Princess Arabia

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    16,289

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Princess Arabia

  8. Posted · Edited by Princess Arabia

    4 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

    @Princess Arabia let's say that it's like if you take everything that exists, existed and will exist, you merge it until no difference remains, then you expand it to infinity and then you shrunk it in a non dimensional point that is inside of your heart

    What I'm not understanding is, isn't everything that exist already infinite? If so, what is there to merge, isn't there already no difference and that difference was only created in the mind. If not, then how can anything that spawns from infinity not be infinite, fundamentally?

  13. Posted

    2 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:

    Being human only one thing is success: giving your best, absolutely without reservation every moment. Anything else is fail. 

    So, the person who is there to help with your success and who did their part to make that possible e.g. cleaned the toilet you shitted in in the hotel you stayed at while traveling to pursue your success,(not you, but anybody) is a failure. Just one example out of thousands. Also the person that didn't do their best that you learnt from to not make that mistake is also a failure. Think the bigger picture before you come to these absolute conclusions.

  15. Posted

    4 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

    I understand and I think that it's wrong. The absolute is not something that does things, like imagining, for a purpose, like experiencing itself.

    Things happen because the absolute is reflected in itself to infinity, since there is no limit for this not to happen. then everything that is coordinated has infinitely coordinated continuity, and what is not coordinated simply does not appear. All manifest reality is a reflection of the absolute, and no other creative will is necessary besides the absence of the will not to create.

    Can I ask you this. To you, what is the Absolute? Please don't just say it's everything. I'm interested in how you define it even though its literally indefinable, but try your best, I'm curious.

  17. Posted

     A general rule for me is to try and stick to real food. 80/20 is a good ratio or 70/30; no lower than that where 70/80% is real food. By real food, I mean buying real apples instead of in a can or raw or frozen spinach instead of canned or creamed or fresh pineapple instead of the ones in boxes or canned. Stuff like that. Limit junk foods and processed foods and white breads and boxed up cereals. Things in the center isle of the supermarket. 

    That said, everybody is different and requires different nutrients and supplements. Some can't ingest gluten or vegetables or meat because of autoimmune disease. You have to get to know your allergens and body type, also blood type if there are issues with certain foods. I developed a peanut allergy later on in life, and now I can't eat them but that doesn't mean others can't. 

    As far as vitamins and supplements, some are generic for most and some are needed more because of lifestyle or age. These become more personalized and is best to do the corresponding searches and get good quality information according to your own needs. Vegetarian VS carnivore diet is a debatable issue even amongst the experts, so is coffee, eggs and wheat products and dairy. These need to be personalized and not a general consensus because we all have different blood and body types. 

    Get to know your body and go from there; but the general rule is to stick to mostly holistic foods in their natural form.

    Videos on vegetarianism VS the carnivore diet won't help much for beginners as it's usually a personal preference and studies on both sides have shown both can be a good choice. Maybe look more for less debatable issues to start and get a more rounded, generalized view on health and nutrition before getting into these controversial topics. I will try to search for a video that suits this topic or comes close.

     

  19. Posted

    42 minutes ago, Ishanga said:

    This is True, I see it everyday, I am out and about at work, I'm a courier for a well known company, I'm all over the place, malls, residential areas, hospitals, airports, etc... Ppl today are completely blind and conditioned, self centered, of course there are the rare "good" ones, that are truly polite and well mannered and want the best for themselves and their families, but its limited to just those ppl close to them, and I feel it within myself how living in this environment has effected Me, its like I am seeing a part of myself that is sick and diseased and its spreading, but it doesn't affect me for long periods of time, I feel it for a few minutes then I am back to my happy go lucky self, and I am able to naturally treat all ppl with respect when they deserve it..

    While I understand where you're coming from with these statements; and yes, people can be crude, I don't think this is what Leo was referring to. I'm intervening and could be wrong, but I just wanted to point out what I think he meant. The ego has constructed a life for itself and is deeply conditioned by it's own beliefs and ways of seeing itself and the world. It lives in it's own fantasy land of deeply rooted belief systems which has been carved with the help of societal constructs and cultural norms. When one can see through this, and realizes they are dealing with a construct and conditioned belief systems and are relating to an unconscious being who isn't aware of this, it becomes extremely difficult to play into that game. People can also be nice, good, respectable and cooperative and still fall into this category. It's just they are so deluded it takes patience for a more aware being to be able to relate to them in their fantasy world. Was this what you meant @Leo Gurain so many words? This is my interpretation and I could be wrong.

     

     

  20. Posted · Edited by Princess Arabia

    1 hour ago, Nemra said:

    For me, it's more important to not be needlessly verbally violent than to ignore someone. The former is actually rude.

    This is just a general statement and is far from the context I presented. Just saying. I agree with you here, but it's not what I was trying to communicate.

  23. Posted

    42 minutes ago, Razard86 said:

    The only corruption is thinking that accomplishments like money and social status equals your worth. This is the biggest issue in the human world and is the reason God as all of these humans struggles to feel like it belongs. The secret why you matter? Cause you are the only one here. Existence, Life, is a miracle which means you are a miracle. The path to a healthy mindset is to realize that you are so valuable that nothing you do can add to your value because your value is Infinity. Understanding this and accepting this isn't ego, what is ego is believing that your value is more important than some part of creation.

    Competition inherently produces ego which is why human society is an ego creation machine.

    Well said. So powerful. 

  24. Posted

    52 minutes ago, Thought Art said:

    @Princess Arabia Thanks for clarifying because I thought you meant reply to every comment as well. 
     

    What you say makes sense. Interesting to consider. I have to think about that.

    Thanks for understanding and seeing the difference. Even if I didn't respond to your comment, that is ok too. You didn't ask me a question nor asked for my advice, just made a remark. That's the difference i'm referring to. I ignore a lot of comments or don't respond but I will never ignore someone that reached out to me to try and help with something I'm going through. Especially if their response to written with a clear indication of trying to help or solve my problem. If I don't it's because I didn't see it.

  25. Posted · Edited by Princess Arabia

    33 minutes ago, Nemra said:

    No, they don't have to respond, because the advice could be misinterpreted, misleading, false, stupid, etc.

    Why should we dishonestly say "thank you" when we can avoid it?

    Maybe in a professional setting we must, but this is a forum.

    I'm not saying one has to say thank you either. I said at least a thank you. It could be anything. That's the way you see it and i respect that. Personally I'm not just going to ignore someone that responds to a thread I made asking for advice and totally ignore the respectful stupid advices and only acknowledge the ones I deem fit for a reply as it was an attempt to help me solve my problem. If I know an advice is stupid, misleading or false then obviously I already know the solution and didn't need the advice in the first place. This is one of the few cases I'm referring to where I think it's appropriate and of good etiquette to respond to, and shows love and caring. I was addressing the notion of how we can show more love on the forum, and gratitude for people's time and effort in trying to help you is one. Sorry, if it seems silly to you, but it doesn't to me. If you never respond to this comment, it's not in the context of which I'm referring to and there is a difference. No issue there and quite appropriate, but asking for help and simply ignoring the responses to that help whether you see them fit or not and they were respectful, is just outright rude in my opinion. I did use tge word discernment and one can tell a response was meant to be disrespectful, sarcastic or just outwardly inappropriate. A "go take care of your own shit response" doesn't need a reply, but a "I'm sorry you're going through that and hear is what I think will help...etcetc" reply sure can show gratitude, love and care if responded to. I'm through making my point - see it how you please. The end.