do not really rely on the five senses in that way, if we look at dreams etc, then it is the "subtle" mind which can create out of a seemingly nothing and is not in need of the gross physical senses to create an experience and a dream world. " Nothing is known except through the modality of the knower " Thats why i feel that this singularity is limiting it self down to our 3 d world. We are a black hole, black holes is the most destructive and the most creative thing in the universe. A singularity. The singularity is the mind of GOD, we are in the mind of god here